According to the WaPo’s Peter Baker, the White House thinks things are looking up for the President and the Republicans, now that they’ve got their new Attorney General, Bush is vetoing spending bills and the reported killings in Iraq are back to levels not seen since early 2006.
After more than two years of being buffeted by one political disaster after another, President Bush and his strategists think they may finally be getting back at least a bit of their footing. While still facing enormous challenges, from the crisis in Pakistan to the backlash over children’s health care, they hope Bush has arrested his downward spiral and established a better foundation for the remainder of his time in office.
In many ways, the shifting political fortunes may owe as much to the absence of bad news as to any particular good news. No one lately has been indicted, botched a hurricane relief effort or shot someone in a hunting accident. Instead, pictures from Iraq show people returning to the streets as often as they show a new suicide bombing. And Bush has bolstered morale inside the West Wing and rallied his Republican base through a strategy of confrontation with the Democratic Congress, built on the expansive use of his veto pen.
The unspoken premise of the article is the White House view that corrupt, failed and stalemated government is somehow good for the Republicans. Success is measured by the fact that the President and his Congressional loyalists can frustrate the popular will, prevent needed government programs from being funded, continue an unpopular war, and avoid accountability for rampant lawlessness and corruption.
Somehow, I doubt the American people view the state of the union through the same lenses. And yet Bush apologists continue whistling in the dark, finding hope in the unpopularity of Congressional Democrats:
“There’s a reason they’ve become unpopular,” said Karl Rove, who recently stepped down as deputy White House chief of staff. “They’ve taken stands that make them look churlish, small, petty and more interested in scoring political points than in doing good things for the country.”
An us-vs.-them framework is comfortable for Bush. Some Republicans said he appears more spirited as he engages in a showdown over spending. “It’s really a reinvigorated guy here,” said Sen. Lindsey O. Graham, who traveled with Bush recently to his home state of South Carolina. “It’s noticeable. Things just seem to be moving forward and hitting on all cylinders.”
Yep. All cylinders. The government is not functioning except as a mechanism for channeling public tax dollars to private war profiteers and corporations that rip off the American public with no government oversight. The Bush economic and fiscal policies are a disaster and the dollar is tanking so fast, OPEC may dump it. Small wonder the number of Americans who think the country is headed in the wrong direction is about 70 percent. But pointing that out is just being petty and scoring political points.
Meanwhile, there is a reason why hatred of America abroad is at dangerous levels, and it is not a victory for America if the President’s Attorney General can’t define torture that the Muslim world believes has been used primarily against Muslims. Everyone but the White House understands that American foreign policy is in shambles in Pakistan, where democracy is being crushed in a extremely dangerous region, and there doesn’t seem to be anything the Administration can or is willing to do to prevent the collapse of one of the worlds’ largest democracies.
The Bush White House signaled early on that the US would not withhold billions in aid to stop Musharraf from crushing Pakistant’s democracy, and that was the only green light Musharraf needed to continue his crackdown and remain in power. Since then the White House and Negroponte have been trying to cover for Bush’s poor judgment and America’s betrayal of several hundred million Muslim people. Now the New York Times reports that we’re seriously thinking about sending in more military advisers and spending untold millions more funding local militias to fight the bad guys. So the message to the Pakistanis is, “we can’t/won’t do much to save your democracy, but we’d sure like to fund a civil war in your Northern Territories. Can we send in more US military?”
The Bush/Cheney regime is a national and international catastrophe, but it’s all good for Republicans.
Update: Apparently Karl Rove missed this recent poll showing the public has a favorable view of Democrats. Republicans? — not so much. (h/t katherine Graham Cracker)
The Nov. 2-4, 2007, poll finds 54% of Americans saying they have a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party, while 37% have an unfavorable opinion. Ratings of the Republican Party are much more negative, with 40% favorable and 50% unfavorable.
The public’s ratings of the Republican Party have improved slightly in recent months, edging up from 36% in July to 40% in early November. The current ratings are at roughly the levels seen in April and at several points in 2006. The party’s unfavorable ratings are down nine points since September and are now on the low end of what Gallup has measured since 2006.
Photo: Bush speaks to business leaders, 11/13/07; AP/Michael Conrad.
Related posts:
- New Gallup Poll Finds Republican Party Less Popular Than Russia, China, Venezuela
- The Anti-Bush, Or Bush Lite?
- Republicans Reject Science; Scientists Reject Republicans
- Republicans Furious Bush/Cheney Didn’t Win Nobel War Prize
- Peggy Noonan: Catering to the Base Hurts the Country, Except When Republicans are in Charge





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Good morning!
good good morning Scarecrow and am I a Zednick?
