<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #3,215 With A Bullet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:14:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dan_ps</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1049213</link>
		<dc:creator>dan_ps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1049213</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;His absurd “Hilary’s cleavage=Abu Ghraib” note &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2007/10/19/BL2007101900770_2.html&quot;&gt;from last week&lt;/a&gt; is reason enough not to buy it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His absurd “Hilary’s cleavage=Abu Ghraib” note <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2007/10/19/BL2007101900770_2.html">from last week</a> is reason enough not to buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048990</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048990</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048431&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CTuttle @ 43&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048418&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @ 33&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;OT -&lt;br /&gt;
c-span’s book tv has an interview with naomi wolf starting in 30 min. and she’s being interviewed by …… viet dinh!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;who thought up that combination?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I watched it earlier, at one point I was exasperated at Naomi for not refuting Dinh’s argument that; Clinton asked for all the USA’s resignations… what was wrong with Shrub’s floating of it in ‘06!!!  Uh, because it’s habit for administrations to request it at the &lt;b&gt;beginning&lt;/b&gt; of their term, not, in the middle.  8-(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because at the BEGINNING of the term you aren’t retaliating against them for investigating naughty things by the Administration in power. You are simply clearing out “patronage” positions. But when you attack your own patronage appointments for investigating activities you don’t want it’s considered obstruction of justice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1048431"><em>CTuttle @ 43</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1048418"><em>selise @ 33</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>OT -<br />
c-span’s book tv has an interview with naomi wolf starting in 30 min. and she’s being interviewed by …… viet dinh!</p>
<p>who thought up that combination?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I watched it earlier, at one point I was exasperated at Naomi for not refuting Dinh’s argument that; Clinton asked for all the USA’s resignations… what was wrong with Shrub’s floating of it in ‘06!!!  Uh, because it’s habit for administrations to request it at the <b>beginning</b> of their term, not, in the middle.  8-(</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Because at the BEGINNING of the term you aren’t retaliating against them for investigating naughty things by the Administration in power. You are simply clearing out “patronage” positions. But when you attack your own patronage appointments for investigating activities you don’t want it’s considered obstruction of justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prostratedragon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048757</link>
		<dc:creator>prostratedragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048757</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fair Game&lt;/i&gt; has shot up from about 550 on Amazon this evening just before &lt;i&gt;60Minutes&lt;/i&gt; to 101 just after midnight et. Maybe the interview broke some new ground.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Fair Game</i> has shot up from about 550 on Amazon this evening just before <i>60Minutes</i> to 101 just after midnight et. Maybe the interview broke some new ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048697</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048472&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kevster @ 74&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Howie Kutrz’ wankishness knows no bounds. Abu Grahib rvelations=Hillary Clinton’s cleavage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See?  They all do it. You bloggers are just so damn shrill.&lt;br /&gt;
…
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Shrill”? How am I gonna be ‘foul-mothed’ and ’shrill’? Would somebody tell them to stop changing our characteristics like the clothing on a mannequin! I mean, how can we live down to their expectations if they keep changing it all the time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I try, I really do. But, they just make it sooo hard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, who is Howie Kurtz?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1048472"><em>Kevster @ 74</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Howie Kutrz’ wankishness knows no bounds. Abu Grahib rvelations=Hillary Clinton’s cleavage.</p>
<p>See?  They all do it. You bloggers are just so damn shrill.<br />
…
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“Shrill”? How am I gonna be ‘foul-mothed’ and ’shrill’? Would somebody tell them to stop changing our characteristics like the clothing on a mannequin! I mean, how can we live down to their expectations if they keep changing it all the time.</p>
<p>I try, I really do. But, they just make it sooo hard.</p>
<p>BTW, who is Howie Kurtz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Citizen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048609</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048609</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048445&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Joe Klein’s conscience @ 56&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048389&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jane Hamsher @ 9&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I found all the Amazon reviews to be quite helpful:Hi Teddy!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doesn’t Nolan realize who Kurtz is married to?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t understand what all the kerfuffle is about. I would think that by this time all would realize that what The MeatGrinder, the GWOT and Dear Leader are all about is….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Helping Howie and BillO and Coultergeist and the fat idiot Tweety……&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sell their books! Wake up you liburuls! These Very Serious People are mainly about one thing and one thing only….No, no, no!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It ain’t ’supporting the &lt;strike&gt;cannon fodder &lt;/strike&gt;troops’…NO!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s all about getting paid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just ask Howie he’ll tell ya….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well…maybe even he ain’t that stupid…but, yeah that’s what this is all about. And while there might not be as much do-re-mi in crummy books as there is in mercenaries, MREs, $300m embassies, police stations which leak sewage and those other big ticket items KBR, Halliburton and The Carlyle Group are producing…..’&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Howie-the-Putz will take what he can get.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1048445"><em>Joe Klein’s conscience @ 56</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1048389"><em>Jane Hamsher @ 9</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I found all the Amazon reviews to be quite helpful:Hi Teddy!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Doesn’t Nolan realize who Kurtz is married to?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don’t understand what all the kerfuffle is about. I would think that by this time all would realize that what The MeatGrinder, the GWOT and Dear Leader are all about is….</p>
