You gotta give it up for Ben Affleck. The guy showed up yesterday for an event with no glitter and glam but a whole lot of people simply trying to better their lives — the healthcare workers at Boston’s teaching hospitals who are struggling to get the CEOs of these institutions just to agree to let them have a fair, supervised union election.
But the CEOs are cringing like a bunch of shrinking virgins whose date just tried to cop a cheap feel, as if they’ve never heard of such an inconceivable outrage. They have called their list of requests for fair elections both “undemocratic” and “unnecessary” given the fact that the NLRB has rules regulating such things.
Dear me. Let’s have a look at those outrageous demands:
- Management agrees to abstain from spending any patient care resources on efforts to dissuade employees from unionizing.
- Both the union and the employer agree not to disparage each other and to present only factual information.
- Employees are allowed to exchange and discuss information about unionization.
- Management does not take a position on unionization, but allows employees to make up their own minds.
- Employees are given access to union representatives and information at the workplace.
- Management agrees to schedule an election without delays and respect the decision employees make.
- Management and the union agree to a fair, timely and binding enforcement process for these guidelines.
“If it’s already illegal, it shouldn’t be so difficult to agree to it,” said the SEIU’s Dana Simon.
As we saw in the California and Nevada nurse’s strikes, union busters like Larry Arnold and Brent Yessin are regularly contracted by hospitals to come in to harass and intimidate workers who support unionization (in an attempt to skirt the NLRB’s regulations). Moreover, the NLRB is not immune from the politicization that has characterized so many government agencies under the Bush administration. They recently reached back to a case from 2000 — the Carney Hospital and SEIU case — to decide that the appropriate penalty for a hospital who illegally suspended a pro-union worker was basically to pay the employee for the time he was suspended and promise not to do it again.
Ouch. That’ll leave a mark.
Paul Levy, chief executive at Beth Israel (and also a blogger) clutches his pearls and scolds the SEIU for having held up construction of a new facility in New Haven. “What kind of healthcare service union would stand in the way of a cancer center in New England? That strikes me as the kind of union we don’t want,” Levy said.
He didn’t address the fact that the workers who are trying to unionize have neither the incomes nor the health insurance benefits to be treated in the hospitals they work in.
Given that one in six jobs in Boston is in the healthcare sector, Mayor Menino (who endorses the union’s efforts) was also at the press conference. And the Boston City Councilor will be voting today as to whether they should recommend that hospital CEOs agree to hold fair, supervised elections.
Said Andy Stern:
Today is a historic day. Workers have stood up to ask for the basic right to choose a Union without interference from their employers, for being able to deliver quality care to all residents of Boston. We are so appreciative that Mayor Menino and the other public leaders have spoken out and asked the executives of the huge medical centers in Boston to recognize that quality care can only be delivered by workers who have been given the basic human right to vote for a union without fear of reprisal.
Most of all, it was an inspiring day of bravery of hundreds of workers who publicly said, we are not afraid because workers rights and patients rights are too important to stay silent.
This is an important fight. As Paul Krugman notes in his new book The Conscience of a Liberal, “middle-class societies don’t emerge automatically as an economy matures, they have to be created through political action.”
This is a prime example of that kind of political action.
Pretty exciting.
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

hello Dalia
Hello, Jane!
zed
We’re an 1199 union family and damn proud of it!
Long live 1199 SEIU
the mighty might union
The heath care union!
GO SEIU –
Work union – live better.
Yay nurses!
nurses are the heart of healthcare.
Elliott @ 6
Absolutely right !
((((( Jane )))))
OT – the Schumer-Mukasey love-fest continues in the SJC…
jayt @ 8
Have Whitehouse/Feingold/Durbin had their say ?
jayt @ 8
I don’t know a better way to describe it.
Petrocelli @ 9
Don’t know, I’m afraid – I just tuned in – home sick today.
Andy Stern is one of my heroes
Re Mukasey
What would you have them ask? Hes been pretty straight forward with questions we wanted answered.
Nothing has changed since I was a Surgery Resident at several of the Harvard teaching hospitals 30 years ago. At one hospital, the nurses were making “noise” about unionizing..an upper level administrator was assigned to stop it. It wasn’t pretty. In theory, nursing administration should be protecting and representing the nursing staff..what a joke. Unless the “staff” nurses have leverage in dealing with administration, patient care suffers.