Excellent post. But a very discouraging way to begin Thanksgiving week. Not much to be thankful for in the national news, is there?
msmolly @ 3
Well it’s a turkey’s point of view.
I have a sweatshirt with a turkey on it, holding up a sign that says, “Eat Pizza!”
Good morning everyone.
More seriously, for those following Old Coastie’s effort to stop ballot petition reform and are from her Coast[ies?], there is a link to a page of the CA dem. party called Fraudbusters where sighting can be reported. HT/commenter on Coastie’s diary at http://www.calitics.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4407
Of course all the kudos go to Coastie. I speak up for her out of admiration and because as my appearance among the Zedniks is great way to get the news out.
Good Morning Scarecrow!
BlueStateRedHead @ 5
Boy, did that need a preview it did not get. Sorry!
“They’ve taken stands that make them look churlish, small, petty and more interested in scoring political points than in doing good things for the country.”
The Democrats are churlish, Karl? Churlish? First, I’m amazed you even know the meaning of the word and second, the people who have been standing in the way of “doing good things for the country” are overwhelmingly Rethugs in Congress. They only understand “doing good things for the Rethuglican Party” – doing something “good for the country” is completely out of their world view.
Morning Gab now reporting on Dubai and their enormous economic growth and power. It’s a good thing they own all our assets says the International Superstar….
Yeh, and it’s a good thing China makes all our products…
and it’s a good thing bushco has ruined America.
also, Fran Townsend’s resignation
George W. Bush, America’s Greatest Conservative President
Excellent post.
I have often said the Dems need to constantly use language of “for the people”, “rule of law” and an invitation of partnership with the people to solve the real concerns of the citizens to keep our country economically strong and a roll model of democracy. Then, when Karl unleashes his “they look petty and political propaganda” the people will be more than able to conclude who needs to look in the mirror. The Dems should also use language of not bowing to divisive disfunction which renders our three branch government useless. Dems need to use lots of “we represent the needs of the people”. Even show actions of representing the people through outreach research about what the people care about. Many issues require “us” to call our reps. If we elected them, why are they not using their staff to reach out and tap constituents? This could be quite strategic, for elected officials to reach out to constituents in a more pro-active manner. Many times officials are voting on bills with little input from their electorate. Perhaps it’s about time they work to seek out electorate concerns.
I’ve started reading the remarks first on Wapo to see if I want to waste my time reading the article. This is one of their more inane ones and that is saying something.
surely no one expects the washpost to reverse its descent into pamphleteering for the republicans and actually provide a true reflection of reality.
what i don’t get is why it still has a reputation worth anything more than, say, the new york post.
hacks, rubes and relentless shills.
“Most See Democrats Favorably
Despite a slew of recent polls findings Americans unhappy with Congress, a new USA Today/Gallup poll finds that the majority of Americans still hold a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party. 54% of respondents viewed Democrats favorably with only 37% holding an unfavorable opinion of the party. The Republicans faired far worse, receiving a favorable opinion from only 40% of Americans while being viewed negatively by half.
These numbers, should they stay consistent, could set up another bad election cycle for Republicans in 2008.”
more good news for the goopers
I cannot wait for the first results and the corpulent media is once again proven to be buffoons.
from the post
“Success is measured by the fact that the President and his Congressional loyalists can frustrate the popular will, prevent needed government programs from being funded, continue an unpopular war, and avoid accountability for rampant lawlessness and corruption.”
that’s a pretty corrupt view of success they have, and yet it’s been successful for them.
Fran Towsend agrees.
There’s nothing left to do – except leave.
Krugman on the GOP Southern Strategy used by Nixon, Reagan, et al, and why it’s a doomed strategy.
Something to be thankful for.
allan_in_upstate @ 16
Hey I thought all the Bushites had to stay if they didn’t resign by Labor Day!
And the kicker is, reading through the comments under the WaPo article, half of them accuse the “liberal Washington Post” of mixing the good news with the bad and bashing Bush. This mixed in with things about Democrats hating our country and being unpatriotic for criticizing Bush. (As if they didn’t bash Clinton when he was President?)
“They’ve taken stands that make them look churlish, small, petty and more interested in scoring political points than in doing good things for the country.”
(the Death of Irony)
katherine Graham Cracker @ 14
Suggests that disapproval of Congress is, as many have argued, a result of them not opposing the Bush agenda strongly enough.
biff diggerence @ 20
A master of projection.
How many filibusters have the Republicans put on bills in the Senate because Dems didn’t have 60 votes needed to overcome them? Does anyone know?
