![]() |
||||
|
||||
The United Steelworkers (USW) union, like the rest of us, is outraged over the flood of toxic toys. But unlike the Bush administration and its disaster of a Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) chairwoman, Nancy Nord, the 850,000-member union has launched a campaign that enables members to take action to protect their children—and at the same time, see the connections between the nation’s unfettered trade and failed regulatory policies and the consequences in the crib and playpen.
Leeann Anderson, one of the union’s active Women of Steel, says she never thought her five-year-old son Evan’s favorite Thomas the Tank Engine might some day poison him. That was before more than 30 million toys, including 1.5 million Thomas the Tank Engine toys, were recalled this year because of dangerous excessive levels of lead.
It made me sick to my stomach to think that from the time he was a year-and-a-half, he had his Thomas the Tank Engine in his mouth and could have lead in his system.
Anderson did more than just pack away Thomas the Tank Engine and shove the problem aside. She and hundreds of other union activists are taking part in the USW’s campaign, Protect Our Kids: Stop Toxic Imports. She hosted one of the campaign’s first “Safe Home Sessions” last month, in which Women of Steel gather parents in their homes to examine how to find and remove dangerous products with the help of the USW Get the Lead Out screening kits. (The kits are available for free to anyone, for as long as they last, at www.usw.org, www.stoptoxicimports.org or www.protect-our-kids.org.)
In addition to screening equipment and information, the kits also provide information and tools to mobilize concerned moms and dads to join the fight against the failed trade policies and inadequate regulatory protections that allow dangerous products to threaten families and jobs.
As a new report by the Institute for America’s Future shows, the mantra of free trade at all costs and little or no regulation at home have combined to make the products we buy toxic and unsafe. According to Toxic Trade: Globalization and the Safety of the American Consumer:
Nearly $2 trillion in imported goods enter the United States every year. Since 1974, the first year the Consumer Product Safety Commission went into operation, U.S. imports have quadrupled. Imports from China double approximately every five years. Retail chains like Wal-Mart drive their suppliers to move production to low-wage producers like China and Mexico to insure the lowest possible costs.
These imports mean millions of U.S. manufacturing jobs have been lost to globalization, especially to China, where a lack of workers’ rights and safety and environmental standards is well documented. According to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), the growing U.S. trade deficit with China has cost 2.1 million U.S. jobs between 1997 and 2006. As Toxic Trade notes:
Trade with countries with lower labor standards, lower environmental standards and less stringent safety and regulatory regimes present[s] special challenges. The standards that American consumers demand and expect should not be lost amid the challenges of a global economy. Additional attention is needed before signing the next generation of NAFTA-style trade agreements.
So, even as corporations are sending U.S. manufacturing jobs to countries with terrible safety records, the Bush administration is deliberately undermining the CPSC, which is charged with protecting us from dangerous products. In sum, the report finds:
When it comes to imported products, Americans are basically on their own.
USW activists have hosted “Safe Home Sessions” since September, and the campaign is kicking into high gear now, with sessions planned in 17 cities, including: Los Angeles; Columbus, Ohio; Traverse City, Mich.; Buffalo and Syracuse, N.Y.; Houston; Oklahoma City; Tacoma, Wash.; Des Moines; St. Louis; Tampa, Fla.; Louisville, Ky.; Charleston, W.V.; Indianapolis; Green Bay, Wis; and Nashville.
Lead can cause a variety of health problems, including learning disabilities, stunted growth, kidney damage and even death. One of the nation’s earliest pioneers in lead research, Dr. Herbert Needleman at the University of Pittsburgh, says he is “deeply disappointed that “decades of progress through research have been reversed.”
Products we made safe years ago through the regulation of U.S. manufacturers are now being made abroad and they’re coming in poisonous through a back door in trade.
The USW also is urging members to visit kindergartens, day care centers, churches or local retailers to make sure that the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s recalled items are not in those facilities.
Says USW President Leo Gerard:
Until our failed trade policies are remedied, our families are going to remain endangered. How many more toxic toys are going to end up on our store shelves and in the hands of kids before our government stops protecting big business and does something about this crisis?
