![]()
More than $500 Billion, 3,882 american soldiers killed, 25,000 wounded, no one knows how many tens of thousands — or hundreds of thousands — of Iraqis killed. And all for one of the most corrupt regimes in the world. Not only can the Iraqi government not find a way to come together in political reconciliation, they’ll only sell you an "I ♥ Democracy" t-shirt with a $85 markup…and they ONLY come in "medium"!
The whole sordid, rotten, stinking pile of corruption is laid out in the NY Times:
Abu Ali is a 23-year-old Sunni with a soft middle and a common tale. Identifying himself by only a nickname, which means father of Ali, he said that he, his wife, his elderly mother and six relatives fled their home in eastern Baghdad last year after receiving death threats from Shiite militias. First they rushed to Diyala Province, and when that turned violent, they moved back to a safer area of Baghdad — broke and desperate.
A major breadwinner for his family, Abu Ali needed a job. And like many Iraqis, he saw only one employer hiring: the government. A neighbor who was a police officer suggested joining the force. Abu Ali asked how, noting that recruits outnumbered positions. The answer was simple: a $500 bribe.
Abu Ali borrowed the money a few months ago and found his way to a cellphone shop downtown, where, he said, a man in his late 20s welcomed him inside. The man identified himself as a police captain and seemed at ease with the transaction. His wealth sparkled all around.
“He had a silver Mercedes,” Abu Ali said. “He was wearing a thick gold chain and a gold watch.”
Abu Ali tried to bargain for a lower fee, but failed, handing over the cash and filling out official forms. In return, he said, he received a blue card stamped “Ministry of the Interior,” which declared him an accepted member of the police force. The man with the gold chain told him to watch for an announcement in the local paper that listed the names of newly accepted recruits, and to bring the card to his first day of training.
“How do I know I’ll really get the job?” Abu Ali said he asked. “He told me, ‘I’ve put in 70 or 80 people already. Don’t worry about it.’”
Five months later, Abu Ali’s name appeared in the newspaper. At the police academy in September, he said, he discovered that most of his class was from Sadr City and that everyone paid $400 to $800 to join.
“There’s not a single person among the 850 people in my class who joined for free,” he said.
His commanders, he added, also now collect the salaries of recruits who quit, a payout of more than $100,000 a month. “No one can stop it,” Abu Ali said. “Corruption runs from top to bottom.”
Holy Crap, it’s almost like they joined the Republican Party!
Thank goodness security has improved, that’ll make it better right?
Corruption and theft are not new to Iraq, and government officials have promised to address the problem. But as Iraqis and American officials assess the effects of this year’s American troop increase, there is a growing sense that, even as security has improved, Iraq has slipped to new depths of lawlessness.
Well that millisecond of hope won’t do. I better go read a Fred Hiatt editorial to buck up my sense of "magic & wonder".
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Sounds like not much has changed in Iraq from Saddam’s day. Just different people collecting the gelt.
It seems like we’ve exported big city politics rather than democracy.
the entire purpose of this war was to once again try the rediculous freidman economic principles
it doesn’t work, it can’t work, it’s failed wherever they force it down the country’s throat
but a very few number of people are able to make more money then countrys when they do get to force it down their throats
these people aquire the treasure of entire nations and that’s why they do it time and again
morton was a moron who’s principles are rediculous and using his economic strategy plummets that country’s economy into ruins
and they are doing it to America at the same time that is the really sick part
Hey Attaturk! How do you like the new place?
It’s quite lovely.
Granted it’s hard to top the pea-green layout of my home blog, but this comes close. ;-)
His commanders, he added, also now collect the salaries of recruits who quit, a payout of more than $100,000 a month.
Hey wasn’t Bernie Kerik sent over there to organize the Iraq police force? Contrary to popular opinion, it seems he left his tell-tale mafia mark. If these Interior Ministry guys are in charge, my guess is somewhere, somehow, someone over here is getting kickbacks. Just a hunch.
g’morning attaturk – couldn’t leave without reading your excellent post. leaving for realsies now
I hope this sordid tale gets some major MSM play. The whole thing is worse
and worse.
Can I get my old ID back? Please please?
Good Morning Attaturk
nice to know are spreading Republican values across the globe.
Me too, please, with the spaces???
Exactly, perris. Friedmanonmics requires a collapse to a level of a brownfield, but the expected rapid regrowth could only happen with the knowledge and tools that are available to those in that brownfield. If they’ve only known shakedown rule, combined with a sudden influx of money, of course they’d be corrupt.
