As Rahm Emanuel continues his campaign to demonize immigrants, I think it’s valuable to place these actions in the larger context of his continuing support for the corporate welfare otherwise known as “free trade.” Sirota has an excellent piece connecting the dots:
The fact is, both Democrats and Republicans know that exploitation is at the heart of illegal immigration, but neither party is really willing to confront that exploitation because that would mean confronting their big corporate donors who are profiting off the status quo. And so, taking a scapegoat play out of the Reagan and Clinton playbooks, the con artists in both parties are trying to channel Americans’ intense anger at Big Money interests into a rage at illegal immigrants.
This is particularly disgusting on the Democratic side, mainly because the Democratic Party is supposed to be the party of the little guy, and of fairness. Instead, it is becoming the party of Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) – the former investment banker and NAFTA architect who is cravenly trying to protect the moneyed interests that have underwritten his political career by playing to the ugliest societal instincts. The whole debate is about how much or little to punish undocumented workers - rather than about how to punish the moneyed interests that are abusing all workers, undocumented or otherwise.
Clearly, illegal immigration is a serious issue that needs to be addressed – but simply bashing illegal immigrants or proposing punitive measures against them doesn’t go the root problem, nor will it solve the issue.
But then, perhaps neither party wants to get to the root of the problem. Maybe both parties want a scapegoat to take take heat off the interests writing the big campaign checks. That would be a real tragedy, especially considering polls show that the American public is ready to embrace the kind of populist power-challenging politics that would be required to beef up wage/workplace safety enforcement and reform our globalization policies so that they lift up all workers, rather than crushing them and exacerbating the illegal immigration problem.
NAFTA was Rahm’s baby, and his reward was the congressional seat he now holds. He recruits Republicans for Democratic seats because he knows they will be reliable votes for the trade- and corporate-friendly legislation he promotes (drill down into the immigration bill he put forward through his puppet Heath Shuler and you’ll find yet another corporate boondoggle to privatize/raid more of the public sphere through the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security that the taxpayers underwrite). He’s a portrait of everything Naomi Klein warns about, and to do his dirty work he needs a convenient scapegoat for his narrative that immigrants serve well.
Now he’s turned into a concern troll, offering advice to Republicans. Word to Rahm: the Democrats don’t need a Karl Rove.
(h/t Eureka Springs)
Related posts:
- Lessons Learned in VA and NJ: Is Rahm Emanuel Orchestrating 2010 Democratic Massacre?
- Why Does SEIU’s Andy Stern Sound Like Rahm Emanuel?
- Memo to Dems: Rahm, Not Hippies, Caused 1994 Debacle
- Is Rahm Emanuel Demanding That Walt Minnick, Bobby Bright, and Parker Griffith Commit Political Suicide?
- Your Junk Insurance is About to Get Worse, Courtesy of Max Baucus & Rahm Emanuel





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Ack again!
Jane!
(OK, that’s just weird. Two in a row.)
Erm, what I meant to say was: Hail, Muse Jane!
Those Below have been notified.
Scumbag.
So he’s the bastard behind NAFTA!
Ohhhhhh, the bad things I am wishing for him right now!
*spit* in RE’s general direction.
Bah!
Anyone catch this little tidbit of news?
Paulose stepping down as USA, moving to Justice
Just fire the incompetent partisan hack and be done with it!
Tell it, darlin’!
(I can say that, it’s not sexist, Jane IS mah darlin’)
Rahm sees politics through the lense of money. If you haven’t got any, he ain’t interested.
Could the Ill. Dem Party censure Rahm? Alright, I’ll put the pipe down… ;-)
any word on feedback on the advertisement you ran? is Rahm feeling some heat? Are Dems thinking similar ads might appear in their districts?
Alice @ 10
yeah, any signs he’s really squirming now that he’s in the crosshairs?
They’re mostly laying low and playing it cool in public, though his surrogate, Shuler, has contacted Howie.
