It is Columbus Day, a federal holiday, and thus calling Congressional offices would likely be an exercise in futility for a whole lot of us. What’s an activist to do? Spend that time productively on a letter to the editor.
Today is Correspondence School: Letter To The Editor Basics. (Following up on Correspondence School: Congressional Contacts.)
Why bother writing a LTE in your local newspaper? Two big reasons: (1) congressional staffers scan these LTEs to gauge how much attention they should pay to particular issues and votes; and (2) editorial staffs keep a watch to gauge which issues deserve more news coverage. A well written letter to the editor can sometimes sway local public opinion, or at least spark some debate and that is well worth the price of a stamp. Additionally, a lot of local talk radio folks pull commentary ideas from LTE topics.
I want to first direct you to the spot-on angry letter-writing piece that TRex did for us a while back. A key point:
…To this end, one should write as if you are doing your duty to the addressee by snatching them up by the scruff of their neck and setting them straight. You are saving them from future embarrassment and error. You are doing it For Their Own Good. This is where phrases your parents used on you can come in very handy, “I’m not angry with you, I’m just very, very disappointed” or “It grieves me to have to point this out to you, but I thought it best for your reputation and career that I do it rather than someone who really, really hates you.”
The person to whom you are writing has failed in some way. The purpose of your letter is to address this failure and make certain that the recipient will think twice before making this kind of error again….
That particular aggrieved yet caring tone can be a very effective one for letters to the editor, and much more readable than angry ranting for most folks who are not so politically involved. Which leads me to the considerations for letters to the editor:
– No more than two paragraphs, max. Try to limit yourself to the 100-200 word range. As TRex said, this is no time for the Unibomber Manifesto. Be succinct and you are more likely to get published. Longer letters are more likely to be edited by someone else — you are much better off doing your edit yourself.
– Stick to a single issue.
– Mention your Representative and/or Senator by name. Their staff is much more likely to pay attention, and the editorial folks at the newspaper will as well. A lot of Congressional offices use clipping services to pull LTEs for them where the name is mentioned, so you have a much greater chance of them seeing your letter by including names.
– Highlight the local impact of the issue, this has a much more effective reach for your letter and makes a broader potential statement to readers who may not be as familiar with the subject matter.
– Do send in LTEs to your local newspapers, to newsletters in your community and other smaller publications. These have quite a reach in terms of readership, and you are more likely to be published there than in a larger national publication.
– Humor can be very helpful. So can doing a little research on the style of your local newspaper and its editorial staff.
– Avoid being shrill, name-calling, or getting personal. You want to criticize facts not beliefs. Be sure to do your homework on your subject. Use facts, figures, and expert information in the form of short quotes where it is useful.
– Always proofread. And then proof it again.
– Try to read your letter from the perspective of a reader who has no background in the subject. Will it make sense to someone who isn’t watching a lot of C-Span? Who doesn’t read blogs? This is important, because those are people you are trying to reach.
– Always include your name, address, day-time phone number, e-mail information and signature. Editors like to verify letter content before publication, so make it easy for them and you are more likely to get yours published.
Some helpful sites on this: here, here, here and here. And try here for information about local media contacts. Take a peek here (PDF) to see the sort of wingnut/congregation outreach set-up that the right wing has been doing for years, and see why we all need to get on the ball to rebut these points. Someone has to do it — why not make that someone you? Just remember the following:
Letters to the editor should be thought of as bits of a sustained civic conversation. You are not going to change hearts and minds with a single letter. But you might have a chance with several, well-written letters offered over time. Write for the moment. Write for the one point you’re making today. Don’t write as if you expect to slam-dunk the issue for all time. Ain’t going to happen.
As egregious says, it’s a marathon, not a sprint. Give it a try today. Let’s start with SCHIP as an issue to hit nationwide. Do share some examples of what you plan to do in the comments and we can all talk about tailoring the message for different regions and helpful facts to include and such. Let’s get typing!
(Photo of letters being written with iPod via fernando [pixelstains].)
Related posts:
- I was the X-Files Editor for the New York Times
- Speak Out: Write Letters To Your Local Papers and Urge Members of Congress to Vote “No” On Supplemental
- A Very Odd Letter from Democrats and Telecom Lobbyists on Net Neutrality
- Ryan Grim and Naomi Klein on MSNBC, Discuss FDL Audit the Fed Letter
- Early Morning Swim: Florida GOP Chief Convinced White House Changed School Speech to Appease Him





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Christy!
BADA BING!
3?
