[As always, please keep comments on topic, be polite with our guest, and take any off-topic discussions to the prior thread. With that, please welcome Mark Schauer to FDL! -- CHS]
Marcy (emptywheel) first told me about Mark Schauer, a state senator from a district near her own, quite some time ago. There were a lot of people declaring they would run in southern Michigan's 7th CD -- to face the most radical right member of the state's congressional delegation, Tim Walberg -- but Marcy counseled me to hold off. She felt there was a very good chance Mark would jump in and that when he did, everyone else would bow out and endorse him. After spending some time with him on the phone this week, I understand from whence her enthusiasm springs.
I started off by asking him what issues his constituents are telling him are the most important for them.
"Without question," he stated immediately, "the top issue facing the 7th congressional district is the economy and jobs. This is a state that has been rocked by outsourcing, a global economy, and trade agreements that have cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. Folks are worried about their future, about their families, about whether they can retire, whether they can send their kids to college or whether they're going to lose their home. And related to that are basic security needs, like health care. Are they going to be able to keep health care and afford coverage for their kids or are they going to lose their pension? Will Social Security be there for them? Once you get past that, the war and our foreign policy -- or lack thereof -- are a major concern. Are their sons and daughters and neighbors in harm's way in Iraq? And people are hopeful that we'll be able to restore a foreign policy based more on diplomacy and less on war. And third would be the environment, including climate change."
That got him talking about the economic opportunities for Michigan in pursing alternatives to fossil fuels for energy.
"Folks are concerned about gas prices. Folks are concerned about the rising cost of heating their homes and they know there are alternatives. They know our planet is at risk and you have to think about it as the legacy we're leaving our kids. Michigan is a Great Lakes state and the environment is always an issue of concern to the people here. People in south-central Michigan don't think slant drilling in the Great Lakes is the answer, although Tim Walberg supports it."
And speaking of Walberg, I had to ask Mark about the war. Walberg's record is crystal clear. Since getting to Congress last year, he's participated in 18 roll calls concerning Iraq and he's voted 18 times with Bush and Cheney. He never found a single issue about Iraq to disagree with them on -- although most Republicans have. He's also voted 7 times on issues affecting the well-being of our military personnel and he's been wrong all 7 times-- voting against our servicemen and women and for his party leader.
But Mark, although a state senator, has an Iraq-related record to examine as well. I asked him to explain it.
"It was March, 2003, just days before the president went into Iraq and one of the ultra-conservative members of the Michigan senate put up a meaningless resolution to put everyone on the record in terms of support for Bush's strategy in Iraq. I voted against it. It was a tough vote at the time if you'll recall the public sentiment back then. People were getting in my face about voting against the president when they were equating that with not supporting our troops. I do support our troops but that vote was the right thing to do then and history has born that out. I'm on record from the start saying this was a flawed strategy."
Mark's state senate district, like the congressional district, has a Republican lean. Gore took 46% of the vote and Kerry took 45%. Last year, an underfunded, barely known Democrat who wasn't taken very seriously in political circles, came within one percentage point of beating Walberg. And Walberg hasn't become popular since winning the seat.
There's a certain amount of residual resentment of the way a great deal of outside PAC money, from Club For Growth, was used to defeat a decent, moderate Republican incumbent. And his voting record -- in a basically all-American, moderate district -- has been very, very hard right, way at the bottom of the Republican congressional barrel and far more extreme than any other congressman from Michigan. If you examine Progressive Punch's Chips Are Down rankings, you find Walberg sitting there with radical kooks and ideologues like Patrick McHenry, Michele Bachman, Mike Pence, Virginia Foxx, Marsha Blackburn...with an even worse record than Mean Jean Schmidt, Marilyn Musgrave or Virgil Goode.
"We're spending $12 billion a month in Iraq and this president, along with Tim Walberg, opposes spending an additional $7 billion a year to make sure that three a half million kids receive health care. It's a tragedy in so many ways for our country... This president and his policies have put us more at risk. We have got to start to change. You want to hold this president accountable?