I joked to my partner he and I might have to get in drag and hit the road with a women’s jazz band to avoid Chicago mobsters.
Nice tie in with Naomi at the end. Rahm wants to be the next Lieberman.
rat bastahd @ 6
I’m afraid she’ll be in a position to cause worse havoc, as a senior Legal Policy Advisor to the AAG…
EPD’d
Mr.Novak
Pachacutec @ 12
Some Like It Hot (Note: YouTube)
marymccurnin @ 15
I mean EPU’d. Sorry. Just did laps and am still all wet.
OT,
I received this email from a friend:
“I’m very deeply touched by the concern many of you expressed about my safety and welfare during what some of you considered an entirely reckless endeavor on my part. I returned from Tehran in one piece on Saturday evening. Briefly, it was the most amazing travel experience of my life without any problems of any type. Contrary to what some of you saw as the potential for another hostage situation or worse, I was never treated with the degree of kindness, hospitality, warmth and respect anywhere in the world as I was throughout Iran. Everyone in our group was treated like a celebrity. I shook more hands, posed for more family photos, signed more autographs, and received more hugs and well wishes than Hillary Clinton did during the same two-week period. We were literally cheered and welcomed by every Iranian we met. These encounters were not staged events as one might experience elsewhere. We were approached by regular Iranian citizens in public places who were very curious about us since it was obvious that we were not the usual tourists from Europe. Each person expressed gratitude for our decision to visit Iran and voiced hope that relations between our countries will normalize soon. All were very curious about the upcoming presidential elections and who we thought would prevail.
Keep in mind that thanks to the Revolutionary edict in l979 to reproduce in order to create more jihadists and the subsequent ban on contraceptives, roughly 70% of the current population is under 30. Like us, the ordinary citizens draw a separation between the people and our governments. Ahmedinejad’s approval rating among Iranians is lower than Bush’s standing with Americans. One older gentleman we ran into at a mosque in Shiraz summed it up in his halting English: “Americans….gooooood; Boooosh and Ahmedinejad…..baaad. Together…in leaky boat……,” as he gestured his hands in a sinking motion…..”
Interesting ha?
excellent – i was bummed to see sirota’s diary scroll get so little attention at daily kos today.
the lack of any discussion of our trade policies during this year’s immigration legislation fight was the big reason i was not trusting the dems on that one (i confess my mistrust may have been misplaced – i never got around to reading the bill).
digg it!
This post deserves a lot of digg’s. (hint hint)
Drive by …
Teddy, saw your link about Do Little stepping down.
Keep two words to keep in mind: Ted Gaines
And if Charlie wins, look for Tom Sullivan (KFBK radio financial guy, who’s going to Fox Business Channel) to swoop in in 2010
The “Naomi Klein” link is empty.
john in sacramento @ 22
What! Did I miss this. Do Little gone???
Linkie please.
dakine01: ding ding ding!
Pachacutec @ 7
Oh, my Darling!
Pachacutec @ 25
I was nice guy too. I could have put up a vid of Clay Aiken doing that song…
Wow, Sandra O. Interesting.
Naomi Klein link isn’t functioning.
excellent post: “Rahm Dunk!”
Not all Democrats are buying into immigrant bashing. Virginia Democrats ignored this trash and WON. There is a lesson there.
Here in NYC, we have a law that says that if you’re caught with an illegal gun you get 3.5 years in prison.
It doesn’t take a street musician to figure out that if you applied this to those who hire undocumented workers, the problem would be solved in a very short time.
But then we’d have to start to talk about things like Living Wages and Universal Health Care.
Boring…
Oy it took us so long to get rid of the racists. Now we’ve got to work on the Rahms. So much work. So little time.
did somebody mention My Darling Clementine starring Henry Fonda as Wyatt Earp?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WTaci5qIJ0
CTuttle @ 9
See there is this thing about the Democratic Party in Illinois. It is a disordered joke with more than a tinge of criminality about it. The only thing that keeps it in power is that the state Republican Party self-destructed a few years ago.
