The more the arguments and rationalizations fly back and forth on the Mukasey nomination and the Bush Administration’s tortured reasoning the last few years, the more I keep coming back to a thought that has been expressed by a number of commenters here the last few weeks: “How low have we gone that a discussion of whether torture is acceptable (H/T ThinkProgress) practice is even a debate at all?” Too true.
But then again, we had David Rivkin on C-Span this morning arguing that waterboarding is a boon for mankind and America because ”we can learn as much from what they lie about as we can when they tell the truth.” (H/T twolf1) Good to know that he is “comfortable with waterboarding,” isn’t it?
Let freedom ring.
Keith Olbermann’s commentary on these issue hit home last night (C&L has the clip). And I kept thinking that there is so much wrong in a media environment that treats this issue as an everyday debate. From the LATimes, in a commentary which contains one of the best “fairness in reporting is crap” analogies from Murrow that I have ever read: (H/T Froomkin)
It’s the kind of he-said-she-said news coverage that would have reported the Sermon on the Mount this way: “On a mountainside in Galilee today, a popular young rabbi argued that ‘the meek shall inherit the earth.’ Other religious authorities, however, pointed out that if God did not want the rich to fleece the poor, he would not have allowed them to behave like sheep.”…
President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are insistent that any discussion of [torture] is precluded by the exigencies of national security and the war on terror. Cut to the core of their real argument, however, and it boils down to the naked assertion that whatever the president says is legal is legal — including torture, which isn’t torture, if the president says it isn’t….
“Waterboarding is slow motion suffocation with enough time to contemplate the inevitability of black out and expiration — usually the person goes into hysterics on the board. For the uninitiated, it is horrifying to watch and if it goes wrong, it can lead straight to terminal hypoxia. When done right, it is controlled death. Its lack of physical scarring allows the victim to recover and be threatened with its use again and again.”…
What’s really at stake is whether this country will continue to stand with the framers of our Constitution and our authentic moral traditions or whether we now will allow Bush and Cheney to put us shoulder to shoulder with Pol Pot.
Scott Horton at Harper’s (H/T to “WB”) dug into this issue earlier, and his analysis on a former torture proponant turned opponant who got drummed out of the DOJ is a must read.
…There is no serious or competent basis upon which waterboarding can be claimed to be legal. The persistence of these bogus arguments is just more evidence of the deterioration of public discourse. Our habit as a nation has always been to accept anything that our political leadership states as a respectable contention, even if worthy of criticism. But with the arrival of the Bush Administration this has become an extremely dangerous premise. There is no respectable opinion that can hold waterboarding legal. It is criminal depravity. When we allow its justification as an article of polite conversation, we deal our society and its values a potentially mortal wound….
I read the op-ed from Sen. Schumer this morning with an eye for the “practical deal-making” that is his tendency, and found it in spades in the writing. The concerns that he voices on the state of the DOJ and the USAtty system are accurate, and the hope that a number of them could be resolved with competent leadership is tempting. Except…making a deal with the Bush Administration is like running on quicksand: the deal sinks and disappears entirely over time, leaving them free to disregard you altogether. Good to know that he was able to find a fellow traveller in DiFi so that they could provide each other mutual cover, isn’t it?
Related posts:
- Dick Cheney: I’m Proud I Tortured to Protect Our Country But Not Our Allies
- Tortured Logic: GOP Senators Concerned Prosecutor Will Make You Dead
- Walid bin Attash to be Denied Day in Court Because al-Nashiri Was Tortured?
- Tortured to Death: In Afghanistan, Brutal Treatment Far from “Rogue” Action
- Tortured Logic: Judge Richard Leon Delivers Habeas Smackdown





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

HI
hi
has anyone seen Schumer’s op-ed in the NYT this morning? He’s officially jumped the shark.
The concerns that he voices on the state of the DOJ and the USAtty system are accurate…
I’m glad to hear that I was correct in reading it that way too. I was too afraid of getting skewered if I asked!
