<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Huckabee To Musharraf: We Own You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:56:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117561</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1116718&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;dakine01 @ 39&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find Huckabee a fairly scary candidate but I’m curious as to why the R’s “cognescenti” are finding him so scary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From Novakula hit pieces to the Doughy Wide Pantload saying Huckabee’s scarier than the “scary leftie” Ron Paul, someone is “working the refs” here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s probably because he might win and he isn’t one of them. He isn’t just pandering to the ‘religious right’ the way Reagan and Bush did, he actually &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; ‘religious right’. How are they going to control him or have influence, so they can get their insider contracts and other money deals?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1116718"><em>dakine01 @ 39</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I find Huckabee a fairly scary candidate but I’m curious as to why the R’s “cognescenti” are finding him so scary.</p>
<p>From Novakula hit pieces to the Doughy Wide Pantload saying Huckabee’s scarier than the “scary leftie” Ron Paul, someone is “working the refs” here.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s probably because he might win and he isn’t one of them. He isn’t just pandering to the ‘religious right’ the way Reagan and Bush did, he actually <b>is</b> ‘religious right’. How are they going to control him or have influence, so they can get their insider contracts and other money deals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117542</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117542</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It makes Huckabee sound cautious compared to Obama’s “I’ll nuke ‘em.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes Huckabee sound cautious compared to Obama’s “I’ll nuke ‘em.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wingunter</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117182</link>
		<dc:creator>Wingunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117182</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Proof the Huckster is a con man and not a conservative or a man of values.&lt;br /&gt;
Up until last year he took the Federalist approach on abortion but, believing a pro-life amendment is what people wanted to hear he changed his stripes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On 2/12/95 an article Ralph Z. Harlow from the Washington Times wrote under the caption “Conservatives Hold Fire On Abortion” the Huckster said this:&lt;br /&gt;
“&lt;b&gt;In the spirit of federalism, the proposed GOP revision also would replace the abortion amendment with a statement saying the issue should be left up to the individual state legislatures to deal with as each sees fit. ‘That’s exactly what we have looked for, and if it’s left up to the states, more of them are going to put some restrictions on abortion,&lt;/b&gt;‘ Arkansas Lt. Gov. Mike Huckabee said in an interview after appearing on a conference panel yesterday.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On 4/ 2006 in an interview with John Hawkins on RightWing News the Huckster was talking the same talk: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/huckabee.php&quot;&gt;http://www.rightwingnews.com/i.....ckabee.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“It would please me because I think Roe v. Wade is based on a real stretch of Constitutional application — that somehow there is a greater privacy issue in the abortion concern — than there is a human life issue — and that the federal government should be making that decision as opposed to states making that decision. &lt;b&gt;So, I’ve never felt that it was a legitimate manner in which to address this and, first of all, it should be left to the states, the 10th Amendment,&lt;/b&gt; but secondly, to somehow believe that the taking of an innocent, unborn human life is about privacy and not about that unborn life is ludicrous.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUT then on 11/19/07;&lt;br /&gt;
Huckabee Rejects Letting States Decide Whether to Allow Abortions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312107,00.html&quot;&gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312107,00.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“If morality is the point here, and if it’s right or wrong, not just a political question, then you can’t have 50 different versions of what’s right and what’s wrong.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“For those of us for whom this is a moral question, you can’t simply have 50 different versions of what’s right,”he said in an interview on Fox News Sunday.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“But my surprise was nothing compared to the surprise of people across America who had been faithful supporters of right to life, said Huckabee, who is challenging Thompson’s claim that he is the most reliable conservative in the GOP field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Huckster will say anything to get elected AND publicly ridicule those who rightly still stand on the position he himself held!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proof the Huckster is a con man and not a conservative or a man of values.<br />
Up until last year he took the Federalist approach on abortion but, believing a pro-life amendment is what people wanted to hear he changed his stripes.</p>
<p>On 2/12/95 an article Ralph Z. Harlow from the Washington Times wrote under the caption “Conservatives Hold Fire On Abortion” the Huckster said this:<br />
“<b>In the spirit of federalism, the proposed GOP revision also would replace the abortion amendment with a statement saying the issue should be left up to the individual state legislatures to deal with as each sees fit. ‘That’s exactly what we have looked for, and if it’s left up to the states, more of them are going to put some restrictions on abortion,</b>‘ Arkansas Lt. Gov. Mike Huckabee said in an interview after appearing on a conference panel yesterday.” </p>
<p>On 4/ 2006 in an interview with John Hawkins on RightWing News the Huckster was talking the same talk: <a href="http://www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/huckabee.php">http://www.rightwingnews.com/i&#8230;..ckabee.php</a></p>
<p>“It would please me because I think Roe v. Wade is based on a real stretch of Constitutional application — that somehow there is a greater privacy issue in the abortion concern — than there is a human life issue — and that the federal government should be making that decision as opposed to states making that decision. <b>So, I’ve never felt that it was a legitimate manner in which to address this and, first of all, it should be left to the states, the 10th Amendment,</b> but secondly, to somehow believe that the taking of an innocent, unborn human life is about privacy and not about that unborn life is ludicrous.”</p>
<p>BUT then on 11/19/07;<br />
Huckabee Rejects Letting States Decide Whether to Allow Abortions<br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312107,00.html">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312107,00.html</a></p>
<p>“If morality is the point here, and if it’s right or wrong, not just a political question, then you can’t have 50 different versions of what’s right and what’s wrong.”</p>
