<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mukasey, Feinstein and the Constitutional Wing of the Democratic Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:52:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078835</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078835</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1077561&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Scarecrow @ 23&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1077559&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;anna belle @ 21&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Somewhere I have gotten the notion that there is tacit agreement between the parties that investigations will not be pursued once the office of the president flips party-wise. Sort of a “catch ‘em in the act or not at all” kinda deal. Is that true?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But we did catch them in the act. Hundreds of times.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;—–&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Abu Ghraib photos and stories to match care of an Army sergeant are the smoking gun.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1077561"><em>Scarecrow @ 23</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1077559"><em>anna belle @ 21</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Somewhere I have gotten the notion that there is tacit agreement between the parties that investigations will not be pursued once the office of the president flips party-wise. Sort of a “catch ‘em in the act or not at all” kinda deal. Is that true?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But we did catch them in the act. Hundreds of times.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>—–</p>
<p>Abu Ghraib photos and stories to match care of an Army sergeant are the smoking gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peony</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078759</link>
		<dc:creator>peony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078759</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1077709&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kurt @ 118&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1077660&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;GSD @ 108&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hypothetical.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a ticking nuclear bomb in LA or NY.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are a special agent and you find one of the culprits who knows where the bomb is and how to defuse it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After hearing about the wonderful benefits of torture in solving this very scenario, you then torture the subject.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The subject is a plump, guy, sort of like Khalid Sheikh Mohammad who promptly goes into cardiac arrest after severe beatings and waterboarding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He dies and the bomb blows up killing hundreds of thousands.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you tell anyone or do you just kill yourself?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-GSD&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ok, then on the flip side of this, what do you do if the “plump guy” is tight lipped and just waits out the timer on the weapon and it goes off. Either way in your scenario the bomb goes off. The common factor here is time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The information you get may be bad information, but you also may get useful information. That has apparently helped in the capture of various high-rollers in Iraq, and even with the Iranian Republican Guard operatives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The “ticking time bomb” scenario seems to be the favorite argument in support of torture.  Well, according to an intelligence officer interviewed on NPR who was involved in three wars, this situation was never encountered in real life.  It’s a chimera, advanced to win an argument.  This man also said young interrogators in Iraq took their cues from “24!”where the “ticking time bomb” scenario gets a lot of play, so I hear.  Get it, fiction!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1077709"><em>Kurt @ 118</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1077660"><em>GSD @ 108</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hypothetical.</p>
<p>There is a ticking nuclear bomb in LA or NY.</p>
<p>You are a special agent and you find one of the culprits who knows where the bomb is and how to defuse it.</p>
<p>After hearing about the wonderful benefits of torture in solving this very scenario, you then torture the subject.</p>
<p>The subject is a plump, guy, sort of like Khalid Sheikh Mohammad who promptly goes into cardiac arrest after severe beatings and waterboarding.</p>
<p>He dies and the bomb blows up killing hundreds of thousands.</p>
<p>Do you tell anyone or do you just kill yourself?</p>
<p>-GSD</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ok, then on the flip side of this, what do you do if the “plump guy” is tight lipped and just waits out the timer on the weapon and it goes off. Either way in your scenario the bomb goes off. The common factor here is time.</p>
<p>The information you get may be bad information, but you also may get useful information. That has apparently helped in the capture of various high-rollers in Iraq, and even with the Iranian Republican Guard operatives.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The “ticking time bomb” scenario seems to be the favorite argument in support of torture.  Well, according to an intelligence officer interviewed on NPR who was involved in three wars, this situation was never encountered in real life.  It’s a chimera, advanced to win an argument.  This man also said young interrogators in Iraq took their cues from “24!”where the “ticking time bomb” scenario gets a lot of play, so I hear.  Get it, fiction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickinSF</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078720</link>
		<dc:creator>RickinSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078720</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see on Crooks &amp; Liars that Project Censored rates DiFi’s conflicts of interest in Iraq at #23 of the top 25 unreported news stories of the year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An open secret in San Fran; Dianne loooves a man in uniform.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see on Crooks &amp; Liars that Project Censored rates DiFi’s conflicts of interest in Iraq at #23 of the top 25 unreported news stories of the year.</p>
<p>An open secret in San Fran; Dianne loooves a man in uniform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jawbone, aka Rabid Lamb with Venoumous Fangs</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078605</link>
		<dc:creator>jawbone, aka Rabid Lamb with Venoumous Fangs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078605</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re: Bush’s early action to keep presidential records secret much, much longer–never got a question from Timmeh, did it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, it’s simply understood that IOKIYAR, plus there’s no expectation that ReThugs will honor openness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arrrrgh.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Mukasey thing has me in a really bad mood–where are the Dems who will honor our nation’s values? the Party’s values? The Constitution?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Bush’s early action to keep presidential records secret much, much longer–never got a question from Timmeh, did it?</p>
<p>Well, it’s simply understood that IOKIYAR, plus there’s no expectation that ReThugs will honor openness.</p>
<p>Arrrrgh.</p>