For the sake of Democracy, freedom, and justice. I advocate that all lawyers (that means judges too) go on strike.
OT — does anyone have advice on getting a political book published? Are there agents who specialize in liberal political books. Who would represent someone like Sirota or Thom Hartmann.
Since this is my last week with income and benefits, my plans on this front have been accelerated.
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 3
He had me fooled. Here I thought that he was listening to me when I wrote those emails to his website, but, sadly, no.
Fill me in: what happened, and what did Whitehouse do?
raven at 4 — He is correct. LHP had something on that over the weekend, and I’ve been hearing nothing but disaster stories on morale and personnel vacancies, which spells huge problems for real, working law enforcement in the federal system.
But the problem comes in thinking that Mukasey is the “magic bullet.” Bush and Cheney will still be pulling the strings, whatever Mukasey tries to do to reform or rebuild. And Schumer is fooling himself if he thinks otherwise.
think progress has this;
from here
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2…..#more-1025
title=
Urgent: Letter from Intelligence, Military, Diplomatic, and Law Enforcement Professionals
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 3
Thinking citizens have known since 2002 that Schumer is nothing more than the modern Democratic Senator; useless for anything other than ramming the corporatist agenda through. I certainly hope his grandchildren ask him why he favors torture over Habeas Corpus?
Schumer?
I”ve shit him.
perris at 9 — That’s from Larry Johnson’s website, and from his post at DKos. You can see the full text of the letter in both places.
Shorter Schumer: Mukasey was our only hope; there were no alternatives.
Schumer still wants to deal in good faith with criminals who behave thusly.
He is a fool.
He is the Neville Chamberlain to Bush’s, well, ah…
-GSD
Christy Hardin Smith @ 8
Schumer is a fool. This is the problem with many ‘centrist Democrats. They’re just plain stupid and they don’t realize that Bush and his cabal are, in fact, smarter than they are.
Hi all :)
Quick question; Is it today that ‘The Kunich’ puts IMPEACHMENT back on the table?
Does anyone think what is going on in Pakistan could happen here? I do.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 8
So no one is going to get this appointment that won’t be subject to getting their strings pulled, right? Is there any hope that, as in cases with Supreme Court Justices who defy their label, Mukaskey might actually function as a real AG?
It’s ironic the Sermon On The Mount is mentioned in this post.
I wish the Christians who have supported and enabled this administration would realize that they are responsible for the most un-Christian practices EVER engaged in by our government.
Corruption and greed have waxed and waned in our government since it’s inception. But until now, we have ALWAYS had a certain moral line that would not be crossed.
This administration has blown past that line wo quickly they can’t even look back and see it.
And the fact that we’re actually having a debate about this brings untold shame on our nation.
The Mukasey hearing are on
http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs…..p;Code=CS3
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 3
i have to work myself up to it.
After reading your post, Christy, a vision of Lady Justice came to my mind. Her scales were so disproportionate that she was almost horizontal. :(
jackie @ 15
I believe he’s going to include bush in the motion though, and though I agree with the idea I think it has less chance of passing
I think best strategy is first cheney then bush
Oklahoma kiddo @ 16
Imagine Bush’s response to a similar election as that in 2000?
Do you think he’s gonna side with Hillary or send in the troops to bring on Giuliani?
I know what my answer is.
-GSD
I want to see people who say they’re fed up, walk the talk.
selise @ 20
Don’t bother it is nothing but lies
Oklahoma kiddo @ 16
I think the real question is does anybody think it won’t happen here?
perris @ 22
Kucinich not stopping with Cheney, plans Bush impeachment resolution
This is a low point in Schumer’s career.
I operate under no illusions about Judge Mukasey.
nomolos @ 25
if was going to avoid lies from my senators and representatives, i’d have to stop watching c-span. :(
BTW, the illustration accompanying Schumer’s op-ed piece shows Lady Justice toppling to her right but being held at about a 45 degree angle by a little man who looks a LOT like Sen. Schumer. Whoodathunkit — Schumer is keeping Justice from toppling over all by his little self. (NYC and the NYT are just too chummy a little club for words.)
