<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enough Fluff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:47:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034622</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1033070&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Beerfart Liberal @ 125&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It’s been discussed here and everywhere how the Republicans resort to fear to try to win. Watch FOX sometimes. The line now is that it looks like Hillary is going to be the next president. They’re trying to scare their viewers into getting behind the GOP nominee even if its a cross-dresser or a Mormon - something they haven’t shown an inclination to do in numbers large enough to be of comfort to the GOP and it’s media outlet, Fox.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s really not fair that you single out FOX, all the news outlets do the same thing, just FOX has put a conservative spin on it to capture the conservative audience. CNN &amp; PMSNBC is just as worthless.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also your comments about Mormons seemed a little on the negative side. Thought you libs were supposed to be “open minded” to things. Do you feel the same way about JFK? He was Catholic you know.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1033070"><em>Beerfart Liberal @ 125</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>It’s been discussed here and everywhere how the Republicans resort to fear to try to win. Watch FOX sometimes. The line now is that it looks like Hillary is going to be the next president. They’re trying to scare their viewers into getting behind the GOP nominee even if its a cross-dresser or a Mormon &#8211; something they haven’t shown an inclination to do in numbers large enough to be of comfort to the GOP and it’s media outlet, Fox.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s really not fair that you single out FOX, all the news outlets do the same thing, just FOX has put a conservative spin on it to capture the conservative audience. CNN &amp; PMSNBC is just as worthless.</p>
<p>Also your comments about Mormons seemed a little on the negative side. Thought you libs were supposed to be “open minded” to things. Do you feel the same way about JFK? He was Catholic you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034615</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034615</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1032904&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;ifthethunderdontgetya @ 4&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I remember something about &lt;a href=&quot;http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Mitt_Romney_spent_nearly_2K_on_0719.html&quot;&gt;Oven Mitt’s makeup bill&lt;/a&gt;.  Died without a trace, while the haircut lives on in infamy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t get it. Why are you comparing the two? One was $400 for a single 30-minute haircut, the other was $2000 over a 4-year period. Didn’t Billy do something similar while holding up flights when he was President?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1032904"><em>ifthethunderdontgetya @ 4</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I remember something about <a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Mitt_Romney_spent_nearly_2K_on_0719.html">Oven Mitt’s makeup bill</a>.  Died without a trace, while the haircut lives on in infamy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don’t get it. Why are you comparing the two? One was $400 for a single 30-minute haircut, the other was $2000 over a 4-year period. Didn’t Billy do something similar while holding up flights when he was President?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NMvoiceofreason</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034296</link>
		<dc:creator>NMvoiceofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What about Bush barf syndrome. Didn’t that one time incident fuel an entire season of SNL?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And what about the Merckel back rub?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Bush barf syndrome. Didn’t that one time incident fuel an entire season of SNL?</p>
<p>And what about the Merckel back rub?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NMvoiceofreason</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034293</link>
		<dc:creator>NMvoiceofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I remember Chevy Chase and Gerald Ford, where a very nimble and athletic President was humbled by a momentary gaff caught on tape.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary’s laugh works fine by me. And if she want’s to laugh at stupid questions, I say GO FOR IT girl!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Chevy Chase and Gerald Ford, where a very nimble and athletic President was humbled by a momentary gaff caught on tape.</p>
<p>Hillary’s laugh works fine by me. And if she want’s to laugh at stupid questions, I say GO FOR IT girl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth in cary</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034248</link>
		<dc:creator>beth in cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1034248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that maybe you have missed the point of the “cackle” stories-which was EVADING questions by Hillary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So unless she answers-it IS an election seasonon and she IS fair game. Playing the victim card for everyhting is getting very tiresome for people who would like to hear some answers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that maybe you have missed the point of the “cackle” stories-which was EVADING questions by Hillary.</p>
<p>So unless she answers-it IS an election seasonon and she IS fair game. Playing the victim card for everyhting is getting very tiresome for people who would like to hear some answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victoid</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033893</link>
		<dc:creator>victoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033893</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;So when you spread your bread with Fluff and peanut butter….be sure you leave enough for another &lt;/em&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fluffernutter!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So when you spread your bread with Fluff and peanut butter….be sure you leave enough for another </em><b>Fluffernutter!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033771</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1032990&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Marilyn In Texas @ 82&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1032940&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Susan in Iowa @ 34&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You missed the opportunity to see The Imperial Campaign in action.  Nothing that can be bought was left out. …&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for all that, it was disappointing.  She rambles, she offers up a lot of platitudes, with a few programs where she gets into details (mainly healthcare).  My mind kept wandering. …
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;unthreatening-looking women. . .teachers. . . child care workers. . .&lt;br /&gt;
