<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rules of Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:27:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Welsh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062825</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062825</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Toffler’s Future Shock was very influential the time, by the way, and I think still speaks to us.  You may want to pick that up at some point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Toffler is a “futurist” and I think he’s sometimes too sloppy.  But some times he had some real insights.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toffler’s Future Shock was very influential the time, by the way, and I think still speaks to us.  You may want to pick that up at some point.</p>
<p>Toffler is a “futurist” and I think he’s sometimes too sloppy.  But some times he had some real insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Welsh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062824</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m amazed you didn’t read Goffman in your undergrad education actually.  That’s very interesting to me for what it says about Sociology today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What did you find most useful from your undergrad days, if I may ask.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Collins is my favourite living sociologist — I think he qualifies as “great”.  If you have access to a university library and you like the one I reccomend reading all his stuff.  In particular, don’t skip “the Credential society”, it’s old and out of date (75) but it’s still very useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m amazed you didn’t read Goffman in your undergrad education actually.  That’s very interesting to me for what it says about Sociology today.</p>
<p>What did you find most useful from your undergrad days, if I may ask.</p>
<p>Collins is my favourite living sociologist — I think he qualifies as “great”.  If you have access to a university library and you like the one I reccomend reading all his stuff.  In particular, don’t skip “the Credential society”, it’s old and out of date (75) but it’s still very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RFK Action Front</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062820</link>
		<dc:creator>RFK Action Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ian you totally rock!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve read and greatly enjoyed Weber, Csikszentmihalyi, Lakoff, and Chomsky.  But Collins, Goffman, Toffler, and Castiglione are all new to me — time to make a trip over to Amazon.com!  This is one of the reasons I totally love FDL in particular and the progressive blogosphere in general.  I like starting the conversation on line but then moving deeper into the actual texts and becoming conversant in them myself.  You don’t get this level of insight from traditional media!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is incredibly helpful!  Thank you so much!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian you totally rock!!!</p>
<p>I’ve read and greatly enjoyed Weber, Csikszentmihalyi, Lakoff, and Chomsky.  But Collins, Goffman, Toffler, and Castiglione are all new to me — time to make a trip over to Amazon.com!  This is one of the reasons I totally love FDL in particular and the progressive blogosphere in general.  I like starting the conversation on line but then moving deeper into the actual texts and becoming conversant in them myself.  You don’t get this level of insight from traditional media!</p>
<p>This is incredibly helpful!  Thank you so much!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Welsh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062798</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Taking a look at your personal website, you may know more about Sociology than I do and be able to point yourself better than I, and the texts I suggested may in some cases be too basic for you.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, I would say if you take care of people’s Maslowian needs, you’ll have power.  Maslow was a bit too western to fully emphasize how much physical security matters and I would take the top two positions and replace them largely with “meaninng and a story line”, but the basic idea is sound.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking a look at your personal website, you may know more about Sociology than I do and be able to point yourself better than I, and the texts I suggested may in some cases be too basic for you.  </p>
<p>In general, I would say if you take care of people’s Maslowian needs, you’ll have power.  Maslow was a bit too western to fully emphasize how much physical security matters and I would take the top two positions and replace them largely with “meaninng and a story line”, but the basic idea is sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Welsh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062793</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062793</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1062736&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RFK Action Front @ 85&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi Ian:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is good stuff!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A good simple introduction to Weber is Randall Collin’s “Max Weber, a Skeleton Key”.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also recommend Collins “Conflict Sociology”, it’s big, it’s a bit out of date, but this stuff doesn’t go out of style that quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Macrohistory: Essays in Sociology of the Long Run” by Collins has some essays that speak directly to the question of when states form and break apart (prestige is big).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, on the Collins side, “Sociological Insights: An Introduction to Nonobvious Sociology” is something I always reccomend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(There’s so much Collins because when writing intro texts he is the clearest writer I have ever found in Soc.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A good basic cultural anthropology textbook would be wise as well (no reccomendations, it’s been a long time since I took anthro).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Strangley enough, Alvin Toffler’s “Power Shift” had, in the first few chapters, a good basic introduction to different types of power.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2007/04/03/mideast_peace/&quot;&gt;This piece from Salon&lt;/a&gt; speaks to my thesis that you need to deal with the people who have control over violence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The works of Erving Goffman in general apply.  He wrote a lot of books and the connection isn’t obvious, so I’m not sure what to reccomend — perhaps either a reader or a summary book (pick the shortest one).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For writing on meaning, I’d start with Flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent is still worth reading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Prince, by Machiavelli is a good book to read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another book I reccomend, though you probably won’t enjoy reading it much, is Castiglione’s The Courtier.  (Which seems to have had no new translation for 5 centuries, making it painful to read.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Metaphors We Live By” by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson  is also worth reading (skip the later stuff, read the original Lakoff)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s no one book that I can point you at, if it exists, I don’t know of it.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As people are socialized they learn to play roles.  Part of power is about controlling what roles others play, and making them switch into roles that are useful to you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To do this you have to supply storylines and meaning; you need to supply an in-group for them and you need to take care of basic needs (very basic).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What people want more than anything is to feel like they belong to something bigger than them and to be able to fit their lives into a story arc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1062736"><em>RFK Action Front @ 85</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hi Ian:</p>