This Congress has got to use its investigative powers and if it's determined that George W. Bush has violated his oath of office then he has to be held accountable. I'll be entering office in January of 2009 and there will be a new president and I want to spend my time moving us forward and undoing the mess that this president has created and that's where my energies will be focused-- on that change and that new direction."
Mark will be with us online for two hours and he's happy to take questions. Please consider giving his campaign a boost at our Blue America ActBlue Page.
Login Here
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Hi Howie!
Welcome to FireDogLake, Mark Schauer…
I’m pleased to be with you!
Hey Howie! Welcome Mark!
Welcome to FDL Senator Schauer. A lot of us who hang out here regularly are aware that Tim Walberg is one of the half dozen most extreme right-wing ideologues in the Congress. But replacing him with you… how is that going to change things for people who live in MI-07 and for America in general?
The Michigan 7th may be the best opportunity this cycle to toss out a reactionary extremist in Tim Walberg. I’m ready for the challenge. I’m battle-tested as someone who has beaten an incumbent Republican and other Rs in tough, Republican-leaning districts.
Hello Howie, welcome to FDL Mark.
I look forward to reading your views today.
Hi Mark, welcome.
The one and only emptywheel says great things about you, that is high praise indeed.
And for anyone not aware of what a kook Walberg is, there’s a great blog in Michigan, Walberg Watch, that I heartily recommend.
It would change things fundamentally. For example, I will work to change policy in Iraq and begin to bring our troops home. Walberg has not. I voted for an increase in the minimum wage in the MI Legislature; Walberg voted no. I am passionate about expanding access to health care, especially for kids, and Walberg is not. I’m for protecting our environment, while Walberg wants to drill for oil in the Great Lakes…
Senator Schauer, what do you see as the most effective way for Democrats to stand up to and marginalize modern Republican political techniques?
Sen.Schauer:I have but one question for you…And that would be…”If a person in Govt at any level..is accused and convicted of crime…do you think they should lose their retirement benefits?(as you know they can still collect their pensions even in jail)…I’d also like to bring up the Mark Foley story.Do you think he should be able to collect his benefits?..Thank You and Good Luck..
But for people less interested in Walberg and more interested in what Mark can do, feel free to ask him all the questions you’d like. And if you want to know what kind of music he likes, count on Crooks & Liars to get to the bottom of that! Also feel free to help Mark with the job his campaign has to do by visiting our Blue America ActBlue page.
Thanks for participating, Sen. Schauer!
Earlier this summer the Senate Republican Leader Mike Bishop blocked access to the website Blogging for Michigan on Senate computers. Can you tell us a bit about that incident, and tell us (briefly) how you’ll continue to support the online community as a member of Congress?
Sangemon, Jane and Howie: It’s great to have the opportunity to get to know you. As Dem Ldr in the MI Senate, I have worked very actively with our blogosphere. I also battle the majority leader’s censorship of a progressive blog in MI. You might have heard of that. This campaign will use the netroots as a way to reach out to many new folks. I guarantee you a very dynamic campaign.
Hi Sen. Schauer, always great to see you on the Tubes of the Internets. :-)
As you know, I’m a big proponent of stem cell research, and even though Michigan is still anti-stem cell as a state, do you have any plans for tackling this when you’re in Congress and how?
Dems have to reach people where they live, so to speak. I have always beaten Rs in tough districts by hitting the doors hard, using phones, etc. Now the internet will be key.
Yes, the Mark Foleys of the world should lose their public benefits!
Thanks Howie…this is sooo nice being able to communicate with some of our people in Govt……and they actually talk back to us…NICE…..again thanks Howie..
Liberal Lucy: Great to hear from you. I absolutely will make stem cell research a top priority when I’m in Congress. There’s a great chance the issue will be on the ‘08 ballot in MI. Even “pro-life” Walberg loses on this issue. It’s an issue about life!
Welcome Senator Schauer!
The district Senator Schauer is running in starts right across the street from my house in Ann Arbor (well, almost) and runs through some really conservative territory (Hillsdale MI, if anyone has heard of it) to Schauer’s Battle Creek. We in Ann Arbor have been leaking out into the district for the last decade, which makes it increasingly blue–and that’s all happened since Clinton was able to win in the district.
