What happens when you e-mail President Bush with concerns over the president’s handling of workers’ rights? You get an auto-generated e-mail, natch—but one filled top to bottom with lies. Let’s take a look.
From: “White House Strategic Initiatives”
Subject: Thank you for sharing your concerns about U.S. workers’ rights
Reply-To: “White House Strategic Initiatives“
Thank you for sharing your concerns about U.S. workers’ rights.
President Bush is committed to the well-being of America’s working men and women and their families, and his economic policies are having a real effect.
Now, here are the facts:
Job growth over the past business cycle has been slower than in any other business cycle lasting at least 78 months: Payrolls were only 4.3 percent higher in September 2007 than in March 2001, compared with the other three recent cycles, which posted growth rates of at least 10 percent.
The wealthiest 1 percent of Americans earned 21.2 percent of all income in 2005, up sharply from 19 percent in 2004. The bottom 50 percent earned 12.8 percent of all income.
Workers’ productivity grew 18 percent between 2000 and 2006—but most people’s inflation-adjusted weekly wages rose only 1 percent during that time. This was the first economic expansion since World War II without a sustained pay increase for rank-and-file workers.
Under Bush, the number of those without health insurance rose from 38.4 million (13.7 percent of the population) in 200 to 47 million (15.8 percent of the population) in 2006.
Health care premiums have increased 78 percent since 2001, the year Bush took office.
Since 2001, 1.8 million jobs have been lost in the U.S. due to the growing trade deficit with China.
Since January 2001, 3.1 million manufacturing jobs have been lost, a decline of 18.3 percent. In September 2007, U.S. manufacturing jobs totaled only 13.9 million—the last time the number of manufacturing jobs in the United States fell below 14 million was in June 1950.
Household debt is now more than 90 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) and more than 120 percent of disposable income—both historically high levels.
The Bush administration has increased total outstanding federal debt by more than 550 billion per year for the past four years. That means by the end of 2007, if current trends continue, the nation under Bush will be $9.216 trillion in debt.
Bush and Republicans in Congress fought an increase in the minimum wage which, until Democrats gained a majority in the House this year, remained at $5.15 for 10 years.
Nationwide, the number of home foreclosures will reach 3 million by the end of 2007, nearly five times the rate of 2004.
Forecasts show by the end of Bush’s term in 2009, 700,000 fewer people will own homes than when he came to office.
Since the President took office, after-tax income has increased by 11.9 percent—about $3,500 per person.
Fact:
Because the tax cuts are being paid for with borrowed money, the cost of paying the added national debt more than wipes out any benefits from the tax cuts for 99 percent of residents in each state. Only the best-off 1 percent are net winners from the president’s fiscal policies.
Middle-income taxpayers are paying more taxes while high-income households have seen a sharp drop in their tax bills. And working people are getting less for their taxes. Of the approximately $2.7 trillion the federal government spent in fiscal year 2006, social programs—such as unemployment insurance, child care assistance and low-income housing—made up only 9 percent of the federal budget. Some 21 percent of the budget, or $557 billion, went to pay for defense, homeland security and security-related international activities.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the largest percentage of income gains in 2006 occurred for people in the bottom 20 percent of incomes.
Fact:
By 2004, real after-tax income of the poorest one-fifth of Americans rose by 9 percent, that of the richest one-fifth by 69 percent and that of the top 1 percent by 176 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The poverty rate is lower than all but one year in the 1980s and 1990s while unemployment is 4.6 percent, lower than the average of each of the past four decades.
Fact:
The percentage of children, people and families who are poor was higher in 2006 than before Bush took office. In 2006, 9.8 percent of families were poor in the United States, compared with 8.7 percent of families in 2000. Among America’s children, 17.4 percent were poor in 2006, versus 16.2 percent of children in 2000. In all, 12.3 percent of all people were poor in 2006, compared with 11.3 percent in 2000.
Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that the 4.7 percent unemployment rate in September 2007 was higher than when Bush first took office in January 2001, when the unemployment rate was 4.2 percent.
The president also has worked diligently to protect workers’ rights and paychecks.
The administration opposed a recent bill that would have stripped workers of the fundamental democratic right to a supervised private ballot election and interfered with their ability to bargain freely. The bill was eventually voted down.