“Who could have known the new Iraqi police would be so corrupt”…any bets on how long it’ll take before we hear that in response to this article?
Good morning Attaturk and firepups. This sounds like capitalism at its very best. We should be so proud that we’ve managed to install our values on the Iraqis.
Another indication of the spread of Amerikan values around the world is revealed in the Times of London this morning: The US says it has right to kidnap British citizens.
Brownfield? It sounds rather like wallowing in the mud, but I doubt that’s what it really means. I confess I’m unfamiliar with the term.
Yeah, you never want to hear “Iraq” and “new depths of lawlessness” in the same sentence.
Not that it works so great for “US” and “new depths of lawlessness” either.
Here, Marion: brownfield
Contrast with greenfield
A war zone that hasn’t been rehabilitated might well be labeled “brownfield.”
I beg to differ. My guess is that the corruption is much greater now than under Saddam. He kept a tight lid on it from the central authority. Now you have free market corruption and you know how much more efficient markets are than government.
What else would I expect from a GOP installed system.
Ooops, I forgot the purple fingers. It must simply be that all those scary brown people are just not cut out for democracy.
I guess that’s our cue to install a new puppet?
Is everyone keeping up with the impending collapse of Belgium as a single country?
http://observer.guardian.co.uk…..44,00.html
Not a chance.
Ah! Now I understand. Thanks!
Holy crap, Bilbo, when will there be a rash of kidnappings of U.S. citizens using the same argument?
One can only wonder if these kidnapped citizens would end up in the Hague…
I do not like this new setup………… WHY????
Hey LooHoo — I wonder if your login identity is linked to your email addy. If you registered for a new, similar ID like “Loo[punctationmark]Hoo” with a different email, you might get a proximate facsimile of your name back…?
Attaturk, I know this is the wrong blog for this.
But what the hell is a Lemon Party?
So we need a different e-mail, or we are stuck with our new ID?
Also, at the new house, when I follow a link and come back, I can’t go to the same place, gotta re-load and then try to find my place again? That isn’t too efficient.
(Grumbling and feeling around in the dark.)
If that beverage makes you feel that zippy I want some!
Instead of reloading the “back” button works for me. Have you tried that?
A Lemon Party is what David Broder likes to throw for John McCain and Fred Thompson.
Although the truth is, I’m not sure what a lemon party is, other than kind of icky and creepy.
I can’t describe how disturbing that was. I’m not a prude, but with a little warning I would have been better prepared!
OK, M I S, I will try next time. Going back to bed. It is cold here. But not snowy. For some things I am truly thankful. Goddess Bless you if you are in MPLS.
Thanks, Attaturk for the post.
Thank you that most useful little tip, I’m stumbling around here.
First, I would like to thank FireDogLake for my one and only panic attack yesterday after I tried to register here and the whole blog went haywire making it so I couldn’t (you Pups must have been making some additional changes to the new site)! Thankfully this morning I was able to pull my lawn chair up to the bar with the rest of you. Phew. *smile*
Second, George Bush & Dick Cheney have had a good time in their nation building exercise in Iraq and it’s not surprising that corruption and theft are prevalent over there! That’s a dream nation for them. This is the kind of nation they’ve always wanted. Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, how cute. Spit.
JamesJoyce — many reasons, starting with these:
– All websites need refreshing from time to time to sustain interest, draw new users and keep up with growth and changes in technology. (DailyKos has been through 3-4 iterations in 5 years, for example.) This interface allows for more highly targeted advertising as well, so that the site doesn’t flood users with ads, only ads that are appropriate to them;
– Previous platform had limitations related to advertising; this site needed to become more self-sustaining, rather than relying heavily on donations from users;
– Community development was challenged by previous platform; the use of Facebook for organizing is now more tightly integrated into the site. Other community development tools should be more readily developed based on this platform (and I’m betting on an announcement here soon);
– Comment refreshing placed considerable load on infrastructure, with users constantly pulling refresh during times of liveblogging; this format allows the system to push the information, reducing demand on system;
– Resources that users have requested over the life of the blog are now in a single location on the site;
– Multiple bloggers will be more easily integrated into the site (and I’m guessing about parts of this feature, based on what I’ve seen so far);
– This new platform will likely accommodate the kind of growth we should expect during the coming election year. With primaries/caucuses literally just around the corner, FDL needed the change badly and now.
And I’m also betting there are more bells and whistles under the hood that we have not yet seen.