“….whose date just tried to cop a cheap feel…”
Those were the days! :D
Should we liveblog here or on the previous thread? radiofreewill is doing a good job in the last thread.
I don’t have statistics on hand, but I believe that the economic health of the middle class (and the size of the middle class)are both directly related to the strength and membership of unions.
And the fact that workers today are suffering so much, economically, is also a direct result of the evisceration of unions and the ability of workers to unionize, which has taken place over the past 30-40 years.
OT..Digby has a sobering piece about public support for SCHIP.
link
Hugh @ 16
come up here
I had the pleasure of hearing Andy in person about labor issues…he rips it up
Here is Amy goodmans interview with him
http://www.democracynow.org/ar…..04/1428207
Andy Stern
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Stern
Can this man save labor?
http://www.businessweek.com/ma….._mz001.htm
Hugh @ 16
This one’s fine, I don’t mind.
Steve-AR @ 18
that’s a revolting development
snowbird42 @ 13
Re Mukasey
What would you have them ask? Hes been pretty straight forward with questions we wanted answered.
“Judge Mukasey – do you agree with Senator Schumer’s characterization of the last Attorney General as a “Potted Plant”?
“Judge Mukasey – if we vote to confirm today – do you at least promise to do your level best to not fuck things up any worse than they already are at the DOJ?”
My condolances to all you Texas firepups who have to put up with Cornyn!
Cornyn probing, weakly, around ’suspicion’ and ‘probable cause’ – asking Mukasey to work with the committee.
Mukasey says he will.
Leahy says only one round of questions for today, more tomorrow.
Durbin up!
Durbin!
Toby Wollin @ 17
Post-WWII something like 30% of all workers were unionized. That figure is now down to 8% I think for workers in the private sector. There is absolutely a direct relationship.
Durbin on torture. There’s a whole lot between pretty please and torture.
Will you acknowledge that it is unlawful to partake in CID treatment?
A: No Doubt about it.
Q: When could the Pres’s authority over-ride a statute like the McCain Statute?
A: The Pres has some authority inherently, and he contests some of the limitations placed on him by Congress. It has never been tested, and I hope it’s never tested. We have to compromise in many cases.
Q: Do you believe the McCain Amendment is an unconstitutional infringement on the Pres?
A: No.
someone should ask him outright..
“If the president demands that you authorize torture, the way torture is defined pursuant to the International Convenant on Civil and Political Rights and other multilateral treaties to which this country is a signatory, what will you do? If pressured, would you resign?”
In fact.. they should ask him outright, if he’s asked by shrub to countenance any form of illegality (each forms to be laid out clearly to him in the question), would he resign
Wonderful post Jane! My “baby” son graduates from nursing school in mid-December and reports job recruitment of his class by nationwide hospitals began agressively last spring. He lurks at the lake when he can and am sending Cole your post to make sure he doesn’t miss it.
;~)
Willy-nilly, globalization, which, inter alia, means the flight of domestic jobs into the global labor pool, has vitiated the power of American workers to unionize. Market economy has the hegemony. Everything else follows.
uh-oh – durbin is saying that Mukasey has taken the position that the prez’s authority might take precedence ober the McCain anti-torture statute…
“Mercifully, we have never, and hopefully never will, come to a situation of litigations that the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional…”
me – I’d like to see that – pretty damn quick.
Mukasey does, however, say that he doesn’t view the McCain anti-Torture bill as being an unconstitutional usurpation of presidential power.
Q: Do you think mistreatment happens to Gitmo detainees?
A: Gitmo doesn’t mistreat people, but detention policy needs to be debated.
Q: Is holding detainees with charges and sometimes releasing without ever telling them the charges unlawful?
A: Hamdi says the Pres can do it, that doesn’t neccessarily mean it’s good Policy.
Mukasey *still* has no problems with holding U.S. citizens indefinitely.
If that’s not disqualifying, Senators, jesus h. christ.. what’s it gonna take?
snowbird42 @ 13
I don’t think he has been. He has done a lot of bobbing and weaving. Look at what he’s doing with the War Powers Act. It’s unconstitutional but is OK as long as push doesn’t come to shove. From this it seems that Mukasey in fact does believe in essentially unlimited Article II power just that the President should be polite about it. He is now mischaracterizing Hamdi. Hamdi says that the US can detain someone but not indefinitely and not without due process.
this is a redux of the Alito hearing
radiofreewill @ 29
Hey Dick, ask MM – So, how does the attached signing statement fit in there? Where does it fit between the amendment and inherent powers?