Are we prepared to exclaim that Mukasey is a political hack?
SufiLizard @ 6
Look at who’s publishing the books out now…read the author’s acknowledgements, they often list their agent. Cross reference with resources such as PublishersMarketplace.com
Beware faux agents who make income from reading fees not selling. Verify credentials at sites such as AAR [Association of Authors Representatives, I think it is] maintains. Authors Guild is another respected organization.
A.Citizen @ 14
Fool, perhaps, though I tend to think that Schumer, DiFi, et al. are living in a world where if they just hold out…long…enough…and try to stop Bush and Cheney from actually doing permanent damage (not realizing that perhaps this has already happened)…that … somehow, the Democrats will kiss the booboos in Jan., 2009 and it will be “all better”.
Sorry, Chuck. Not all better. And you guys are actually making it worse. Better for you all to become The Resistence and refuse to cooperate at all.
selise @ 30
Yeah, good point. Why shoomer insists that there is no-one else available is beyond me.
Oh gawd the specter is speaking
raven @ 17
Schumer’s patronage of Mukasey and their deal-making with this administration has rendered any future actions by Mukasey suspect.
OKK,
I think its being viewed as a ‘test scenario’. I think ‘folks’ are seeing how well it plays out. If the people in Pakistan just let it go then I think they will move here.
Either way it causes even more instability and the war junkies love that….
Paul Keil at TPM quoting Roll Call on Reid and the Senate vote for Mukasey:
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 3
A Vote for Justice
Oklahoma kiddo @ 32
edited (with apologies)
behindthefall @ 31
I hadn’t seen the op-ed illustration before I posted my #21. I guess I’m not the only one who sees it that way. It’s gonna be a very sad day.
Laura Doty @ 38
shorter paul keil – look for lots of kabuki and no serious attempt to stop the nomination.
There you go. Specter using Schumer for cover.
I’m going to be sick.
I remember back to the first Gulf War when our aviators were shot down. The Iraqis roughed them up, but they were otherwise unharmed.
Imagine today, if one of our service men or women were captured. There is an unmistakable green light for torture from this administration. I can imagine also that Bush/Cheney want torture to happen so as to drum support for their own twisted policies. “They did it too!” is one of their favorite rallying cries for just about everything.
Makes my skin crawl just to *look* at rivkin, much less alone *listen* to him.
What’s the emoticon for gagging?
jackie @ 37
I confess to having those same thoughts breezing through my brain.
raven @ 17
If no one will be appointed that won’t have their strings pulled by Bush/Cheney, I’d just as soon the Ds let it go and confirm know one and force Bush to recess appoint. At least then, they aren’t complicit in the crimes that follow.
Actually, making a deal with the bush administration is like bending over and saying, “Please sir, may I have another!”
with the inevitable “heh-heh” chortling in the background…
hit_escape @ 44
They were captured by the Iraqi Armed Forces.
nomolos @ 40
Your editing is, I think, appropriate.
And I’m tired of hearing the rationale for torture being a ticking bomb somewhere. Have a discussion with anyone and they throw that into the debate. “Well, if there was an imminent threat, what would you do?” This argument is working with the neocon followers. But, is that what they’re really doing? Did all those naked men in the Abu Ghraib pyramid know of a ticking bomb? Did they fear the Canadian knew of a ticking bomb? Do the prisoners at Gitmo know of a ticking bomb? NO! They are systematically torturing people and it has nothing to do with an imminent threat. I am sickened and outraged and depressed all at the same time.
hit_escape @ 44
I don’t think this fact means a thing to Bush/Cheney. After all, the captured are trained to resist :(
This whole thing makes you wish for Pakistani lawyers!
What we need is mass demonstrations by lawyers, insisting that the our 3 branches of government follow the law.
We the People ask for redress!