<p>This Mukasey thing has me in a really bad mood–where are the Dems who will honor our nation’s values? the Party’s values? The Constitution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Zen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078388</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078388</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They have to filibuster. Jeez, they have to make a stand *somewhere*. What is &lt;em&gt;wrong&lt;/em&gt; with these people?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have to filibuster. Jeez, they have to make a stand *somewhere*. What is <em>wrong</em> with these people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078278</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Senator Feingold states that we need an AG to show the President he is not above the law….apparently we do since Congress is unwilling to do what the are REQUIRED to do when a President breaks the law….it’s called IMPEACHMENT.  but hey, let’s put all the responsibility on the AG, then Congress can continue to be irrelevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Feingold states that we need an AG to show the President he is not above the law….apparently we do since Congress is unwilling to do what the are REQUIRED to do when a President breaks the law….it’s called IMPEACHMENT.  but hey, let’s put all the responsibility on the AG, then Congress can continue to be irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078155</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078155</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lieberstein!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberstein!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brantl</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078051</link>
		<dc:creator>Brantl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1078051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t understand how Feingold can call this a difficult decision. I used to respect Feingold. not any more. If this asshole, Mukasey hasn’t got the stones to call waterboarding torture, he’s either stupid, incompetant, a liar, a crook, or someone who has his head shoved into the sand or so far up his ass an Xray should look like he’s got 2 digestive systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t understand how Feingold can call this a difficult decision. I used to respect Feingold. not any more. If this asshole, Mukasey hasn’t got the stones to call waterboarding torture, he’s either stupid, incompetant, a liar, a crook, or someone who has his head shoved into the sand or so far up his ass an Xray should look like he’s got 2 digestive systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realist</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1077980</link>
		<dc:creator>Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1077980</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;manufactured issues about Presidential records&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking of Presidential records, anybody recall how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A20731-2001Oct31&quot;&gt;one of Bush’s first acts as President was to block the scheduled release of papers from Reagan’s presidency&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, you probably don’t recall, largely because right-wing boot-licking pieces of crap like Timmeh completely ignored it and gave Bush the usual pass.  Timmeh is the last person who has any right to ask anybody else about the release of Presidential records.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>manufactured issues about Presidential records</em></p>
<p>Speaking of Presidential records, anybody recall how <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A20731-2001Oct31">one of Bush’s first acts as President was to block the scheduled release of papers from Reagan’s presidency</a>?</p>
<p>Actually, you probably don’t recall, largely because right-wing boot-licking pieces of crap like Timmeh completely ignored it and gave Bush the usual pass.  Timmeh is the last person who has any right to ask anybody else about the release of Presidential records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1077922</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/11/05/mukasey-and-the-constitutional-wing-of-the-democratic-party/#comment-1077922</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1077691&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kurt @ 115&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I agree this sounds like a 24 episode, and that it doesn’t happen all that often….but it has happened. We had our’s on 9/11, the Japanese had their’s, and Spain just recently had an episode. Thats 3 in the last few years and it should be alarming the hell out of everyone. On the flip side to that argument, waterboarding/torture is not used all that much either. It is being used on targeted individuals to extract information to hopefully   avoid the attacks I listed previously.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kurt…in none of the scenarios above was &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a) foreknowledge of an imminent terrorist attack &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(unless you are suggesting that the CIA, Condi Rice, and George Bush did know of an imminent attack on 9/11 and did nothing about it?).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b) a terrorist in custody who would have knowledge of such attacks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So your idea that 9/11, the Spanish Railroad attacks, or the japanese subway attacks could have been averted by torturing anyone is, quite frankly, absurd. The situation you are suggesting are likely to occur only one in a hundred thousand cases. And the risk is that the application of torture will result in misleading information that strains resources from factual leads (after all one has actually arrested a suspect). If that suspect is actually trained s/he WILL give false information. If they are innocent they will also give false information under torture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, if one really knows that an individual is involved in an imminent terrorist attack (and isn’t carrying the bomb himself…in which apprehension solves that issue) the best thing is to TAIL the suspect to acquire as much information , without false leads, as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1077691"><em>Kurt @ 115</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
I agree this sounds like a 24 episode, and that it doesn’t happen all that often….but it has happened. We had our’s on 9/11, the Japanese had their’s, and Spain just recently had an episode. Thats 3 in the last few years and it should be alarming the hell out of everyone. On the flip side to that argument, waterboarding/torture is not used all that much either. It is being used on targeted individuals to extract information to hopefully   avoid the attacks I listed previously.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Kurt…in none of the scenarios above was </p>
<p>a) foreknowledge of an imminent terrorist attack </p>
<p>(unless you are suggesting that the CIA, Condi Rice, and George Bush did know of an imminent attack on 9/11 and did nothing about it?).</p>
<p>b) a terrorist in custody who would have knowledge of such attacks</p>
<p>So your idea that 9/11, the Spanish Railroad attacks, or the japanese subway attacks could have been averted by torturing anyone is, quite frankly, absurd. The situation you are suggesting are likely to occur only one in a hundred thousand cases. And the risk is that the application of torture will result in misleading information that strains resources from factual leads (after all one has actually arrested a suspect). If that suspect is actually trained s/he WILL give false information. If they are innocent they will also give false information under torture.</p>
<p>In fact, if one really knows that an individual is involved in an imminent terrorist attack (and isn’t carrying the bomb himself…in which apprehension solves that issue) the best thing is to TAIL the suspect to acquire as much information , without false leads, as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