Senator Schauer’s been a great ally of the blogosphere and a stalwart fighting against the nutty Republican Majority leader in the State Senate. He will be a real asset in DC.
Another comment about Dem strategy. The blogosphere is a great way to involve people–volunteers. And they can be anywhere. I hope you’ll join our campaign.
MarkSchauer @ 17
Judging by all the Republicrooks in Congress eligible for pensions, we could pay for a chunk of the S-CHIP bill they all refused to vote for by taking away their undeserved benefits. And it goes way beyond just Foley and Cunningham and Ney. The way that Wilkes trial in San Diego has been going, it looks liks Jerry Lewis, Tom Delay, Duncan Hunter and half a dozen others may soon be facing indictments. Not to mention John Doolittle and Tom Feeney.
Hi Senator Schauer, the following is called the “Contenders’ Registry”…it may be useful for you down the road:
http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki.....7_Registry
Thanks, emptywheel. Washtenaw County will be key in winning this district. For folks out there not familiar with this race, Walberg won the general election (after Club for Growth bought the primary for him) with less than 50% of the vote. Ann Arbor supporters will help make the difference!
Thx, LS, we will contribute there.
MarkSchauer @ 17
With all due respect Sen Schauer, blocking Mark Foley from collecting his pension does seem to fly totally against the Constitution and the presumption of innocence since he has not been charged with any felonies, much less convicted.
Duke Cunningham on the other hand has been convicted and is collecting his pension while in prison. IIRC at this time, the only former congressman not collecting a pension is james Traficant because he fought his case until he was convicted and then expelled from the Congress. I believe all others are allowed to keep their pensions as they resigned from Congress prior to being convicted.
Were you for or against the sending to 363 tons of cash (the largest transfer ever) to Iraq, just because the Iraqi Finance Minister asked the US Government to.
By the way, assuming you were against it, the picture of pallets of money being sent to Iraq, makes a great ad, to hang around your opponents neck.
Will you pledge to actively fight for 100% public finance for elections?
Sandman, as a State Senator, I am on record opposing the war. I voted no on Senate Resolution 37 in March 2003 (just before Bush sent troops to Iraq). This was a controversial vote at the time.
The state finances are a mess. What do you propose to do about it???
Funding for Universities has been cut and cut and cut again. We are one of the worst states for public financing of higher education. We are losing talented folks to other institutions. What do you plan to do about this???
SCHIP was brought up earlier and everyone is probably aware that Walberg has been a key vote sustaining Bush’s veto. What has the reaction been like in your district and what are your thoughts about expanding health care coverage?
Publicly financed elections would be great (you can imagine I have to spend a lot of time raising $$). The courts, unfortunately, have equated $$ with speech in campaigns, and won’t opposed limits. In MI, billionaire Dick DeVos tried to buy the Governorship. He was not limited as to what he could contribute to his own campaign.
Welcome Mr. Schauer, and thanks for visiting with us today.
For anyone who has watched manufacturing jobs flee the country, we know that states like Michigan have been hit particularly hard. So-called “struggling” companies relish the prospects of low wage assembly and manufacturing workers, and pointing the finger at labor unions is one of their favorite tactics.
How do you overcome the demonizing of union labor on a day to day basis on the campaign trail? And what is the sense on the ground in your district about preserving union labor, with decent pay and benifits, versus the panic to keep any jobs in the state, regardless of the pay and benefits?
It’s great to see you here, Sen. Schauer!
You mentioned Washtenaw County as key to winning, but how competitive do you expect to be elsewhere in the district– especially the southern row of counties, Lenawee, Hillsdale, and Branch, which were solidly for Walberg?
Very glad to see a Michigander like Mark Schauer on FDL! And even happier to see him take on Walberg!
