<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Magazine Rejected Karl Rove As Columnist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:14:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: opalheart</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108462</link>
		<dc:creator>opalheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Time probably remembers what happened with they decided to put make Dubya “Person of the Year” and put him on the cover for all the world to see. I doubt that they wanted to experience the same drop in subscribers….Like me.  I’m going to cancel my Newsweek now too, with a letter referring to Kreepy Karl’s start-up.  Don’t want him anywhere near me in any form.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time probably remembers what happened with they decided to put make Dubya “Person of the Year” and put him on the cover for all the world to see. I doubt that they wanted to experience the same drop in subscribers….Like me.  I’m going to cancel my Newsweek now too, with a letter referring to Kreepy Karl’s start-up.  Don’t want him anywhere near me in any form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluetoe</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108185</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluetoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108185</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Time, Newsweak, what’s the difference?  Read Time today for the first time in YEARS and it hasn’t improved.  Newsweak continues to decline.  Why bother with these status quo dinosaurs?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time, Newsweak, what’s the difference?  Read Time today for the first time in YEARS and it hasn’t improved.  Newsweak continues to decline.  Why bother with these status quo dinosaurs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobschacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108177</link>
		<dc:creator>bobschacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1108005&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hmmm. @ 106&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would put Pelosi in a far stronger position to get ‘er done if it were to appear that a sustained majority outcry for impeachment simply forced her at long last to permit it to proceed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That might be true, but she’s had a tin ear for at least six months, already. It seems like they’re waiting for a Saturday Night Massacre tsunami, and instead “all” they’re gettng is a tidal wave.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But as KO explained last night (on segment #5?), the Democratic leadership has decided that progressives don’t matter because “we don’t have anywhere to go.” Guess they haven’t heard about the concept of energizing your base. We could just sit on our hands, y’know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1108005"><em>Hmmm. @ 106</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>It would put Pelosi in a far stronger position to get ‘er done if it were to appear that a sustained majority outcry for impeachment simply forced her at long last to permit it to proceed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That might be true, but she’s had a tin ear for at least six months, already. It seems like they’re waiting for a Saturday Night Massacre tsunami, and instead “all” they’re gettng is a tidal wave.</p>
<p>But as KO explained last night (on segment #5?), the Democratic leadership has decided that progressives don’t matter because “we don’t have anywhere to go.” Guess they haven’t heard about the concept of energizing your base. We could just sit on our hands, y’know.</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreedomOfInformationAct</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108084</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomOfInformationAct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108084</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bush’s commutation of Scooter Libby now all makes sense, if he ended up behind bars, he might have squealed that bush and dick were ultimately behind the original plan to leak the covert identity of Valerie Plame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That, my friends, is the textbook definition of treason.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush’s commutation of Scooter Libby now all makes sense, if he ended up behind bars, he might have squealed that bush and dick were ultimately behind the original plan to leak the covert identity of Valerie Plame.</p>
<p>That, my friends, is the textbook definition of treason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobschacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108056</link>
		<dc:creator>bobschacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108056</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1107948&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @ 67&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don’t think that Rove had to subdue journalists or turn them into stenographers.  They sold themselves and their integrity willingly, even enthusiastically.  From the White House point of view, the surprise was that it was so cheap and easy to do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ever since the Fairness Doctrine was scrubbed, TV executives have decided that to make more money, news had to have more entertainment value. Thus, news became infotainment, and journalists became infotainers. I can imagine in my mind’s eye a meeting in the conference room of every newspaper and TV station, the producer calling a meeting and shouting at his crew, “Alright, folks; you know what to do! Now get out there and &lt;b&gt;titillate&lt;/b&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1107948"><em>Hugh @ 67</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I don’t think that Rove had to subdue journalists or turn them into stenographers.  They sold themselves and their integrity willingly, even enthusiastically.  From the White House point of view, the surprise was that it was so cheap and easy to do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ever since the Fairness Doctrine was scrubbed, TV executives have decided that to make more money, news had to have more entertainment value. Thus, news became infotainment, and journalists became infotainers. I can imagine in my mind’s eye a meeting in the conference room of every newspaper and TV station, the producer calling a meeting and shouting at his crew, “Alright, folks; you know what to do! Now get out there and <b>titillate</b>!</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Beyerstein</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108035</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Beyerstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108035</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rove’s machinations nearly sent TIME’s Matt Cooper to jail. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Takes some serious chutzpah to apply for a job with TIME after that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rove’s machinations nearly sent TIME’s Matt Cooper to jail. </p>
<p>Takes some serious chutzpah to apply for a job with TIME after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolyn urban</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108022</link>
		<dc:creator>carolyn urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108022</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The betrayal of Valerie Plame!  Back in chimps face.  Everyone here has got to be loving this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The betrayal of Valerie Plame!  Back in chimps face.  Everyone here has got to be loving this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolyn urban</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108019</link>
		<dc:creator>carolyn urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108019</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;uh, that would be David Shuster. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course.  I used to know a Mike S.; hence my confusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>uh, that would be David Shuster. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course.  I used to know a Mike S.; hence my confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine01</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108016</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108016</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1107990&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;carolyn urban @ 101&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Olbermann!  Mike Shuster!  Yea!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What are they saying?  Tha..tha…tha..that they all LIED?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good God!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;uh, that would be &lt;em&gt;David&lt;/em&gt; Shuster.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1107990"><em>carolyn urban @ 101</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Olbermann!  Mike Shuster!  Yea!</p>
<p>What are they saying?  Tha..tha…tha..that they all LIED?</p>
<p>Good God!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>uh, that would be <em>David</em> Shuster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmm.</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108005</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmm.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/20/time-magazine-rejected-karl-rove-as-columnist/#comment-1108005</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It would put Pelosi in a far stronger position to get ‘er done if it were to appear that a sustained majority outcry for impeachment simply forced her at long last to permit it to proceed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would put Pelosi in a far stronger position to get ‘er done if it were to appear that a sustained majority outcry for impeachment simply forced her at long last to permit it to proceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