what is that?  I see too much picking apart of HRC here.  So you don’t support her.  Okay.  Let’s hear why you support another candidate.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the previous writer gave a hint, that “My mind kept wandering.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we have some very big problems which need to be addressed…monumental really, and Clinton doesn’t address them very well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Out of Iraq&lt;br /&gt;
Health Care reform&lt;br /&gt;
retirement pension reform&lt;br /&gt;
infrastructure rebuilding&lt;br /&gt;
mortgage crisis repair&lt;br /&gt;
environmental protection&lt;br /&gt;
new energy sources&lt;br /&gt;
world fair trade&lt;br /&gt;
fix New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
fix the military&lt;br /&gt;
fight Al Qaeda&lt;br /&gt;
review 9/11&lt;br /&gt;
fix education (if it can be done)&lt;br /&gt;
fight poverty&lt;br /&gt;
improve world relations&lt;br /&gt;
revive anti-nuclear proliferation&lt;br /&gt;
revive nuclear draw-downs&lt;br /&gt;
increase minimum wage AGAIN!&lt;br /&gt;
strengthen unions&lt;br /&gt;
improve port and border security&lt;br /&gt;
improve immigrations problem&lt;br /&gt;
revive stem cell research&lt;br /&gt;
get religion out of government&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean, the list goes on and on and on. Hillary has said she’ll work on 3 or 4 of these things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ll vote for John Edwards and his big bold ideas for a better America!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1032990"><em>Marilyn In Texas @ 82</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1032940"><em>Susan in Iowa @ 34</em></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>You missed the opportunity to see The Imperial Campaign in action.  Nothing that can be bought was left out. …</p>
<p>But for all that, it was disappointing.  She rambles, she offers up a lot of platitudes, with a few programs where she gets into details (mainly healthcare).  My mind kept wandering. …
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>unthreatening-looking women. . .teachers. . . child care workers. . .<br />
what is that?  I see too much picking apart of HRC here.  So you don’t support her.  Okay.  Let’s hear why you support another candidate.</b></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think the previous writer gave a hint, that “My mind kept wandering.”</p>
<p>I think we have some very big problems which need to be addressed…monumental really, and Clinton doesn’t address them very well.</p>
<p>Out of Iraq<br />
Health Care reform<br />
retirement pension reform<br />
infrastructure rebuilding<br />
mortgage crisis repair<br />
environmental protection<br />
new energy sources<br />
world fair trade<br />
fix New Orleans<br />
fix the military<br />
fight Al Qaeda<br />
review 9/11<br />
fix education (if it can be done)<br />
fight poverty<br />
improve world relations<br />
revive anti-nuclear proliferation<br />
revive nuclear draw-downs<br />
increase minimum wage AGAIN!<br />
strengthen unions<br />
improve port and border security<br />
improve immigrations problem<br />
revive stem cell research<br />
get religion out of government</p>
<p>I mean, the list goes on and on and on. Hillary has said she’ll work on 3 or 4 of these things.</p>
<p>I’ll vote for John Edwards and his big bold ideas for a better America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033737</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1032922&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;cleter @ 18&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
…&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican candidates should start wearing orange jumpsuits, so we can recognize them as Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Somehow the image of a line of Repubs wearing orange jump suits, standing in line along a prison wall and whistling while they tap their feet in unison (a la the Rockettes) just makes me smile.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1032922"><em>cleter @ 18</em></a><br />
…<br />
The Republican candidates should start wearing orange jumpsuits, so we can recognize them as Republicans.</p>
<p>Somehow the image of a line of Repubs wearing orange jump suits, standing in line along a prison wall and whistling while they tap their feet in unison (a la the Rockettes) just makes me smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033123</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033123</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:Beerfart@125.&quot;&gt;Beerfart@125.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think Faux is using Clinton to scare the base NOW, with three effing months until the first primary, if we nominate her, just think what they’ll be doing in the general.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    One mistake that a lot of her supporters are making is this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    They’re assuming that Iraq will at least stay at the same level of mayhem, and not get worse.   Anyone want to bet 8 more years of a republican president on THAT?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because, with her ducking the tough questions on that most important of issues now,  think about this;    if Iraq starts to unspinnably implode, where is the “mistake” word from her?   How can she go after george bush and the GOP for what’s going on, when she has spent so long in bed with them?   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(As if she shouldn’t ALREADY be going after them…and apologizing, as John Edwards has done repeatedly, for that authorizing vote.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:Beerfart@125.">Beerfart@125.</a></p>
<p>If you think Faux is using Clinton to scare the base NOW, with three effing months until the first primary, if we nominate her, just think what they’ll be doing in the general.  </p>
<p>    One mistake that a lot of her supporters are making is this:</p>
<p>    They’re assuming that Iraq will at least stay at the same level of mayhem, and not get worse.   Anyone want to bet 8 more years of a republican president on THAT?</p>
<p>Because, with her ducking the tough questions on that most important of issues now,  think about this;    if Iraq starts to unspinnably implode, where is the “mistake” word from her?   How can she go after george bush and the GOP for what’s going on, when she has spent so long in bed with them?   </p>
<p>(As if she shouldn’t ALREADY be going after them…and apologizing, as John Edwards has done repeatedly, for that authorizing vote.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/14/enough-fluff/#comment-1033108</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry about the ad pitches.  If you want to read Krauthammers fifth column, fifth column, you might want to turn your volume down. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, re-reading it, he’s not as hard on Bill, as I thought, but the whole piece is him talking about Hillary, in civil terms.   Which is something NO bushCo-sucking columnist would be doing, if they didn’t know that she is the ONLY chance they have to keep the white house, and retake the congress.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the ad pitches.  If you want to read Krauthammers fifth column, fifth column, you might want to turn your volume down. </p>
<p>And, re-reading it, he’s not as hard on Bill, as I thought, but the whole piece is him talking about Hillary, in civil terms.   Which is something NO bushCo-sucking columnist would be doing, if they didn’t know that she is the ONLY chance they have to keep the white house, and retake the congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