Fact:
The Employee Free Choice Act opposed by Bush and some Republicans in Congress, would not have taken away workers’ freedom to join a union through the ballot process. It would have added another option for workers seeking to join unions—majority sign up—a process that involves far less government involvement.
Bush’s National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) repeatedly ruled against workers seeking to form unions, even though union members on average earn more than nonunion workers. (In 2006, median weekly earnings for full-time wage and salary work were $833, compared with $642 for their nonunion counterparts.)
Since 2001, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) Employment Standards Administration has made record-level recoveries of back wages ($1 billion, including overtime) and improved employer compliance with wage and hour and anti-discrimination laws.
Fact:
In August 2006, Bush used a recess appointment to install former Wal-Mart attorney Paul DeCamp, a lawyer with a long record of urging restrictions to the Fair Labor Standard Act’s overtime pay and other provisions, to head up the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division. DeCamp was senior policy adviser to the Labor Department’s Employment Standards Division when the division’s failure to stop rampant wage theft involving wage-and-hour violations by employers engaged in Gulf Coast recovery work after Hurricane Katrina.
The Bush administration proposed weakening rules for determining whether private employers with federal contracts illegally pay women or racial minorities less than other employees for comparable work. Under Bush’s plan, the Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) would abandon the current system in which pay bias is determined through large discrepancies in pay grades and replace it one with based on non-statistical factors such as experience.
DOL’s civil rights enforcement agency and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recovered $2.3 billion since 2001 for U.S. workers subjected to unlawful employment discrimination.
Fact:
Earlier this year, the Bush-dominated U.S. Supreme Court ruled that workers have no right to sue to remedy pay discrimination if they wait more than 180 days after their first short paycheck, even if workers don’t discover the pay discrimination until years later.
The Bush administration threatened to veto a bill that would have remedied this pay discrimination.
The administration also is committed to ensuring the retirement security of America’s workers, retirees and their families. In August 2006, the president signed the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the most sweeping reform of America’s pension laws in more than 30 years. This legislation strengthened the pension insurance system and ensured that workers receive better information about their pension plans.
Fact:
Bush made privatizing Social Security a priority, with a failed proposal that would have forced drastic cuts in retirement benefits for America’s workers—whether or not they chose to take part in the scheme. His plan would have slashed guaranteed benefits as much as $9,000 per year, with the average worker losing $152,000 in guaranteed retirement benefits. Between 1960 and 2004, Social Security helped cut the poverty rate among seniors by more than two-thirds, from 35 percent to 10 percent.
Since 2001, DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration has protected $9.2 billion in workers’ pension, health and other employee benefits, and its investigations have led to 691 criminal indictments.
Fact:
With backing from the Bush administration, House Republicans in a straight party-line vote rejected a Democratic economic stimulus proposal in 2002 that would have extended the emergency federal unemployment benefits program for long-term laid-off workers for another six months and added 13 weeks of regular benefits for jobless workers in all states. The plan offered the jobless assistance in only three states, did nothing to help the long-term unemployed workers who had exhausted their benefits and denied benefits to 2.9 million laid-off workers who were expected to run out of emergency and regular benefits.
Finally, thanks to this president, more workers are eligible for overtime. In 2004, DOL finalized reforms to white-collar overtime regulations. For the first time ever, the regulations explicitly guarantee overtime protection to blue-collar workers, police, firefighters, EMTs, production-line workers and construction workers.
Fact:
When Bush and Republicans in Congress rolled back overtime pay protections, they made it possible for as many as 6 million workers to lose the right to any extra pay for the time they work beyond 40 hours a week.
Further, the new rule excludes police, fire fighters and other workers now classified as “executives” from receiving overtime pay.
Thank you again for taking the time to write.
Office of Strategic Initiatives
The White House
P.S.
The White House memo left out any reference to the more than 1.4 million U.S. men and women who return home after being deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those who left jobs when they were deployed have the legal right, in all but the rarest circumstances, to get them back. But veterans groups have charged the federal government has violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) by denying veterans reinstatement to federal civilian jobs or full benefits on their return from service.
The 2006 unemployment rate for veterans 20–24 years old was 10.4 percent. Some 1.8 million U.S. veterans have no health insurance. More than 400 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are reported to be homeless, and the Veterans Affairs Department and aid groups say they are bracing for a new surge in homeless veterans in the years ahead.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Tula!
