<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But Soft, What Light In Yonder Window Breaks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:34:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Pierce</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096763</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096763</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it has more chance to be Roger Aisles or someone who works with him, or several someones at News or Fox or both,  rather than Wendy Deng Age 39 (Mrs. Rupert Murdoch)–Rupert Age 76 although it would be interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has more chance to be Roger Aisles or someone who works with him, or several someones at News or Fox or both,  rather than Wendy Deng Age 39 (Mrs. Rupert Murdoch)–Rupert Age 76 although it would be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julia</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096734</link>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096734</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know what I thought was interesting? Unless I missed it, nowhere did Regan specify that the executive was a he.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regan’s pretty famous for telling all about her sex life to women she works with, and she used to socialize with Murdoch (supposedly he ceased to be amused by her when he heard the Kerik story). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would certainly change the power dynamic significantly if the un-named executive “close to Murdoch” was the current Mrs. Murdoch, don’t you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I thought was interesting? Unless I missed it, nowhere did Regan specify that the executive was a he.</p>
<p>Regan’s pretty famous for telling all about her sex life to women she works with, and she used to socialize with Murdoch (supposedly he ceased to be amused by her when he heard the Kerik story). </p>
<p>It would certainly change the power dynamic significantly if the un-named executive “close to Murdoch” was the current Mrs. Murdoch, don’t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Pierce</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096566</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096566</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/kerik-indictment/&quot;&gt;Bernie’ Kerik’s Indictment–When Bush says Nanny He Means Mob&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/kerik-indictment/">Bernie’ Kerik’s Indictment–When Bush says Nanny He Means Mob</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Pierce</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096558</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096558</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1096356&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jeff @ 148&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you knew Judy, like I know Judy…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s nothing here but noise. There’s nothing on the tapes except sexual innuendo she steered the conversation toward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no false testimony to federal officials, coerced or voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no NewsCorp connection to Rudy, anymore than there is one to any other candidate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All she wants is notoriety and to slime as many other people as she can.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no there there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She portrayed herself as a money-making machine, but all she was ever able to do was celebrity books and diet books that succeeded on packaging and her ability to bully HarperCollins into giving her books more than their share of co-op dollars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every piece of fiction she published flopped–with the exception of Wicked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no there there yet. You also haven’t heard the alledged tapes that La Regan says she has.  But a more thorough investigation might uncover some ‘there’ regardless of anyone’s evaluation of the carnival freak type books that Regan often promoted, not to mention the Right Wing authors like the drug addict Rush.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We never had the benefit of the “fictional biography” (whatever that is) of Mickey Mantle (a real and not fictional ball player) on my real not fictional 1954 autographed SI cover.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will Rudy be tied to the mob or any illegality by Regan’s lawsuit or Kerik’s looming trial?  Most probably not other than his sucking up to the Sopranos staff for advanced tapes and that he knew the Kerik Regan relationship was a problem when he pushed him for Secretary of DHS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will Kerik be tied to the mob?  Could be.  Will Roger Roger Aisles be impacted by this law suit if the evidence is real, &lt;em&gt;considering that counts in the Kerik indictment which is “there” stem from activity with Judith Regan?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ghouliani and the rest of the Republicans still favor cronyism over competence.  Look at the US attorneys now with no significant experience all over the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be a close contest though as to who would have flown DHS into the ground more-former Heckuva Job former3rd Circuit Judge Chertoff or Bernie Kerik.  I say it’s a toss up.  They both would have screwed it up equally.  We have over well 100,000 on the no fly list, and probably close to 100% should not be on it and both the FBI and CIA couldn’t even vet Nada Nadim, and if she really was a Hamas or Hezbollah mole and the DOJ and CIA know, you never will.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/14/washington/14spy.html?_r=1&amp;ref=washington&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;C.I.A. Officer Admits Guilt Over Hezbollah Files &lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Look at the pudding heads who shaped up the Iraq fiasco and the money hemorrhage now pegged at hundreds of billions with no sign of the Caveocrats putting the breaks on any of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;In Iowa right now:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;27% Romney&lt;br /&gt;