Durbin has a hold on Bradbury’s nomination!
Q: OPR investigators looking into the NSA Program were denied security clearances, do you agree that it would be inappropriate to send up a nominee, Bradbury, who is still under investigation?
A: Don’t know about the OPR investigation?
Blub @ 37
Sad but true.
Blub @ 37
I disagree. It is more a replay of the Roberts hearing. This is all pat on the back stuff, no tearful wives here.
Ben Affleck was on Hardball the other night. Damn that guy is smart. Hope he runs for something. He would blow anyone he ran against out of the
water.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/
2007/10/11/matthews-riffs-affleck-fearless-carter-
gop-jingoists-crazy-right-c
Affleck on Hardball scroll down
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/
Blub @ 37
Is his wife going to cry?
Q: As the AG, what will you do to address issues of Race and Equality?
A: I don’t think we’ll achieve closure in my lifetime on Civil Rights. It’s a process that removes a stain on our history by using the Law. I will make absolutely certain the Civil Rights Division is focused on that mission.
Huckleberry up!
Way to go, Mr. Affleck!
Q: Do you consider the 911 attacks a criminal act or an act of War?
A: War
Hugh @ 41
What they didn’t get boehner boo hoo-ing either?
Kathleen @ 42
I recall seeing Matt Damon on “Inside the Actor’s Studio,’ and thinking he came off as pretty damn smart.
He was asked about turn-ons and turns -offs (I know, gag.) Turn-ons, he said, “curious people.” Turn-offs? “Incurious people. President Bush.”
radiofreewill @ 47
shit.
Mukasey following Huckleberry’s leading question that 9/11 was an act of war. If it was, then why did the Congress not declare war and state precisely against whom war was being declared?
Q: Graham listing laws that apply to detention interrogations -
Geneva Convention Common Article 3?
A: not clear, need more detail
UCMJ?
A: Yes
Military Commissions Act?
A: Yes
Detainee Treatment Act?
A: Yes
International Treaties?
A: Yes, but delicate
jayt @ 50
War on Nouns!
Huckleberry’s bogus legal arguments medicine show.
Mukasey dodges on habeas corpus but basically says that detainees should have no more rights than those they already have, that is no habeas corpus.
Shorter Huckleberry: Habeas corpus helps the terrorists.
Q: Would you advise the Pres to grant detainees at Gitmo to have habeus rights?
A: No, nothing beyond what they are entitled to.
Q: Who should determine the ’status’ of an enemy combatant? I say it’s the Military, but others say it’s a Civilian judge – giving the enemy more rights than the Germans and Japanese had in WWII. What do you say?
A: ??? (I don’t think he answered?)
Q: Will detainees get a day in court according to Military Commissions?
A: Yes
Q: Would combat status tribunals managed by the military be a problem for you?
A: No.
..and meanwhile, from criminally-insane land (maybe this is supposed to distract us from his rubber stamp AG nominee):
Bush: Threat of World War III if Iran goes nuclear
By Matt Spetalnick 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President George W. Bush warned on Wednesday a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to World War III as he tried to shore up international opposition to Tehran amid Russian skepticism over its nuclear ambitions.
Good on Ben Affleck for helping out the Boston Hospital workers.
The Mukasey hearing is putrid. The Dems should shove Mukasey right back in Georgie’s face….but they won’t becuase of the spineless shitheels that they are.
The difference between Abu and Mukasey is that Mukasey is not a babbling hack but both believe in trashing the Constitution in the service of the President. The Democrats are snookering themselves again and caving to a President with a 24% approval rating. Even jellyfish are incensed at their spinelessness.
Blub @ 57
So Bush would start WWIII if Iran were to get nukes?
radiofreewill @ 56
Given what shams the CSRTs are this is really quite telling.
thanks for the sjc hearing live-blogging folks. after following the the fisa kabuki for the last week and a half, i don’t have it in me to be able to watch ag nomination hearing…
…. but i can’t ignore it either… reading the live blogging is a way to follow along without my laptop ending up smashed against the wall.
so again, my thanks to all.