<p>“For those of us for whom this is a moral question, you can’t simply have 50 different versions of what’s right,”he said in an interview on Fox News Sunday.”</p>
<p>“But my surprise was nothing compared to the surprise of people across America who had been faithful supporters of right to life, said Huckabee, who is challenging Thompson’s claim that he is the most reliable conservative in the GOP field.</p>
<p>The Huckster will say anything to get elected AND publicly ridicule those who rightly still stand on the position he himself held!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparrow</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117090</link>
		<dc:creator>sparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1117090</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What’s with this popular Republican meme of “the first duty of the president is to protect the country” crap. His oath of office is to uphold the Constitution. I believe it’s the responsibility of Congress to declare war or authorize the use of military force.  Why wouldn’t Wolfie call him on this? On second thought, stupid question.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s with this popular Republican meme of “the first duty of the president is to protect the country” crap. His oath of office is to uphold the Constitution. I believe it’s the responsibility of Congress to declare war or authorize the use of military force.  Why wouldn’t Wolfie call him on this? On second thought, stupid question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alank</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116967</link>
		<dc:creator>alank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116967</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shark bait, oo-ha-ha!  I gather Huck is the dark horse candidate.  This is really bad news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What we see on telly is the result of the enormous drag factor of proliferating morons in this country.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shark bait, oo-ha-ha!  I gather Huck is the dark horse candidate.  This is really bad news.</p>
<p>What we see on telly is the result of the enormous drag factor of proliferating morons in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sassy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sassy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116897</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was just wondering, if Pakistan knows that the enemy is in her area, and she wants us to help her, should we? I mean if the enemy takes over Pakistan,wouldn’t that mean that THEY have the NUKES NOW??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just wondering, if Pakistan knows that the enemy is in her area, and she wants us to help her, should we? I mean if the enemy takes over Pakistan,wouldn’t that mean that THEY have the NUKES NOW??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wigwam</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116896</link>
		<dc:creator>wigwam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116896</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Per Huckabee:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I think we have to always remember that &lt;b&gt;the first job of the American president is to protect the American people.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, that’s a damn lie.  Here’s the president’s job description, per Article II:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and &lt;b&gt;will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.&lt;/b&gt;“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 2. The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; &lt;b&gt;he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed,&lt;/b&gt; and shall commission all the officers of the United States.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per Huckabee:</p>
<blockquote><p>
I think we have to always remember that <b>the first job of the American president is to protect the American people.</b>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In fact, that’s a damn lie.  Here’s the president’s job description, per Article II:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and <b>will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.</b>“</p>
<p>Section 2. The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.</p>
<p>He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.</p>
<p>The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.</p>
<p>Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; <b>he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed,</b> and shall commission all the officers of the United States.
</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kdh22</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116830</link>
		<dc:creator>kdh22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1116783&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;katherine Graham Cracker @ 91&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hey the media loves Mike Hucksterbee and he is a nice guy –I’m sure he would use the words please and thank you before entering the borders of a sovereign nation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;707!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1116783"><em>katherine Graham Cracker @ 91</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hey the media loves Mike Hucksterbee and he is a nice guy –I’m sure he would use the words please and thank you before entering the borders of a sovereign nation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>707!!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116795</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Found the &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Oh7mlrmgws&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt; Novak was frothing over the mouth over. High eighties camp. Looks like a madonna video. &amp; He’s outraged. The man has got serious problems.&lt;br /&gt;
Warning: I don’t find it offensive, but Novak does. Reminds me of a Peaches video&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found the <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Oh7mlrmgws">video</a> Novak was frothing over the mouth over. High eighties camp. Looks like a madonna video. &amp; He’s outraged. The man has got serious problems.<br />
Warning: I don’t find it offensive, but Novak does. Reminds me of a Peaches video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egregious</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116789</link>
		<dc:creator>egregious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/26/mike-huckabee-as-texas-ranger/#comment-1116789</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1116777&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;masaccio @ 88&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Elliott, I’m not seeing a link to the video. Could you put it up again? Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it in this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/published/pentagonsnewmap.htm&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1116777"><em>masaccio @ 88</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Elliott, I’m not seeing a link to the video. Could you put it up again? Thanks.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is it in this <a href="http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/published/pentagonsnewmap.htm">link</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
