A great new campaign from Women’s Voices, Women Vote on the importance of women’s involvement in the political process. And a challenge: can you spot Digby?
The WaPo is touting a new WaPo/ABC News poll that says Americans really want a change. Well…duh. Anyone who has spoken to any group of Americans in the last few years already knew that, but I suppose having statistical validation of the disgust, unease and outright hostility toward the Beltway Classes is useful. There are, however, a couple of points that I want to emphasize:
Concern about the economy, the war in Iraq and growing dissatisfaction with the political environment in Washington all contribute to the lowest public assessment of the direction of the country in more than a decade. Just 24 percent think the nation is on the right track, and three-quarters said they want the next president to chart a course that is different than that pursued by Bush.
Overwhelmingly, Democrats want a new direction, but so do three-quarters of independents and even half of Republicans. Sixty percent of all Americans said they feel strongly that such a change is needed after two terms of the Bush presidency.
Dissatisfaction with the war in Iraq remains a primary drag on public opinion, and Americans are increasingly downcast about the state of the economy. More than six in 10 called the war not worth fighting, and nearly two-thirds gave the national economy negative marks. The outlook going forward is also bleak: About seven in 10 see a recession as likely over the next year….
Thirty-nine percent of Americans said they now have a favorable impression of the Republican Party, lower than at any point since December 1998, when Republicans were in the midst of impeachment proceedings against then-President Bill Clinton.
Among the GOP rank and file, Republican favorability has fallen 15 percentage points since March 2006 (from 93 percent to 78 percent). It has dropped 19 points among independents, whose support for Democratic candidates in last year’s midterm elections contributed significantly to GOP losses in the House and the Senate.
Only 23 percent of those surveyed said they want to keep going “in the direction Bush has been taking us,”…
The Democratic Party holds double-digit leads over the GOP as the party most trusted to handle the three most frequently cited issues for 2008: Iraq, health care and the economy. The Democratic advantages on immigration and taxes are narrower, and the parties are at rough parity on terrorism, once a major Republican strong point. (emphasis mine)
The Republican tendency to fail at governing has caught up with them. Again. It seems that you have to believe in government as something other than a supply mechanism for military incursions in order to do it well. The results of corporate welfare and self-regulation are evident from the mortgage crisis to the lead paint on your baby rattles to your workplace non-safety to that bridge you won’t drive over any more until someone scares up the money to shore it up. And a whole host of issues that impact our daily lives from potholes to cost of groceries.
It’s time that Democrats started listening to Jane: On Image, Part I and Part II. “Until they are willing to organize and do battle with the beast where it lives they will continue to be scattered and picked off one by one by the GOP machine and no amount of “comity” will ever change it.” Amen. Could we start by standing up for the Constitution? ‘Cause that would be swell…
Related posts:
- New Gallup Poll Finds Republican Party Less Popular Than Russia, China, Venezuela
- Pew Poll: Americans Losing Patience with Congress
- Obama’s Numbers Driving Democrats Down
- Americans Care More About Having Public Option than Gaining Snowe’s Vote
- GOP Fearmongering Succeeds in Casting Doubt on Legitimacy of the Electoral Process





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

I love Digby!
zed?
Oh Digby is in there! I looked for her the first time but didn’t see her.
It’s quick but she looks gorgeous.
Not counting Barney.
dammit….
LS – if you’re here – I left you one downstairs…
(I refuse to use EPU any longer – Removed by Mod)
edit: imo
I saw Digby! Of course, how could you miss her like that?
Christy – I’m glad you brought up this topic. I’ve been wracking my skull over how I can become more of a participant – I just have not experience with this. Before I came to FDL, I never emailed, wrote, or called my reps. I did not give money. Now I do all of them and have spoken personally to two — one of them is my rep; one of them is Maurice Hinchey. I’m not sure what else to do, unless it is at the local level and I’m not sure how exactly that goes….
I’ve been thinking about going to “Take Back America” – I’ve been getting enough email invites from them. But they keep playing a picture of Nancy Pelosi – so that makes me hesitate about going, especially when I have no idea what happens there – what I could contribute to the cause by going there – what I’d “get” out of going there…
Jane Hamsher @ 3
Light hair, black jacket and Macbook? Every piece of hers that I read, I am awed by the brain in her head.
