We have a strong case and the right is shirnking, because the failed policies of the Bush “adminstation” even those who listen to Malkin and the likes have turned against Bush. Those left are the one Abe said you can fool all the time.

THe left give the Coulters and Malkins as much press as the right does. Stop it. If we ignore them, they will not go away but they will have to make it on their own. They are outrageous to get noticed. Everyone shook in fear of Rush L. Now where is he? They have a tendency to do themselves in.

We have a War to stop, make Pelosi afraid of us. We can’t do that playing Malkins game. The facts are on our side and for now so is the population. We just need to close.

Forget Malkin. Focus on ending the war, singularly. Spend the time on Pelosi and Reed as you do on “what is her name” and maybe we can stop the killing of our troops. Columnists have to think that other columnists are important for obvious reasons, but really, you guys are just part of the pig picture, not the picture itself.

Glenn Reynolds And Michelle Malkin do not matter.

I wish that were the case, but that’s not true. They are the most read bloggers on the right, and often given bigger platforms by the corporate media, and they’re a part of the poisonous megaphone that conflates the support with the troops with support of the President. The megaphone that the Democrats in the House and Senate apparently still fear.

If you write off the two biggest bloggers on the right as meaningless, then the corollary is also true — and we’re all just wasting our time here.

PUSH the Democrat “Leadership” to Shut Down the Governemnt if that is what it takes to get the troops out of Iraq. Do we have to wait until 99.99% of the people are ready to openly revolt before someone does something.

Shut It Down – the War or the Government. Let Bush Decide. If he wants to play stubborn, make it hurt. Make him explain why he is shutting down the government for a failed policy.

PUSH, Shove, Shut it Down.

According to this, the majority of military families feel this way, not the troops

Er, no. “Military families” is inclusive of active duty members, vets, and families of both.

By the way, whether the military’s view on Iraq and Bush are “right” is a red herring. The post is about the wingnuts’ phony support of the troops.

And are you really going to go with the slavery analogy?

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
never help other countries

maybe just send them money
never fight for their freedom

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
just blame America

for all the ills of the world
don’t blame simple dictators

http://absurdthoughtsaboutgod.blogspot.com/
.

There is a sea change surging in this country. That’s the real surge that matters.

http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/si…..ocument#a2

The Conventions ban use of individuals under 15 years in the armed forces, so that anyone who recruited such a child would be in violation of the Convention.

But an armed child would remain a combatant, and thus could be fired upon until hors d’combat (i.e. removed from combat due to injury, disarmed, or surrendered). They are to be treated as a Prisoner of War until they are given a hearing to determine their status.

BTW In an area of combat, one can also fire upon armed civilians (combatants that are not wearing proper emblems or uniforms of the military of the enemy), just as they are official troops of the opposition force.