Bottom line: All the calls to Chuck and DiFi obviously came to naught…
Fitz! Oh, dang! Too late.
The focus on waterboarding conjures up the cliche about trees and forest.
Waterboarding is not the only torture method being used. The practice of torture of any kind is the issue that by now should be at bar, with Cheney and Bush in the dock, sovereign immunity gone to hell where it belongs.
More of this “simulated drowning” flack!! How did that meme get started??? Nothing “simulated” about it; it just uses less water than a swimming pool.
Hi all, just a crawl-by comment:
It is now more acceptable to accept torture than to impeach the most corrupt president in our history.
The only thing worse than the abuser is the enabler looking the other way.
What are the motivating factors involved in the Schumer-DiFi-Mukasey event?
Interesting timing….
‘The US military said on Tuesday it will release nine Iranians detained in Iraq in recent months, including two seized in a swoop in the Kurdish city of Arbil in January accused of fomenting violence.’
http://www.breitbart.com/artic…..p;catnum=3
Shorter Specter: blah blah blah saying nothing, but talking a lot about it blah blah blah
Christy Hardin Smith @ 60
Typical Specteramous :(
Biodun @ 54
I think you are probably correct in your assessment of this issue.
Specter coming close to calling Mukasey a liar re: not knowing what waterboardng is.
Arlen is very concerned about presidential signing statements.
And he’s still gonna vote yes.
Shut up already, Arlen.
behindthefall @ 56
I think the real problem is the relatively benighn title of this particular technique of torture
“water boarding”
doesn’t sound too scary, we need to stop calling it that and start calling it something like;
“drowning to near death again and again torture”
frig that ‘waterboarding” crap, the term plays right into their hands
Oklahoma kiddo @ 58
It might be their intense love of a foreign country, not a very trustworthy ally, which covets its neighbors’ lands and has been waterboarding prisoners since the early 1950s.
I’ve been asking for about a week in the threads. Does anybody have a “black and white” count of the SJC members’ stance on waterboarding? I would like to see a list of those who belief it is torture and those who do not. A simple “yes” list and “no” list.
It would make a great advertisement and a nice list for the Hague…
Congress already passed a ‘no torture’ bill. It was voided with a signing statement. Let Mukasey say that the old bill is the law.
Sorry OT already, but I wonder ‘who’ will get this contract…
‘RIYADH, 6 November 2007 — Saudi Arabia is currently studying offers from 14 local and international companies, which are interested in constructing the wall the Kingdom plans to build along its border with Iraq.’
http://arabnews.com/?page=1&am…..amp;y=2007
There we go, another done deal 11-8
Classic Scottish Haggis: here’s a logical argument to vote no, but I’ll be voting ‘aye’ anyway.
And it’s done. Fuckers.
Gee; 11-8 he passes.
perris @ 64
How about “attempted murder?”
TheraP @ 53
yes.
how sad.
EPU’d from below.
Ed*ard Teller @ 65
I am unable to take issue with your perception of the situation.
perris @ 64
How ’bout “water torture”?
Sorry, following EPU’d:
Regarding the scenario about using torture to avoid a dirty bomb or whatever: I wonder why no one asks them if they would place any limits. What about hot pokers? How about torturing someone’s spouse or children? Should the U.S. rule anything out under their rationale? Anyway, I’ve never heard anyone ask the Rivkins.
So now they just bloviate for as long as they want to? Why bother?
How about “deliberate near drowning”?
Too many people think water torture is having water dripped on your head slowly, not that they are filling your lungs til you pass out.
My C-SPAN 3 hookup is going wild this morning – frozen picture frames, multiple audio channels – on RealPlayer. Anyone else having that experience? It makes the testimony about torture even more eery than it already is!