Mark’s currently in a grim fight with forces from outside our state that are using “shock doctrine” against Michigan; they’ve been continuously beating on our state for nearly two decades, draining a surplus into a deep deficit, and now claiming that the only way out is through more cuts in spending. We’ve already had 15 cuts in spending, none of which has changed the economic climate in Michigan — but surely more and deeper cuts must be the answer, right?
If Mark can hold these blood-sucking monsters back — funded by some of the worst elements on the right, like dominionists and ultra-right libertarians and white supremacists — he can surely do all of us proud in Congress.
Don: I made the tough votes to enact a comprehensive solution to fix MI’s budget crisis (unlike the feds, we have to balance our budgets annually). I opposed Republican efforts to cut higher ed, our schools, health care and public safety, and helped craft a solution of cuts, reforms and revenues. I supported revenues to allow us to continue to invest in higher ed. That’s a key to transforming MI’s economy.
mipolitics: Unfortunately, many have bought into Walberg’s/Bush’s myths and lies about the Children’s Health Insurance Reauthorization. I have been advocating fiercely to help explain the bipartisan bill. Most in my district are appalled that Walberg opposed this measure to insure kids.
In MI and nationally, unions will be part of the solution. The UAW contracts with the Big 3 will demonstrate. I refuse to be in a race to the bottom for wages. Federal trade policy, including lack of enforcement, is a key part of the answer to helping our mfg sector.
Regarding district strategy, we will target our effort and our time carefully. The most conservative counties are the smallest ones, fortunately. But we will have a presence everywhere. That’s one of my principals!
As the Outreach Director for Michigan’s lefty blogosphere, I am proud to say that Mark was one of the first state legislators to come to the bloggers in order to work with us. He’s posted several diaries on http://michiganliberal.com, our flagship blog, and I’m proud to say that he’s been a real leader for our state in terms of netroots outreach and has walked his talk, something that we all know is too rare these days in politics.
I hope you’ll consider supporting him with your votes and your wallet!
Can you tell us about what you would do to advance renewable energy as a member of Congress?
Fitzy: My current Senate district gives we an awesome base to run from. Also remember, the Dem candidate won Eaton County in ‘06. We’re assembling a first-class campaign team, strategy and resources to win this race!
Senator Schauer,
Which committees would you most like to serve on if elected? Best luck, and with Marcy on your team, well, how can you not win?!
Zack: In addition to addressing the huge problem of carbon emissions, I will actively support alternative energy technologies in order to help MI’s economy. I want to develop and build the technology here! I would look for federal support for our domestic auto industry for new technology development. I also want to push renewal portfolio standards as we’re doing here in MI!
Committees… I’m interested in Education and Labor Comte and Ag Comte for starter (coincidentally, Walberg serves on both of these). I have a passion for early childhood development, math and science educ in our schools, and training and retraining $$. Maybe Congressman Dingell would allow me to join him on the Energy Comte!!
dakine01: Thanks for your feedback on the question from earlier.
Okay, you have my support. And I’ll make a contribution right now if you vow to replace some of those exclamation points with periods (I just think periods read more Congressional).
Do you consider the election process a level playing field?
Hi Mike-best of luck in your run.
I don’t really understand why MI Democrats have been so against enhanced CAFE standards. Sound policy at the federal level could make the purchase of fuel-efficient cars much more financially attractive (tax incentives, etc). This could be a big win for Detroit as well as for all of us. In addition, a strong focus on health care finance reform would also be in Detroit’s interest.
what’s your view on these issues?
SaltinWound — if you ever meet Mark, you’ll realize he really is as enthusiastic as the exclamation marks indicate. He’s a real dynamo.
(I’d have punctuated that with an exclamation mark, but well, I was thinking of your sensibilities. Heh.)
Hi Mark. We’re all grateful here for your 2003 vote on Iraq. As I’m sure you read Michigan Liberal and Blogging For Michigan, you probably know that I’m an Iraq vet myself. Yet we all want to know what you as a Congressman, will do to end the war. Do you see defunding the war so that we are made to withdraw if every other option to get us out of Iraq is exhausted?
Also, another issue that is important to us is the strange kow-towing we’ve been watching in the national Congress to Bush and to the Right Wing Noise Machine. We need to know that you’re going to stand strong against them.