Change isn’t always easy, but it’s been necessary here. And it’s a good thing from what I’ve seen over the history of this blog.
Thanks for the clear, concise clarification. I guess we’re all sort of groping around stubbing our toes on things still, but probably within a week it will feel like home.
Scott Horton’s steaming on WaPo & Rummy. The post get’s better & better, so read all the way to the end.
http://www.harpers.org/archive…..c-90001811
Thanks, Marion. Been there, done that as an IT project manager, had to explain to users why changes were made. This could have been much, much worse, has been a fairly smooth roll-out.
My only beef would be with communications in advance of the change. Past experience tells me that shaping users’ expectations with ample communications in advance greatly improves user adoption, no matter the change.
(I did mean to bundle all my comments about advertising under one bulletpoint in my explainer…damn, I guess that means I need more coffee.)
I had to post and run but I want to elaborate on my post up top
Milton Friedman is the economist that came up with the ridiculous notion that industry will monitor itself based on profit
he actually believes if you take away restraints the market will force industry to restrain itself
how RIDICULOUS is THAT?
how the hell is the market going to get an auto company to acknowledge that their cars cause cancer?
they will NEVER acknowledge something that takes research to discover, NEVER…and they will ALWAYS do what’s best for the QUARTERLY bottom line, NOT the projected bottom line
in other words, if making your door with a lock that will by faulty design eject passengers in an accident, they will NOT fix that item if they believe the flaw will not be discovered…and THEY will NOT research to find the flaw
and they DON’T CARE if the “overall impact” is lower profits, they are interested in THIS months profits NOT next months
Milton got himself a ton of awards but his “the market monitors itself” and his “free market” philosophy are moronic
and it is BECAUSE if Friedman that we invaded Iraq…the very purpose was to force this “free market” down their throats
and they KNEW it would fail, it fails EVERYWHERE, it brings the economy to RUIN
and that is what this president does day in and day out, he is dismantling government restraints, he is dismantling middle class protections so corporations can “monitor” themselves
look at what he’s done to our infrastructure, he is deliberately destroying the military so we are forced to use private firms, he is deliberately destroying public health programs so we are forced to use private firms
take a look at new Orleans, once hundreds of public schools, now there are four or five…that’s right, four or five…and they are NOT “affordable”, those that need public education are forced to move from their homes
and every day the president makes believe this is a sound policy, things like “we are not going to add programs, we are not going to fund programs”
so that’s what’s going on in Iraq and they have to be called on it and show what a failure it is so it’s NEVER tried here in the states again
Wow! He really is pissed, isn’t he. Too bad the editors at the WaPoo won’t pay him any mind.
The US says it has right to kidnap British citizens.
A senior lawyer for the American government has told the Court of Appeal in London that kidnapping foreign citizens is permissible under American law because the US Supreme Court has sanctioned it.
Don’t ya just hate bad break-ups?
Continuing, the U.S. lawyer said – “and thanks for boltin’ outta Iraq, fuckers. The defense rests.”
mornin’, pups.
Off topic:
Anyone here know how to link our homepage to our name in the threads?
Re: “market” disciplining itself.
According to Adam Smith, the “invisible hand,” or internal monitor, is competition. The trouble with Friedman is that he has seemingly forgotten that tiny little essential detail. Thus he seems to expect that all markets will be self-regulating regardless of their structure. Since most real-world markets do not follow the textbook atomistic competition meme, they are of course, not self-regulating.
A solid, honest economist (don’t bombard me with oxymoron accusations, please) would study the details of each specific market imperfection and try to devise a way to mmoderate it’s negative aspects without introducing greater inefficiencies. Introduction of pollution rights in Clean Air Act is one such example. Regulation is another, though regulation itself does present problems, as regulated industry often captures the regulators.
What’s screwing up the U.S. economy these days is the corporate (mostly oligopolies) takeover of the federal government. This bears no resemblance to atomistic competition, so should never be described as a market economy. The U.S. is sliding toward fascism in its economic structure as well as all the other ways.
Can’t we indict Bush on a criminal conspiracy to avoid the light of day?
http://www.rawstory.com/news/m…..12007.html
I just clicked on your name and was whisked to what I presume is your homepage. So it seems to have happened seamlessly.
it’s almost like they joined the Republican Party!
Naw….they just used some of our tax dollars to print and hand out the playbook. :-(
Marion -
Am so glad that you semi-sort of got your name back; thought I read in one of the early threads yesterday that you wound up with some strange combo of letters. I *really* hope that’s one of the things that can be tweaked so that, in addition to other new things, we don’t have to reidentify some old friends by totally different monikers.