The Steelworkers’ campaign is supported by a broad array of consumer and environmental organizations, including the Blue-Green Alliance, the partnership between the Steelworkers and the Sierra Club. It also is sponsored by the Public Health Institute and the Center for Environmental Health. Also working with the USW is Marilyn Furer, the grandmother who blew the whistle on the leaded bibs.
The Bush administration prefers the public see disasters like an influx of toxic toys as unrelated to its corporate-driven policies. We know they are not.
Related posts:






Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

me?
[edit]
YAY!!!!!!
will link downstairs
TWO!
My daughter has two small children and she is freaked over the lead in toys business. I am so happy that the USW is taking this action. I will let her know about it.
Times have changed.
When I was a kid (I’m 56) my dad, a dentist, would from time to time bring home my favorite toy: a fresh vial of mercury to play with.
No joke.
I recall pouring it out on my desk, bashing it with my fist, moving a big globule of it around to suck up all the other globules. Then going to eat dinner.
People tell me that explains everything.
EPU’d: Glennzilla has now posted a response to Hoekstra’s nonsense: http://www.salon.com/opinion/g…..index.html
Cetain amount of bullshit surrounding the “China Toys” issue….
Everyone’s blaming the Chinese- not the american companies who designed the toys, contracted for production, inspected the produced toys, and marketed them here- nor is anyone talking much about regulatory agencies that don’t regulate. Let’s just blame the chinese- who for all we know were producing to specs given them.
Hiya Tula!
(drive by…)
Hi Tula. Have you taken a look at this:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news…..128-3.html
great post
here’s the thing just about nobody understands;
when we buy from countries that don’t provide basic necessities for their workforce we are supporting slaves, we are profiting from slaves and we are enabling slavery
tariffs are NOT intended to “reduce trade” from those countries, they are SUPPOSED to make sure we don’t buy from slaves
here’s the deal;
when we are purchasing product from a country that doesn’t allow for collective bargaining we MUST tariff that product..we must create a level playing field
we can’t have 5 year olds making Nike’s for 14 hours a day and condone that business
that’s why we need tariffs, it economically enforces human rights
Thanks for this, Tula!
Unfortunately, those test kits are not entirely reliable.
This is the dark underbelly of globalization. When Republicans talk about globalization, it is all about the bottomline, outsourcing, going to where products can be made at the cheapest possible price. Nowadays that usually means China. But globalization was supposed to mean other things as well such as pollution controls, worker safety standards, wage standards, and oh yes, product quality standards. Corporations in their headlong rush to disinvest in this country and maximize profits in the wide open frontier of China simply turned a blind eye to what was going on. They exercised zero oversight of their suppliers at the source. All they wanted was a cheap product. Rather it was their testing divisions who after the fact found many of the defects that have subsequently been made public. One of the reasons these scandals keep coming up though is that toy companies like many others still find it absurdly profitable to manufacture in China. So they continue to roll the dice with the health of America’s children. It’s just business.
rwcole @6, that may be true about specs, but that would mean that the specs would have to ask for that exact lead-based paint. More likely, the decision on type of paint was made by Chinese production managers.
It is up to the Chinese to correct this step in all products produced.
I think companies would still favor having Q.C. done in China, though, because it saves money. But there ought to be a sampled Q.C. at the very least done in the U.S. I think if the leaders of both countries took these steps public, then this whole fiasco would be eliminated.
OT but good news
Good work Pat… take a chunk out of Rover’s
leg…
http://www.nytimes.com/aponlin…..rs.html?hp
One of the things a good economist will do is look at a problem (many of them, included the one in this post, stem from what we call market imperfections) and determine what solutions might be least disruptive. In this case, it wouldn’t be tarrifs, but probably more well thought out trade agreements that contain protections for workers, for example.
After the WTO demonstrations in Seattle, at least one pro-trade economist, Jagdish Bhagwati of Columbia, wrote a book, inn Defense of Globalization, with exactly that notion in mind. (Caveat: I didn’t read it but I went to a lecture where he talked about it.)
http://www.amazon.com/Defense-…..amp;sr=1-1
dov12348 @ 4
Heh. I used to break open thermometers and play with mercury in the palm of my hand. Sometimes I’d put it in my mouth. Then I’d eat matches.