The belief here is that Affleck is one of the good guys.
JF @ 60
He has an IQ of 70 right?
Elliott @ 6
Absolutely.
Q: Wouldn’t it be nice to show the Sunnis and Shia who are so horrible to each other, that our honorable processes rise above religious persecution?
A: Yes, but we have to look at every case.
Q: KSH was reportedly water-boarded – are you comfortable with using the evidence collected being used in his trial.
A: I don’t know enough about water-boarding to know if it’s coercive, or not, but certainly coerced evidence is no good.
I find myself without the time, inclination, or energy to fully rebut Huckleberry’s sophistry.
Has Mukasey taken a stand in opposition to any questions yet asked by any Senator?
I think he’s Judge Gumby.
tw3k @ 64
How generous of you.
selise @ 62
ditto! I only get CSPAN1 so thanks and thanks selise for keeping an eye FISA!
JF @ 60
I think we’re now officially in Dr. Strangelove territory.. or just the Twilight zone
JF @ 60
Damn the impeachment process, we need men with white coats and trank darts…!
Huckleberry endorses Mukasey.
Leahy asking if Mukasey if excluding torture would be the same as compromising intelligence gathering?
A: No
Whitehouse up – this may get good
Whitehouse up!
Steve-AR @ 18
Algorian money quote:
This torture talk is all kabuki. Mukasey has said that the Administration does not torture. So Mukasey can say he would throw out information gained by torture because he has already said this doesn’t happen.
I am confused — what is getting liveblogged here? I’ve scanned the comments but am not quite clear…
Talk about union busters. Look at what WalMart does to organizers. But of course Bill Clinton extols WalMart’s environmentalism. And who was it that once sat on the board of directors at WalMart?
peanutbutter @ 71
Paging St. Elizabeth’s!
Whitehouse says he’s very worried about the DoJ. He’s not sure that just replacing the guy at the top is enough to fix the department.
peanutbutter @ 71
constitutionally, can’t members of the cabinet declare the president insane and remove him from office?.. I mean, if he’s sittin’ in that big chair literally raving insanely about starting World War III…
Q: What is the role of the DoJ?
A: To enforce the Rule of Law.
Hugh @ 76
He needs to be asked to define torture.
Bush ‘honoring’ the Dalai Lama. Isn’t that a bit like Satan honoring Christ?
Blub @ 81
That would assume sanity within the cabinet.
What is the DLC’s position on union organizing and ‘right to work’?
Whitehouse bringing up the access the Bush white house to DOJ; changing the rule books re: indictments before elections; firing USAs unfairly.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 84
It looked like it too.
Well we’ve now got Gates and soon we’ll have Mukasey. I don’t know how much more of these improvments we can stand.
Whitehouse: what will you to to inquire into which rules need to be restored so that the DOJ could perform it’s functions?
Mukasy saying he’s “hands on”. Will talk to the people at the bottom as well as the top. Standard b/s job interview answer.
Whitehouse describing the politicization of the DOJ and asks what Mukasey will do about it. Mukasey says he is a hands on person. He will listen to the AG’s Advisory Board and it seems like everybody else, but he doesn’t say what he will do.
Q: What should the American people be able to look to the DoJ for?
A: The constant application of the Rule of Law.
Q: What about the traditions and practices of the DoJ that have served as safeguards until recently but have fallen into dis-use in recent years, weakening the structure of the DoJ itself? Like no prosecutions brought immediately before elections, which has been removed from the Policy Manual? What will you do to inquire into the norms, practices, rules and protocols need to be ‘restored’ or brought back into use?
A: I had a sandbox experience in my Court on this very subject. I see involvment of the USAs, the career staff, the AG’s Advisory Group, etc as essential to restoring the prestige, moral and traditions of the Department. I also plan to talk to former DoJ employees, also. I will talk to the SJC on a regular basis – your experienc with DoJ is greater than mine.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 84
Yeah. I think it’s supposed to be the other way around [Mt 4:9]
Mukasey? It’s Demo roll-over time again.
Whitehouse speechifying and not really asking any probing questions. Disappointing.
Whitehouse encouraging Mukasey to do a formal ‘damage assessment’ on the Department.
