There’s something uncommonly fake about Thomas Friedman’s latest column, from "Manama" to "anymore". And I mean uncommonly fake even by Thomas Friedman "I talked to a cab driver in Damascus who sounded just like me" standards.
Growing up in Minnesota, one of my favorite things was going to the state fair each summer and watching the guy who would guess your weight within 5 pounds. If you fooled him, you won a stuffed animal.
Tom, you and I are both from Minnesota. You know damn well that growing up in the land of 10,000 lakes our favorite things were watching the Vikings get trounced in the Super Bowl, driving our cars on frozen lakes, adding yellow-dye to our butter, standing a respectful distance from one another, making fun of Iowa, and noting we didn’t have as many serial killers as Wisconsin.
But Mr. "Suck on This" is not yet ready to give up America’s "Pundit Given Right" to contemplate war as much as it darn well pleases:
The Gulf Arabs feel like they have this neighbor who has been a drug dealer for 18 years. Recently, this neighbor has been very visibly growing poppies for heroin in his backyard in violation of the law. He’s also been buying bigger and better trucks to deliver drugs. You can see them parked in his driveway.
In the past year, though, because of increased police patrols and all the neighbors threatening to do something, this suspicious character has shut down the laboratory in his basement to convert poppies into heroin. In the wake of that, the police declared that he is no longer a drug dealer.
“But wait,” say the Gulf Arabs, “he’s still growing poppies. He was using them for heroin right up to 2003. Now he says he’s in the flower business. He’s not in the flower business. He’s dealing drugs. And he’s still expanding the truck fleet to deliver them. How can you say he’s no longer a drug dealer?”
Alright, are we talking about Sunni theocratic monarchies distrusting a Shiia theocracy or Milton Berle as "Louie the Lilac"?
Can you stretch one more analogy Tommy?
If we sit down with the Iranians without the leverage of a global coalition ready to impose tighter and tighter economic sanctions — should Iran not halt enrichment — we’ll end up holding a stuffed animal. The peculiar (obtuse?) way the N.I.E. on Iran was framed has deprived all who favor a negotiated settlement of leverage.
Tom Friedman is calling something "obtuse"?
Related posts:
- A Bag of Tea with Joe Thomas
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Thomas Ricks – The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006-2008
- Conservative Justices Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Thomas Say Virtually Bribing Judges is Okay
- Entrenched Interests Are Safe from the Obama Administration





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

my ex calls me obtuse! :’(
obtuse, cryptic …
just whispers of luv
g’morning attaturk
Is that like unchallenged avoirdupois?
Good morning all!
I’m up on the highwire
Classic example of why I never read the twit. :-(
“Can you stretch one more analogy Tommy?”
I’m not so sure he’s trying to make an analogy. He may be speaking of narcotics trafficking quite literally, but he’s confusing the Iranians with the contras.
Attaturk – are you ok? are you feeling any lasting ill effects? in my experience, reading mr. f.u. can be dangerous to one’s well-being.
Good morning, pups. I’m profoundly grateful to Attaturk for dealing with Mr. Friedman today. MoDo is also in the Times today. She says, writing about Doug Feith, that it defies reason, but there are still some who think the chuckleheads who orchestrated the Iraq misadventure have wisdom to impart.
http://mgpaquin.wordpress.com/
The coffee, tea and hot chocolate are ready, and I’ve got waffles this morning. It’s your choice if you want real maple syrup or gingered peach topping. Have a grand day.
I thought Afghanistan was growing the poppies…
Pardon me for asking, folks, but I haven’t seen TRex around here lately. Is he on vacation or has he bid farewell?
TRex has his own place now:
TRex’s tree house
Watch out for the first step on the ladder, it’s getting a little splintery.
Good Morning!
waffles v Friedman, what an gastronomical conflict I now feel
oops that was a reply to Marion.