;)
LS @ 8
Yes, thanks, LS. Something about workers acting in solidarity that drives Bush off the edge.
As long as we have govt of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation, the answer is “never”.
OT
Josh asks the REALLY good Q about Rudy’s Judy trysts:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/059876.php
Cancer Cures @ 13
WRT imports, someone wise once said:
“It’s not what you expect… it’s what you inspect.”
dov12348 @ 4
I’m not surprised. My best friend’s father was a vet. When we were kids we worked at the hospital on Saturdays. She would break open thermometers and play with the mercury regularly. Yikes!
OT, but another hat tip to Chris Dodd.
bankruptcy
eCAHNomics @ 19
I brought this point up last night as well as how the funny money aspects are very similar to Bernard Kerik’s modus operandi and go far to explaining why these two got along so well together.
The toxic trade goes both ways. The lead and other toxins in some Chinese products are chemically equivalent to chemicals from batteries and electronic waste that we ship over there for disposal. We need to stop using China as a toxic dumping ground if we don’t want it coming back to us.
Yes, that’s right…it is still not safe to simply buy any toy off the toy shelf. Not only are recalled toys still in stores, but the Center for Environmental Health tested 100 toys purchased in November that have not been recalled. Nine of these toys, all of which were manufactured in China, tested positive for high levels of lead.
“How is it that in just a few days we can find many problematic toys still on the store shelves?” asked Carolyn Cox, the research director for the Center for Environmental Health. “It’s the beginning of the holiday shopping season, and it shouldn’t be a minefield of lead hazards for parents. Toymakers, retailers and the CPSC are still not doing enough to protect children from lead in toys.”
from http://ecochildsplay.com/2007/…..-and-ebay/
Hugh @ 22
Yes, but the point that Josh is making is that Rudy had the power to create the nearby tryst spot by placing the command center in WTC7, and because it was there on 9/11, the whole rescue operation was thrown into chaos. Kerik didn’t have the power to make the command center be there.
Another reason for buying locally produced goods.
Hi Tula and pups,
Phtalates seem to be a big concern also. If it is used to soften PVC plastics and as a solvent in other products it can cause liver, kidney, lung and reproductive problems.
rwcole @ 6
Except in the AquaDots case, IIRC.
But your point is well taken. As with illegal immigration, the corporations who profit should be held accountable (as in PUNISHED!); just blaming/harassing/deporting/punishing the “BAD, BAD brown people” is ineffective and disingenuous, if not outright opportunistic politically.
As for the political appointees put in charge of regulatory agencies expressly to protect corporations from regulation, and especially for the political schmucks who make those political appointments of such cronies, well, my contempt knows no bounds.
FunnyDiva
PS: TULA!!!
Awesome post. Brilliant, brilliant move on the part of Women of Steel: do the right thing for ordinary people, and the timing couldn’t be better. Remind me to remind anti-union types I encounter of this sterling example of unions/union members standing up for ordinary American families. Since I’ve no direct/family ties to any unions, I’ll be harder to paint as “just playing politics.”
FD
Mods
Didn’t see me @ 25 on last refresh, so I redid it. You can eliminate the second one. Thanks.
[Mod Note; refresh your browser and the duplicate is gone.]
eCAHNomics,
I think that you misunderstand me. I was making two points. The first about Rudy siting the command center in the WTC so he could boink his mistress. The second was playing fast and loose with the city’s finances as they went about seeing those mistresses.
cgreen @ 11
False positives (not great) or false negatives (BAD) or positive AND results from the same sample under different conditions (WAY BAD)?
Linky? Not disputing your point, just indulging my science nerd side. Few tests are entirely reliable–it’s important to know the degree and direction of unreliability.
Thanks!
FunnyDiva
Hugh @ 31
OK. Got it, I think. But Rudy had the ability to make faster & looser with much more than Kerik. Kerik is a piker compared to Rudy, but yes, they think & behave alike.
eCAHNomics @ 32
they’re both irresponsible scum
NAFTA jammed through Congress in Bill Clinton’s first term, over the objections of his own party … thanks alot!