OT, but elderly antiwar veterans in Boston could use your help.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/15/11129/658
Yes, I know its blogwhoring but I have reached out to these people and am committed enough to what they are doing that I don’t mind if you flame away at me so long as some of you consider, writing a letter, sending a FAX, or making a call on their behalf.
We all like to say, including myself, that we support the troops and vets but not the war. This is a simple way to show that.
These guys lie the way they breathe: constantly, automatically, and even when not doing it would benefit them.
I’d reather trust a ‘Philadelphia lawyer’
On the writers’ strike, which is having ripple effects (see the LA Times story today, business section):
A world without writers, via Making Light (Youtube)
*headkerplooie*
Sigh.
If the people who made signs with posterboard and marking pen switched to large sheets of cardboard and paint, this country might not turn into a flourishing democracy, but at least it’d look like it.
http://freewayblogger.blogspot…..mbers.html
Be the Media.
Tula—this is a great rebuttal to the regurgitation of absurd talking points we hear far too often.
Crick—I rec’d your diary…but I gotta say….honey catches more flies. :>)
Excellent article Tula. I spotlighted it and digg’d it.
We’ve already tried free markets from 1800-1930, and we see how well that worked out.
Why on earth we are doing it again is beyond me.
diogenes @ 8
Because the winners win, and win big, and they don’t ive a FF about the rest.
RBG @ 6
((( RBG )))
*cough* … which are you … the honey or the fly ?!! *g*
as a teamster going through contract negotiation at this very moment, it is clear, the corporate message won. johnny q has been willing to shoot his own feet for these corporate rat bastards. every night i listen to the 23%ers in the lunch room. they listen to rush and they walk in lock step. they are going down with this admin no matter what, even at the cost of their own job.
RBG @ 6
Thanks. I knew some would feel that way. just don’t know what to do. The first two diaries caught very few flies, all honey. I have a list of high-traffic bloggers as long as my arm that I contacted and asked to say a word, but no one responded. I asked all of them expressly NOT to link to my diaries, just look at the primary sources and say a word.
If you knew all the details about the skewed media coverage, what went on in court the other day, etc., you might better understand my frustration. When I first read about the 92 year old veteran being arrested and heard him speak on video, with his composed, calm, manner, he reminded me of my own father who would also be 92 (and a vet). Something broke in my head at that moment.
The diary clearly states that I used that lede just to try to get some attention.
Maybe some of you who have a bigger megaphone than me and more blogosphere savvy will lend a hand. I would be happy to step aside for anyone who will.
Sorry for this OT again. I’ve taken too much space now and will not distract from the thread again.
Apologies again.
I don’t think the Bush administration considers “workers” in the same sense that you or I would.
Of course, this is true of many other things, as well – Freedom, Democracy, Peace, torture, the Constitution, etc.
OT: There’s a rumor that Newsweek plans to hiring both Rove and Kos as commentators on the 2008 “horserace.” Hmmmmm.
wigwam @ 14
Kos has already been hired, & said that the announcement of his counterpart would come within days, which means probably before the end of the week.
Wigwam — More than a rumor…see here.
Heh. Newsweek balancing Kos with Rove..:
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/…..-newsweek/
Tula — this is a great rebuttal piece. Nicely done! Thanks so much for all the research and work on this — must have taken you a LOT of time to compile all of this in one place.
Jobless Claims More Than Expected
Folks have to dig out from under the load of crap the BLS trys to bury..
Congress and the Mortgage Mess
And will Congress care?
Now what would Rove say…?
Tula, that is an amazing post. It is sickening to see what they have done to our country.
The only good news about workers lately is that for the first time in years and years, we are seeing organized groups striking. I hope the pendulum is swinging back in that direction. We’ve lived with divide and conquer for way too long.
OT–
Portfolio hearts HuffPost:
*Sam Gustin, the Portfolio writer
Hastert to give farewell speech…so soooon???
Thank you for all the hard work. It’s really hard to know how to overcome the effect of blatent official lies.
On topic:
The perils of freelancing:
Ah yes. You’re an employee but non-staff. How does that work again? Some of us know this too well.
Did anyone see the Morley Safer episode on 60 Minutes this weekend? It was about all of the accommodations businesses have to accept in order to keep a workforce. The theme was that all the 20 somethings would simply get a better job if employers didn’t grant their every wish.
