Matt Stoller of OpenLeft asks Donna about her campaign. Huge thanks to Matt for sending this along...
Jane's surgery went well yesterday, so everyone can breathe a sigh of relief and know that she is doing really well and woke up as feisty as ever. So much so that the first thing she asked about was how things were going with Donna Edwards. If you missed our Blue America chat with Donna the first time around, do take a little time to read it -- her answers are thorough, forward-thinking and just what we need in Congress these days.
So it’s up to you. Donna is a fantastic candidate. If you want to mitigate the effect that people like Pelosi and Reid have on keeping Bush Dogs like Al Wynn in office and in power, please consider giving to her campaign.
If we want change, we are going to have to make it happen. What we get from inside the Beltway is a strategy to perpetuate more of the same. The leadership has to depend on incumbants for votes while they are still in office. It's a practical, short-term stop-gap approach that sticks to the status quo.
Honestly, that just isn't good enough for the long haul.
If we want more and better Democrats, we are going to have to do the work to get them. Any Maryland readers out there? Donna's campaign is looking for some volunteers. Anyone who can do so? We're definitely looking for some donors -- because early numbers in a campaign have a big impact, and we'd love to help Donna shake things up any way we can. As a local MD newspaper shows, keeping up with the PAC money pouring in to incumbant Al Wynn's coffers is a big job:
...Seventy of Edward’s 89 contributors had addresses outside of Maryland, according to her report. For Wynn, 88 of his 124 donors were not from his state.
Wynn’s campaign also relied heavily on donations from trade groups, unions and major corporations. Wynn reported that $66,450 – a little more than half of his quarterly donations – came from political action committees. To date, more than $293,000 of his campaign funds have come from the groups.
Wynn’s donor groups included the AFL-CIO and the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) labor unions, the tobacco company Altria, cable giant Comcast and both Coca-Cola and Pepsi, as well as numerous doctors....
That's a whole lotta PAC money. To help Donna be competitive, we need to step up. We've seen that aggregated donations in the $10s and $20s from people who want change can be more powerful than a fat cat PAC. So far, we've raised $17,845.25 for Donna's campaign -- just in the last few days from 369 donors. And a rough total of donations from across the blogs reaches $50,608.25, according to Howie, over the same time period (including our total). You guys are amazing! We are over halfway to our goal of $100,000 for Donna -- excellent!
Your donation today can make a difference for Donna -- and for our goal of more and better Democrats.
One race at a time, we are going to make the Beltway a better place. Plus, big totals for challenging progressives scare the bejeebers out of the Beltway Brahmins. If you need more incentive, this is it. I can't think of a group of people more in need of a good, wake the hell up shake. Can you help today? Go Donna!
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Christy!
Yeah, I got an email about Donna this morning from Jane and Matt (Stoller).
I was at the Lake when Donna had her Blue America chat. I donated and also she’s now one of my Facebook friends. I think she’s terrific too!
I am just not paying attention! Once again I missed a zed by reading first. I am such a wanker. ;-)
I gave a couple of days ago. Will give more in the future.
And most welcome news about Jane!
(I’ve notified people below about new thread…)
There is a facebook group She Should Run
now to go back and read.
But back to the topic. I get e-mails from Donna’s campaign because of my giving the last go ’round. I’ve got a few moments right now, so I will give again today. I love her.
Good morning, Miss Christy.
Darned chilly at my house this morning. Glad to read Jane’s news - she is superhuman, that woman.
I saw my state senator at a fancy function last night. He was being collegial with all the old dems that were there to honor the man of the hour. It was interesting to see which ones had once been Democrats and with ones did the switch when John Connally made it Ok to do so here in Texas. The only one who was still a Dem through and through was former senator and Clinton ambassador Bob Krueger. I don’t think old Governor Briscoe counts, even though I think he may still be a democrat.
More better women candidates. Here, here. As soon as I deal with my credit card fiasco. Still dealing with some bogus online escort charges. How does this crap happen?
needed that, thanx for the update
And this is why we need more and better (women!) Democrats in Congress:
mui @ 11
In my mind, part of the issue is HOW to get more good women into the process?
??!!!???
today is national blackout day but think it’s ok to donate to donna and blue america.
Toby Wollin @ 14
by letting them know they will have our support.
donate to donna - two birds, one stone.
Another Donnation here.
I saw the same old Democrats at some rally they had for themselves yesterday. Looked the the crowd was just staffers. lol!
They were rolling out their “New Direction for America” campaign. Instead of talking about a new direction, why aren’t we well on our way? It’s not like we don’t know which direction to go here.