From last thread:
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…..nt-1077993
I’ve said before that Bush has his fingers in the dike trying to hold back many scandals until he’s out of office so he can blame somebody else. This applies equally to Iraq and the economy. The monkeying with interest rates is designed to pump up the stock market – the most visible, if imperfect, indicator of the economy.
Jane at 3 — I know — she really looks fabulous, doesn’t she? I had to run the video a coupla times to be certain it was her, it is such a quick shot. *g*
Digby!
[EPU’d]
Christy –
Can FDL lobby Barney Frank to support an ARM reset moratorium?
Back in September, I told Mark Udall’s staff that Congress should enact a two year moratorium on ARM resets — this would put the brakes on the foreclosure crisis, and allow the new administration and Congress time to work out long term solutions.
The economic news of the weekend suggests that the global financial crisis is just beginning — it’s time for Congress to save the financial system from the crisis of it’s own making.
FDIC Chairman Sheila Blair called for a voluntary freeze on ARM resets — but we’ve all seen how well the markets regulate themselves.
It’s time for Congress to take action, and save the American Dream.
She looks great with her hair up like that.
Fantastic ad.
Yes, these are the faces of the voters who Will Make Change.
I would love to see some coverage of the Dean DNC voter involvement plan that is rolling out this fall. In mid-November there is a big push via the net to get people on board.
I have seen a live presentation of the methodology, and I can REALLY recommend that anyone who reads here regularly should check with their state Democratic Party and find out if the DNC trainers are scheduled for their area any time soon.
It is a fantastic “product” to turn voters out next year, and EVEN BETTER, to keep the national people who flock into our areas during election season Out. Because we’ll be running our own campaigns fine, thank you very much.
Can we print this paragraph on handbills and get it to every single American? I don’t think things could be summed up more succinctly!
And if anyone can get that message more succinct, then I think we could put it on billboards too.
-ck- @ 12
-ck-
We, the readers, ARE FDL so when we take the actions you suggest, it IS FDL doing it.
IMNSHO.
OT-
brendan and selise (if you are here), I responded to your comments at the end of the message control thread
Hmmm, Digby in the big chair in the Oval Office…
Yeah, that would be a good look for her.
IMO..The more the Republican mouth breathing, knuckle dragging morons try to beat up on Hillary; the wider the margin of victory.
Thanks for this, Christy!
dakine01 –
Understood, but collective actions work best when there is a focused call-to-arms — or in this case, calls to support an ARM reset moratorium.
Tapping away at her computer? Yes :-)
But don’t they ever caption these things? Can’t tell what they’re saying.
Meanwhile, apropos women’s involvement, the sisters duke it out:
Yea! Kobe Matisse Rose is now my friend! Now I’m related to the famous Fauve painter!
Christy – Thanks for this thread. And thanks SO MUCH for covering the issues of racism in media consolidation and sub-prime lending in your two earlier posts today.
The Republican tendency to fail at governing has caught up with them. Again.
Here in Alaska, the GOP is getting so depressed by the large and broad scales of their corruption coming out in one indictment or conviction after another, it is depressing their electorate. But, just as important, is the perception that these GOP pols haven’t been providing any meaningful or helpful solutions to problems confronting a rapidly growing population.
OT, New Froomkin up Another Bush Backfire
bg @ 14
Hi bg,
Could you provide a link, I checked out the DNC website and saw no information. thanks!
This situation in Pakistan is twice as dangerous as Iraq and Iran and North Korea combined- Apparently no one in the White House including the great Clusterfucker himself has the faintest fuckin idea what to do about it. If there is a bloody revolution- they will be fighting for control of a large nuclear arsenal…holy fuckin shit!!
Click on 50 State Strategy. I promise, this is a really great thing. It builds on the concept that MoveOn used in 2004. But it does MoveOn much better because it creates a data base that belongs to the people. MoveOn took their data base with them. It was terrible.
Dean figured this out and gives it back to us. And the county and state Party.
Pakistan represents another US policy bus that the Clusterfucker has driven into a cul de sac.