I thought it was from the 90’s or depicted another planet.
LS @ 22
Maybe to beat the indictments…when he will have to slither away (or whatever Jabba did) into the shadows.
I would gladly claim you as a member familia. You can be my udda brudda.
Hastert’s up-cspan! Cspan, not 2. Ooops/.
Residential Construction Employment Update
Oh, it’s simple —
Denigrate, Obfuscate, Reiterate
THE BUSH/GOP AGENDA
Attention! Deep pockets getting threadbare…
Tula, thanks for writing this. Reading letters like the swill the WH puts out makes my head explode. It’s great to read a rebuttal correcting their lies along the way.
You guys probably already discussed this, but, is This (Hastert on CSPAN 1 at my house) the Flynt kaboomb….in other words?
I think it’s just a typo. Instead of “America’s working men and women and their families”, it was supposed to read “America’s wealthy men and women and their families”. With that change, the words match the deeds.
wigwam @ 14
David Broder is Karl Rove’s personal friend. They have dined on quail together. Yet, Broder is considered a centrist.
If Rove had written that Clinton hit piece himself, one couldn’t detect any difference.
OT–
From Newsweek’s release about Karl Rove:
demi @ 31
He’s lost a lot of weight.
Now how are deep pockets going to finance lobbying when this kind of thing leaks out…
Corporations Taking Hits to Marketable Securities
I hear candy leads to cavities…
LS @ 35
Fear is a great diet…except that there are all of those other pesky symtoms.
demi @ 31
IIRC the Flynt ka-boom was supposed to be another senator
pma at 25 — I did see it and, in all honesty, I thought it was a pretty accurate depiction of what a lot of law firms are going through with younger lawyers these days — just based on complaints that I have heard and things I have seen first hand, both from defense and plaintiffs’ firms.. It’s a weird dividing line between how “highly trained” work force folks are treated and “everyone else.” And it was weird to see it presented so starkly without a “the other half” backdrop, too.
hackworth @ 33
That makes several things make more sense. Thanks.
IIRC the Flynt ka-boom was supposed to be another senator
Ah, right you are. I sit corrected.
(this still sounds a little bit like Craig’s speech…)
Jane’s upstairs with Mr. Rove…
Even though Dennis is getting a prolonged and heartfelt (?) standing ovation, still…it’s gotta hurt. I’m thinking.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 39
Well, that’s what my wife thought and I did not a mention of Harvard. Still, it really jangled with my perception of the employment market. I have three kids with degrees from state colleges, and while they have jobs, it essentially seems like and employers market.
pma @ 44
Sorry, I meant “I did note a mention of Harvard.”
coyne @ 11
One of the most disheartening things about organizing I learned in another incarnation when Teamsters for a Decent Contract was formed back in 1975. Guys were all gung-ho until you asked them to take a stand and hand out some flyers or stand up at a local meeting to ask a simple question.
They wouldn’t do it, no matter how many times they’d promised. I was in Local 804 when Ron Carey was local president during the strike that sold us out and brought in part-timers to UPS in 1974 to positions they hadn’t held before. Carey let the company bring in part-timers because they paid into the health and welfare fund while not getting full coverage in return. But he local got its money, and the gangsters on the executive board took their cuts. Three guys from that executive board went to jail for RICO violations.
But don’t give up. We just passed an anniversary in this country that everyone knows as Veteran’s Day. In my house it’s known as Haymarket Day, the day the government murdered four anarchists in Chicago after a demonstrably rigged trial. For twenty years or more after those hangings workers in this country remembered Haymarket. The convenient end of the war date of 11 November ended that. Just another piece of lost history like the teamster rebellion in Minnesota during the 30s.
Spread the word to those 23%s…when the economy finally hits rock bottom their heroes won’t be there to bail them out, they will be calling them whiners and complainers. That’s when you get to sit back and smile.
Friends, this post lays out the core progressive issue. And what should be the core Democratic Party issue. This is what the party has stood for, from Mr Jefferson through Mr. Jackson to FDR. 2 derivatives here: 1)the DLC and the Blue Dogs are not with us. Not part of any democratic party worth the name.2) unless you put this at the center of your agenda you can forget your feminism, your ecology and all the rest. How you handle this will determine whether you have any money or energy left for all the rest.