SaltinWound: done.
SanderO: No, but I don’t know when a “level playing field” ever exist. When I beat Repub state House incumbent Eric Bush in ‘96, he spent nearly 3 times as much as I did. Challengers have to work harder and work smarter and take advantage of every innovation and talent available. The key is message communication. TV is very expensive. That’s why the netroots can be so imporant.
Senator Schauer,
I am not from your district: I live in Muskegon but I welcome anyone who will speak for the people of Michigan. For most of my life my district has been misrepresented by the Republicans: first by the lamentable Guy VanderJagt and now by the pathetic Pete Hoekstra.
These two have conspired to send our jobs overseas, involve us in endless wars, and not represented the views of the people of Muskegon at all. (Muskegon has been effectively taken out of the picture by the surrounding areas of conservative voters for those of you not from the area. The congressional district does not look like a salamander - it looks like a bloody snake. It extends from South of Holland almost to Traverse City right along the shore of Lake Michigan except where they extend it into Georgetown near Grand Rapids to pick up enough Conservative voters to keep it Republican)
Please: I wish you good luck and keep fighting.
Senator: The last time a lot of this district was blue it was held by Howard Wolpe. Did you learn anything from Wolpe?
Senator Schauer, a couple of quick question. Here’s one of the things Congressman Walberg said in his latest “Weekly Wrap-Up”:
First, what are your thoughts on terrorism in general, and FISA in particular?
Second, how do you respond when your opponent is so willing to distort the facts, as shown above?
djtyg: Re Bush “kow-towing”, let me be clear that the main reason I’m running is to help clean up the mess he’s created–abroad and here at home. If you knew me as minority leader in the MI Senate, I think “kow-towing” is the last work the majority leader would use to describe me.
Strategy to get out of Iraq: Heaven forbid, I won’t be dealing with a Repub president. If I am, we’ll use every tool, including the purse, to change strategy and start to bring our brave men and women home. I look forward to working with a Dem prez to execute a new strategy.
1,340 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen Schauer:
Thank you for the kind words to the blogging community. My question is very simple and may provide some direction for others in other districts in other states in trying to knock off right-wing Republicans in Republican-leaning districts: how do you intend to overcome the “incumbent advantage” and attract enough nominal Republicans and independents to defeat Tim Walberg?
KEEP THE FAITH, ALL THEY’VE GOT IS OUR MONEY!!
emptywheel @ 20
Marcy likes him? That’s good enough here. Donations: I’m in.
Mark’s campaign could use some help from grassroots activists. You can volunteer at his website and you can donate at our Blue America page. Right now I’m looking for people who would like to make small donations of $5 or $10. I’m willing to match all the $5 and $10 contributions that come in at the Blue America page for Mark in the next hour (as long as the total doesn’t go above the legal limit).
Hi Senator Schauer-
I would just like to thank you for everything that you have done for us at BFM - from taking on Senator Bishop on the censorship issue, to posting your diaries; it has been an honor and a privilege to have you and the rest of the Senate Dems join us!
My question- the water. What at the federal level would you like to see done to protect the Great Lakes from diversion?
The question I really want to ask- Did Patterson really almost take a swing at you the night of the shutdown? I’ll understand if you can’t answer that. But inquiring minds want to know. ;-)
Best of luck to you Senator- thanks again.
I welcome my Muskegon friends and those from everywhere.
Howard Wolpe was a role model for me. As a freshman at Albion College in 1980, I knocked on doors for Howard. What I learned most from him was his dual focus on sound public policy and service to his constituents.
Walberg is wrong to blindly follow the president, on FISA and everything else. We do have to anticipate terrorism taking every possible form, and we have to be prepared to protect our citizens. But we must not trample our civil rights in the process. I respond to the current Congressman and his myths and distortions by taking them on directly: in the press, blogs, etc. It’s become pretty much a full-time job lately on SCHIP.
Thanks, Senator!
People in south-central Michigan don’t think slant drilling in the Great Lakes is the answer, although Tim Walberg supports it.”