Preview still isn’t working for me in Safari. And I definitely agree with Rayne @ 4:40:
My only beef would be with communications in advance of the change. Past experience tells me that shaping users’ expectations with ample communications in advance greatly improves user adoption, no matter the change. With no preview I have absolutely no idea what this paragraph is gonna look like. But here goes “submit” anyway.
BTW, I’m looking out my window here in midtown Manhattan & it’s snowing! Glad I didn’t go to the country this weekend. Now if we could only get more of the white stuff in Alta.
Hi, Waccamaw! It took about 3 tries, with various different e-mail accounts, to get the name sans spaces but persistence paid off. And preview doesn’t work for me either, using Firefox.
I’m using firefox on windows xp and preview works for me
There doesn’t seem to be any consistency to it — I’m running XP Professional and the latest version of Firefox, with no preview. It’s a mystery…
from the article:
he Justice Department, citing a Cold War-era court ruling, declared that the contents of the “Sensitive Security Records” cannot be publicly revealed even though they could show whether Abramoff made more visits to the White House than those already acknowledged.
“The simple act of doing so … would reveal sensitive information about the methods used by the Secret Service to carry out its protective function,” the Justice Department argued.
“Ummm, Your Honor, we don’t really care *how* he got in; we just wanna know *when* he got in. Would the Court prefer that I refer to the government’s argument as sophistry, or as being fatuous? Just trying to help here Your Honor. Thank you.”
boy, do I miss the edit function!!
Preveiw test
Second that. Please bring back ‘edit.’
Talking Head Thread is upstairs.
Hey! There’s the preview link! I don’t know if it wasn’t there before or I’m just not the sharpest knife in the drawer…
I also, really liked the edit function!
eCAHNomics December 2nd, 2007 at 4:35 am
That *is* a nice take-down by Horton…too bad it’ll never see the light of day at the wapo.
Marion & Ellott -
I’ve got Firefox also but comfort level is with Safari at this point and, after the last 24, I *really* ain’t in the mood for another new learning curve. ;-(
that’s what I tried to say and you did it quite a bit more concise…I do have an issue with the following paragraph though
when there are no market restraints or said are removed it necessarily follows that corporations will take over the government
the two are sequentially exclusive and the latter will always follow the former
man, I miss the edit button but let me elaborate on this as well
I agree 100 percent with the statement however to address a market’s imperfections is always going to introduce consumer protection
these are not economically inefficient they are frugal and the cost of protecting the consumer are returned with dividends in costs that do not have to be born by either consumers or the government in compensation for events that would have occurred without those constraints
my list of to do’s on the site
1) edit button
2) open links in new tab or the option to do that in user preferances
3) preview next post at top and bottom of the response page
4) user preferance to open page with lead post expanded
4) authors name at the bottom for credit purposes without having to scroll back to the top
5) respond with quote button to save cut and paste steps
5) tag buttons to bring the cursor to the proper position for paste instead of to the end of the tag
oh, oh, oh
the name of the users on line would be nice too…we could log in anonymously if we choose but if we allow it our names to show at bottom of comments page
and I think I wasn’t clear on one of my requests, but when a new post is up it should be linked to by default right above or below the response box…this way we won’t have to reload the home page to find out if there is a new post up
Competition among businesses can only be effective is there is a level playing field and the smaller ones have the abilities to compete with the larger ones. This is rarely the case because size often includes economies of scale and this often mitigates against competition.
The unfettered free market always tends toward monopolism and then there is no possibility of competition. Today we see large corporations choose to merge rather than compete. This lowers their own individual costs and allows them to control the market, pricing and maximize their profits. Competition is expensive. Faux competition is so much more profitable.
Further you can’t have corporations which are losing in the battle for market control. If a corporation loses its value drops and it will disappear. In an attempt to remain afloat it begins to cannibalize itself, selling off assets, outsourcing labor to cheaper environments, moving its domicile to avoid burdens of regulation, taxes and so forth.
Monopolists, believe rightly so that once their product or service becomes a necessity, the consumer will blindly go wherever they are led.
There is no competition. There is a appearance of competition in name only. Winning is everything and it matters not how you do it. It matters THAT you do it. And that my friends is the republican view of life.
All good suggestions on site features. So why didn’t FDL do a survey of what we would like, what we had which we did like, what we had which we didn’t like and then decide on how the new FDL would look and work?