Q: Regarding the 400-WH access grants to the DoJ on on-going investigations – what do you think of that?
A: Contact with DoJ on on-going investigations should be limited to a very small number of people.
Q: Does that include the Pres?
A: Most emphatically.
Q: Prosecutions right before elections?
A: No.
tw3k @ 69
Yesirreee Thanks Selise
My connection to c-span keeps going on the blink on line. where else can I go watch this?
Whitehouse is so thorough so clear about his intent
Leahy taking 10 min break.
Announcing investigations close to elections taken out of guidelines manual. Mukasey expresses sensitivity to the issue but does not say he will re-insert the language in the manual.
Ok so for all you legal experts out there how is Mukasey doing? As I read through the comments sounds as if the majority of folks think the Dems are rolling over?
radiofreewill @ 96
Somebody should ask him which version of the FISA law he supports and why.
Related news (see the last few paras)
Tsongas’ Widow Elected to U.S. House
While we’re on break, I get the feeling that Mukasey is going to please enough folks to get through these confirmation hearings.
He does seem to have the confidence of Leahy and Specter, which is saying a lot considering all the hell we went through with Gonzo.
Have they asked anything about turning over documents?
I like Mukasey’s tone, does that mean anything?
radiofreewill @ 44
He’s right about one thing. As long as we keep putting men like him in postions of power, civil rights closure will always be out of reach.
JF @ 60
Even WWIII would not cause anyone from the Bush family to serve in the military.
The Iran hawks
http://www.salon.com/opinion/f…..0/17/iran/
Oklahoma kiddo @ 94
Mukasey? It’s Demo roll-over time again.
Yep. But it’s worth noting that GWB had a list of much more dangerous characters that he could have tossed forward for nomination.
I think it’s also worth noting that no one person, at least no one person who might possibly be endorsed by the WH, would possibly be able or willing to *fix* the DOJ within the time left in this administration. Mukasey’s role is to be a cipher – a non-entity who will never even understand who the players are before he’s sent forever off to the bench (no legal pun intended).
I just wish I understood better what Schumer’s so fucking happy about, and precisely what he thinks he’s gained by trading off this walk-through of a nomination for… – what?
Has anyone even gotten a promise from Mukasey that he’ll *try* to get the SJC the documents it’s already subpoenaed?
JF @ 60
You have a doubt about this?? That’s exactly what he’s saying by throwing this out to the public.
Kathleen @ 100
Absolutely. Mukasey is giving fuzzy non-specific answers that sound like answers but aren’t.
public.takeover @ 101
I believe that he would just say that he has not been briefed and can’t answer.
“During the debate itself, Romney also took heat for not mentioning the need for congressional authorization, although the rebuke came from a lonely voice out of the GOP’s isolationist past. “You’re not allowed to go to war without a declaration of war,” said Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. Paul declared flatly that the Constitution was clear and that Romney’s talk about consulting attorneys was “baffling.” He also maintained that “the thought that the Iranians could pose an imminent attack on the United States is preposterous.” When Giuliani shot back that Sept. 11 had been such an attack, Paul interrupted him. “That was no country,” snapped Paul. “That was 19 thugs. It has nothing to do with a country.”
There’s nothing in Mukasey’s testimony so far that indicates he intends to withhold documents or sit on investigations, but we need to hear more from him on the USA Scandal, the Torture Memos, the Yoo-Addington Memos, Warrantless Domestic Wiretapping, Telecom Immunity, etc.
peanutbutter @ 102
Well that’s a bit of good news! Now please be a progressive and not a blue dog.
Kathleen @ 105
Nope, Roberts has a nice tone too.
Kathleen @ 97
http://www.c-span.org/
but you need realaudio
We’ve been down this road before. With Roberts and Alito.
Kathleen @ 112
There are many things I do not like about Paul; his being very strongly Libertarian is one of them, but he does have his head screwed on far straighter than the more conventional Republicans.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 78
Your favorite girl?? :)
Kathleen @ 105
He sounds independent, which I like. The funny part earlier is when they asked him if he would be prepared to resign if the WH went ahead with something that he advised was wrong, and he said yes. That should come up on about day 2.
I don’t think he is aware of all of the dirt that’s been going on though, since he was unfamiliar with the fact that security clearance was denied to the OAG?ORG?, whatever it was, by the WH when they were attempting to investigate. I think his eyebrows went up, and he looked a little surprised. I think it was Durbin who was questioning him.