Now we realize outsourcing all our industry was a bad idea in so many ways, and FDL details them, but you’ll all vote for Hillary Clinton anyway.
And because Clinton and the rest of the DLC, and the Democratic wing of the neo-con cabal know that even the most committed and aware activists will fall every time for the Axiom of Automatic Support for the Least Worst, they don’t need to change a thing.
Enjoy your toxic toys, and be assured that a second Clinton term will abound with toxic byproducts, possibly including nuclear fallout from some war of aggression “options” she keeps on the table.
Classic accountability requires an adversarial relationship. When an accounting firm audits an organization, the auditors are supposed to look for problems, not conceal them. The same goes for government auditors, whether they are inspecting the Pentagon, imported foods or kid’s toys.
Lack of accountability is a seamless theme running from the corporate world (Enron) to government (insert the Bush debacle of your choice).
Authoritarians don’t want to answer to anyone: then they can make any stupid decision they please (Iraq, anyone?) and get away with it.
Good on the Steelworkers for stepping up! It’s up to us: the freakin’ corporate/media/war machine and their minions aren’t gonna.
LS @ 8
Happily for the president, he gets to appoint the Board.
If this doesn’t cause a massive country-wide strike, nothing will. This president wants to legislate and judge from the oval office. Un-freaking-believable.
FunnyDiva2002 and anyone else interested in the accuracy of home testing for lead:
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-…..amp;EDATE=
I’ll qualify my comment above — some testing kits are ok, but home testing is not entirely reliable no matter what kit is used. Probably it is better than nothing and home testing has identified some problems. Some brands are much better than others. Read at the link.
Fairy dust is toxic too?
Florida Suspends Withdrawals From Investment Pool
Uh oh, call the waaaaambulance…
Heckuva job, Jebbie!
Aw, c’mon…this is a Republican state — how could all those “conservatives” fail to “conserve”?
Ah, that’ll solve everything… Until it doesn’t…
[Greed & Fear] On the potential for panic
Now you see it… now you don’t.
Leadership vacuum…ratings vacuum…ethics vacuum… We’ve been Hoover’d!
More about lead testing kits
“Of 104 total test results, more than half (56) were false negatives, and two were false positives. None of the kits consistently detected lead in products if the lead was covered with a non-leaded coating. Based on the study consumers should not use lead test kits to evaluate consumer products for potential lead hazards. These findings are consistent with previous CPSC staff test results.” http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pr…..08038.html
Leadership vacuum…ratings vacuum…ethics vacuum…We’ve been hoover’d!
707!
This should be a bumper sticker!!
(and I never use two explamation points)
bluejeansntshirt @ 27
Again, depends on which pthalate, concentration and exposure.
Full Disclosure: I routinely use polymer clays, which are ASTM nontoxic and have pthalate plasticizers, and teach others how. I and my friends/students have decided to handle the material as safely as possible and to accept any residual risk.
Fuller disclosure: I’m a scientist by training, in a field that deals with chemistry/biochemistry/potential toxicity, so I’m a little hyper-vigilant toward “aaaagh! Chemicals! Bad! Toxic! Aaaaagh!” and will tend to chime in to temper that when I perceive it (even if it’s just my perception and not actually another commenter’s assertion). Call it FunnyDiva’s knee-jerk blind spot (one of ‘em, anyway).
Everyone has a right to (must, actually) make their own descision vis a vis acceptable risk from pthalates or any other potentially toxic substance in art materials or any other common substance. I only ask that the same critical thinking and investigative skills be applied to “be afraid” messages vis a vis chemicals that most of us apply to “be afraid” messages vis a vis other scary things…like socialized medicine and DFH bleeding-heart lib’ruls.
Guess I better go evaluate some polymer clay/pthalate links. Been a long time since I went digging on that one.
FunnyDiva
Another aspect of the economics of all this is that while recalls could potentially affect 30 million toys in reality they don’t. I remember reading once that such recalls often result in something like 10% of the items being returned.
