<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looks At Brooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:02:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1039016</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1039016</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037769&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RockPaperScizzors @ 230&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here we have frontline outlining these f666ers premeditated dissolution of the constitution and laws, and all I can wonder is why the hell aren’t these criminal wearing orange jumpsuits?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ask Fitzgerald why Rove, Fleischer, Armitage and Libby haven’t been taken down for outing a CIA NOC who was protecting us from nuclear annihilation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Polling says …&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037769"><em>RockPaperScizzors @ 230</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Here we have frontline outlining these f666ers premeditated dissolution of the constitution and laws, and all I can wonder is why the hell aren’t these criminal wearing orange jumpsuits?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ask Fitzgerald why Rove, Fleischer, Armitage and Libby haven’t been taken down for outing a CIA NOC who was protecting us from nuclear annihilation?</p>
<p>Polling says …</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038999</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038999</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037631&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kathryn in MA @ 96&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Abu Ghraib - congress moving to prohibit torture -  Cheney moved to block the amendment but they made a show of signing the bill. then that night they issued signing statemnent. Addington drew red line thru bill and Yoo wrote sentence saying unconstitutional. Charlie Savage goes looking at signing statements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Funny I don’t recall anyone appointing Addington to the SCOTUS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Somebody ought write a bill/resolution clarifying that signing statements carry absolutely NO weight and should be elided or burned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037631"><em>Kathryn in MA @ 96</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Abu Ghraib &#8211; congress moving to prohibit torture &#8211;  Cheney moved to block the amendment but they made a show of signing the bill. then that night they issued signing statemnent. Addington drew red line thru bill and Yoo wrote sentence saying unconstitutional. Charlie Savage goes looking at signing statements.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Funny I don’t recall anyone appointing Addington to the SCOTUS.</p>
<p>Somebody ought write a bill/resolution clarifying that signing statements carry absolutely NO weight and should be elided or burned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038993</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038993</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037602&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TexBetsy @ 67&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;How did Brooks earn the name BOBO?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someone looked at him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037602"><em>TexBetsy @ 67</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>How did Brooks earn the name BOBO?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Someone looked at him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038991</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038991</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037562&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;newtonusr @ 29&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037559&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kathryn in MA @ 26&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Yoo legal council passes legal judgment on whatever admin wants- and is quite compatible to their views.&lt;br /&gt;
9/14 - admin went to congress and asked for unlimited power - refused - just as cheney and addington feared. &lt;b&gt;so they, in secret, went to Yoo who said that congress could not do anything to stop them as long as the nation was at war.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a source for this statement, please?&lt;br /&gt;
my bold&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asking Yoo for a legal opinion is like a Rich guy asking his butler whether he’s dressed nicely?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A man has to say what he’s being paid to say.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037562"><em>newtonusr @ 29</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1037559"><em>Kathryn in MA @ 26</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>John Yoo legal council passes legal judgment on whatever admin wants- and is quite compatible to their views.<br />
9/14 &#8211; admin went to congress and asked for unlimited power &#8211; refused &#8211; just as cheney and addington feared. <b>so they, in secret, went to Yoo who said that congress could not do anything to stop them as long as the nation was at war.</b></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is there a source for this statement, please?<br />
my bold</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Asking Yoo for a legal opinion is like a Rich guy asking his butler whether he’s dressed nicely?</p>
<p>A man has to say what he’s being paid to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038983</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038983</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037551&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kathryn in MA @ 20&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;on 9/11, in the bunker, cheney says we will have to be a nation ruled by men and not laws at this time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“How about *that* Mr. Fong!” — from the OJ trial&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Isn’t it amazing how easily people drop their support for Democracy and the Rule of Law when Bush said “Global War on Terror” and Cheney says “we have to”?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037551"><em>Kathryn in MA @ 20</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>on 9/11, in the bunker, cheney says we will have to be a nation ruled by men and not laws at this time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“How about *that* Mr. Fong!” — from the OJ trial</p>