Nobody even bothers to talk about whether torture works or not. The assumption is that it’s some sort of magic thing that works every time. The big problem with torture is that the tortured say what the have to to get the torture to stop, which is not the same thing as giving up secrets. Those who were responsible for interrogating Nazis after the war say that ping-pong, checkers, and friendly conversation, aimed at tricking people into letting their guard down, were far more effective than torture at getting information from people.
mukasey and giuliani are both out of the same law firm in New York, patterson belknap. schumer just got caught on his own ego. He will find any rationalization for mukasey because he sponsored mukasey.
trivia, mukasey represented roy cohn in his disbarment proceeding and thereafter was appointed to be a federal judge. Mukasey is a most unfortunate selection.
JF @ 76
Let’s call it ‘American water torture’, to distinguish it from the Chinese variety. I see nothing wrong with that three-word phrase.
Does anyone know what time Kusinich is going to do his thing on the floor?
Grazie Sunshine. I’ll have to look into that.
It’s hard to stay focused on my personal issues when democracy is crumbling down around us. And when just plain decency is a losing argument in our society now — well at least in the halls of congress.
nomolos @ 68
the vote comes before the sentors’ statements?
why is leahy making passage of the nomination as easy as possible? this is just nuts.
Ed*ard Teller @ 80
Try the windows media player option.
I almost drowned in the icy waters of the American River, just below the old Fair Oaks bridge in Sacramento many years ago. My BFF saved me. You can assume that drowning to death is not very pleasant.
pseudonymous in nc @ 82
I almost said that, but it has been used by other regimes and prosecuted by the US. Of course this is no longer the same USA.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 46
Imagine the US SJC placed under house arrest, by the executive just before they file a decision finding the executive’s actions unconstitutional. This is what just happened in Pakistan with a Bush wink and nod.
behindthefall @ 31
I thought it looked like liberty was going to topple and crush Schumer.
I wish one of the Senators had given Mukasey a quick answer, yes or no, test. Which of the following would, in your view, constitute torture:
fingernail extraction
wolf slowly eating entrails (ala Larry McMurtry
hot poker in eyes
hip hop music
water boarding
etc.
Very somber assessment by Kennedy. Waterboarding is against the Geneva Conventions, the Constitution, and existing U.S. law. Top military lawyers and others across the political spectrum oppose waterboarding as torture. Prospective AG either doesn’t know torture when he sees it, or is willing to look the other way for the President.
The big white lie in the room is that the debate over whether waterboarding is legal or not is presented in a hypothetical, as in, is it ever permissible to torture?
But it’s pretty clear that this torture already took place. Bush and/or Cheney authorized torture and they don’t want to get in trouble for doing it. It’s not a what if? It’s that they did it – and for no good reason and with no good results.
Why haven’t all those prisoners in Guantanamo been tried? Because either they were tortured, or the evidence against them came from someone who was tortured. No court in the US would accept evidence or confession that came out of torture – apparently even the military courts are having problems with this. In any case, sitting for five years in a cell in Cuba without a chance to defend yourself or know the charges against you, amounts to cruel and unusual punishment itself. Torture is already happening. It’s happening for no good reason. All this talk about waterboarding is a sideshow.
Schumer “explains”…
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/6/7300/04659
Schumer and DiFi waited to reveal their positions to avoid liberal mobilization over the weekend:
http://thehill.com/leading-the…..11-06.html
OT–
Here’s Professor Cole on the situation in Pakistan:
Fran Taylor @ 81
The point of torture is that you get to be a torturer. That’s how torture works: it works by making you a torturer, giving you the power to torture.
It’s a power associated with arbitrary monarchy, a feudal society in which everybody belongs to somebody unless you’re the king.
egregious @ 78
Water torture is more like what is happening to dozens – and soon to hundreds – of Alaska Native villages on the Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea coasts. They’re slowly being inundated by rising oceans. Rush Limbaugh mocked the testimony of a young, 18yo Yup’ik girl yesterday, after she testified at a DC conference on global climate change:
WASHINGTON — Charlee Lockwood has never heard of Rush Limbaugh or listened to his radio program, and perhaps it’s just as well.