This is what has happened to crude oil prices in just the last two years.
Cheney Corp’s Iraq debacle has been the major factor, and they are the ones who have also profited from same.
Can you convey this essential truth to your voters, Mark?
Is there any chance that an Enterprise Zone could be created in your district that would being new manufacturing jobs to America, for example, LCD panels, millions are made, but as far as I know not one in the US, if the company making them could be free of taxes and the workers could be free of incomes taxes, that might lower our price to compete with South Korea. No existing business in the US would complain because their is no current LCD panel production in the US.
MarkSchauer @ 19
Late to the party & haven’t read all the comments, but what about energy research, energy independence? Does being from MI put constraints on how you interface with the motor vehicle industry?
I just made my contribution. Thanks!
I have experience in beating an incumbent who has many advantages. You quite simply have to outhustle him (or her). In this case I will need an incredible amount of money–$500K by the end of the year is the goal I’m shooting for–in order to afford the paid communications in a sprawling district. I need you all to help me provide the people-power and the hustle.
Wizardkitten: no one puts a straw in the Great Lakes-period. What was Bill Richardson thinking? Not about MI, apparently. Great Lakes water levels are done. In Congress I will figure out why. Global warming is part, but what else? No, Patterson didn’t take a swing, just loud, threatening language and finger pointing. I’m very tough, so no worries.
I’m gonna combine a couple of questions about energy and economic development. I have helped the state create some $$ resources and tools (21st Century Jobs fund, etc.) to support alternative energy R&D and job creation. Washington lacks any kind of economic policy, from my standpoint. I’m going to change that, and do so in a way that helps MI. Why not incentive education and training in these areas, as well as support research and commercialization. We have incredible R&D infrastructure already in place in MI, including an amazing university system.
dakine01 @ 26
I don’t think that Mark Schauer was suggesting that he could specifically take Mark Foley’s pension away…unless he was later convicted and a bill passed prior to that conviction.
But there is a Bill that has been forwarded on this very issue.
The Federal Pension Forfeiture Act (aka the ‘Duke Cunningham Act’), was introduced by Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Ken Salazar (D-CO) resulting in a Congressman losing a pension from:
“Bribery of public officials or witnesses
Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States
Perjury while denying the commission of bribery or conspiracy
Subornation of perjury committed in connection with false denial or false testimony of another individual.”
Executive officers can be impeached, even after serving and resigning from office, and have the benefits of office terminated, as well as future office (and such things as Federal contracts) barred. That would fall under the “removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States”.
On that point, realizing that your term would follow the departure of the current Administration, would you press the Speaker to “put impeachment back ON the table” to make certain that Bush and Cheney could not keep unavailable their Presidential records necessary for Congressional oversight and criminal investigation. Currently, under an Executive Order that Bush himself created this power was expanded to former Presidents and Vice-Presidents. Only impeachment could prevent these former officeholders from hiding the crimes of themselves and their appointees.
here’s a point I love to make when talking about wages, outsourcing and unions;
a corporation does not set the price for the products they require, the provider sets the price
for instance, if I need steel to build my car I don’t tell the steel industry “this is what I am going to pay”
instead the steel company says “this is the price you are going to pay”
of course the company can bargain but it’s the provider that sets the price not the purchaser
yet for some reason they don’t want that scenario for their workforce
and that is the way we have to present labor
no it’s necessary for workers to live, they need to be able to afford the health care for their wives and kids, if their kid breaks an arm they need to be able to fix it
they need to be able to put healthy food on the table, they need to be able to put their kids through college and they need to be able to retire
those are the costs of doing business when you hire a workforce and it is a cost big business does not want to pay
they therefore try to export their labor force to countries where they don’t have to pay these costs
that cannot be allowed
when a company exports it’s work force to a country that does not allow for collective bargaining, where the workforce does not get the cost of living and providing for their family, then that corporation or product MUST BE ASSIGNED A TARIFF
that tariff will offset the added costs that the corporation incurs but refuses to pay
Thx, SaltinWound.
howieklein @ 57
Endorsements from Howie and Marcy? I’m in. You can consider me 10 10$ contributors, Howie.