Prairie Sunshine @ 17
But the Democrats have to be willing to stand up to the closed border demagogues. If they try to split the difference and adopt republican talking points on this, they’ll blur the distinction.
The Dems need to focus on companies exploiting illegal aliens to circumvent US labor law. This is not, the story should be, about hardworking individuals trying to feed their families. It’s about meatpackers avoiding paying the minimum wage, providing workman’s comp, unemployment insurance and complying with OSHA regulations. The culprits here are the businesses knowingly hiring aliens, not the people trying to send money back to their families.
katherine Graham Cracker @ 14
The Dems are obviously peaking too early, so it’s good for the Republicans.
Thanks — I’ve added the link to that poll as an update.
the krugman article, and the polls, are obviously positive news.
but statements like rove’s and the critique by the wapost can be seen as signs of delusion — or as signs that the counting of votes will become further liable to fraud.
in my bones, i feel rove has been working under the radar to organize widescale vote theft for the next round of elections.
George Simian @ 23
McClatchy
42 as of July 18. Projected 153 by end of term.
Previous record for a Congressional term (2 years), 58.
Nuclear option, indeed. Dems are frickin’ suckers for every bluff.
It’s pretty sad when the lack of a new scandal is interpreted as “good news.”
Re: Military advisers to Pakistan, where are these troops going to come from? I was under the impression that our military was already stretched to the breaking point. Does “military advisers” really mean “thugs from Blackwater”?
‘morning, all… coffee is ready, hot and strong – hold out your cups!
O Dear: And I have to go to work. But Rove calling the Dems CHurlish = Rush calling them angry (so angry) people. All with a straight face. And this blurb about Bush having his groove, or smile, back is tragically fitting. After all, the man likes nothing better than mayhem and a good fight, even better when lethal. And he made it to church yesterday with Laura smiling at the crowd. I guess they are both happy. Nero, anyone? Fran was always smiling, too. Yep, nothing like a big ol’ war to make one joyous. Remember the young men singing in Germany?
allan_in_upstate @ 16
Nice catch, thanks.
Great post as per usual scarecrow.
There is a reason that large corporations have taken over network television. They must be government controlled. Government and multinational corporations are one and the same now. Fox Noise or ABC television, it is how the Soviet Union ruled, by controlling all propaganda.
“We are not allowed to talk about the minor candidates because they are minor.”, David Brooks of ABC. By we, he means warmongering neo-cons, who have stolen our public air waves. David Brooks is controlled by Darth Cheney, and so is ABC.
From CQPolitics:
Paul Devotees Spark Online Backlash
Can’t have us no enthusiastic citizen participation.
No telling where that’ll lead.
Peter Baker will somehow conclude that this is bad for the Democrats.
And I thought you were talking about the US—until I read on and saw that you meant Pakistan. Silly me.
this comes from the Times of India
the goopers are fighting over 30% of the vote and the Democratis are fighting over 70%. The media continues to portray it as an equal fight.
Who is the chairman of the goopers now that Mel has resigned to spend more time with his family :)
WOW! This murdering moron hasn’t QUITE destroyed the Army, US economy, the environment, the Constitution and cute puppies everywhere and these meatpuppets think that’s the GOOD news? Because he hasn’t COMPLETELY destroyed them? Well he’s still got just under a year to work on em, don’t count the chimp out. In my family we have a “why didn’t we just kill the first two or three boatloads” memorial service. I mean, everybody here’s REALLY nice and all, but it IS an intriguing thought ain’t it!
Gonna be harrrrrd to sustain the “Now we’re winning” bullshit for a year. :o)
Prairie Sunshine @ 17
I have long thought Lincoln was wrong. Should have let the south go. So tired of having racist white southern males in charge of the country. (Notice I did’t say my country.)
The WaPo doesn’t report on that sour feeling that pervades the Country, that unease about what will fall apart next, that sense that the administration is so incompetent that everything that goes wrong will be a worse disaster than it should be, and an intense desire to be rid of the incumbents and their enablers. None of that would fit with Karl’s advertisement.
jayackroyd @ 24
completely agree that this makes sense in the long run – but in the short run we have a problem: the people who benefit from circumventing labor laws donate money to political campaigns – hard working non-citizens (w/o papers) do not even vote.
there’s a short term cost in order to benefit from the long term gain. who’s willing pay the price?
Think Progress
Why cant they just stand firm?
RevDeb @ 34
I already wrote that post. Keep up, RevDeb!
Right, Karl. You gonna do “good things” for the country…such as figuring out a happy ending for the clusterfuck-to-end-all-clusterfucks that you guys did so “good” for us, when you created it?
The goddamned democrats should be hooting in derision every time one of the bloody sleazes open his or her piehole to tell us about turning another corner.