One teensy nitpick with your article, Christy – I don’t think Republicans see the government as a way to support military actions. I think they see it as a way to increase profits, at least for their friends and allies. The military action is just one means of getting there.
rwcole @ 30
Pardon the correction.
Pakistan … Bush and Cheney have been so het-up about (fairly stable) Iran getting nuclear anything, but Pakistan has nukes already, and hasn’t had a stable government for years, and – how about we hand them all the technology they want.
Bush is throwing Musharraf under the bus it seems.
dakine01 @ 32
Beat me to it.
Pakistan was the country who exported nuclear technology to the enemies of the US—no wonder he’s Bush’s best bud..Pakistan can never quite locate Osama- although he’s apparently sheltered there.
This fucker knows how ta pick friends eh?
Re: Pakistan:
Musharrif gave going after Al-Qaeda and the Taliban in the border areas with Afghanistan as the excuse for suspending the Constitution and declaring a blend of emergency and martial law. But doing this doesn’t necessarily give any more power than he had before to go after the “terrorists.” He did all that just to stay in power, period.
Several days ago the conversation here was focused on being proactive as opposed to reactive. Yesterday there was considerable conversation about MODO’s latest twisted piece and what to do about it.
Here is a proactive idea to solve the MODO problem and much more. How about mounting a big push to get Digby a regular slot on the NYT opinion page?
rwcole @ 36
Which one? Bush, Musharrif, or Bin Laden?
JF @ 39
Therein lies the rub.
I just received an e-mail from Edwards on how we can put up pictures of our own heroes. . . it will start to look more like the women heroes above. . .
The Pakistan ISI created the Taliban; the ISI created Al Qaeda; ISI Chief Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta shortly before the 9/11 attacks. Osama bin Laden is comfortable in the Northwest region of Pakistan.
But Saddam tried to kill Junior’s daddy, so we invaded Iraq and sell F-16s to Pakistan.
Quick after action report from the NY Netroots visit to Schumer’s office.
While we left messages for the staffer we’d met with during last year’s Easter recess, we never managed to get past the security guard this time. Things at the office “were crazy today” and nobody was available to meet with us.
I arrived late, but with Matt Stoller in tow (met him at an earlier event), but I was told that there was press who stopped by earlier.
RagingGurrl was on her second video tape, so there is a lots of raw material that she will have up as soon as she can. There’s also a Mukasey/Schumer mashup in the works.
New York State residents who are interested in the outcome of this action, or who want to hear about future events, can sign up here:
http://groups.google.com/group…..ct-newyork
My personal take on Schumer’s position here is that he believes the Republicans are doing themselves irreparable damage by voting in bloc to support Bush and the Iraq occupation and torture and incompetence. He wants the republicans to choose between repudiating the president, or have he Bush albatross around their necks during the 08 elections–especially the senate.
This may not be as wise as Schumer thinks. A lot of NY progressives may decide to stay home in ‘10, and there’s a popular billionaire who is interested in politics and will be out of a job in 2010.
Please don’t mistake my reporting on this to indicate that I organized it–that was Joanne L, RagingGurl, Sari and others. I just had to get home earlier than they did.
Naomi Wolf on Thom Hartmann for the better part of the hour.
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, speaking at a news conference in the West Bank Monday, said Musharraf, who imposed emergency rule Saturday, should stick by his pledge to step down as the country’s military chief.
“We believe that the best path for Pakistan is to quickly return to a constitutional path and then to hold elections,” Rice said.
“It is also true that President Musharraf has said that he will take off his uniform. That would be an important step.”
President Bush is scheduled to address the situation from the White House on Monday.
CNN
Sorry to just blurt this out before we get to EPU territory, but katymine mentioned in the Late Night thread that she’ll be in Seattle this coming weekend and wants to get together with any FDLers in the area. Anyone who wants to meet up with her (we’re looking at either Saturday or Sunday) please email me and I’ll put you on the list. Let me know if either day doesn’t work for you. Not sure where we’re going to meet, so any suggestions for places in downtown that are within easy reach of the hotel would be appreciated.
My email address is my Internet handle at earthlink.net. You don’t have to capitalize the “C”.
