<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Southwick:  A Study In Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:10:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055929</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055929</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;And why is it that the Democratic leadership continues to get its ass kicked on whip counts and back-door deals by the GOP?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because they are a bought congress. I can’t by now call it anything else, bought and paid for and doing the biding of the purchasers. Congress doesn’t belong to us, doesn’t represent us, doesn’t care about what we care about, won’t fight for us, doesn’t care when we fight for them and when they break our hearts, like over Aiito - and every damn thing since Alito. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their actions, their “losses” and “failures” make sense when I remind myself - they don’t represent We the People. These are not losses, these are wins for them in some way. They listen to the people with the money. The women are just as corrupt and undependable as the men, including my two women senators. I used to feel so proud - two women! Now I feel ashamed for them both.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And why is it that the Democratic leadership continues to get its ass kicked on whip counts and back-door deals by the GOP?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Because they are a bought congress. I can’t by now call it anything else, bought and paid for and doing the biding of the purchasers. Congress doesn’t belong to us, doesn’t represent us, doesn’t care about what we care about, won’t fight for us, doesn’t care when we fight for them and when they break our hearts, like over Aiito &#8211; and every damn thing since Alito. </p>
<p>Their actions, their “losses” and “failures” make sense when I remind myself &#8211; they don’t represent We the People. These are not losses, these are wins for them in some way. They listen to the people with the money. The women are just as corrupt and undependable as the men, including my two women senators. I used to feel so proud &#8211; two women! Now I feel ashamed for them both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055719</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055719</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ben Nelson voted with the Republicans to send the nomination of Hans Von Spakovsky to the FEC to the full Senate.&lt;br /&gt;
 Senator Feinstein was in charge and she did nothing to stop it. Although she sent out a letter later saying that she opposed the nomination, she went along with Republican claims that the committee had to vote together for four nominees as a package.&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect she did not try to influence Ben Nelson to vote otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like they are a team in supporting extremely dangerous rightwing operatives that the Republicans have the nerve to put out there.  Any comments?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Nelson voted with the Republicans to send the nomination of Hans Von Spakovsky to the FEC to the full Senate.<br />
 Senator Feinstein was in charge and she did nothing to stop it. Although she sent out a letter later saying that she opposed the nomination, she went along with Republican claims that the committee had to vote together for four nominees as a package.<br />
I suspect she did not try to influence Ben Nelson to vote otherwise.<br />
It looks like they are a team in supporting extremely dangerous rightwing operatives that the Republicans have the nerve to put out there.  Any comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055707</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055707</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054873&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Badwater @ 162&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054866&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;ironranger @ 158&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pat Robertson (&amp; he wasn’t the only one) said hurricanes were God’s punishments at one time. Now Fake News says the fires were set by Al Qaeda. I wonder how they all decide which are acts of God or acts of terrorists. It’s just sooo confusing for secular sinners.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s not confusing.  They just go with the explanation that they think benefits the Republics most.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush LET Al Qaeda set the fires!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pivot and attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1054873"><em>Badwater @ 162</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1054866"><em>ironranger @ 158</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Pat Robertson (&amp; he wasn’t the only one) said hurricanes were God’s punishments at one time. Now Fake News says the fires were set by Al Qaeda. I wonder how they all decide which are acts of God or acts of terrorists. It’s just sooo confusing for secular sinners.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s not confusing.  They just go with the explanation that they think benefits the Republics most.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bush LET Al Qaeda set the fires!</p>
<p>Pivot and attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055697</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054843&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @ 145&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054842&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;GSD @ 144&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Condi is the Brownie of the State Dept. …
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But with better shoes.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brownie would take offense at that comment!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1054843"><em>Hugh @ 145</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1054842"><em>GSD @ 144</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Condi is the Brownie of the State Dept. …
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But with better shoes.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Brownie would take offense at that comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055689</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055689</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054820&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;ADM @ 125&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054801&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @ 109&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m so confused.  It’s chilly here today.  Should I blame Clinton or al Qaeda?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s Clinton working &lt;em&gt;with&lt;/em&gt; al qaeda of course.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t forget the “do-nothing Congress”. After all, they haven’t impeached &amp; kicked out the Bush admin., so they actually are guilty of letting him run wild.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1054820"><em>ADM @ 125</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1054801"><em>Hugh @ 109</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’m so confused.  It’s chilly here today.  Should I blame Clinton or al Qaeda?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s Clinton working <em>with</em> al qaeda of course.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Don’t forget the “do-nothing Congress”. After all, they haven’t impeached &amp; kicked out the Bush admin., so they actually are guilty of letting him run wild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055662</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055662</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054724&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;chisholm @ 50&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Democrats don’t play to win. They play to tie. They WANT to share power, not control it. I find this utterly perplexing. Is their a single elected Democrat whose goal is to neuter the Republican Party? Because that’s what it should be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s a lack of real leadership that has goals and wants to get things done and requires a majority to have the power to get those things done. Without goals and leadership they just play pattycake and get nothing right.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1054724"><em>chisholm @ 50</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Democrats don’t play to win. They play to tie. They WANT to share power, not control it. I find this utterly perplexing. Is their a single elected Democrat whose goal is to neuter the Republican Party? Because that’s what it should be.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s a lack of real leadership that has goals and wants to get things done and requires a majority to have the power to get those things done. Without goals and leadership they just play pattycake and get nothing right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055655</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054712&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;kdh22 @ 39&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senator Dodd can be in Iowa campaigning and not be called to the carpet for missing an “important” vote, but Obama gets castrated for doing exactly the same thing. Hmmmm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s depressing to have so many “important” votes while we have senators on the campaign trail. Sigh.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1054712"><em>kdh22 @ 39</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Senator Dodd can be in Iowa campaigning and not be called to the carpet for missing an “important” vote, but Obama gets castrated for doing exactly the same thing. Hmmmm</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s depressing to have so many “important” votes while we have senators on the campaign trail. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055644</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055644</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054686&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;-ck- @ 17&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
…&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, we need a SECOND party — and to paraphrase Lincoln, since the DC Democrats don’t seem to have any interest in actually being a majority party, might we borrow the Democratic Party for a while?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great campaign slogan for a primary, “Sir, since you have no interest in using your seat, may I borrow it?”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1054686"><em>-ck- @ 17</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
…<br />
Actually, we need a SECOND party — and to paraphrase Lincoln, since the DC Democrats don’t seem to have any interest in actually being a majority party, might we borrow the Democratic Party for a while?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Great campaign slogan for a primary, “Sir, since you have no interest in using your seat, may I borrow it?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055631</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055631</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1054671&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;big bob @ 5&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;We need a THIRD party  !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mo better Dems!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1054671"><em>big bob @ 5</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>We need a THIRD party  !</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mo better Dems!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055453</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/24/southwick-a-study-in-failure/#comment-1055453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To the Dems, in the immortal woids of Bugs Bunny:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Sucker”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the Dems, in the immortal woids of Bugs Bunny:</p>
<p>“Sucker”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