Instead, they’re letting them get away with media-murder by permitting this kind of bullshit to go unanswered.
Elliott @ 18
none of the bobbleheads have pointed out the untimely leaving of Frau Townsend and why she is leaving after the Shrubco deadline.
Scarecrow @ 43
I’m lucky to find time to get over here at all lately. And yes, you’ve written that post several times if I’m not mistaken.
Of course this IS the plan; to cram enough troops into Baghdad and the midlands to put the place into semi-lockdown with checkpoints everywhere, and thereby suppress the attacks on our troops, and the sectarian violence enough to allow the assholes to get out of town and turn around and say to the dems:
“There now; YOU go ahead and lift the lid.”
What’s appalling is watching the democrats hold still for it.
A.Citizen @10
You are mistaken. GWB is not our Greatest Conservative President. In case you forgot, he wants to be remembered. Our Greatest War President. Methinks if he keeps going, he may even be our last war president.
Hi.
I must say I am not surprised to see that Republicans think this situation is good for them.
They live in a world where Bill Clinton is a murderer and a rapist, where “Islamofascists” are two steps away from destroying our government and reinstating the caliphate, where every other leader in the Arab world is the next Hitler and its perpetually 1938, where Hillary Clinton is ready to invite Osama bin Laden to inauguration, where the President (as long as he is a Republican, no doubt), where terrorists are bringing WMDs across the Mexican border, where has infinite power to torture and spy on Americans without a warrant, and where there is no problem a tax cut to billionaires cannot fix.
They are living on a totally different planet than we are. So, yea, the fact that they think this current mess is a good thing does not surprise me. I wonder what excuses they will have next November.
I hope that the world continues to be just as good for the Rs as it is now, right up to the election.
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself: Theirs and our own, I guess. I really try not to be an alarmist, to have faith in the future. Then I go round the bend.
Joshua @ 49
Yes — different planet; but then Biden often says there are virtually no Republicans in the Senate who still believe in the war; they just can’t break from Bush. It’s hard to believe, but he seems very convinced on this point.
Per the MSM, no matter what happens, it’s always good for the Republicans. If the dollar goes up it’s a testament to the soundness of Republican fiscal policies. If the dollar goes down, it’s a readjust that, per Republican planning, will aid American exports. It’s all good for Republicans.
IOKIYAR
Scarecrow @ 52
The 64K$? is will the repugs coalesce around the chimp if he is impeached. My feeling is that there are a few goopers that would welcome the chance to declare their freedom from the WH. If only the rotten witch of No Calif. would allow impeachment on the table I believe that more than a few goopers would be relieved.
eCAHNomics @ 39
Being from the south, I don’t necessarily disagree. There was long a saying, ” Save your Confederate money boys, the south will rise again.” I’ve often thought that was the case since 1992.
On the other hand, I think Lincoln may have been more wrong by not pointing out that you can fool a sufficient number of the people long enough to do serious damage to your country.
I think it is too late for impeachment and now it would just distract from the election.
The fact that Shrubco will soon be nothing but Shrub and Cheeeeny should be emphasized over and over. The rats are leaving the sinking ship of state.
pma@56
Thanks. I expected that I’d be attacked from the southerners on this thread, since they are not the racists I’m referring to.
nomolos @ 55
Seems to me they’ve had plenty of chances to “declare their freedom.” SCHIP? The most recent appropriations veto? Troop deployment rules? FISA? As much as I’ve been a proponent of impeachment, I don’t know why the Republicans would support that without taking these other steps, several of which were politically safe.
nomolos @ 55
nomolos, why do you think Pelosi wouldn’t/won’t allow impeachment?
Scarecrow @ 59
The inevitability of “revelations” coming out in an impeachment process would change the lanscape. No place to run and all that.
Speaking of running…….
You begin to wonder if this war president meme is the key to understanding the bush personality in all its decadence. The guy seems happiest when feisty, when he has a battle to fight, no matter how insane or full or failure it may appear. So, the bush who feels in great shape is the bush who views himself as waging a battle he views as part of the cartoon character he seems to be.
I think if we view bush as a cartoon we get what he’s all about. Swagger. A kind of superman fantasy.
Your post sparked those thoughts. So I thank you. (And I think I’m right!)
My own hunch is that, once the Republican nominee is established, there will be a mad rush away away from Bush and Iraq by frantic Republican officeholders, who will try to blame Democrats for both.
Everything is good news for Bush thats the expected spin. The problem is that he believes it. The American people don’t believe it thankfully.
We just need Congress to get a spine.