Right the fuck on! (for this post, Jane!)
Do you think there’s any top down contact between Nancy, Harry and Hillary?
This Salon article is great
“Of the four senators among the Democratic candidates, only Hillary Clinton voted for the non-binding Kyl-Lieberman resolution on Sept. 26. The Kyl-Lieberman resolution, which passed 76-to-22, with 29 Democrats voting in favor, says, “the United States should designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a foreign terrorist organization … and place the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps on the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists.” Jim Lobe, among the best journalists covering neoconservatism in Washington, wrote that unnamed “Capitol Hill sources” told him that the resolution was crafted by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh of the New Yorker, interviewed on “Democracy Now,” concurred that the amendment was pushed by the Israel lobby.”
“In short, Clinton’s staffers must have read the Opinion Dynamics poll for Fox Cable News, which shows that 80 percent of the U.S. public believe that Iran’s nuclear program is for weapons purposes, and 50 percent believe that the U.S. should take a tougher line with Iran (as against 31 percent who do not). About 29 percent of the sample want Bush to go ahead and attack Iran before leaving office, while a bare majority thought he should leave the problem to the next president. Some 54 percent of respondents believed that if Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had been allowed to visit the site of the Sept. 11 attacks, he would have been intent on honoring the hijackers.”
http://www.salon.com/opinion/f…..0/17/iran/
Oklahoma kiddo @ 122
Maybe top down triangulation… :)
Kathleen @ 112
That is what has me so disappointed with current crop of Dem contenders. Who is going renounce the War on Terror?
I’ve got to go, ‘pups!
Back tonight!
It’s becoming increasingly obvious. I am an out of touch Democrat. I need to become more conservative.
tw3k @ 116
I am listening on a University computer and on the C-span link but it keeps breaking up. hey I will keep reading the comments.
Democrats? And they say Eisenhower was a “do nothing”.
kirk murphy @ 79
I think St. E’s is pretty much a memory. I did several Psych rotations there; one in the Criminal building..interesting.
Hugh @ 111
Boy, I agree. My impression is, I don’t trust this guy. I also saw them talking about some specific cases that he’s handled and he was reversed on appeal, in one case, he ruled that the case should not go to jury, but on appeal he was overruled. Then they had a jury trial, and the jury found for the plaintiff and adjudicated a settlement, but the judge reversed their finding. Once again the case was appealed and the appeals court again reversed his decision, saying that the judge had no business supplanting the jury’s decision for his own. I think we’re in trouble with him.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 127
Then you can complain about Ron Paul instead?? ;-) ;-)
kidding, KIDDING!
radiofreewill @ 113
This is the essence of Mukasey’s testimony is that he has not said much. He has not said what he will do either. Even so, he tends to support Bush’s rationale of non-torture torture, Bush’s extended power claims as Commander in Chief, suspension of habeas corpus, the legitimacy of the CSRTs (Combat Status Review Tribuals). He buys into the War on terror as a real war in the legal sense. This guy is bad news, but the Senators are too starry eyed to see anything except that he is not Alberto Gonzales.
Steve-AR @ 130
Thanks for the chuckles, guys…
Holy Jumpin’ Jeebus -
radiofreewill @ 66
I can tell Mukasey right where to head off to to experience some good old fashioned waterboarding run by the gubmint, and he can come home later and have a beer.
These people are beyond fucking belief. “…doesn’t know if it’s coercive”. Astounding.
Edwards. At this point I will give money, time and my vote to this candidate. For you Hillary; nothing. Absolutely nothing.
New Jane upstairs
Stalkin’ Malkin and the Drooling Fanboys at the Washington Post
Oklahoma kiddo @ 127
What we all need is to become absolutely, fire-breathing revolutionaries. The current junta carried out a revolution which has basically nullified the two party system, neutered the separation of powers and the constitution, and turned us into a third world banana republic with court decisions evident in advance just by looking at the issues at bar.
Time to stop playing nicely. Our representatives have, by and large, been co-opted and are bought and paid for.
Time for other means, I do believe.
(Does this comment qualify as not playing nicely in the sandbox?)
Jane, I have written you and Christy several times with no response, so be it.