Monday, the talk radio king told listeners that Democrats were exploiting the 18-year-old Yup’ik Eskimo, and that her emotional testimony earlier in the day in front of a U.S. House committee on global warming made him “really want to puke. I just want to throw up.”
“It’s the Democrats exploiting a young child, ladies and gentlemen, for the advancement of a political issue that will grow the size of government and increase their control over everyone,” Limbaugh told listeners of the 600 stations nationwide that carry his show.
Lockwood didn’t let Limbaugh’s comments faze her. Her upbringing in the community of St. Michael included learning “about respect and treating people the way you want to be treated,” Lockwood said, during a brief interview just before she got on a plane to return to her village on Alaska’s west coast.
lawyer question:
If we now pass a law that explicity calls water torture torture,could the slimmy bastards calim it wasn’t illegal when they did it?
selise @ 85
Because if the power of persuasive language were enough to change anyone’s mind, as opposed to vested interests, the Congresscritters wouldn’t have a clue how to handle it?
Leahy was at least honest enough to not make it some charade of suspense, given that Schumer and Feinstein had already tossed their honour on the bonfire.
The vote is over. There’s nothing else to talk about (in the Committee I mean). When it gets to the Senate floor, it’ll be interesting to see which Dems vote for Mukasey.
Ruffian @ 98
Can they or will they?
Hatch: Torture and waterboarding not the real issue.
Why?
Because, of course, they are the real issue.
Now Hatch saying because the real issue is politicizing the DOJ. He then blames the Democrats for trying to politicize the DOJ by asking Mukasey to take a position on torture.
I wonder if there is a circle in Hell deep enough for Hatch’s rank hypocrisy and sophistry.
OT:
It looks like some Obama supporters have a problem with Democracy
http://politicalticker.blogs.c…..ff-ballot/
i feel a need to go into mourning.
what is appropriate mourning wear now-a-days?
Seems to me that waterboarding could instigate other mishaps. Like heart attacks and strokes. Wonder how many have perished as a result of the terrorist tactic of waterboarding?
raven @ 87
Frozen here, too. On my tv.
selise @ 105
Black. It’s always been black. At least in the West. In Muslim countries, it’s white.
HRC indicates she will go ‘thumbs-down’ on Mukasey.
Ruffian @ 99
I was watching Pat Buchanan last night and had exactly that thought. He was saying that if we want it to be against the law then the Congress should make it against the law. I believe that he was implying that 1) it’s not against the law and 2) since it’s not now against the law then anyone who has done it up to now has not broken the law.
Speaking of mourning: You can all bet there will be lots more to mourn about between today and January 2009.
To all those who believe waterboarding isn’t torture: would you be willing to undergo it to prove your point?
If not, then STFU.
It’s no longer a question of impeachment (and perhaps it never way). The elephant in the livingroom has always been the fact the our president and his henchmen are war criminals and are guilty of crimes against humanity. They’ve known it from the beginning — witness the passage of the Hague Invasion Act in 2002 — and we’ve known it certainly since Abu Ghraib.
But they’ve built themselves quite a wall of legal protections, which is still under construction (e.g., retroactive immunity on FISA) and will ultimately be completed with a massive round of presidential pardons.
My questions for presidential candidate are:
— Would you, as the highest law-enforcement officer of the land, seek to prosecute your predecessor and his henchmen for war crimes?
— Will you work to repeal the American Service-members’ Protection Act (aka, Hague Invasion Act)?
— Will you recind the immunity that Scott Horton says Chertoff conferred on CIA and contract torturers?
— Will you seek to restore the War Crimes Act of 1996 to the clarity and strength it had before the MCA?
— Will you repudiate the good-faith defence written into the DTA and the MCA?
— Will you seek an extradition agreement with Paraguay?
— Will you seek senate ratification of the the ICC treaty?
Kohl finished, Grassley up.
Biodun @ 108
Buddhist is white as well (if I am not mistaken)
George W. Bush is the world’s number one terrorist. Ooooh. Can I get into trouble for saying that?