Here’s the CSPAN morning line-up
ON WASHINGTON JOURNAL
Wednesday, December 12
7am – Newspaper Articles & Open Phones
7:30am – Tim Starks, Congressional Quarterly, Intelligence Reporter
8am – Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Mississippi, 4th District, Armed Services Subcmte. Chairman
8:30am – Bruce Bartlett, Former Deputy Asst. Treasury Secretary for Economic Policy, 1988-93 & Daniel Mitchell, Cato Institute, Tax Analyst | Op-Ed
thanks!
i’m curious to see what starks has to say.
Good morning, Attaturk, Selise, other firepups.
Selise, thanks for the Thomas URL yesterday. I have bookmarked this and will call on it frequently, I’m sure. They certainly can’t improve access to Congressional bill information too soon for me. It’s almost as though they really don’t want you to know what they’re doing.
Can’t remember which of the pups were asking yesterday if anyone had just seen the “debate” between scar, Mika and Shuster on the subject of waterboarding….well, my friends, they just went at it again today to the tune of about eight minutes. The mods will not allow me to say what I think should be done to joe scarborough. Suffice it to say, based upon his so-called logic, this man cannot be classified as a human being. He is so far beneath contempt that you couldn’t get there from here and this country is well and truly fucked when people like *MR.* scarborough are given access to spew their filth around the airwaves.
Waccamaw, was yesterday’s dust-up ever posted on the web?
if you want to feel better about future access to congressional info – check out the sunlight foundation and the openhouse project.
a year from now, i expect we will have very different tools available to us in our efforts to provide oversight and accountability to our congress. i don’t think one can overstate how revolutionary the tools will be.
personally, i’m looking forward to the day when we have an automated and accurate list of congressional hearings – one that does depend on my cut-n-paste and abilities. *g*
I had to go read the Moustache of Understanding to really believe he wasn’t writing about Afghanistan.
p.s. i’ve put a bunch of useful links on the sidebar to the congressional hearings list (click on my name)… and you’ve reminded me that i have some more i want to add (thanks!)
doesdoes notoff to make coffee. i obviously need it. *g*
Don’t know, darlin’. Can’t watch vids due to dial-up so I never go looking for same.
I’ll be back in a little bit. Blood pressure must be spiking thru’ the roof and I’m just sittin’ here feelin’ dirty for even having listening to that piece of trash. God!!! What a way to start the morning! :-(
.
listeninglistenedScarborough is beyond repugnant. They should have given the gig to Mika Brzezinski &, if someone insisted, a right-wing type who’s not as personally repellent as Scarborough. I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m going to sleep now. G’night.
elliot and waccamaw – there are three videos listed on youtube. (google search)
C&L posted part of the dust-up yesterday… I just heard today’s version too and would have to concur with Waccamaw @ 16…
http://www.crooksandliars.com/…..ral-media/
gak and good morning.
(hope the link works)
Good morning!
Angie how nice to see you!
Thank angie and selise!
Morning,
Elliot, is this the dustup you mentioned?
Wow! What great work. I’m probably the last one to visit Selise’s page, but if there are actually firepups who haven’t seen it yet, you really must take a look. Thanks so much for all you do, Selise.
today’s version?
nope– it’s from yesterday.
it’s all christy’s fault – she’s the one who got me hooked on listening to congressional hearings.
oh, good… i thought maybe there was a continuation today.
Nice to see you too, egregious.
I actually saw a bit of this~I do not have tv in my home but I was at work(hospital) and was in a vent patients room and the tv was on (tvs are often left on to provide stimulation or something I do not understand in rooms with patients who are unresponsive) and I started hearing this idiot and looked up and reached over and went 1 channel up to star trek. If I was hovering around I do not think Joe would entice me to stay~but tribbles? And hope for a better time ahead….I could not beleive the foul thought concepts flowing forth…
Yep! that’s the one!
I love the smell of smoldering Joe in the morning.
I have a wingnut friend who also keeps losing it these days. It’s sad really. They just can’t admit to themselves that they.were.wrong.all.along!