<p>Isn’t it amazing how easily people drop their support for Democracy and the Rule of Law when Bush said “Global War on Terror” and Cheney says “we have to”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038315</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1038315</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037951&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;kathleen @ 292&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037853&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mui @ 282&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Was david brooks twin brother on this post before? Or am I having an allergy/Robitussin moment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You gotta get off the hard stuff&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You mean lay off the medicinial sauce? Pretty hard to do during hay fever season.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037951"><em>kathleen @ 292</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1037853"><em>mui @ 282</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Was david brooks twin brother on this post before? Or am I having an allergy/Robitussin moment?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You gotta get off the hard stuff</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You mean lay off the medicinial sauce? Pretty hard to do during hay fever season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037979</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037830&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Petrocelli @ 279&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037793&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TeddySanFran @ 252&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Mockery of her coronation might be an effective tactic, as it takes on TradMed and appeals to Iowan and Hampshirite sense of self-importance at the same time.  It’s a great strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Laughing at her might unnerve her enough to make a mistake.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Setting herself as&lt;em&gt; the nominee&lt;/em&gt; this early gives all the others 3 months to tear her down … not a smart move on her part, IMO …&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Edwards has stated that he would not give the Bush/Cheney administration an inch on Iran.  Hillary Clinton voted for the Kyl Lieberman amendment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edwards learned a lesson from his stupid, irresponsible, deadly 2002 war resolution vote  Hillary did not learn anything.  I’ll go with the person who learned a lesson.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just wish Gore would declare and burn pass Obama, Edwards and Clinton.&lt;br /&gt;
Run Al Run…Please&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037830"><em>Petrocelli @ 279</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1037793"><em>TeddySanFran @ 252</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Mockery of her coronation might be an effective tactic, as it takes on TradMed and appeals to Iowan and Hampshirite sense of self-importance at the same time.  It’s a great strategy.</p>
<p>Laughing at her might unnerve her enough to make a mistake.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Setting herself as<em> the nominee</em> this early gives all the others 3 months to tear her down … not a smart move on her part, IMO …</p>
</blockquote>
<p>John Edwards has stated that he would not give the Bush/Cheney administration an inch on Iran.  Hillary Clinton voted for the Kyl Lieberman amendment.</p>
<p>Edwards learned a lesson from his stupid, irresponsible, deadly 2002 war resolution vote  Hillary did not learn anything.  I’ll go with the person who learned a lesson.</p>
<p>Just wish Gore would declare and burn pass Obama, Edwards and Clinton.<br />
Run Al Run…Please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037951</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037951</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037853&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mui @ 282&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Was david brooks twin brother on this post before? Or am I having an allergy/Robitussin moment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You gotta get off the hard stuff&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037853"><em>mui @ 282</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Was david brooks twin brother on this post before? Or am I having an allergy/Robitussin moment?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You gotta get off the hard stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beerfart Liberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037938</link>
		<dc:creator>Beerfart Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037938</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Citizens for Responsibility &amp; Ethics said that about him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citizens for Responsibility &amp; Ethics said that about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beerfart Liberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037933</link>
		<dc:creator>Beerfart Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/16/looks-at-brooks/#comment-1037933</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037915&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mui @ 289&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1037890&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Beerfart Liberal @ 288&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think our people have been pretty good exposing SCHIP bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My infantile Congressman has now weighed in. He actually says this at his website:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FEENEY DEFINES THE REAL SCHIP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;S&lt;/b&gt; ocialized&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;C&lt;/b&gt; uba-style&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;H&lt;/b&gt; ealthcare for&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; llegals and their&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;P&lt;/b&gt; arents &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He says $6.5 billion will go to illegals because proof of citizenship will be too lax. This is a new one for him. Nothing they’ve tried so far has caught on so they’re playing the “brown people are taking your money” card.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wow.Your congresscritter is blantantly racist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yup.  And he’s named as third most corrupt Congressperson by, I forget who.  Supposrt te war.  I just got his respons eto my letter about Iraq.  Now, ya see, this war isn’t like WWII, ya know.  We’re not fighting a country, like Germany.  We’re fighting Islamo Fascism which is omnipresent.  If he wasn’t such a prick he’d be pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1037915"><em>mui @ 289</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1037890"><em>Beerfart Liberal @ 288</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I think our people have been pretty good exposing SCHIP bullshit.</p>
<p>My infantile Congressman has now weighed in. He actually says this at his website:</p>
<p>FEENEY DEFINES THE REAL SCHIP</p>
<p><b>S</b> ocialized<br />
<b>C</b> uba-style<br />
<b>H</b> ealthcare for<br />
<b>I</b> llegals and their<br />
<b>P</b> arents </p>
<p>He says $6.5 billion will go to illegals because proof of citizenship will be too lax. This is a new one for him. Nothing they’ve tried so far has caught on so they’re playing the “brown people are taking your money” card.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wow.Your congresscritter is blantantly racist.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yup.  And he’s named as third most corrupt Congressperson by, I forget who.  Supposrt te war.  I just got his respons eto my letter about Iraq.  Now, ya see, this war isn’t like WWII, ya know.  We’re not fighting a country, like Germany.  We’re fighting Islamo Fascism which is omnipresent.  If he wasn’t such a prick he’d be pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.249 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 00:08:27 -->