Impeachment hearings should be over by now, or just wrapping up, for starters I don’t understand it. actBlue
‘New Direction’ is new theme for Democratic plan
Thanks everyone. I met Donna two years ago at Take Back America and she really is a phenomenal person. Full of energy and full of drive to change things for the better — I absolutely loved her.
From Donna’s campaign website (link in Christy’s post):
Yep. She’ll be a much better woman Democrat in Congress.
Gnome de Plume @ 4
Heh, I have the same problem.
CHS @ 20:
phenomenal…*g*
Biodun at 23 — Yes, it was a typo. It happens.
Call Schumer (212) 486-4430 or (202) 224-6542.
CHS:
I know it happens. I once spelled you Christie, if you recall…*g*
More And Better (Women!) Democrats!
Donna sounds like a true progressive! I’m glad she is running.
And look at what Donna has already achieved outside Congress:
(Same link as above.)
Christy Hardin Smith @ 20
Speaking of Take Back America - Christy - I got an email to register early. Is it worth it to go? What can I expect?
eCAHNomics @ 25
Here’s the email I wrote to him (I’m at work and can’t call):
Sen. Schumer:
I know there is a lot of pressure being brought to bear on this nomination.
I know that there are a lot of people who feel that “anything is better than what we had in Gonzalez and that the goal should be depoliticizing the Justice Dept.”
I know that Mukasey seems better than what Bush might push on us if he is not nominated.
BUT:
I KNOW TORTURE WHEN I READ A DESCRIPTION OF IT AND SO DO YOU.
Waterboarding is well known and well documented. It is basically controlled murder by drowning. It is meant to terrify and get people to do things like sign false confessions. SERE (US Navy) has used it as one tool of torture and to train US Navy fliers as to what to expect when they are tortured.
It is torture.
We can’t say “the US does not torture; it is not what this country is about”. We ARE using torture - whether we outsource it to other countries’ organizations, do it ourselves under doctors’ supervision, or use organizations like Blackwater. We are approving it when we allow it to be done.
Waterboarding IS torture and Mukasey’s refusing to say it is signals that he has been briefed by Addington, Cheney, etc. that if he says it is, they will be exposed to liability.
Good. Using stuff like this is war crimes and they should be prosecuted for it.
Don’t vote for Mukasey. By refusing to say waterboarding is torture, he has shown himself to be NOT independent.
We need an AG who IS independent, who will clean house at DOJ. Not this.
Do NOT vote to confirm.
made a (small) donation today. and now my credit card is getting locked down out of respect for blackout friday.
Biodun @ 28
I’m impressed!
selise:
I heard about Blackout Friday a few days ago. Unfortunately, I can’t afford (economically) to participate. All my work is more or less online.
eCAHNomics @ 25
done. called leahy too. (202) 224-4242
from tpm:
selise @ 31
Selise,
Thank you for your post about calling Schumer. I asked straightup whether the Senator was aware of Judge McTorture’s position on torture when he recommended him. Got an emphatic No from Jonah the staffer.
I told him it was a choice between rule of law or rule by fiat. He said they’ve been getting lots of calls so let’s keep up the pressure.
Thanks to eCAHNomics as well for getting me off my ass.
And look at the dude Donna is seeking to replace:
Yikes!
selise @ 31
I like it, It’s like Gandhi going to the ocean to make salt!
Yes, more and better dems and more women. I’m all for it. Whatever happened to enlightened thinking?
The writing was on the wall. Here’s a pic I have not seen until today. It is worth sharing. Young Dubya delivers illegal, but gratifying right hook..
http://i87.photobucket.com/alb.....rPunch.jpg
Mods:
And why is my 36 in moderation?
I was busy this morning. I wrote up this long post on poverty and posted it over at Kos.
selise @ 34
Yep. Just called Leahy myself.
Have been leaving similar messages on a few other comments threads on other sites. Everyone should do the same. Don’t think other lefty sites have readers as oriented to action as we are. We need to teach them.
I think it’s time for Madam Pelosi to come to the reality party
Mods:
Thanks!
George ‘n’ Dick
GEORGE
Donna Edwards? Wasn’t she Ellie May in the Beverly Hillbillies?
DICK
No, George. That was Donna Douglas, who would be much older by now. And she was white.
GEORGE
(staring, long pause)
Well, I still say she looks like her.
JulieWaters @ 40
Damn… pressed “submit” too quickly. I was going to say– I really think we have a shot at getting some of what I suggest implemented if we get better Democrats in office and a decent president. Edwards seems to definitely be one of those better Democrats.
Biodun @ 33
no judgements from me. just wanted to do what i could to spread the word, so that people could decide for themselves what they want, if anything, to do about it.
John Edwards
Donna Edwards
Hmm… (Yes, I support these two candidates, who not only share a last name but who also look like each other…*g*)
(In homage to 44.)