21% Huckaby&lt;br /&gt;
15-11% Ghouliani&lt;br /&gt;
McCain Way Down Less&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rest are dead men walking in every state.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1096356"><em>Jeff @ 148</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>If you knew Judy, like I know Judy…</p>
<p>There’s nothing here but noise. There’s nothing on the tapes except sexual innuendo she steered the conversation toward.</p>
<p>There’s no false testimony to federal officials, coerced or voluntary.</p>
<p>There’s no NewsCorp connection to Rudy, anymore than there is one to any other candidate.</p>
<p>All she wants is notoriety and to slime as many other people as she can.</p>
<p>There’s no there there.</p>
<p>She portrayed herself as a money-making machine, but all she was ever able to do was celebrity books and diet books that succeeded on packaging and her ability to bully HarperCollins into giving her books more than their share of co-op dollars.</p>
<p>Every piece of fiction she published flopped–with the exception of Wicked.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There’s no there there yet. You also haven’t heard the alledged tapes that La Regan says she has.  But a more thorough investigation might uncover some ‘there’ regardless of anyone’s evaluation of the carnival freak type books that Regan often promoted, not to mention the Right Wing authors like the drug addict Rush.</p>
<p>We never had the benefit of the “fictional biography” (whatever that is) of Mickey Mantle (a real and not fictional ball player) on my real not fictional 1954 autographed SI cover.</p>
<p>Will Rudy be tied to the mob or any illegality by Regan’s lawsuit or Kerik’s looming trial?  Most probably not other than his sucking up to the Sopranos staff for advanced tapes and that he knew the Kerik Regan relationship was a problem when he pushed him for Secretary of DHS.</p>
<p>Will Kerik be tied to the mob?  Could be.  Will Roger Roger Aisles be impacted by this law suit if the evidence is real, <em>considering that counts in the Kerik indictment which is “there” stem from activity with Judith Regan?</em></p>
<p>Ghouliani and the rest of the Republicans still favor cronyism over competence.  Look at the US attorneys now with no significant experience all over the U.S.</p>
<p>It would be a close contest though as to who would have flown DHS into the ground more-former Heckuva Job former3rd Circuit Judge Chertoff or Bernie Kerik.  I say it’s a toss up.  They both would have screwed it up equally.  We have over well 100,000 on the no fly list, and probably close to 100% should not be on it and both the FBI and CIA couldn’t even vet Nada Nadim, and if she really was a Hamas or Hezbollah mole and the DOJ and CIA know, you never will.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/14/washington/14spy.html?_r=1&amp;ref=washington&amp;oref=slogin">C.I.A. Officer Admits Guilt Over Hezbollah Files </a> </p>
<p>Look at the pudding heads who shaped up the Iraq fiasco and the money hemorrhage now pegged at hundreds of billions with no sign of the Caveocrats putting the breaks on any of it.</p>
<p><b>In Iowa right now:</b></p>
<p>27% Romney<br />
21% Huckaby<br />
15-11% Ghouliani<br />
McCain Way Down Less</p>
<p>The rest are dead men walking in every state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096356</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096356</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you knew Judy, like I know Judy…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s nothing here but noise. There’s nothing on the tapes except sexual innuendo she steered the conversation toward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no false testimony to federal officials, coerced or voluntary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no NewsCorp connection to Rudy, anymore than there is one to any other candidate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All she wants is notoriety and to slime as many other people as she can.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no there there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She portrayed herself as a money-making machine, but all she was ever able to do was celebrity books and diet books that succeeded on packaging and her ability to bully HarperCollins into giving her books more than their share of co-op dollars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every piece of fiction she published flopped–with the exception of Wicked.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you knew Judy, like I know Judy…</p>
<p>There’s nothing here but noise. There’s nothing on the tapes except sexual innuendo she steered the conversation toward.</p>
<p>There’s no false testimony to federal officials, coerced or voluntary.</p>
<p>There’s no NewsCorp connection to Rudy, anymore than there is one to any other candidate.</p>
<p>All she wants is notoriety and to slime as many other people as she can.</p>
<p>There’s no there there.</p>
<p>She portrayed herself as a money-making machine, but all she was ever able to do was celebrity books and diet books that succeeded on packaging and her ability to bully HarperCollins into giving her books more than their share of co-op dollars.</p>
<p>Every piece of fiction she published flopped–with the exception of Wicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096306</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My God!  The tendrils…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rudy; Kerik; Judith; Harper/Collins; Rupert… &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reaching; twining; commingling….asking; DEMANDING; to be tied together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   Grow; little vines, Grow… :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My God!  The tendrils…</p>