Didn’t some “guru” make a prediction that the Repukes would gain seats in 2008, while losing the presidency. Since my tv is restricted to BBC, PBS and Keith, it has to have come from one of those sources.
selise @ 41
They don’t donate to democrats, so there is no short term campaign finance loss.
And we really want to keep this from becoming the new code words. By shifting attention from the borders to the factories, we may be able to get the media to write stories that make this not a question of brown people sneaking in and stealing American jobs, but of corporations not paying fair wages and benefits.
This IS the republican signal to their racist base this time around. The fuss about Reagan and Neshoba is making it clear that the Republicans really do not want to see their race-baiting discussed openly. We need to force this into the open; it is a much more important element in Republican tactics than is, say, Hilary playing the gender card, and should be getting just as much coverage.
Krugman is helping enormously here, of course. Bob Herbert could write these stories until the cow comes home, and they would be dismissed–which is, of course, another manifestation of the illness that infects Sally Quinn’s world.
The column is a grotesque overstatement, but I agree with the basic point that the Republicans have regained their footing in the past few months and are on the rise. Really, all the Democrats have to do to counter that is to explain what they stand for, but they refuse to do that, thinking it’s “smart politics” to make things as vague as possible. Extrapolate this behaviour for a few more quarters, and the Democrats will have blown their lead.
BushCo came into office stating NOW the adults are in charge and they keep trying to enforce they are the Daddy party so you are safe….
Now there is the threat of the Mommy Party taking over with the BIG bad Mommy at the head…. woooo that really scares them.
Gee they might have to behave….
BTW. I grew up hearing the presidents were supposed to almost never used Veto power. That must have been a school house rock truism. This preznit vetos everything. And I am a little angry at Dems for not stepping up the game, since this veto crap is obviously affecting the welfare of this country and Iraq.
Veritas78 @ 63
Don’t see how they can do that, since R prez leaders are tying themselves to W. Too many YouTube clips to undo the knot.
I heard Lindsay Graham prattling on about how iraq is a national security concern for the USA? Ha?
Exactly how would that be? Oh I forgot they will get into their ships and land on Long Island… No no.. they will take to the air and drop paratroppers in under cover of darkness. We’ll wake up to find an Isalmofascist standing with an AK47 on every street corner in America.
Oh no.. how silly… they’ll be more stealthy and brig a suitcase nuke in their stowed luggage and AA or UAL. Once here they’ll threaten to blow up disneyworld and we’ll torture the shit out of every mofa in Gitmo to get them to reveal the disarm codes. But once the prisoners are all dead will cry uncle and turn over the keys to the constitution to the IslamoIraqiFachists. That is what’s left of the constitution.
The sky is falling… the sky is falling! Call in the Stealth bomber, the F16s and the the other Fs… we gotta kick ass!
Regardless of the polls, I always worry because it seems to me that there is a large voting block which is characterized by the following:
Not very interested in politics;
Feels somehow obligated to vote, like going to church on Easter;
Likes to hear simple answers to complex issues;
Is ready to hear that their personal failures are due to some other group;
Can be made insecure about future threat by some other group;
Thinks there is something smart about being “among the undecided.”
Therefore, I worry about too strong feelings during the primaries causing a rift in the Democratic Party which brings on another Nixon, Bush, or Guliani.
BlueMesa @ 67
I think Barack Obama *is* vague. I smell a Lieberman on him. If he talks of bipartisan reach one more time . . . I’ll puke.
The goopers are not on the rise. There is no evidence to support that statement.
The only thing they have is the appearance of progress in eyerack –which is a fantasy.
Bush by vetoing and doing his little signing statements (prepared by the federalist society no doubt) is the one who is blocking the will of people and making their government in operable.
He’s obstructionist among all the other bad stuff. Who really defends that bozo? Let’s invite him for a beer. Isn’t that what he’s good for?
katherine Graham Cracker @ 74
I thought you were the source for the last two sentences of the article, which says that favorability ratings are up, and are now about what they were in April? That’s what I’ve seen in several polls, that the Republicans bottomed out in the summer and are back on the rise.
jayackroyd @ 66
is that still true? looks to me like big changes are in progress.
SanderO @ 75
Or addington maybe?
Sure AddiBoy does them, but he prolly farms them out to interns to give em practice… doncha think?
Addiboy would be one helleva guy to brun in hell if there is one. ICK
TheraP @ 62
I am just (belatedly) getting well into Glenn Greenwald’s Tragic Legacy, and he makes it pretty clear that the swagger/superman persona is Bush “the champion of the GOOD,” waging a battle against “EVIL.” And no amount of evidence to the contrary will divert him….he is impervious to rational argument. And of course, at this point has nothing whatever to lose.