<p>This is good stuff!  </p>
<p>Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  </p>
<p>These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A good simple introduction to Weber is Randall Collin’s “Max Weber, a Skeleton Key”.  </p>
<p>I also recommend Collins “Conflict Sociology”, it’s big, it’s a bit out of date, but this stuff doesn’t go out of style that quickly.</p>
<p>“Macrohistory: Essays in Sociology of the Long Run” by Collins has some essays that speak directly to the question of when states form and break apart (prestige is big).</p>
<p>And, on the Collins side, “Sociological Insights: An Introduction to Nonobvious Sociology” is something I always reccomend.</p>
<p>(There’s so much Collins because when writing intro texts he is the clearest writer I have ever found in Soc.)</p>
<p>A good basic cultural anthropology textbook would be wise as well (no reccomendations, it’s been a long time since I took anthro).</p>
<p>Strangley enough, Alvin Toffler’s “Power Shift” had, in the first few chapters, a good basic introduction to different types of power.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2007/04/03/mideast_peace/">This piece from Salon</a> speaks to my thesis that you need to deal with the people who have control over violence.</p>
<p>The works of Erving Goffman in general apply.  He wrote a lot of books and the connection isn’t obvious, so I’m not sure what to reccomend — perhaps either a reader or a summary book (pick the shortest one).</p>
<p>For writing on meaning, I’d start with Flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi.</p>
<p>Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent is still worth reading.</p>
<p>The Prince, by Machiavelli is a good book to read.</p>
<p>Another book I reccomend, though you probably won’t enjoy reading it much, is Castiglione’s The Courtier.  (Which seems to have had no new translation for 5 centuries, making it painful to read.)</p>
<p>“Metaphors We Live By” by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson  is also worth reading (skip the later stuff, read the original Lakoff)</p>
<p>There’s no one book that I can point you at, if it exists, I don’t know of it.  </p>
<p>As people are socialized they learn to play roles.  Part of power is about controlling what roles others play, and making them switch into roles that are useful to you.</p>
<p>To do this you have to supply storylines and meaning; you need to supply an in-group for them and you need to take care of basic needs (very basic).</p>
<p>What people want more than anything is to feel like they belong to something bigger than them and to be able to fit their lives into a story arc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBG</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062770</link>
		<dc:creator>RBG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062770</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1062758&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RFK Action Front @ 88&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I meant RBG!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It ain’t the first, or likely the last, time it’s happened. The old saw…”just don’t call me late for dinner” works just fine for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for noticing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1062758"><em>RFK Action Front @ 88</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I meant RBG!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It ain’t the first, or likely the last, time it’s happened. The old saw…”just don’t call me late for dinner” works just fine for me.</p>
<p>Thanks for noticing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RFK Action Front</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062758</link>
		<dc:creator>RFK Action Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I meant RBG!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant RBG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RFK Action Front</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062755</link>
		<dc:creator>RFK Action Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062755</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1062737&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RBG @ 86&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1062736&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RFK Action Front @ 85&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi Ian:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is good stuff!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry to not directly answer your questions…but gotta say I liked checking out some of your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rfkactionfront.com/search/label/Jane Hamsher&quot;&gt;earlier writings.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks RGB!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1062737"><em>RBG @ 86</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1062736"><em>RFK Action Front @ 85</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hi Ian:</p>
<p>This is good stuff!  </p>
<p>Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  </p>
<p>These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry to not directly answer your questions…but gotta say I liked checking out some of your <a href="http://www.rfkactionfront.com/search/label/Jane Hamsher">earlier writings.</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks RGB!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBG</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062737</link>
		<dc:creator>RBG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1062736&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RFK Action Front @ 85&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi Ian:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is good stuff!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry to not directly answer your questions…but gotta say I liked checking out some of your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rfkactionfront.com/search/label/Jane Hamsher&quot;&gt;earlier writings.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1062736"><em>RFK Action Front @ 85</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hi Ian:</p>
<p>This is good stuff!  </p>
<p>Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  </p>
<p>These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry to not directly answer your questions…but gotta say I liked checking out some of your <a href="http://www.rfkactionfront.com/search/label/Jane Hamsher">earlier writings.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RFK Action Front</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062736</link>
		<dc:creator>RFK Action Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/27/12532/#comment-1062736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ian:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is good stuff!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian:</p>
<p>This is good stuff!  </p>
<p>Would you please supply us with some sources — books for further reading, links, etc.  Are you mostly inspired by Weber and if so what texts?  What other writers are informing your thinking on this topic?  </p>
<p>These questions of the sociology of power are all around us these days — and it’d be great if we could all get conversant and deeply informed  ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