Sander0 @ 18
Interesting ha?
Very!
LooHoo,
My friend is a wonderful person who is a lawyer for a labor union and so she “gets it”… but it is interesting to see how she was received; her pix are amazing and Ahmedinejad is obviously not a well liked guy. We have one of our very own, don’t we? hahahaha
A couple of years ago, Howard Dean (always ahead of the curve) warned that Gopers would use immigrant bashing as the only thing the party had left, having failed so miserably at actually governing.
I don’t think he imagined at the time that the Goper wing of our party would actually take the ‘bait.’
Keith asks, “Why is anyone listening to Novak?”
What if we stopped calling it illegal immigration or any kind of immigration. What if we started calling it what it is: Slave running. Or slave-wage running, if the first is too harsh on some delicate ears.
“Immigration” conjures blame on the immigrant. “Slave running” brings the corporate man out from behind the curtain.
Loo Hoo. @ 39
ANd CNN is not asking that question as they play the Novak meme over and over again.
I’ll give you one name that will not bend to the whims of corporate pockets.
Fred Dalton Thompson – “I don’t dance to anybody’s tune.”
One of the most cogent quotes I read recently (apologies to the source, whose name I’ve forgotten) is that Republicans earn political capital on social issues (e.g., gay bashing) and spend it on economic issues (e.g., vetoing SCHIP). The immigration issue is both bait and switch and consistent with this pattern. Turn undocumented workers into the burning social concern (scapegoat economic victims) while leaving the systems that exploit them in place. The Dems should absolutely not follow the Repubs in running after the white racist vote, a steadily shrinking constituency. Rainbow America can be the new progressive majority if people like Rahm don’t convince the Dems to run away from it. We needs some new memes. Like: no human being is “illegal.”
How about slave labor?
SanderO @ 18
Indeed, Iranians are among the most civilized, cultured and mannered people to be found in the world…As for Ahmadinejad, I would not be shocked to find in the course of history that he was involved with those who perpetrated the October Surprise.
john in sacramento @ 22
Exactly. I live in Gaines’s district, and over the last couple of months I’ve received several robocalls “inviting” me to a call-in town hall meeting to discuss the issues of the day.
He’s making moves.
Wingunter @ 42
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Droopy Dawg’s been dancing to the tune of the Corparistas since the seventies!
this morning the topic of the meat packing industry taking advantage of undocumented workers came up… just for fun, i took a look at political donations by party for livestock industry (which i think includes meat packing).
from open secrets:
year % to Dems / % to Repubs
2008* 45% / 55%
2006* 32% / 68%
2004* 22% / 78%
ahah i thought, major shifts are happening… no wonder dems don’t want to piss off the employers.
but then i looked at other industries and frequently saw the same thing. it’s not just employers of undocumented workers, corporate america seems to be switching parties.
dakine01 @ 47
‘When Fred Thompson does a pushup, he isn’t lifting himself up…He’s pushing the lobbyist cash in his mattress down’
;>)
Rahm must think his Dems will pick up a few RabidWing voters, while further marginalizing and unempowering the immigrant labor his corporate backers depend on for their bonuses and shareholders.
Immigrant issues are politically difficult enough to wrestle with withtout the likes of Emanuel sabotaging efforts from the inside. His constituents need to send him packing back to his “disinvestment” bank.
SunnyNobility @ 29
I don’t know what Jane intended to link to, but here’s a link to Naomi’s chat from Sunday’s book salon.
earlofhuntingdon @ 50
i don’t think it’s about getting the votes of anti-immigrant racists… i think it’s about scapegoating immigrants in order to protect the people who benefit from worker exploitation and corporate welfare – the same people who are now donating like mad to the dems.
immigrants are the shiny object to distract us from seeing what’s really happening.
darkblack @ 49
Day-uhm DB, you didn’t even have to break out the photoshop to create that nasty visual image.
selise @ 52
ding ding ding
When are the progressive caucus and Hispanic caucus going to get together with the black caucus to change the leadership in the house? That’s what it will take, a coalition of non- DLC types.