The planets must be weordly aligned. George Will agrees with us!!
And I even agreed with Robert Novak today!!
Who’da thunk it?
LHP at 47 — Stop it — you are scaring me. *g* (Sorry gang, I’m on a conference call, so apologies for being slow to respond.)
looseheadprop @ 47
I must be dreaming…slaps face…
What, they run out of Kool Aid over the weekend?
looseheadprop @ 47
I was amazed to find that I was nodding my head in agreement with Will. Of course, he couldn’t resist the standard “Bbbbbut CLINTON!!!”
On topic: Elections ‘08:
“The Republican tendency to fail at governing has caught up with them. Again.”
That’s because Republicans don’t want to govern, they want to rule.
Governance means compromise, trust, courage and making tough and unpopular decisions that are for the better of all, not just a select few.
Republicans have all the answers already, those reasons are called Jesus.
They want to rule your lives. They want you as a subject to the state, not as a free-thinking, decision-making constituent, who can openly and at times, angrily disagree with those lofty souls who have been given the reins of power.
Republicans would just as soon as do away with any civil right guaranteed to all humans, not just Americans. Do as your told (and from all of the closeted cock-sucking going on behind Republican closed doors) and not as I do.
Don’t question, follow.
Disagreement is treason. Straying from the path means indeterminate detention, a few years of re-education, topped off with a full confession of how you have managed to be un-America.
There is no governing from Republicans, only rulers and the ruled.
Here’s a tidbit…
House Judiciary to file paperwork on Miers/Bolten contempt resolutions
Hope Nancy is ready to consider acting on behalf of her country this time…
jayt — EPU is a rather nice person and whatever issue you may have with him, this is a comments thread and not a barrom brawl. And we’d like to keep it that way (birthday or not…happy birthday, btw…)
In other words, substantive discussion — yes. Calling someone out because of personal peeves? Not so much.
Says Manhattan District Attorney Arthur Branch:
(Same link as my 52.)
Christy!!!
Consider this: In Pakistan, thousands of lawyers have taken to the streets to defend the Constitution of Pakistan…
Let that sink in for a moment.
What would it be like if, in Washington D.C., thousands of lawyers took to the streets in protest against the Constitutional abuses of the Bush administration? [It is true that Bush has never officially suspended the Constitution, but Bush has derided the Constitution as “just a piece of paper.”]
Bob in HI
neokneme @ 55
Acting on behalf of her country has so far proven to be beneath her majesty dignity.
LS @ 60
“
majestydignity”Perino was asked today whether there would be any condition where Bush would think it was okay to suspend the Constitution in the name of terrorism. Her answer: No.
Nancy a Queen Bee? Heavens to Mergatroid!
LS @ 62
While I don’t believe her answer, I’m glad the question was asked.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 48
There must be a worldwide shortage of koolaide. Even the die hards cannot think up any more excuses for this madness of King George’s?
OOORRRRR? Are we finally coming to the tipping point?
Remember, republicans fianlly turned on Nixon to save their own political viability. Despite the digs at Clinton and Carter (which I chalk up to “old habits die hard”) these were both pretty forceful repudiations of Bushco.
And yet, Impeachment Is STILL of the table.
Sigh
Got EPU’d on the sub-prime mortgage thread and thought that the impact on this disaster on the 2008 elections (and beyond) needed to be brought forward.
Let’s consider the effect of foreclosures on the election process. On the one hand these folks will likely want to vote Democrat, especially if Bush and the Republicans in Congress don’t act to assist those being made homeless.
OTOH Homeless and displaced people are far less likely to have their voter registrations up-to-date, have the necessary home address generally required, and are extremely mobile from residence to residence. The PUGS are going to go challenge crazy!!!
Plus, many of these minority voters were moving into suburban or rural areas which were previously white districts….and with Republican Congressmen. Thus prosperity for minorities posed a threat to the PUGS, if not immediately, then down the road 10 or 15 years. While I don’t think the mortgage crisis was intentional in this respect it wouldn’t behoove the Republicans in these Districts to help those in foreclosure. They aren’t the correct Party, class or race.