<p>Rudy; Kerik; Judith; Harper/Collins; Rupert… </p>
<p>Reaching; twining; commingling….asking; DEMANDING; to be tied together.</p>
<p>   Grow; little vines, Grow… :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dclawyer06</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096082</link>
		<dc:creator>dclawyer06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096082</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is fantastic, and the timing is perfect. The lurid details of Kerik and Judith Regan’s adulterous affair-in a room designed for rescue workers-is gonna hurt Rudy big time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Couldn’t happen to a lousier group of con artists.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is fantastic, and the timing is perfect. The lurid details of Kerik and Judith Regan’s adulterous affair-in a room designed for rescue workers-is gonna hurt Rudy big time.</p>
<p>Couldn’t happen to a lousier group of con artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fahrender</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096081</link>
		<dc:creator>fahrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1095925&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A’57 @ 58&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1095901&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Christy Hardin Smith @ 39&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A’57 — It’s a reference, not a direct quote.  But thanks…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even so it jarred.&lt;br /&gt;
However, your instinct was faultless. We live in Shakespearean times.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;au contraire, if i may ……&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the old chinese curse, “may you live in interesting times.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the leet update: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“may you live in a time when life imitates Harold Robbins.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1095925"><em>A’57 @ 58</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1095901"><em>Christy Hardin Smith @ 39</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>A’57 — It’s a reference, not a direct quote.  But thanks…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Even so it jarred.<br />
However, your instinct was faultless. We live in Shakespearean times.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>au contraire, if i may ……</p>
<p>the old chinese curse, “may you live in interesting times.”</p>
<p>the leet update: </p>
<p>“may you live in a time when life imitates Harold Robbins.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096072</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096072</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Killer piece, Christy!   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And SteveAR @#30:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dude!   That IS a bombshell.   Let’s load THAT little willy-peter projectile into the Howitzer and see how it flies.  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Killer piece, Christy!   </p>
<p>And SteveAR @#30:</p>
<p>Dude!   That IS a bombshell.   Let’s load THAT little willy-peter projectile into the Howitzer and see how it flies.  :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Pierce</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096055</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/14/but-soft-what-light-in-yonder-window-breaks/#comment-1096055</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1096030&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Christy Hardin Smith @ 142&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;maxcat06 at 140 — It’s the gift that keeps on giving, isn’t it?  And yes, I’d say someone very soon will have a few questions for several of the parties involved…if they haven’t been asked already, including the possibility of an attempt to obstruct justice series of questions for some “senior executive as yet to be named.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We would hope someone would, and of course conveniently in his brief, Regan’s lawyer omits whether Regan actually lied to F.B.I. vetting Kerik, or what the alleged “evidence” is of Senior Exec. participation at News Corp. or Fox.  In the home stretch of the 2008 run for the Roses Garden though, I have no confidence in Moooookasey Justice to follow though on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Christy pointed out, this is not one lawsuit that has a high prospect of early or any settlement and the unfolding of the alleged evidence and the potential to involve Rudy 911 Ghuliani, News Corp. or Fox &amp;  Roger Ailes as well as provide a backdrop to his campaign should he win the primary, will be interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1096030"><em>Christy Hardin Smith @ 142</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>maxcat06 at 140 — It’s the gift that keeps on giving, isn’t it?  And yes, I’d say someone very soon will have a few questions for several of the parties involved…if they haven’t been asked already, including the possibility of an attempt to obstruct justice series of questions for some “senior executive as yet to be named.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We would hope someone would, and of course conveniently in his brief, Regan’s lawyer omits whether Regan actually lied to F.B.I. vetting Kerik, or what the alleged “evidence” is of Senior Exec. participation at News Corp. or Fox.  In the home stretch of the 2008 run for the Roses Garden though, I have no confidence in Moooookasey Justice to follow though on this.</p>
<p>As Christy pointed out, this is not one lawsuit that has a high prospect of early or any settlement and the unfolding of the alleged evidence and the potential to involve Rudy 911 Ghuliani, News Corp. or Fox &amp;  Roger Ailes as well as provide a backdrop to his campaign should he win the primary, will be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