So if you had a product called Tobias the Steam Engine and you sold 10 million units wholesale at $20 each. That would represent $200 million in potential sales. Now suppose you paid your suppliers in China $5 per Tobias. That’s $50 million. So your profit is $150 million. Now suppose that you have to do a recall. If 10% of the Tobiases are returned, you are out $20 million so your profit is down to $130 million but part of your losses you can write off or are covered by insurance. So at the end of the day, is your toy company really out enough to cause you to change how you do business?
At some point if there are enough recalls, your brand or your industry might suffer a backlash. But kids will always want toys and parents will always want to give them toys. So while you have a problem it is unclear to me at least that barring strong outside pressure you will have much incentive to do that much about it or treat it as anything other than a PR problem.
War On War Off @ 16
Don’t tell me — the matches were to kill the taste.
inmymindseye @ 21
I guess I should feel lucky I got a whole vial.
TexBetsy @ 24
Yup.
I know I was unpleasantly surprised to find AquaDots playsets in Target’s Thanksgiving/Black Friday print ads. Wish I’d had the huevos to do something about it…
FunnyDiva
cgreen @ 37
Thank You!
FunnyD
But wait… there’s more —
The Bernanke Put and the Last Legs of the Stock Market Sucker’s Rally
Warning… it’s a long walk off a short plank.
itwasntme …“~}
Use it!
Funnydiva2002 @ 45
Letters to the editor? This would be a good issue.
I think every kid in the 50’s at one time or another broke open a thermometer and played with the mercury. I know my sister and I did, but my mom had enought sense to tell me not to put it in my mouth.
Also other horrors, DDT which was everywhere, weed killers, ant bait, all those injections we were given every couple of months or so, I wonder what the effects of all that were on us. I guess we’ll know when it catches up with us as we age.
neokneme @ 38
FWIW, Jeb hasn’t been in office since Jan 2 of this year so Mr Crist has some fault here as well.
Funnydiva2002 @ 46
There were a number of news reports I saw last week that the ads for Aqua-dots were in for Target and a few other stores prior to the recall and the stores hadn’t been able to pull the ads.
neokneme,
I have never understood how institutional investors could be such chumps. The subprime meltdown was a disaster that could be seen years out and yet these groups walked into it like a bunch of gormless saps.
Although even this I think would have been a violation of their fiduciary responsibilities, if they had wanted to play these markets, they could have done so and left them in 2006, figuring the sh*t would hit the fan sometime thereafter. Instead they held them and got screwed, and now they have the chutzpah to act surprised about it all. Like I said, I don’t understand them.
dakine01 @ 50
Good point!
"~]Hugh @ 52
Greed….
dov12348 @ 4
That has to weigh on your mind these days. That’s heavy stuff…
itwasntme @ 49
If you’re referring to childhood immunizations, I’d argue that the real risks from those actual diseases, both to us kids and all the kids in our ‘herd’ more than offset any risks that have been remotely documented for those vaccines.
As we age, it’s going to be, in many cases, really hard to know which risk factors contributed what to which problematic outcome. If I get some odd cancer associated with both tobacco smoke exposure and pthalates in polymer clay, will it be because of the choking levels of 2nd hand pipe smoke I was exposed to until I was 12, or because I played with polymer clay beginning in my mid-20s?
FunnyDiva
Tried to get out of going to school one morning by claiming to have a fever. Mom put the thermometer under my tongue and walked away. I touched the thermometer to moms hot iron. Just like in the cartoons the mercury blows the top off and shoots out. I ended up in school.
dakine01 @ 51
Thanks, Dakine!
I hope that’s the case, and that there were empty shelves with an explanation. Wish I’d gotten off my duff to check.
I heart Firepups! Not least for their willingness to be both informed and informing.
FunnyDiva
bluejeansntshirt @ 57
oops. i used to just put it in the tea that was supposed to help me get better
bluejeansntshirt @ 57
I did the same with a lighter. I also ended up in school.
Bay State Librul @ 54
Greed certainly, but it is the stupidity angle I don’t get. You didn’t have to be a rocket scientist to see that these markets were going to tank a few years out from when these mortgages really began to move. At that point the rates would change on them and make them unsustainable and the bubble would burst. These guys had to have known this but they held on to what was soon to be worthless paper anyway. That’s what I don’t get.