Hugh:
You better publish that scandal book real soon. Like yesterday…*g*
Well I’m trying to stay optimistic and think that it’s not too late to save our country. But I’m finding myself more and more in a pessimistic mood.
I just read an interesting piece by Naomi Wolf here.
Olbermann really gives it to them. But nobody’s listening. Let’s see if they really “pass a law” that outlaws waterboarding. That they think this is even necessary is a joke. God help our service people all over the world, because they have a green light. We have become the enemy.
Buchanan is a liar as well as being insane
msgop used him as their climate change denier since he has so much experience with the denying the holocaust
todays wowpoo article on the shrub family and the campaign is very dishonest since Poppy has been helping McCain in SC ..oh right its the compost.
I wonder if someone has asked Difi about the inquistion and if she thought was taking the least worst option was the right thing to do.
Biodun @ 117
What would be the next steps towards publication? Do you need an editor or agent?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 109
Must mean that she knows that there are enough votes to confirm.
In 1983, a Texas sheriff was sentenced to ten years for waterboarding a prisoner: http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..70_pf.html
David Addington is the AG and Murkasey’s Mon/Tues show confirmed it. Who the sock puppet is doesn’t make any difference. Reid and Leahy are probably making the right political calculation and it makes me sick. The goal is more and better Dems in ‘09. Would stopping Murkasey be a pyrrhic victory? Probably and I still don’t like it.
I have been checking human rights sites and no luck. Has anyone come across a “yes no” list on waterboarding WRT the Senate and House membership stances?
I would like to see a list that simply answers the yes-no question, “Do you consider waterboarding torture?”
Does anyone know if anyone is working on putting something like this together?
It would be powerful.
If no one is creating one, Christy, would FDL consider?
DiFi up.
We’ve got to figure out a way to be heard. Two things I read recently bother me. The first was that voters don’t have influence any more. It’s all what the corps want.
The second was a quote from Haig during the Vietnam War. Paraphrased: “Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.”
Oh GAWD DiFi up. I should keep it on mute, no?
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 102
From the article.
Yeah, right. I’m sure, in reality, they were afraid we was altogether too viable.
wigwam @ 113
I’ve been supporting Edwards as the “top tier” candidate that comes closest to my views. But I honestly think with the Constitutional Crisis we now face, we need to rule out any compromise at all.
I think Kucinich is the only chance we have to save our country.
Republicans doing their usual shtik which is saying the exact opposite of what they mean. Mukasey now being called a “straightshooter” by Grassley even though he didn’t give a straight answer to a single question.
If a nominee had to answer every question to the satisfaction of every Senator no nominee would be approved.
But it is not every question. It is torture, you dope.
Christy’s upstairs…
And oh, I grabbed the zed. *g*
Another victory for Osama bin Laden.
The essence of terrorism is not the actual physical attack, but the dammage wroght on society in it’s wake.
Our economy is threatened, we have squandered blood and treasure;
and now we equivocate on torture…
Because the alternative is that our President will recess appoint someone worse.
I have come to realize that impeachment is the only option.
How about simply wearing black to mourn the Constitution?
Whether for a month or a certain day of the week.
And maybe we can get the Pakistani lawyers to at least demonstrate there in Pakistan – for all Constitutions.
tw3k — She came out against Mukasey ages ago. It’s not a development as of today.
Bush needs to keep waterboarding going in order to feel like a tough guy. Pretending to be a cowboy used to do that. However, ever since Vicente Fox exposed Bush as being scared of horses being a fake cowboy’s not much fun for him anymore.
Cheney likes waterboarding because Cheney is just evil.
egregious @ 121
Both
Oklahoma kiddo @ 116
You’re absolutely right.
But since he has a suit, a haircut and no beard, many people think he couldn’t be a terrorist at all.
egregious @ 112
Good lawd, are you still watching this crap? You are one brave person.
If shoomer and daffydi love the bloody ME so much why don’t they go and live there…and take that idiot/crook/swine lierman with them. I am utterly disgusted with the bunch of them.