“The inevitability of “revelations” coming out in an impeachment process would change the lanscape. No place to run and all that.”
Rotsa Ruck with that.
Fat ass Cheney leaves no paper trail.
Zilch.
New thread
Christy has a new thread ready.
Joshua @ 49
Make no mistake. They, the people who started those stories about Clinton, didn’t believe them. They know perfectly well they are in deep sh*t, just as Rove did in 2006. While Rove was talking a good game to the media, he was engaged in very aggressive campaigns to prevent an accurate vote count, one that he escalated right after the midterms. Their swing state strategy was not message-based. It was pork via Hatch Act violations and the corruption of the DOJ.
What they are trying to do is empower the Rahm Emmanuels–trying to keep the party strategists worried about swing districts, and to keep them pussyfooting on issues like national defense. And they are trying to control the media narrative–to make the presidential election, once again, about the bitch Hillary against America’s Mayor, Rudy!!!.
And to scare away challengers in the House and Senate. They do this by blurring issues, and they do it by making it very personally painful to run a campaign–knowing that any candidate can be smeared.
If they really believed that this was good news for Republicans, they wouldn’t be using Tancredo to set up on of the most racist campaigns we’ve ever seen. We just saw it in NY in the last election. That’s what is in store. A vicious campaign of smears and racism, designed to blur party differences on all other issues, and to keep people at home, disgusted with all politicians.
SanderO @ 79
Yeah, I got the impression from reading something on Goldsmith, that he bullies the underlings. Micromanaging Torture memos?
Naomi Klein has pointed out in the Book Salon today that the Republicans thrive and try to take advantage of the chaos they produce.They generate the storm through lack of compromise and hardened ideological positions, then they blame the other side.
Gates Blames Democrats For Impending Military Crash
“Congressional inaction may trigger Secretary Robert Gates to carry out his threat last week to furlough as many as 200,000 civil servants and defense contractors this winter, raising the stakes for Democratic lawmakers determined to tie war funding to a drawdown of US troops from Iraq.
Before lawmakers left town Friday for their Thanksgiving recess, they did approve the Pentagon’s $470 billion base budget, but not a supplemental funding request to pay for war operations. Democrats don’t want to fund that $189 billion defense request from President Bush unless the money is tied to deadlines, or at least goals, to bring the bulk of troops home from Iraq by the end of 2008.”
Nowhere does Gates, or the article, state that he and Bush don’t HAVE TO, furlough DOD staff and shut down military bases. In fact, the Congress has given them more than enough money to fully fund current DOD expenditures. In addition, the Congress passed a Bill granting $60 billion for Iraq operations restricted to non-combat activities EXCEPT those specifically oriented to al Qaida.
Gates need not draw money from other Departments, in fact he may not be able to if these are truly essential services. He could halt further deployments abroad and use funds simply to end the tours of those over there.
Basically what he is saying is that continuing the war in Iraq is superior to the needs of the DOD on the home front and elsewhere. That is THEIR PRIORITY, and not that of the Democrats in Congress.
Bush and Gates HAVE options…they simply don’t want to take responsibility for them.
Pre-coffee, I had to read this twice:
“There’s a reason they’ve become unpopular,” said Karl Rove, who recently stepped down as deputy White House chief of staff. “They’ve taken stands that make them look churlish, small, petty and more interested in scoring political points than in doing good things for the country.”
For a moment I thought Rove was being honest about the GOP.
I need more joe.
The rise is based on the fake recovery in eyerack and when in March — the goopers say the troops will not come home –the bottom will look up to the goopers
Also a favorite tactic of the goopers is to say..we may be bad but the other side is just as bad or worse–the role of the media– but folks just are not buying into it. A current premise of the goopers is that while they hate the president they hate congress worse…in truth they hate the republican members of congress worse.
RickinSF @ 87
Umm especially those “small and petty” points on SCHIP.
RickinSF @ 87
Above, Scarecrow called this projection. In this case, I don’t think that’s true. They DO do a lot of projecting; it never occurs to them that someone takes a policy position for its own sake, rather than to gain some political advantage.
But in this case, I don’t think there is any doubt that Rove is seeking a “pox on both their houses” spin. To play any kind of reasonable defense in the Senate, which I continue to say is where we should be focusing our efforts. Stevens can be beaten. The open seat in Idaho can be had. (I’m doing an interview with Larry LaRocco, who is the dem candidate in SL next month .)
Media buys in low population states are cheap, and the redness of the Mountain States comes from a different place than the red South. You can run a civil liberties, live and let live campaign there and win.