Toby Wollin @ 14
I admit I am scratching my head thinking about that question. There are so many institutional and cultural obstacles particularly for women.
Christy - this is a suggestion that I found over at kos that I really like. The ability to opt-out from receiving snail mail from candidates that I donate to through Blue America. I appreciate the nice hand written thank you card that Charlie Brown sent me but PLEASE…. not the shower of mailers.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo.....123421/288
I would prefer to stay with Blue America for donations but if I can choose to opt-out.
katymine at 49 — I saw that yesterday. But a decision on that will have to wait for Jane to heal up a bit and then we can talk about making changes. We make decisions with anything Blue America as a group — Howie, Amato, Digby, Jane, etc. — can’t make a unilateral change like that without everyone discussing it.
JulieWaters @ 40
excellent. recommened!
julie may be too shy to ask for a recommend. but i’m not - please ‘pups, if you have a dkos id, please give her diary a recommend. thx!
Biodun @ 36
More and better Dems like Donna!
Is it appropriate to ask for feedback on a letter to the editor here?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 50
I truly understand and expected that would be the answer. Just wanted to put it out there that as a donor, I really like the idea. I also appreciate that you will discuss it.
NZ Expat, now in KS @ 52
Yes.
selise @ 51
Done.
Um, what exactly is a ‘lung haul’? *g*
I seem to recall writing Leahy the other day, urging him to vote against Mukasey. I wrote DiFi yesterday, laying out the reasons for ‘against’ (one more time). She’ll probably do the wrong thing again, but we may be able to salvage Leahy.
And when we’re not browbeating Congress:
Morning Christy. Glad to hear that Jane is doing well. I think you meant to say long haul…Honestly, that just isn’t good enough for the lung haul.
Reminder SoCal pups. A meet-up for all interested tomorrow at noon.
Wahoo’s Fish Tacos
1862 Placentia Ave.
Costa Mesa
Woops! Does anyone know who Donna’s supporting for the democratic nominee. That is, if she’s spoken on the matter yet.
Sorry, but I had to ask. :o)
Biodun @ 58
live hearing on CSPAN 1 right now on that very subject Barney Franks in charge
AND Pacific northwest Firepup meetup
theotherwash and I will be meeting up on 11/3 at 3pm at:
Blue Moose
4936 N.E. Fremont St
Portland, Oregon
Anyone in the area can join us…
I gotta go, my noise to signal ratio it too great.
Kudos to Donna!
selise @ 51
Oh, I’m not too shy. Just too thoughtless :)
Tanbark @ 60
That’s a legitimate question. It would be nice to know.
Here is the letter I’m thinking of sending:
There is no need to waste time and print debating whether or not waterboarding is torture (“Torture and the Attorneys General”). A few minutes of time will quickly answer the question.
Our military is able to provide a safe method of testing this and can do so for a vacillating nominee for Attorney General or any Senator who doubts it. They did so for my husband, who was waterboarded as part of the Navy SERE (Survival, Escape, Resistance, and Evasion) program. He knew that they would stop and his voice still shudders decades later.
His verdict? Clearly torture. Those who claim otherwise might back their declarations with a personal encounter with the technique, if they have the courage of their convictions.
NZ Expat, now in KS @ 66
I think that’s a great letter. I would send it.
Personally I think the fact we are even debating the question is a very sad statement about what we’ve become as a society.
egregious @ 56
Me too. And perhaps it’s worth repeating that link.
NZ Expat, now in KS @ 66
I think you make your point very well, send it!
Should it really make a difference which nominee she’s supporting? Shouldn’t Donna be judged on her own merits?
Remember nostril guy, well he got fired and…
“U.S. Rep. Joe Knollenberg’s chief of staff, who was recently caught on video in a heated exchange with an anti-war activist, said Thursday he is on paid medical leave to deal with a mood-swing disorder.
In an an e-mail to reporters, aide Trent Wisecup said he recently checked himself into Beaumont Hospital in Oakland after sending out “weird and flat out kooky” e-mails.“
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/2/73735/5437
egregious @ 56
Great diary.We are all one paycheck or doctor’s visit from poverty. End the stigma
As Marx said, one needs to recognize class as an economic dynamic. Why I support Edwards. I see two Americas and a new gilded age.
NZ Expat:
Great letter, brief and to the point. I won’t change a thing.
Biodun @ 69
I’m with you here. What we are looking for is good people whose hearts and minds are in the right place. We need people who will do a good progressive job. Who they support in terms of presidential candidates should not even be on the menu.
Just gave to Edwards.
Toby Wollin @ 74
It sure wouldn’t be a deal breaker for me, but I’d like to hear the response.