Hugh @ 35
You can’t mean that the Daley machine is corrupt, now would ya? ;-)
Can the Democratic party be saved? I think for 2008 there’s no alternative, but the leadership clearly is not interested in doing the right thing. The next question is, do we have alternatives?
CTuttle @ 56
“give us this day our Daley bread”
selise @ 48
I would chalk that paradigm up to the fact they want to be on the winning side…
John Dean on the brothers Krongard. He’s curious about what Buzzy told his brother. Cookie doesn’t want further investigation, which he would if he were behaving properly.
The conflicting testimony only serves to call for further investigation.
This is part of a larger investigation…Waxman will do it thoroughly.
Ed Kunin @ 57
better democrats. see donna edwards.
CTuttle @ 59
agreed. so long as the dems don’t rock the boat – and challenge “their” corporate welfare checks.
Loo Hoo. @ 60
AKA the Alice B. Tokeless brothers
punaise @ 58
*groan*
Bedbug!
selise @ 61
You’re putting a lot of eggs in one basket. Lots of primaries might do it, but I’m not sure that’s better than a third party.
ooH ooL!
I think you are right..I read a few weeks ago that 90% of the “big” donors are giving to Dems.
Ed Kunin @ 66
you show me another basket and i’ll spread my little eggs around… right now, howie’s blue america looks (to me) like the best game in town.
look what (i think) the progressive caucus was able to force the house leadership to do on the fisa restore act. more of that please.
Maybe Emanuel is being a serious goon about this immigration thing. I don’t know the details. But boy the circular firing squad is in full swing tonight… we have met the enemy… and he is US!
larry birnbaum @ 70
i’m sure you’re referring to emanuel attacking immigrants – right?
I didn’t know that there were 3 bombs at the Oklahoma City bombing…actual document from investigation 36 hours after it happened:
http://www.whatreallyhappened……bs/dod.jpg
something that taught me how seriously challenged the PTB feel by people protesting our fucked up trading policies was the week i spent in miami for the 2003 ftaa meeting (to protest, not to attend *g*).
over 8 milliion dollars had been budgeted for “security” – as a line item in the first eighty-something billion iraq supplemental. the violence and oppression and out-and-out lying by the police is something that i have not seen at any anti-war protest i’ve participated in (i know it’s happened on occassion – but i don’t think it has been as common as the repression and violence typically seen at wto/imf/trade meeting protests).
to me the violent over reaction is a sign they feel threatened by the possibility of democratic participation in trade negotiatons.
yellowdogD @ 55
What are the numbers in each caucus [not counting overlap?]…and how/where can we build ‘em?
Well, Marcy tells us there are some Cuban fellers having some problems too.
Back in May, a judge dismissed immigration charges against Cuban terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, arguing he had been tricked in the interview that led to his indictment. At the time, it looked like BushCo threw the case, not wanting to convict one of their favored terrorists.
Did you know that Erik Prince was an intern for Bush41, Dana Rohrbacher, and stumped for Pat Buchanan….
Anybody get where I’m going with this?
selise @ 48
Corporate America realizing that for the benefit of a handful of global giganticorps they, too, are but kindling on the bonfire.
New post upstairs
1,663 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen Hamsher and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
Rahm has been a bagman for the Clinton’s (and Daley’s) since the early ’90’s and a look at the “best and brightest” from the Clinton regime and where they are now will tell everyone jest where Mrs. Clinton will take us. Why isn’t ANYone connectin’ the dots? Why are there so many knowledgeable and grown up progressives who are still willin’ ta fall in behind Mrs. Clinton if she wins?
If ya go back and take a peek at Sunday’s FDL booknotes with Sid Blumenthal, you’ll get a good look at the new-old beltway schnitzel chompers, if ya ken suffer thru the condescension and sense of noblesse oblige.