Think of how this ties in with campaigns like that of Charlie Brown against John Doolittle, or Jerry McNerny (okay, I know, yuck) against Pombo back in 2006. The change of minority composition in those districts really helped. Then theres that nefarious Pug plan to make Californias Electoral votes be distributed by voting district.
So there is really going to need to be voter registration and assistance drives to get themse victims of foreclosure to the polls. It needs to be a targetted population, registration-wise for the Domocrats. And laws should be passed that assures that they will be allowed to vote, either in the district of their original home…or in their recent place of occupation.
Completely missed Digby, thanks for the heads up. Great ad!.
neokneme @ 54
Sooooo, did Mukasey promise to unblock the DC USA from pursuing those contempt rulings in court? Do I smell a deal? Small potatos, but this may be the eensy weensy concession given in exchange for DiFi and Schumer getting him out of committee.
looseheadprop @ 63
Wouldn’t it be something if it wound up being republican house members who forced her to put it back on the table?
What with John Cole and others, I do think there’s a change in the air — reasonable people of whatever political stripe — those who are not in the 25%ers are getting mad.
I just hope it’s enough and in time. I think it is.
Biodun @ 56
And, he does have that private jet, which committed no wrong doing.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 57
I’m sorry. Flew off my fingers before I had the good sense to catch it. My bad.
My rent is $809.00 Today, I had, in my checking account, $830. I’ve got $21 to play with – gee, what am I gonna do? Today is my birthday – so I’m a bit grouchy – and I’ll again apologize. I’m tryin’,real hard, to take care of people who need some help. I get stiffed a lot – but I still believe in what I’m doing – and I won’t change it
My apologies for being a dick….
looseheadprop @ 66
Stop playing with my emotions, LHP. That just sounds too good to be true.
cinnamonape @ 64
This is a great post, thanks. I hope someone faxes this to every blue candidate we are supporting. It should be relatively easy to track these names through public records, bankruptcy filings, foreclosure filings. Of those that are not registered as Democrats, it seems to me, it would certainly warrant a phone call (of course not referencing how the candidate came by the name).
looseheadprop @ 65
Verrry interrrresting…I hope tipping point is what is happening…yes, I sure do.
One thing that certainly has to be throwing a wrench on things is Bush’s policies on Pakistan, which are now putting the safety of the troops in Afganistan directly in danger, since 50% of the supplies come through Pakistan. Also the problems in Turkey threaten supply lines to the soldiers in Iraq. This could give the Repubs the “motivation” to back off the war-mongering, and certainly throw a wet rag over Cheney’s Iran war. The military logistics just aren’t panning out there anymore to support such a thing.
LS @ 62
For all practical purposes, Chimpy has already suspended the US Constitution.
The rule of law is still-born in the Bush administration, which was inaugurated in 2000 by the SCOTUS ruling in Gore v Bush.
rwcole @ 45
Condi and George are watching to see Musharraf take off his uniform???
Will Condi take off her stilettos and George remove his codpiece?
Digby, with the laptop in the Oval Office.
Here’s the Dick standard…
U.S. Plan Envisioned Nuking Iran, Syria, Libya
peanutbutter @ 67
A poll of Vermonters indicates that they would seem to agree with you about impeachment. Of course, this may explain why Vermont is the only state Bush has yet to visit during his tenure in the White House.
Hippo Birdies to you, jayt!!!
Sorry to hear about your strained financial situation — life is hard, and the GOP thugs are doing everything they can to make it harder for everyone who’s not part of their billionaire base.
But have a Happy Birthday, just to spite the bastards!!!
neokneme @ 61
Heavens to Murgatroyd!
Snagglepuss
I came home after work, brought up the page, clicked on play, watched the ad…
…and then I saw Digby for half a second, and burst into tears.
Of gratitude and joy, needless to say.
I think I need a t-shirt that reads “What Digby Said.”
dakine01 @ 81
Right-ee-oo!
neokneme @ 75
My Goddess that is outrageous. Impeach already!!!