Wow. That turned into a tangent. All I meant to say is that Rove is trying to muddy the distinctions as much as possible–painting politicians as all alike, as petty and unconcerned with citizens, to drive down turnout and maximize disgust with the process and with elected officials.
Caw, caw, Scarecrow! But I must admit, I am worried. While Rethugs look corrupt and incompetent, unfortunately, I think Dems look ineffectual and impotent.
People remember Dems figuratively weeping and gnashing their teeth before the 2006 election, stating that Rethugs were destroying our Democracy and doing all the wrong things. That’s what they said when Dems were in the minority. Unfortunately, they’re still saying the same things now when Dems in the majority. When Rethugs were in the majority with a margin pretty close to the same one Dems now have, they seemed perfectly capable of pushing through every piece of legislation that they wanted while brushing objecting Dems aside. They seemed perfectly capable of blocking any measures that the Dems thought were a good idea with the same ease. Yet Dems could not even manage to pass the “wildly popular” Schip legislation because they could not find enough votes to override the veto.
Seems to me that it comes down to the fact that there is still no party unity, no party loyalty, and no unity of purpose (even just winning one) in the Democratic party. Until they learn how to play this game better and show some ability to outstrategize or somehow overpower Rethugs politically, they will remain at risk. I think we have little better than a fifty percent chance of winning the WH if we somehow don’t start minimizing the damage this President is doing and taking charge of the government.
The sad part is, there are so many ways to do this, it’s not even funny. One would have been to set up Impeachment as a distraction to keep this President from doing any additional harm, but leadership does not see fit. My advise would be more investigations, please, or do something, it’s better than nothing.
I think it would have helped the Rove statement if he had gone on to mention some of the good things “they” have done for the country. He’s a guy who is never at a loss for words: they gave us Gonzo, intimidating the sick AG, Katrina, Pet Goat, veto SCHIP, mayhem in the Middle East. What’s not to like?
Peter Baker gets the Stockholm Syndrome Award this week.
Congrats Mr. Baker, a golden blindfold trophy and some Rove basted quails’ wings are your reward.
-GSD
Ann in AZ @ 91
Great post. It’s not just the presidency, the last poll I saw showed the SENATE going 49 Republican to 48 Democrat in 2008, with 3 seats up for grabs. That’s way too close given the enormous number of people who believe the country’s on the wrong track. All the Democrats have to do is to do something, just show that they can do more than complain and actually implement a policy. Otherwise voter apathy alone might cost the Dems both the Presidency and the Senate in 2008.
As to Iraq and the pronouncements of impending ‘victory’.
John McCain was apoplectic over the death of 18 US servicemen in Somalia in the 1990’s.
Now he considers twice that amount a great victory in Iraq.
The Bush bar set by the soft bigotry of low expectations has dropped even lower.
Not to mention the great victory when Turkey invades Iraq and when Pakistan fully flies into pieces.
-GSD
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the article didn’t mention foreclosures, either.
brendan @ 96
Rentals are UP! It is good for Republicans!
-GSD
As part 2 of yesterday’s article on the Impeachment Resolution, I have submitted a Summery of the Resolution itself.
It is very important that we understand exactly what the charges against the Vice President are in the resolution, and that we know the evidence is included in the resolution.
Please check it out, and copy it and use it where ever you need to.
http://willyloman.wordpress.co…..esolution/
So are the Clintons, Sandy Berger, Albright, james rubin etc disasters. Maybe less so and disasters of a different sort. But disasters of a different sort are still disasters. You cannot seriously think that the Clintons will do anything about dependence on fossil fuels, for example.
Your blind support of disasters of a different sort does nothing to solve the problems created by Bush and the Clintons before that.
For some reason I think poisoned toys and food, coupled with a bleak Christmas season is going to have a big impact. Even people crazed over the illegal immigration problem aren’t afraid to eat the lettuce they pick. The price of gas in Los Angeles is $3.85 and most people remember the past Christmases that weren’t very jolly.
Hope springs eternal in the Republican breast. We have seen this story before of the Bush comeback. Granted W had a few dead cat bounces on the way to the cellar of public opinion, but the trend has been inexorably down. The Corporate Media is desperate to write the story of W as come back kid. They are way tired of the real tale of the continuous downward trend of Bush’s approval. Shrub has already passed Nixon as the most unpopular president ever, he has also set the record for most precipitous fall from grace ever for a US President. Since 9/11 Bush has been the incredible shrinking man.
The thing that truly scares me is that almost every time the White House claims that Bush is set for a comeback, W then pulls some mind-numbingly moronic stunt that further damages the office he holds. Look for another staggering stupid lowering of the bar in the Bush Limbo real soon.
