<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Potter and the Blinding Flash of the Obvious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:28:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liberty Lover</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045858</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044412&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Twain @ 17&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Harry’s  term up in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt; at this point, it’s not soon enough!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1044412"><em>Twain @ 17</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Harry’s  term up in 2010.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> at this point, it’s not soon enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnacki</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045490</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045490</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Funny stuff Order of the Phoenix Woman. I had Harry Potter on my mind last night too&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/10/19/185951/90&quot;&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/10/19/185951/90&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny stuff Order of the Phoenix Woman. I had Harry Potter on my mind last night too</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/10/19/185951/90">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/10/19/185951/90</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045135</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve got a beef with Hillary!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think Hillary’s camp is trying to keep her supporters in a trance. They react to threats as though their queen is perfect and any threat is evil and lies. I even heard Lawrence O’Donnel say that there would probably be some ‘genned-up’ allegations against Hillary. Oh no, don’t say it’s so. There could NEVER be any allegations against the White Queen! Sheesh! Don’t those people have enough intelligence to realize she’s human and quite interested in having the mostest money of any candidate, regardless of where she and Terry McAuliffe might find it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I say they’re entranced in the fantasy that she’s somehow perfect. I don’t think they realize she’s just a human professional politician who is playing head games with her followers instead of simply telling them what she might do as president to benefit everybody.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I remember right there was a movie made about the first Clinton campaign of 1992. In it James Carville gives a speech to the campaign workers after it’s come out that Bill had a bimbo problem. In the speech Carville warns the campaign workers that the attacks were garbage and if they didn’t support Bill and win there would never ever be another Democratic president…EVER! Of course, Bill was only human and apparently had needs beyond the family bond. Boy were they let down when that came out years later. And, when Gore didn’t win election I’ll bet some of them were even more pissed. Bill had royally screwed everybody. Of course, by giving the presidency to a Republican there would soon be another chance for Hillary to take the presidency. If Gore had won it might’ve been 16 years before Hill could make a run. Everything worked out for the Clintons — wowie.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, the moral of the story is the Clintons get what they want, no matter who they have to lie to, keep in the dark, take money from or stab in the back. They sound a lot like the Bush family mafia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Genned-up’ allegations? How about real stories of how McAuliffe et al have ‘raised’ money for the campaign from all around the world through shady characters and by unbelievable means?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary is a professional politician. She needs money to win. She needs an adoring crowd of supporters who don’t question her motives and goals. It may be an illusionists act, but that’s what they’re trying to do. Hillary’s schtick doesn’t hold up for a second when she faces an audience of intelligent well-informed people (such as on firedoglake.com). This tells me the money will mostly be used to create appearances of presidency and t.v. ads. It’s all show.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve got a beef with Hillary! Hillary, where’s the beef?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve got a beef with Hillary!</p>
<p>I think Hillary’s camp is trying to keep her supporters in a trance. They react to threats as though their queen is perfect and any threat is evil and lies. I even heard Lawrence O’Donnel say that there would probably be some ‘genned-up’ allegations against Hillary. Oh no, don’t say it’s so. There could NEVER be any allegations against the White Queen! Sheesh! Don’t those people have enough intelligence to realize she’s human and quite interested in having the mostest money of any candidate, regardless of where she and Terry McAuliffe might find it?</p>
<p>I say they’re entranced in the fantasy that she’s somehow perfect. I don’t think they realize she’s just a human professional politician who is playing head games with her followers instead of simply telling them what she might do as president to benefit everybody.</p>
<p>If I remember right there was a movie made about the first Clinton campaign of 1992. In it James Carville gives a speech to the campaign workers after it’s come out that Bill had a bimbo problem. In the speech Carville warns the campaign workers that the attacks were garbage and if they didn’t support Bill and win there would never ever be another Democratic president…EVER! Of course, Bill was only human and apparently had needs beyond the family bond. Boy were they let down when that came out years later. And, when Gore didn’t win election I’ll bet some of them were even more pissed. Bill had royally screwed everybody. Of course, by giving the presidency to a Republican there would soon be another chance for Hillary to take the presidency. If Gore had won it might’ve been 16 years before Hill could make a run. Everything worked out for the Clintons — wowie.</p>
<p>So, the moral of the story is the Clintons get what they want, no matter who they have to lie to, keep in the dark, take money from or stab in the back. They sound a lot like the Bush family mafia.</p>
<p>‘Genned-up’ allegations? How about real stories of how McAuliffe et al have ‘raised’ money for the campaign from all around the world through shady characters and by unbelievable means?</p>
<p>Hillary is a professional politician. She needs money to win. She needs an adoring crowd of supporters who don’t question her motives and goals. It may be an illusionists act, but that’s what they’re trying to do. Hillary’s schtick doesn’t hold up for a second when she faces an audience of intelligent well-informed people (such as on firedoglake.com). This tells me the money will mostly be used to create appearances of presidency and t.v. ads. It’s all show.</p>