-ck- @ 78
I’ll second that.
looseheadprop @ 65
Don’t forget! Kucinich has promised to introduce impeachment of Cheney as a point of personal privilege TOMORROW! Then, of course, someone will move to table it. But that will still force a vote on it. See David Swanson’s blog. I don’t know if there will be a floor debate or not, but whatever, I’m hoping it will stir things up a bit.
Bob in HI
Peanutbutter @ 67
That would really infuriate me. Why? Because it would mean that the big daddy republicans would be seen to have ridden to the rescue b/c the emascualted spineless Dems couldn’t get it together to do their frackin jobs!
ARRRRGGGHHHhh!
Chimpy’s and Condi’s hands are tied on his one:
But that’s not the best option for Musharraf. He suspended the Constitution and declared martial law precisely to stay in power, not to fight Al-Qaeda and the Taliban as he claimed. He’s been trying to do that for years.
Jane has a new post upstairs. I got the zed, but I’m gonna keep an eye on this space for a while.
Bob in HI
neokneme @ 76
It always seemed obvious the we didn’t have the conventional forces to deal with the entire “axis of evil.” At first I really thought the speech was gratuitous stupidity. Since the pointless invasion of Iraq, I have no idea what measures the deadly cretans would take.
jayt — No worries. I figured it was something along the “having a bad day” line, because it wasn’t your usual self.
So sorry to hear you are having a rough day. But do know that I’m wishing you a much happier rest of it!
neokneme @ 81
Felix the Cat.
cinnamonape @ 74
BRAIN BLEACH!
Ugh!
cinnamonape @ 64
You know, this is…this is…sheerly brilliant. I agree with you, we’ve got to make s ure these people get to the polls too… I hadn’t considered that side effect of redlining as well … >:-(
Sorry: What is the codpiece?
Plus, I was in the car and heard a few of the Rush comments on this poll. To hear him, it all favors the way things are, so to speak. Thanks for a different take.
And, they manage to sneak in that Republican talking point. I wish I had a link for you, but I may have even gotten it here: poll after poll has shown the supposed advantage of Republicans on national security in public opinion is a myth.
They recite it over and over, but it’s not true, and it hasn’t BEEN true for years.
It’s been a long, long time since patriarchy has ruled the human roost. I personally think of patriarchy as a failed system to keep us all warm, fed and safe from killing each other. Is it the sense here that a woman represents an improvement over the men as a law maker or as an administrator? Or is it just that there is a feeling that women are under-represented in this democracy? Does anyone think that a society can do well or better under a matriarchy? I don’t even know what matriarchy means exactly. The add is done very well in my opinion but how would a right winger interpret it? Up above in no. 3 and 5 I see that there are fans of Digby who is in the video. What does anybody think of Rachael Maddow. She knocks me out with her thinking and her savvy.
bobschacht @ 57
Ding! Ding! Ding!
That’s just what I have been thinking all day long. Blessings on them all in their righteous fight.
I just don’t know what I’m going to wear to the polls tomorrow, maybe my lake blue blouse.
Elliott @ 97
… the one with the fire-breathing dogs on it??
Christy… I like this idea of getting women to vote. Its a good idea. If they changed a couple of things, it could be an empowering campaign for women.
1. They are targeting, according their site, “unmarried” women. They repeat this over and over. This is negative from jump because it tells women what they are not. The standard perspective they’re coming from is “married” and if you’re not married, you are sub-standard… “UN”. What these women are is SINGLE. One. Independent. Making their own way on their own, or coupled-up chosing to not marry or are prevented by law from being married. Single is not a dirty word. Married is not the standard. Dump the “unmarried” bs.
2. There are several alumni from Hillary and Bill’s admin and campaigns on the board of this organization. I think that makes the agenda clear and it diminishes the true empowerment agenda they attempt to present in the spot. Dump the clinton alumni from the organization and really make it about getting women to vote…. for whoever they choose.
3. Julia LD, at the end of the spot, wants you to vote for Hillary Clinton only because she’s a women. They don’t talk about her positions, her record, her resume, or any other qualifying factor. Just vote for her to put a woman in the Oval Office. Not only is that sexist, it is insulting to women. It is against Federal law which prohibits considering gender, race, and religion as a qualification of employement. Since the President is a Federal job, it applies. This is a campaign to get women to vote for Hillary Clinton… plain and simple. Only she doesn’t have to claim it in her campagin financing. Its a sad thing when it could really be a wonderfully empowering thing. Either have Hillary claim this a an ad for her “vote for Hillary” campaign or drop the scene with the Oval Office and drop number 2.