I think the change should have been announced in advance with appropriate advisories. Why all the suspense and chaos which could have been so easily avoided? What was gained by being so dodgey on Friday?
and there is never a free market where government services or “commons” are involved
when a service is required it is almost impossible to have competition since businesses price according to demand not according to cost
there is no such thing as “supply and demand” when it comes to a “commons”, the price is set and the consumer is forced into the purchase or the use
however competition CAN exist AGAINST the commons, wherefore private industry could TRY to compete with the governemt service
for instance, private school is a perfect example, private industry tries to get people to use their service rather then the commons however this system would fail miserably if the public school system didn’t exist to compete against
There is also the notion that the purpose of a corporation is not its product but it profit. The raison d’etre of capitalism. Since it’s all about the bottom line everything the corporation does is normally serving the bottom line (except for the stewards of the corporation who act in THEIR self interest, their personal profit). This, of course, leads to products and services with are made profitable and not necessarily better and cutting corners will always be used, cheaper materials, shoddy techniques, less skilled labor, less quality control and the list goes on and on.
Capitalism is an engine to make the few rich and nothing more than fuedalism – the new fuedalism.
The major problem here is that capitalism is as amiercan as apple pie and is position as the not communism and not socialism all which are framed as oppressive systems. Whatever their flaws, they are meant to serve the people not the owners. There’s no cream and rising to the top and that somehow means you can win at communism or socialism and winning is what America is about. Capitalism wins by default and discussing it seems off the table.
Who will really take on capitalism as a flawed economic system in this country except some crazy professors and DFHs?
Unfettered capitalism is the elephant in the room that no one wants to go near and so politics is almost awlays framed in terms of other issues, like immigration, guns, abortion and so forth.
Unless and and until we address capitalism’s flaws we will march forward into a global monopolist hell.
Nuts, my network access went all kaflooey before I could respond to perris at 37…and now SanderO has an excellent point, too, that deserves further elaboration.
What the hell, I’ll post away here in the EPU zone anyhow.
In ref. to perris: very much agreed.
I’ve written about this before, sorry if it’s a duplication for some of you. I’m a business major, finished at a private school that was very big into free market economics. (Now I understand why they were so big on courting international students.)
One prof in economics, when discussing supply and demand, grabbed a brand new piece of white paper, crumpled it up and tossed it in the trash can to punctuate his remarks. He said that if we were worried about trees, that we should just use paper since the market would resolve the problem by growing more of them.
I damned near levitated out of my chair. I pointed out that the piece of white paper he’d just tossed required bleach, which in turn when made creates dioxins, the most toxic substance on earth. And we were sitting in a class room only a mile from a river with one of the largest concentrations of dioxins in the world. He could not tell me how the market was going to clean the dioxin generated by chemical production out of the river — he simply had blind faith that the market would eventually solve it.
That was 10 years ago. And the river is still highly toxic, made national news.
I have been toying with the idea of writing that moronic prof a note and asking him how the market is progressing on that dioxin removal.
In re: SanderO at 63 — this is the crazy part. That same private business school required a course in business ethics, which was likely the best class I took while there. A local judge taught the course, using a text book that was written and published in the UK. The text said that good business ethics were decisions made for long-term value, with reasonable decency and distributive justice.
Good gravy, there’s virtually nothing that American corporations do that is ethical, by this standard, starting with decisions made for long-term value. And shareholders as drivers of decision-making? Jeebus, right there is the biggest single problem. We do not act on behalf of the public or the common good when we act for the benefit of shareholders, who are typically the monied class, in control of most of this country’s capital but not its labor. (And I say this as a member of the shareholder class.)
We should be making decisions for stakeholders’ long-term value, not shareholders’. And definitely not for the short-term — quarter-to-quarter, minute-to-minute.
God, I think I could write a thesis on this…
testing
test
Did we pass, Jamie?
Thanks for all your work — although I know there’s still a lot ahead.
Is everyone keeping up with the impending collapse of Belgium as a single country?
http://observer.guardian.co.uk…..44,00.html
reply
Crooked timer’s Ingrid Robeyns has had some very informative posts on this
BTW – Attaturk: like the posts and the icon – but you do know that your eponym made that particular piece of headgear illegal, don’t you? It’s a significant date in modern Turkish history, believe it or not.
Thank you for checking. This morning my name wasn’t highlighted but it is now. Maybe it needed a minute or two to upload? Could be. ;-)