<p>I’ve got a beef with Hillary! Hillary, where’s the beef?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Kiddo:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lunatics are now the mainstream, and the old mainstream is now very, very, much, the fringe.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kiddo:</p>
<p>The lunatics are now the mainstream, and the old mainstream is now very, very, much, the fringe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045080</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1045080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044408&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oklahoma kiddo @ 14&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;And Arianna asking on Olbermann ‘where does  mainstream Republicanism end and the lunatic (GOP) fringe begin’?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great rhetorical question! AH is first rate in my book.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1044408"><em>Oklahoma kiddo @ 14</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>And Arianna asking on Olbermann ‘where does  mainstream Republicanism end and the lunatic (GOP) fringe begin’?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Great rhetorical question! AH is first rate in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044912</link>
		<dc:creator>clio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044912</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044401&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CTuttle @ 9&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;When’s Harry up for re-election???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Give ‘em help Harry isn’t up for re-election until 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
Two-timing Jay, OTOH, is up in 2008.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1044401"><em>CTuttle @ 9</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>When’s Harry up for re-election???</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Give ‘em help Harry isn’t up for re-election until 2010.<br />
Two-timing Jay, OTOH, is up in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044722</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044722</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044498&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Phoenix Woman @ 69&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just want to let everyone know that there have been some issues with the WP servers, so your comments may be wonky.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044460&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Phoenix Woman @ 47&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044430&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ish @ 27&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Harry Reid = Cornelius Fudge?&lt;br /&gt;
Nancy Pelosi = Dolores Umbrage?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Is this too many Harry Potter in-references yet?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nancy’s not actively evil — I’d say she’s more like Amelia Bones or Rufus Scrimgeour. :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PW-Nancy is a leader. We progressives elected her. Thru our support, she gained the Speaker’s Position. And given what she’s done since then, and not done, I think it’s safe to say, and and we can cut to the chase . . . that she’s not representative of our needs and issues, and that makes her evil and part of the enemy. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We keep giving our evil enemies any MORE love and they win by default. Time to dig in and fight it PW. And Nancy has proven she’s not with us, or with our fight. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cut her loose, please. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And let’s move the progressive struggle forward WITHOUT those who have broken our trust and proven they don’t have our best interests at hand. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let’s move forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1044498"><em>Phoenix Woman @ 69</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Just want to let everyone know that there have been some issues with the WP servers, so your comments may be wonky.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="#comment-1044460"><em>Phoenix Woman @ 47</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1044430"><em>Ish @ 27</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Harry Reid = Cornelius Fudge?<br />
Nancy Pelosi = Dolores Umbrage?</p>
<p>(Is this too many Harry Potter in-references yet?)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Nancy’s not actively evil — I’d say she’s more like Amelia Bones or Rufus Scrimgeour. :-)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>PW-Nancy is a leader. We progressives elected her. Thru our support, she gained the Speaker’s Position. And given what she’s done since then, and not done, I think it’s safe to say, and and we can cut to the chase . . . that she’s not representative of our needs and issues, and that makes her evil and part of the enemy. </p>
<p>We keep giving our evil enemies any MORE love and they win by default. Time to dig in and fight it PW. And Nancy has proven she’s not with us, or with our fight. </p>
<p>Cut her loose, please. </p>
<p>And let’s move the progressive struggle forward WITHOUT those who have broken our trust and proven they don’t have our best interests at hand. </p>
<p>Let’s move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alank</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044692</link>
		<dc:creator>alank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044692</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Ob-viously!”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reid’s a tosser.  Wow.  Who would’ve thunk it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The party rank and file did not give him leave to go against their wishes.  And yet that’s exactly what he’s done. As Prof. McGonagle might’ve said, “Reid has done a bunk.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Ob-viously!”</p>
<p>Reid’s a tosser.  Wow.  Who would’ve thunk it?</p>