<p>Helping Howie and BillO and Coultergeist and the fat idiot Tweety……</p>
<p>Sell their books! Wake up you liburuls! These Very Serious People are mainly about one thing and one thing only….No, no, no!</p>
<p>It ain’t ’supporting the <strike>cannon fodder </strike>troops’…NO!</p>
<p>It’s all about getting paid.</p>
<p>Just ask Howie he’ll tell ya….</p>
<p>Well…maybe even he ain’t that stupid…but, yeah that’s what this is all about. And while there might not be as much do-re-mi in crummy books as there is in mercenaries, MREs, $300m embassies, police stations which leak sewage and those other big ticket items KBR, Halliburton and The Carlyle Group are producing…..’</p>
<p>Howie-the-Putz will take what he can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katherine Graham Cracker</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048510</link>
		<dc:creator>katherine Graham Cracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048510</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Although you don’t see it on Kurtz’s show when he was interviewed on the Daily Show you can see  he has a comb over&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although you don’t see it on Kurtz’s show when he was interviewed on the Daily Show you can see  he has a comb over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Blood for Hubris</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048508</link>
		<dc:creator>No Blood for Hubris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I saw him interviewed by Jon Stewart, and Kurtz &lt;em&gt;failed to understand a single question he was asked. &lt;/em&gt;  Breathtakingly dumb.  And yet — employed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw him interviewed by Jon Stewart, and Kurtz <em>failed to understand a single question he was asked. </em>  Breathtakingly dumb.  And yet — employed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hackworth</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048488</link>
		<dc:creator>hackworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048488</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048431&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CTuttle @ 43&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048418&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @ 33&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;OT -&lt;br /&gt;
c-span’s book tv has an interview with naomi wolf starting in 30 min. and she’s being interviewed by …… viet dinh!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;who thought up that combination?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I watched it earlier, at one point I was exasperated at Naomi for not refuting Dinh’s argument that; Clinton asked for all the USA’s resignations… what was wrong with Shrub’s floating of it in ‘06!!!  Uh, because it’s habit for administrations to request it at the &lt;b&gt;beginning&lt;/b&gt; of their term, not, in the middle.  8-(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In keeping with the tradition of each new administration cleaning house and appointing new US Atty’s, it stands to reason that Dubya and Co. would have fired not one but &lt;b&gt;two sets &lt;/b&gt;of US attorneys. Did Bushco not fire and replace an existing group of attys in 2000? (These would have been leftovers from the Clinton Administration. Such action would be comparable to what Clinton and prior administrations did).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Later, Dubya and AG Gonzales, et al, decided to fire a &lt;b&gt;second round &lt;/b&gt;of attorneys. Thus creating the US ATTY Scandal. These were &lt;b&gt;Republican&lt;/b&gt; Attorneys that &lt;b&gt;they selected &lt;/b&gt;for their own administration. These &lt;b&gt;Republican &lt;/b&gt;Atty’s were fired b/c they refused to follow Rove’s orders to prosecute only Democrats (and drop any pending cases against Republicans). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do I have this right?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1048431"><em>CTuttle @ 43</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1048418"><em>selise @ 33</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>OT -<br />
c-span’s book tv has an interview with naomi wolf starting in 30 min. and she’s being interviewed by …… viet dinh!</p>
<p>who thought up that combination?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I watched it earlier, at one point I was exasperated at Naomi for not refuting Dinh’s argument that; Clinton asked for all the USA’s resignations… what was wrong with Shrub’s floating of it in ‘06!!!  Uh, because it’s habit for administrations to request it at the <b>beginning</b> of their term, not, in the middle.  8-(</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In keeping with the tradition of each new administration cleaning house and appointing new US Atty’s, it stands to reason that Dubya and Co. would have fired not one but <b>two sets </b>of US attorneys. Did Bushco not fire and replace an existing group of attys in 2000? (These would have been leftovers from the Clinton Administration. Such action would be comparable to what Clinton and prior administrations did).</p>
<p>Later, Dubya and AG Gonzales, et al, decided to fire a <b>second round </b>of attorneys. Thus creating the US ATTY Scandal. These were <b>Republican</b> Attorneys that <b>they selected </b>for their own administration. These <b>Republican </b>Atty’s were fired b/c they refused to follow Rove’s orders to prosecute only Democrats (and drop any pending cases against Republicans). </p>
<p>Do I have this right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevster</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048472</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048472</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Howie Kutrz’ wankishness knows no bounds. Abu Grahib rvelations=Hillary Clinton’s cleavage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See?  They all do it. You bloggers are just so damn shrill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Excuse me while I take this call from Michelle Malkin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fetid Beltway Punditry lives on.  Get a life , people!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howie Kutrz’ wankishness knows no bounds. Abu Grahib rvelations=Hillary Clinton’s cleavage.</p>
<p>See?  They all do it. You bloggers are just so damn shrill.</p>
<p>Excuse me while I take this call from Michelle Malkin.</p>
<p>The fetid Beltway Punditry lives on.  Get a life , people!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauimom</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048467</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauimom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/21/3215-with-a-bullet/#comment-1048467</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1048449&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;neil @ 60&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m looking forward to Val Plame’s visit to the lake tomorrow.  Who caught her on 60 minutes tonight?  Does anyone want to share their impression of how the segment went?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I held my nose re Ms. Couric and watched.  Val was wonderful.  Couric tried to trap her a number of times [re the Vanity Fair article, and were she &amp; Joe “partisan”].  Val was articulate, on point, beautiful [natch] and just generally wonderful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1048449"><em>neil @ 60</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’m looking forward to Val Plame’s visit to the lake tomorrow.  Who caught her on 60 minutes tonight?  Does anyone want to share their impression of how the segment went?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I held my nose re Ms. Couric and watched.  Val was wonderful.  Couric tried to trap her a number of times [re the Vanity Fair article, and were she &amp; Joe “partisan”].  Val was articulate, on point, beautiful [natch] and just generally wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