But my question stands…why are so many progressives afraid ta roll the Clinton rock over and see all nasty critters scurry inta the light? It bothers me that so many articulate and pathfindin’ women are not callin’ out Clinton’s bullshit.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, NOT ALL FASCISTS CALL THEMSELVES REPUBLICANS!!
Steve-AR @ 68
hillary has cornered the arms industry donations i’ve read
Did you know that Dana Rohrbacher wanted to investigate connections to the Middle East of Terry Nichols, because Nichols had visited the Philippines, but…no investigation…
NorskeFlamethrower @ 79
many right=wingers are now ‘liberals’ …..that’s how far the political shift has gone to the right…
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy….
from amazon.com:
The quintessential Cold War thriller, John LeCarre’s TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY introduced the term “mole”–meaning a spy who has burrowed so deeply into his cover identity that it’s nearly impossible to dig him out and expose him–into common parlance. In fact, LeCarre says, British intelligence began using the term after their operatives read …
NorskeFlamethrower @ 79 –
i despise bill clinton, and i think a lot of that affects what i think of hillary clinton. may not be fair, but she doesn’t give me much reason to think otherwise.
maybe i’d speak up more if i had more confidence in her competition… but for now, i ‘m just trying to figure it out….
EPU’ing this:
Francis Townsend resigns!
Needs to spend more time with her
liesfamily.Writ large!!!1!!
Rahm’s not a part of my circle, if that’s what you mean. Bill Clinton tries to say that he is but I’m not seeing it.
Learning that Emmanuel is a ‘former’ investment banker explains much. There’s something about people who center their lives around money; they risk seeing the world in dollars and cents only, and stop seeing its actual intrinsic value.
Loo Hoo. @ 60
Something seriously off about this interaction — and Cookie in general. (won’t even start on Buzzy) Cookie should be up to his neck investigating misplaced cash instead of posing by palm trees in immaculate khakis.
I’m confused! FDL opposes Nafta, yet their support for illegal immigration assists those forces who were behind Nafta, such as… the Mexican government.
In fact, FDL’s position on “reform” is the same as… the Mexican government’s.
Plus, FDL has a brand shiny new indirect link to… the Mexican government.
Gosh, I’m starting to notice a trend.
I feel it’s important to point out that Bill Richardson was the House whip who pushed NAFTA through when neither of his fellow whips, Bonior and Gephart would touch it. Richardson began his political career as an aide to Hank Kissinger in the Nixon Whitehouse. He was executive director of Kissinger/ McClarty Associates when he ran for Gov. in 2002. His mother is from the top 1% of Mexican wealth. I didn’t actually know that Emmanuel, with all his faults, was involved with NAFTA. Richardson’s never said he was sorry for NAFTA or really anything about it being that bad. Pretty amazing, huh ?
LindaR @ 40
Like most black market activities it only remains so long as it’s illegal.
Legalize drugs and offer help to those who suffer.
Legalize border crossing and ensure the border is safe from criminals and nukes crossing.
Make sure emigrants speak English enough to get by and give them IDs if they don’t already have them.
Remove the illegality and a lot of crap goes away.
selise @ 48
They realize it isn’t just about grabbing power, it’s about governing well. Dems have shown for a long time they can govern well.
BTW, if corporations aren’t people, then why do we tax them?
Why don’t we just tax the people who receive pay, interest, income, etc. from them?
~sigh~ It seems clear to me that a ‘human right’ would be a ‘living’ wage. Biblically speaking…(the Workman is worthy of his hire..) But isn’t that at the heart of the problem? They sent our jobs and corporations to mexico and they still keep coming??? They said they went there to alieviate porvety…what a joke. I think they really meant, we sent the jobs there to screw you Americans who think you have a voice …..!!
Seems to me the choices in America are getting kinda narrow….
MarkH @ 92
it’s the price of limited liability.
The only good thing about a Clinton administration is that Rahm would probably go back to the White House and we could get a real Democrat in the Congressional seat he now occupies.