Howie, thanks for your part in making the Blue America page so user friendly.
perris: we are learning about the economic costs of so-called free trade from our China experience. Trade policies must ensure safety of consumers (so people or pets don’t get contaminated food, and so our kids’ toys don’t contain lead paint) and workers. Trade policies must ensure environmental protections. A level playing field and enforceable global standards will reduce the pay gap that countries like China “enjoy.” That will help protect jobs and wages of our workers.
Howie: thanks for your matching commitment.
MarkSchauer @ 73
I hope it costs me a couple grand
We’ve talked a little bit about the need for training and supporting our universities, but I know from your posts on MI blogs that early education is also a priority for you. How would you do things differently at the federal level to help get kids off to a strong start?
Bush increased spending 41% in just six years and increased revenue only 21% and is proud of his economic record.
How can anyone be proud of that record?
Sandman @ 73
he’s proud of it because he knows it is the middle class that is going to pay the bill
they aren’t really interested in gaining wealth for the wealthy they are interested in creating a greater devide between the wealthy and everone else
that is the goal, when a person has more money then they can ever spend all that’s left is to create a greater devide
Sandman @ 76
His tycoon base has made out like bandits, that’s how. The job for our candidates is to clearly convey this fact.
The Democrats have truly become the party of fiscal responsibility. I like the Congress’ “Pay Go” policy. That’s what they did with SCHIP. Bush keeps printing $$: for the war, etc.
Re early childhood, I would start by applying my on-the-ground experience with Head Start. The return on investment projections range from $7 for every $1 invested, to $17:$1. Tim Walberg was the ONLY member of the House Educ and Labor Comte to vote against reauthorizing Head Start. We have to start earlier, involve health care providers and other public and private community agencies to support parents of newborns, and of course we have to involve parents–moms AND dads.
I used to joke (actually I borrowed this from someone else) that Bush-Cheney were the ticket of diversity… They came from two different oil companies. Bush, Cheney, Haliburton, Blackwater…and Walberg have to go. Enough cronyism and rip-off of the American people. Part of the change I will bring to Washington is accountability in government.
Someone once said that Headstart should be called Equalstart or at least frame it that way in your campaign. Most people can agree to an equal start, but few people want other kids to have a head start on their kid.
Hi Senator Schauer!
I see that President Bush has threatened to veto LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) if the funding is too high. Right now, at $2.16 billion, the funding falls short of covering the 38 million people who qualify for the program. Last year, benefits were reduced because there were more people asking for LIHEAP assistance. The Energy Dept predicts heating costs will continue to go up this year.
However, for this year, the Senate wants to keep LIHEAP funding at $2.16 B, the House has passed legislation to increase it to $2.66, and Bush wants to cut it to $1.78.
If LIHEAP had kept up with inflation, funding would be $4.2 billion right now.
(Source = Reuters … I have the info because I am blogging it)
My questions are, where do you think LIHEAP should be in terms of funding? Assuming that LIHEAP will not be funded to the level that is truly needed, what else can the federal and state governments do to help low-income households pay their heating bills?
Thanks for being here & thanks to FDL for hosting this chat.
Sandman: Framing is so important. Every child will benefit from some type of early childhood development. Brain research recently has taught us of the critical brain “wiring” that occurs in the first 5 yrs of life. IQ can be increased, or irreversibly stunted. One of the reasons I’ve been politically successfuly is that I place the issue in an economic context. We can’t afford as a country to have people who aren’t educated with the tools to succeed in an increasingly high-tech economy.
speaking of LIHEAP and the aforementioned Senator Patterson. Here is a youtube clip of Patterson yelling at Senator Schauer about LIHEAP last year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ssMKpSZNA
Christine: When we’re spending $12B a month in Iraq, we can spend more to assist people with heating emergencies. I would support funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) at the House level–or as high as possible. As former Community Action Agency director, I used to administer these funds for heating assistance and home weatherization. I’ve introduced a Senate Resolution calling on the Congress and President to boost these $$, and I’ve even challenged my own state’s plan to make sure some $$ could be spent on weatherization to help reduce energy use and future heating emergencies.