Badwater @ 136
Two years ago, Nov 10, 2005, the late Molly Ivins published this excellent article on the topic of Bush’s and Cheney’s pseuo manliness: http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1110-20.htm
hit_escape @ 44
We have plenty of missing soldiers and contractors in Iraq (and I also believe in Afghanistan). One Army unit from Ft. Drum NY is returning from their latest Iraq deployment without two members – one of which is 19-year old Michigan native Byron Fouty. No one knows what happened to him and his colleague.
By the way, his colleague, Alex Jimenez, had applied for a green card for his wife. After the men disappeared, our government actually considered deporting Mrs. Jimenez.
Deporting the spouses of missing US soldiers?
Fox News writeup on how they didn’t deport her afterall
dalloway @ 112
The US considered it torture when it was done on our soldiers in past wars, correct?
Therefore, “is waterboarding torture” is not a topic that should even be debated.
Of course, due to the GOP/Media Complex’s coverage of this, most Americans probably don’t think that this is a big deal at all.
pseudonymous in nc @ 100
you have persuaded me. thank you.
Ed*ard Teller @ 65
Ding! Ding! Ding! Give the man the kewpie doll!
But, do not construe this award to mean that our own institutions are any less capable than those of a foreign country.
pseudonymous in nc @ 83
Lets call it “Inquisition Water Torture” – ’cause we didn’t invent it, and it’s been around a long time, long enough to be confirmed as torture(esp when the nazis used it in WWII)
Is there any hope of primary-ing Schumer and Feinstein??
sbgypsy @ 146
Sorry, no can do. It’s not who invents it, but who makes it their own. Or it’s a name designed to denigrate: the French letter, French leave, etc. People will be calling it ‘l’eau americain’ for years to come.
George Bush has made waterboarding America’s Torture Method™.
mack @ 115
You’re right. White is also the colour of mourning for Hindus and one can be a legitimate Hindu atheist.
someone needs to inform Schumer that accepting torture for expediency of an unrelated matter is not a credible or moral position.
And the solution for bush insistence on a CYA AG is not to cave yet again to his criminal reign, but to get Pelosi to impeach the bastard so Schumer and co. can remove him and cheney so we can get an American President.
.
After reading Scott Horton’s description of Mukasey’s meeting with members of the Federalist Society and his nod to them on Bush’s torture policy and assurance that he will not appoint special prosecutor, it occurred to me that Bush et al.are seriously afraid of being prosecuted for war crimes. Mukasey tells questioners that if Congress passes a law making waterboarding illegal,then it will be. In other words, if Congress passes the law now, then Bush can argue that waterboarding wasn’t illegal before they passed the law, otherwise why would they need to pass a law. Sounds like a trap. Congress doesn’t need to pass a law to make waterboarding illegal,it is already illegal and they know it. A law passed by Congress would give them cover. Mukasey is in on the fix. Does this make sense?
Ah, yes, Arlen Spector followed his usual pattern of acting like he was going to be a maverick then toeing the Administration line when it came to a vote.
I have almost drowned in big waves in Mexico, or I thought I was going to drown, both things are the same, a terror induced panic is hard to fight.
I cannot imagine anyone condoning this and would suggest that those who deny it as torture or mitigate it with bullshit interpretations volunteer to experience it and then say it is not torture.
That we are even having this conversation is disgusting and very disturbing..what have we become.
I am thoroughly sick at heart.
Why does Congress have to pass a law; isn’t it already illegal? If Congress does pass a law, doesn’t that excuse all prior waterboarding on the argument that it was not illegal until the law was passed?
What needs to be passed is a resolution mandating the AG to enforce an existing law prohibiting torture.
Ruffian @ 99
Seems like they would try, though the other laws against torture have been on the books for years.
On another tack, if there’s a Supreme Court opening now they can appoint someone who accepts torturing as okay. What would stop them now that Senate Dems have said torturing is okay with them?