Jim Clausen @ 71
I work as a “contractor” (fancy name for agency temp) and got the yearly “this is how much it’s gonna cost you if you are crazy enough to buy health insurance through the agency” email. Family coverage is $245 a week. No Rx, no vision, no dental. The median wage for the temps in this place is in the $9-$10 range. You do the math.
No one can afford health coverage. We have at least 6 single moms in this group. I don’t know where their wage puts them in terms of coverage (Medicaid or SCHIP), but I know none of them can afford it. We have people here who can’t even afford the freight on the single side.
NZ Expat, now in KS @ 65 -
awesome!
But why? (I’m not looking for a fight here. Just curious what the argument for this would/could be.)
eCAHN –
I’ve called Shumer. They’re taking zip codes.I let them know that I think when I vote.
Jim Clausen @ 72
Yuppers. I was made painfully aware of this point late yesterday afternoon when I was told my position is being eliminated.
So my paychecks will be stopping soon along with my health insurance (nobody can really afford COBRA).
I’m hopeful I’ll be able to find something else, but I’m not exactly living in the Mecca of communication professionals’ jobs.
Toby Wollin @ 77
As a contractor, I get health insurance through my partner’s place of employment, but I have to pay for it up front. It comes out to around $6k/year, which is, from what I understand, very cheap, as far as purchased insurance goes. I can’t imagine what people who don’t make the sort of money I make can be expected to do.
Biodun @ 79
It would give me an indication of her thinking,for instance she might be diplomatic and chose not to endorse anyone publicly beings that she’ll be supporting the Dem nominee whosoever that may be (you know I have trouble with who and whom, B!)
katymine @ 49
I agree..I am getting a a lot of those now, both from the ‘06 campaign and from the current cycle. It is a waste of money and perhaps more importantly the candidate’s and staff time. The hand written notes are really nice but the time would be better spent going after votes. For me, at least, the only thanks “our PAC” needs is to work you ass off and get elected.
Why more and better Dems? Really, why? Don’t you want to break the deadlock in DC? How about giving some time to something truly newsworthy such as Cynthia McKinney filing to run for president in ‘08 as a Green!
http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P80004930
She may or may not represent you and your views, but I think it is way past time Dems start thinking beyond the Democratic Party to solve their problems, and that’s why I left the Democratic party to become a Green a decade ago.
Nemo @ 80
Thanks. For the future, 10022 is midtown Manhattan. When I called Leahy, I used 05478, which is St. Albans, VT, where my friend has his factory. I know he would agree with me on this one.
Biodun @ 13
this is the same asshole who ran the government in 2001 as if he won by a landslide.
he will always play the bully. he will always play the strong hand until someone calls him on his bullshit.
Dems/ anyone at home on the judiciary committee?
accordingly, i have called and I sent this to DIFI.
Oppose Mukasey on torture, on executive power, on unitary executive nullification of the law and refusal to guarantee action on Congressional subpoenas. If we wanted a monarchy, we didnt need a revolution or a Constitution.
Senators take an oath to uphold it. Bush is challenging you to defend your branch of government.
Separately, look back in history to Watergate, when Dems had real spine. When E. Richardson was nominated as AG after the disgraced Mitchell and Kleindeinst were forced from the AG office, Richardson at his confirmation hearings agreed to appoint a special prosecutor and the terms for that were worked out. I think they even agreed on Archie Cox. You can look it up.
We have perhaps more serious abuses at stake here; certainly they go to the heart of what the Constitution and our country stand for. Any AG nominee should be required to do what Richardson did. We need an independent investigation of lawlessness by this WH and DOJ. The evidence of their abuses has been testified to under oath to your committee.
In 19700-72, Dems had some spine on the SJC. I hope that is still true.
SufiLizard @ 81
wow. sorry to hear that (((SufiLizard)))
Sufi — So sorry to hear that! Here’s hoping you find something else — and something even better — soon.
BTW, I’ve had CNBC on in the background this morning on account of the employment report. Boy, they know nothing about the economy. Knowledge on that subject has decreased by large amounts since I did the instant analysis 6 years ago.
JulieWaters @ 81
You are getting a very very good rate there. I get covered through my husband.
People who insist on using permatemps do so because they CAN. There is no incentive for them NOT to do so and every incentive for them to do it.
And basically when they do so, they are shifting their costs onto the backs of the taxpayers because people who cannot afford coverage and have kids end up with SCHIP and Medicaid.
Angry at 85 — In a word…no.
Elliott @ 68
Excellent letter..because you mentioned SERE, you might consider linking to here
My input on calling Senators who are not your personal representative is that on issues like the USAG, they are representing ALL of us. Their vote affect