New Scarecrow upstairs
Am still feeling the need to throw up AND take a bath at the same time.
Selise @ 34 – NO!NO!NO! MSNBC would never have rerun yesterday’s crap at the very beginning of today’s show…..this had to have been a continuation (ie. on top of) beyond yesterday.
winger neighbor next door. flipping out too.
ain’t it a hoot?
Nice subtle Leon Russell reference, Raven.
Just to clarify selise– I linked to C&L for yesterday’s version and they went at it again live this am on msnbc.
that’s what i though you meant. now i’ll have go looking for clips of today’s dust up.
what a lot i miss by not having cable tv. *g*
Going to see Leon on Fri. night in NYC.
bjns @ 40 -
What scar was spewing this morning is *not* what I would classify as a “hoot”. :-( If you have to live next door to someone with that man’s level of depravity (sp?), you have my sincere condolences.
Tom’s moustache just can’t conceal them jowls.
I concur!! Selise, many props to you for your amazing work!
The problem, Mr. Friedman, is that the police are protecting their own drug dealer on the other side of town.
Like me, if it seemed something wasn’t quite right with Friedman’s common guy persona, it helps to read this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..26164.html
Friedman married into one of the wealthiest 100 families in America. He goes to their parties, chats up what is wrong with America, and then parrots their views in his columns.
Brooks, Cohen, Friedman, quite the neocon spokespeople there. It is a sign of the times when the “liberal” paper of record hires a bevy of neocon spokespeople to blanket their pages, leads us into Iraq and makes loud noise about Iran, holds back critical wiretapping information until after the 2004 election, and pines for the good ole’ days in Latin America with tyrants and death squads taught at our very own School of the Americas.
The NYT has been thumping their chest at Latin America lately. Did anybody see them apologize for their April 2002 editorial condoning the CIA back coup against a democratically elected Chavez? I missed it, all I have seen is more propaganda designed to pave the way for more CIA activities against Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador.
It must be hard work fro Friedman to play common man and billionaire man day in and day out…
I can assure you that there are no Gulf Arabs who give a rat’s ass whether their neighbor grows poppies or anything else. But they do seem to be a bit upset about all that shootin’ going on in Iraq.
http://13martyrs.blogspot.com/
The part that really bugged me this morning was this:
“I’ve been at a security conference in the tiny Gulf state of Bahrain, attended by defense officials and analysts from all over the world, and all the buzz has been about the latest U.S. National Intelligence Estimate on Iran. It has left every Arab and European expert I’ve spoken to baffled — not in its conclusions, but by why those conclusions were framed in a way that is sure to reduce America’s leverage to negotiate with Tehran.”
They were framed in a way to make sure the Administration didn’t take us to war again under false pretences!
And here is his CYA:
“As I have said before, I’d rather see Iran go nuclear, and contain it, than have the Bush team start another Middle East war over this issue. “
If that were true, you’d understand right away why the Intelligence Agencies did what they did!!!!
MikeinDC, Exactly! There was no “framing” the NIE. There is and was no military nuclear program. He is lucky his American readers are so stupid. The neocons pushed this just like they pushed WMD. Friedman writes pure propaganda. The rest of the world gets it.
I am sure the “experts” were baffled at how the U.S. government could produce/publish what amounts to political propaganda. What NIE would the U.S. government like them to read? It is not so bad– in relative terms– that the 2005 NIE was so wrong only that this NIE is 180degrees different, which begs the obvious question, is the 2003 NIE that stated that Iraq has a military nuclear program right or wrong? There is no way to know… which may be the point for these guys.
Unfortunately are entire corporate media is thoroughly tainted. There is no other way to account for the warped view of the world shared by Americans. Until an effort is made to clean up the media of people like Friedman and Cohen and Brooks, the neocons will have their wars.
The one thing worse than Friedman’s bullshit, is when other people take his bullshit as some kind of insightful brilliance. I’m looking at you, Charlie Rose.