Flatwheel: Thanks. It’s funny how you’re accused of being political (as Bruce in the video was doing), when you’re fighting for real people. That’s what I do.
Dear Senator Schauer,
Best of luck in your run!
I’d rather ask this question after you’ve been in Congress for a while, but: Do you and other legislators feel any effects (outside of during campaigns) from the blogs and the actions taken by their readers? Any sense of the people having increased oversight? Any fresh air in those “smoke-filled rooms”?
Behindthefall: Definitely more oversight and accountability–and it’s instantaneous. I’m for pulling back the curtain on government. I’ve gotten into a couple of battles with the Rs in Lansing over free speech, open meetings act, etc. In the case of MI Senate Rs blocking access to a progressive blog, it was conservative bloggers that joined in to hold the system accountable.
Here’s some appropriate artwork for this date in our history:
Tea Party
Good luck Mark Schauer, and I will soon contribute again to your campaign.
ifthethunderdontgetya: Thanks for sharing that. We desperately need new leadership to rebuild our stature about reputation around the globe. Thanks for your financial support. I won’t be able to do it without all of you.
MarkSchauer @ 88
Now there’s an interesting coalition.
I do not if you have been asked about this, but I would like to know how you feel about the liberal bloggers & how you see them as an important part of the future of the Democratic Party. Also, I want to know if you agree with me that Bush Cheney & their cronies are above the law, both literally & figuratively in our minds.
Thanks flatwheel for the YouTube- no one gets to our Senate Republicans like Schauer does. It’s a thing of beauty. I’ve had a great time watching him this year.
(For those outside of Michigan who don’t know, our Senate Republicans could be a TV show. You would be hard-pressed to write characters like we have here. If they weren’t so nauseating and dangerous to the state they would be really funny.)
Carol Lam was my hero and she won two awards while working for the DOJ and then she got fired, under oath she testified that her boss told her it came from the highest levels of government. After over 10 Congressional hearings we still don’t know who.
She was one of the seven US Attorney’s canned on December 7.
Mark, do you favor investigation now over this administration lying us into war in Iraq, and impeachment regardless of time left in this term?
If you do, then I’ll make sure that Howie’s limit is maxed out.
Jane has a new thread up: The GOP Base and the Ugly Truth
This thread remains open for contributions to BlueAmerica for this great candidate.
Mark, thanks very much for spending some time with us today. That was extremely enlightening for a lot of us– in a way that takes a seasoned legislator and someone who has been battling right-wing special interests in the trenches. I think I speak for a lot of members of this community when I say “thanks” for what you’ve done and good luck with the campaign against Walberg. Hopefully you’ll come visit with us again closer to the election. And if anything comes up that you want to get out there, please think of your friends at Blue America.
Howie and friends: I’m sorry that I’ve got to wrap up, but I’m off to the Jackson County Dems FDR dinner. Thanks to firedoglake and all involved with this movement. I hope to be part of a Blue America freshman class joining the next Congress.
Quick note in reponse to the last questions, as I said earlier, I will bring accountability back to government, including to the White House and its Administration.
I would welcome the chance to do this again sometime.
You can keep in touch with me at www.markschauer.com or by joining my facebook group. -Mark
Thanks for stopping by, future Congressman Mark Schauer! We look forward to watching your campaign in the next few months. Marcy, Howie, thanks for the recommendation.
dakine01 @ 26
as I’m sure you know…Foley resigned in disgrace to avoid a trial.I do believe there was three witnesses lined up and several e-mails as evidence…This being the case….No…yank his benefit package..
mudshark @ 100
Without a felony conviction? Sorry, but I have too much respect for the Constitution to go down that road. If Foley were to be convicted for actions occurring while he was a serving congressman, then let’s re-open the situation. But without that, sorry, he may be a totally odious individual that I may detest with all my being, but he is still presumed innocent under our Constitution and rule of law.
MarkSchauer @ 65
Sounds good to me!