This story is so disingenuous, that it’s unreal. I was fired from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in March 2006 for advocating for worker rights (Bigtime illegal work practices against an unskilled worker group which was over-representative of “diversity” in the workplace). I attended anti-union management meetings that were mandatory for all administrative staff. I wrote Paul Levy on his blog and responded to him elsewhere to make sure that he knew what had happened since it appears that his information is highly filtered as it goes up the ranks and gets to him via his senior administrators.
I shopped the Boston Globe and the SEIU to see if either was interested in looking at the evidence I had of those issues and other patient issues (not reporting infant deaths and letting infant remains rot in the morgue for years while the hospital tried to find a funeral home to mass bury them under the radar.) Paul never responded to my comment, and he never posted it on his blog.
A month or so ago I met with Dana Simon and another SEIU rep and showed them all of the evidence. I allowed them to make copies of whatever they wanted.
In every case, after the parties were through with me, my calls weren’t returned.
I am homeless, destitute, and having been balckliasted, cannot find any work or any shelter. I have sold everything I own that is sale-able. Paul Levy knows that I was wrongfully discharged – I appealed to his office of business compliance attorney who verified that all of my claims were accurate but found “no evidence of retaliation.”
Dana Simon knows. The SEIU knows.
I looked everywhere for work, but one cannot compete when one has been thoroughly defamed, blacklisted and threatened.
Tula Connell knows.
Where has the progressive “community” been?
Selise gave me homeless shelter numbers for her city – not where I live. Thanks, Selise.
Another “helper” from FDL referred me to someone who stole my cats. Thanks, William and Colleen.
RevDeb asked all kinds of questions and then informed me that she didn’t know of anyone who could help me. Thanks. But as I have already been defrauded by a priest, no surprise there, and probably to my advatage not to be “helped.”
So now I exist on the street.
Having advocated for healthcare workers and patients, I so appreciate your newfound insight.
Had you ever bothered to read my blog, I have written over and over and over again about this and related issues around professional nursing, management and worker issues and healthcare reform.
But nurses are entirely disposable – as you have proved here.
What in the hell are you thinking?
This thread doesnt tell the whole story. It is true that Boston teaching hospitals are shameless in discouraging unions, but the SEIU has made its own attempts (at least in nursing) at undermining a union. The Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA) is an activist and highly professional union. I believe the SEIU has been more aggessive to supplant the MNA from MNA union hospitals than they have been in trying to unionize nonunion hospitals.
Blub @ 30
My ideal wouldn’t be resignation, but an AG who would go directly to Congress and tell them what’s happening and then go to the press and announce it to them.
Sunlight is a great disinfectant!
Kathleen @ 112
Apparently Mitt is out of his depth in a wading pool.
Jo Fish @ 135
Obviously the man isn’t a moron, so that means he has to be a liar who has some specific reason for not saying what we all know — water-boarding simulates drowning, so a person thinks they’re gonna die.
Hugh @ 59
Hugh, and others . . . the dem’s are NOT caving!!!
They are playing the hand they hold, and the hand they WANT to play.
That hand, sadly, is NOT the one we hired them to run with.
It’s 1% bought, top to bottom, regardless of party affiliation.
When the purported progressive blogosphere accepts that, and begins to work to CHANGE that, then we the sheeple can have a modicum of hope (bless Act Blue/Moveon).
But Hugh, as long as you, and others who are influential in the blogs, continue to paint the dem’s as spineless, you do the progressive’s a great disservice.
The dem’s are NOT spineless, they are running their game for big biz and the war machine, and it’s pretty phookin obvious, by now.
To everyone. Except the blind or the 1% themselves.
JF @ 60
He’s gonna start WW3 REGARDLESS of any truths, now or in the future.
Our best bets to STOP this madman are Putin, and The Chinese.
Irony becomes reality. And our best friend.
LS @ 120
My dog, LS tell me yer joking here . . . he’s an overt GOP rethug, with history to prove it, and the dem’s are laying down for him, proving THEY are once again, the party of the 1% . .
And yer saying Mukasey ’sounds’ independant’? He’s as independant as Shilary will ‘end the war’ as spoken to MA’s finest daughters of Teh Eleanor . . .
Jeebus the progressive movement don’t stand a chance . . .
“Will NO one rid me of these . . . ” (rollseyes in disbelief)