Hugh @ 52
What Hugh said. Especially since even _I_ can remember the *REIT market blowing up in exactly the same way and screwing over institutional investors/pension funds in places like California.
*Real Estate Investment Trust (iirc)
Feh!
FunnyDiva
Bay State Librul @ 54
That and the inability to think/act independently. If they’re on the “inside” then to go against the play would be heretical, I’d say.
The risk management training is overwhelmed by the short term loyalty urge which seeks to preserve the continuity of the “culture” over the needs of the “individual”.
I agree with you, funnydiva. The diseases were worse than the cure, certainly, but those cures have an impact in themselves; and as you point out, only the godess knows what has come along since that will effect us.
A point: I had my son when I was 45. He has Asperger’s Syndrome. More and more kids are having these neurological difficulties, and my take has been environmental polution in general, rather than any specific cause.
Jane’s rapping upstairs.
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…..s/#respond
Bay State Librul @ 55
Greed, yes. But it’s interesting to figure out how it actually works. Since I was there during the tech bubble, I observed it first hand. It still took me years to be able to articulate it.
Of my own employer, I used to say they got up every morning, put on blindfolds & did the same thing that worked yesterday. Turns out that my employer was mainstream. Evey other Wall St. firm did the same. (Goldman Sachs is somethimes, though not always, an exception.) This works great while markets are going in a given direction, but it misses every turning point. Missing an upturn is not much of a problem, since they tend to last a long time, meaning you can get on the bandwagon. But missing a downturn can be devastating, as we are now observing.
Peel back another layer of the onion. Why do Wall St. & institutional investors behave that way? When I asked during the tech bubble, I would get weak sounding excuses. For example, when I would point out that the B-to-C internet stocks had already crashed, the answer would be, Oh that’s not what the Internet is about, it’s about B-to-B and those stocks are still going up. It wasn’t until later that I understood. These folks are in the quarterly beauty contest. They lose business (or get fired) if they underperform for more than a short period. So, in tht sense, they are “forced” to do what everyone else is doing. The other side is equally pernicious. No one (so to speak) gets fired or loses business if they made the same mistake that everyone else made.
So even those who are smart enough to see it coming, and chances are that won’t be many because denial is such a powerful force, can’t take action unless they want to downsize now rather than take a chance & perhaps downsize later.
I’ve mentioned before that I sold my tech stocks in Oct 99. The NASDAQ climbed another 50% and another 6 months after that. If I had done that for a client, I would have been toast at some point during those 6 months.
There are a lot of issue here: NAFTA, China, Republicans… but I think the responsibility falls on companies like Wal-Mart who import pretty much all of their products from China.
Wal-Mart has no regard for safety. It imports shoddy products from China without knowing if they’re toxic or not. And don’t even get me starting about how it sells out American jobs.
The retailer normally doesn’t import anything- they buy from american companies like Mattel who do the contracting and importing.
The thing is, all of these corporations outsourcing American jobs and making record profits are succeeding at it for ONE reason — American consumers buy their products. Nobody is making us do it, although it sure is hard not to! There are so few options anymore. If you’re looking for toys that are made here in this country, please visit my website, where I’ve been compiling TONS of links (over 130) to companies making their toys here in the USA:
http://www.toysmadeinamerica.com
If consumers begin to insist on American-made products, corporations will have no choice but to bring the jobs back home.
Teresa
“rwcole” — with all due respect, that sounds like a comment from the Bentonville spinmeisters. If Wal-Mart is such a force to be reckoned with, then they could easily lean on companies like Mattel and demand some kind of decent standards.
Wal-Mart released it’s 12 “Must Buys” for the holidays earlier this year, and you know what was on the list? Aqua-Dots. The toy that has a date rape drug in it.
Now I’m not saying that Wal-Mart is the only company with questionable business practices, but they’re the largest company in America, and they do more harm than just sell toxic toys.
You wanna talk about union busting? Or environmental degradation? Or their deplorable health care plan?