Women don’t want to get jobs BECAUSE they are women. They want to get jobs because they are the BEST qualified for the position. I don’t ever want to have to wonder on that and up until now I didn’t… ever. I always KNEW I got the job because of my qualifications.
Thankfully, I’m an “unmarried” VOTER so they won’t come after me. :-)
I posted this same sentiment over at Digby’s when she had this up. I also think Digby rocks! I just disagree on this.
Biodun @ 23
As much as I like Ms. Ferraro I have to disagree a bit on this particular issue.
The biggest fight for Edwards in this whole campaign has been with Obama, not Clinton. Obama and Edwards split up a big part of the Moderate-to-Progressive/Liberal vote among Dems. Clinton is far to the right of Edwards and until recently hasn’t been the main competitor. The fight has been to gather in all the Lefties and then to take on Obama to seal up everything to the Left of Hillary. Obama stands in the way and his repeated failures have given us meat for a low-key intellectual fight which has lasted months. Patience and consistent pressure has rewarded us with the public becoming ever more aware of this weakness of Barack’s. He makes mistakes of major significance on a regular basis.
Only since the gay-bashing issue has come out has it become completely obvious to many of his supporters that they should look elsewhere for representation. Now comes the fight with Hillary.
For her and her supporters to claim Edwards is bashing her because she’s female is to completely misread this entire campaign. Perhaps Ms. Ferraro hasn’t been watching it very closely and only began to notice when this kerfuffle arose.
Sure, many of the details about Hillary and her campaign have arisen and been noticed over the last few months. But, the actual fight with her only began with that debate.
Why has that fight been so obvious and loud when compared to the quiet persistent fight with Obama? It’s because it took time for Obama to reveal himself and for Edwards to present himself as a better candidate.
With Hillary the timing is different. Her supporters are different. The issue is different. Everything is different.
The difficulty of facing a candidate whose supporters are (or, at least seem to be) uncritical requires more drastic measures. One must confront them and thus a bit more noise is required. I certainly hope that during this debate (purportedly over immigration) her supporters will listen to the Edwards side of the argument and see it’s not immigration, but personal qualities of Hillary which are crucial. Just as Obama made errors (not because of stupidity or of greed or of some other nasty thing, but just because it’s part of who he is, part of his experience or character or something fundamental to him) Hillary has flaws.
Hillary wants to be President. She’s been told she’s well-qualified for it. She’s seen her husband do it. And she’s been told since leaving the White House that she too could do it. But, she didn’t strive for it for many years. She let Bill do that and she was in the background. Sure, she says she advised him. I have little doubt of that. On which subjects isn’t clear, but all spouses advise. We want them to. But, she … SHE didn’t strive to be president because it wasn’t her goal. She’s being offered it. That isn’t how it should work.
Now that she is going after it we’re seeing she isn’t the same as Bill. She’s as different from Bill as Bush II was from Bush I. I don’t mean to slander her by that, but her personal qualities are obviously different than Bill’s.
Yes, they work well to campaign. Yes, Hillary is smart and presents herself well. But, she takes illegal campaign money. She has a pollster who is anti-union. She worked for a law firm which did anti-union work. She avoid committing to any particular position polls and focus groups haven’t cleared or her primary competitors haven’t committed to first. She doesn’t lead. She didn’t lead in seeking out the White House. She didn’t initiate her own try. She’s been following for far too many years to change stripes now.
My problem with Hillary is that she’s not the Leader America needs at this point in time. She’s a Goldwater Girl/Liberal/corporatist/lawyer and nobody knows what she is or what her experience has been (aside from being scarred by the Republican attack machine) or where she might take the country as president. She’s a cipher and only has a front-runner position because of name and face recognition. If she were Joe Smith she wouldn’t be in this race at all.
Even after the immigration discussion I still have to ask, is she for the Spitzer plan or not?
How can you trust someone like that to Lead the world? I can’t.