<p>The party rank and file did not give him leave to go against their wishes.  And yet that’s exactly what he’s done. As Prof. McGonagle might’ve said, “Reid has done a bunk.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044681</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044490&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;perris @ 66&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044475&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Loo Hoo. @ 60&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;perris, that Blackwater stuff scares the bejabbers out of me.  Thank stars that Waxman is on it.  When the dems are in charge, the military will be speaking to this more and more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;waxman is only “on” what we know about blackwater&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;those are advanced powerfull military air craft and we happen to know about them, what about the weaponry and ordinance we DON’T know about&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;remember that “cache” of ordinance that was left “undguarded” and we all assumed the Iraqi’s were the one’s that raided it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do believe that would be blackwater that raided it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;this is another epiphane I just had as I was responding to your post&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;blackwater are the recipients of that weaponry that we left undguarded, it seems perfectly clear once told and now I am telling it&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Perris, the missing 6 Nukes, from Barksdale. If you buy Al The Spook’s version it was a black rouge ops issued by Cheney. All Blackwater’s missing is some nukes, to blackmail someone. Ya know?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shades of Ian Fleming and Blofeld!!! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And really, I’m not kidding. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those ACM’s, attached to the pods of the B-52, with repainted warheads to LOOK like dummy’s, when in fact they were like W-80’s, those W-80’s could EASILY have been diverted/subverted by Cheney, to go to Blackwater hands. And today, USAF (who investigated itself, what a crock THAT is) says it was a ‘mistake’ and people lost careers. Bullshit. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USAF is notoriously Fundie Based, and so is Blackwater and Erik Prince. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s where I come out of the tunnel-Blackwater will be the delivery mechanism for Cheney’s Black Op’s DO on our homeland, or on Iran . . . or ANYONE, but someone or somehow so Russia and China can’t IMMEDIATELY retaliate, and that will trigger martial law here in USA. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;N then, the heat on WW3 rachets up to full throttle with the needle pegged. It’s a bluff game with Blackwater who still has a few nukes left, who can easily false flag a few more nukes to provoke retaliation enough to do a full launch ‘out there’  . . . &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the rising commences. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;;-) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much of the above, sadly, is way too possible. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even with Fallan’s and Gates and any other military authority insisting Iran is NOT gonna be a do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What a struggle must be going on in our hallowed halls of the WH and Congress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What fear, trepid intimidation, cowering, and evil must be walking those halls, jousting with honorable men and women who know better. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May the honourable one’s prevail in our behalf. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Amen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1044490"><em>perris @ 66</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1044475"><em>Loo Hoo. @ 60</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>perris, that Blackwater stuff scares the bejabbers out of me.  Thank stars that Waxman is on it.  When the dems are in charge, the military will be speaking to this more and more.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>waxman is only “on” what we know about blackwater</p>
<p>those are advanced powerfull military air craft and we happen to know about them, what about the weaponry and ordinance we DON’T know about</p>
<p>remember that “cache” of ordinance that was left “undguarded” and we all assumed the Iraqi’s were the one’s that raided it?</p>
<p>I do believe that would be blackwater that raided it.</p>
<p>this is another epiphane I just had as I was responding to your post</p>
<p>blackwater are the recipients of that weaponry that we left undguarded, it seems perfectly clear once told and now I am telling it</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So Perris, the missing 6 Nukes, from Barksdale. If you buy Al The Spook’s version it was a black rouge ops issued by Cheney. All Blackwater’s missing is some nukes, to blackmail someone. Ya know?</p>
<p>Shades of Ian Fleming and Blofeld!!! </p>
<p>And really, I’m not kidding. </p>
<p>Those ACM’s, attached to the pods of the B-52, with repainted warheads to LOOK like dummy’s, when in fact they were like W-80’s, those W-80’s could EASILY have been diverted/subverted by Cheney, to go to Blackwater hands. And today, USAF (who investigated itself, what a crock THAT is) says it was a ‘mistake’ and people lost careers. Bullshit. </p>
<p>The USAF is notoriously Fundie Based, and so is Blackwater and Erik Prince. </p>
<p>Here’s where I come out of the tunnel-Blackwater will be the delivery mechanism for Cheney’s Black Op’s DO on our homeland, or on Iran . . . or ANYONE, but someone or somehow so Russia and China can’t IMMEDIATELY retaliate, and that will trigger martial law here in USA. </p>
<p>N then, the heat on WW3 rachets up to full throttle with the needle pegged. It’s a bluff game with Blackwater who still has a few nukes left, who can easily false flag a few more nukes to provoke retaliation enough to do a full launch ‘out there’  . . . </p>
<p>And the rising commences. </p>
<p>;-) </p>
<p>Much of the above, sadly, is way too possible. </p>
<p>Even with Fallan’s and Gates and any other military authority insisting Iran is NOT gonna be a do.</p>
<p>What a struggle must be going on in our hallowed halls of the WH and Congress.</p>
<p>What fear, trepid intimidation, cowering, and evil must be walking those halls, jousting with honorable men and women who know better. </p>
<p>May the honourable one’s prevail in our behalf. </p>
<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044626</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/19/harry-potter-and-the-blinding-flash-of-the-obvious/#comment-1044626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1044464&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Loo Hoo. @ 50&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any day now . . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLjNjSpZxzg&quot;&gt;Any Day Now&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any day now, I shall be released. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*G*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1044464"><em>Loo Hoo. @ 50</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Any day now . . . .<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLjNjSpZxzg">Any Day Now</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Any day now, I shall be released. </p>
<p>*G*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