Scarecrow @ 43
If there are still people out there – Pakistan has not been democracy since 1999 and barely experimented with ‘democracy’ for 20 of its 60 years. The world’s largest democracy is in fact next door – India.
Homeland Security Advisor Townsend resigns, stating:
“in the summer of 2001, she became the Coast Guard’s intelligence chief. It was a “backwater” job, she quipped at the time — until the attacks of Sept. 11 propelled it, and her, to greater prominence, and ultimately into the president’s circle of advisors.”
‘Spose 9-11 wasn’t all bad for everyone. Now she plans to write books and give six-figure speeches. I don’t remember the sound of the twin towers falling on 9-11, but apparently it sounded something like “CHA-CHING!!!”
The poll results are in: Some percentage favor the GOP; another percentage favor the DNC.
Put that aside for the moment. Consider this: Some in the GOP-DNC are saying there would be a “backlash” against the DNC if there was an impeachment.
Oh, really? Tell us, GOP: Who, in the DNC, is going to support the GOP if the DNC dares to challenge the GOP? Please point to any meaningful demographic.
That’s the problem. There’s no group of people who are going to “backlash” against the DNC, other than people already committed to the GOP. That’s not a change. That’s what we already know.
Next time someone says there’s going to be a “backlash,” ask them to be specific:
- What is the demographic of this “group of backlashers” (They’ll stall)
- Who, specifically, is going to switch sides, and no longer support the DNC, but the GOP? (They can’t switich if they’re already for or against one side)
- How, if the charges are reasonable, can the GOP or DNC convince anyone there would be a “backlash”? (There won’t).
The only backlash is against the DNC for inaction; and against the GOP for the subsequent illegal acts that would be disclosed. The question is: What activity do Members of Congress hope hide?
Poll numbers aside, the DNC and GOP leadership have some ’splaining to do.
willyloman @ 98
Willyloman,
Thanks for your information. What’s the plan to bypass Pelosi, and convice her to “permit” Conyers to do what the House voted to do: Have an investigatioN?
Can’t blame the DNC in 2007 for an acquisition policy 2001-2006.
cinnamonape @ 86
Gates should know better: The GOP controlled Congress, the White House, and appropriations from 2001-2006. The current “mess” in the DoD is related to the GOP’s lack of attention to the resource requirements.
DNC should stop worrying about trying to “impress” anyone — that is a minority position, of a group attempting to win a majority. But the DNC has the majority.
Rather than focusing on the electorate, the DNC should focus on using that majority position. The issue isn’t the electorate, but the President. This non-sense of, “Oh, the DNC leadership want you to call your reps to . . .”
Huh? the DNC is in power. We don’t need to call them. They need to listen to the 2006 voter mandate: “Impeach.”
DNC should quit talking, and start impeaching/investigating for impeachment.
KLynn @ 11
The reason the DNC isn’g using staff to “reach out” to the constituents is that there are no meaningful consequences for them failing to do just that. There need to be mid-term consequences. Not this non-sense, “Oh, we’ll wait until the next election, we can’t do that now.” Total non-sense.
Maybe someone can explain who the DNC proposes to ‘reach out’ to: The Membership in the DNC is not going to join the GOP; and the GOP Membership, at best, isn’t going to renew support for the GOP despite their detest for the GOP.
On the table are ethics investigations against Members of Congress and their staff for failing to fully assert their oath, bringing discredit upon the House, and failing to defend the Constitution against the President.
“Who supports — before the election — a change in the DNC leadership in Congress?”
Elliott @ 15
Then its time to change the focus from those who are doing the crimes — the President and others — to those who refuse to enforce the law. For the GOP to get away with this, the DNC has to be complicit. If the DNC will not challenge the President, it is time for the public to challenge the DNC. Before the election.
Who would like to see a credible challenge to this President?
allan_in_upstate @ 16
They can be forced out as well. Through prosecutions or popular efforts. This does not have to wait until the 2008 election.
Bush should be arrested, along with dick and the rest of the traitorous PNAC/CarlyleGroup/Neocon/War-Mongering Christofasists in the bush administration!
From WAPO:
“Bush devoted his day to people who, as he put it, serve a cause larger than themselves _ police, firefighters, teachers and citizens who become heroes in times of crisis.”
Then, I’m sure he went to his office to veto their funding.
Scarecrow @ 52
They’re weak. They fear ‘Dear Leader’ and they fear not getting enough money for their campaigns. They probably all say they hate having to run all the nasty campaign ads, but have to to get money. They’re just weaklings who won’t stand up for their constituents, themselves or the Constitution.
BTW, inviting Osama bin Laden to the inauguration would be at least as effective as what we’ve been doing to capture him.