I just printed out the Jena letter from yesterday’s post. Will mail it this evening, and then report my effort to thwart the obvious racism.
Deer stoopid sumbiches…
no, wait…
Does this mean “You Rotten Bastard” is an inappropriate salutation?
Marathon not sprint: putting my running shoes on. To the letters folks!
And for people like me, The Elements of Style, is always handy.
Oilfieldguy @ 5
Don’t you like deer?
My old publisher/editor loved getting LTE’s, especially the hand written ones with strong opinions. Something about the hand-to-paper personal connection.
Most letters to the editor sections have a little primer as to what might help you get your letter published. And editors now mostly seem to prefer the letters be sent by email. If you want to take the pulse of the nation read the letters. And people who read the letters to the editor vote. And letters to the editor many times reach millions. I see so many comments here that are of letter to the editor quality. Do it!
Redd, you said:
I’m not sure what you mean by criticizing facts. Facts are facts, they are the same for everyone. Or as Mark Kleiman put it, everyone’s entitled to their own opinion, but no one’s entitled to their own facts.
Now, it’s true that there are some facts that are deplorable — our government tortures terra suspects. That’s a fact, but the fact exists because some very bad policy choices were made by our government.
The fact is bad, but criticizing the fact won’t change it. What will change it is a policy shift.
So I’d say use facts to document the existence of rotten policy, then criticize the policy. Constructively, please.
BC
I’ve had some success getting letters published, particularly in the Boston Globe, that have a couple of original sound bite phrases in them.
And short! Must be short letters.
OT, but has anybody read
“>MoDo’s latest, and is this an actual excerpt from Clarence Thomas’ book?
Can this be verified or is MoDo just havin’ her some fun? Outrageous.
Uh, where did the rest of my comment go?
Dear Ed,
I want to make a Missing Gooper Report. I have searched high and low through the pages of your paper and I can’t find any evidence of the Rational Conservative, fiscal and/or social, anywhere.
All I see here is Ideological Goopers, whose talking points you seem only too willing to print as the Truth of the Right. Please, bring back into your consideration the ‘left-behind’ Goopers – the ones who can see that we’re all in this together – so we can arrive at a Rational Concensus to the very serious problems that confront all of US.
Signed,
A Peace Loving Citizen
Letters to the editor should be polite, about current events, and be well thought out. Also be economical and concise in your ideas. And after you present a problem try and make sure you have a good solution for the problem you have identified.
Oilfieldguy @ 10
Like congressional staffers, editors also start to recognize regular letter writers. It doesn’t mean that you get in more often, but when they are plowing through a stack of letters and come across one from someone they know and like to read, it can bring a smile to their face even before they open it. (”Oh, look, here’s an envelope from TRex. I wonder what he’s writing about today? . . .”)
epu’d -
O/t -
Vanity Fair has a looong article in the Nov issue titled “The People vs. the Profiteers”:
http://www.vanityfair.com/poli…..rton200711
Haven’t had a chance to read it yetbut, if on par with some of their other work, should be a good one.Part way thru’ and it *is* well worth the read. Deals with contractor fraud and a Florida lawyer named Alan Grayson who appears to be taking them on single-handed with
no helpobstruction from DOJ.As a well seasoned p.r. professional, may I just say, Christy: Damn right!
Oh, and, repetition, repetition, repetition. Put it on your monthly to-do list. Our local paper has “regulars” that they use like salt. You know what to expect from them, so be careful as you build your personal LTE-writing brand.
Look for occasions to say good on ya as well as you crapped up.
[and sidebar to the previous post, also excellent: Karl Rove is like the drunk awakening with his nose against the sewer grate. You’ll never get the stink off yourself, Rover, ’cause what’s emanating from your self is worse than any sewer grate. You ain’t gonna have a Shawshank moment….]
Now back to hiatus….
And if your first few letters don’t get printed, don’t give up. Make adjustments. And read the letters (and op ed.) written by others in the newspaper(s) you have chosen to write to.
Early OT:
Bush has called in a Leavitt marker.
If the override prevails, Leavitt will be resigning soon to spend more time with his family.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITI…..index.html
Don’t know if they still do this or not but the Union-Leader in Manchester, NH used to publish all LTEs received in their entirety.
All right:
I’ll write a letter to the Minneapolis StarTribune about Norm Coleman. But I have to be very careful on what to say about that man. He did vote for s-CHIP though.
The best piece of advice I would want to give letter to the editor writers is be professional. And know the readership.
RickinSF @ 6
Only because it is incomplete. The proper phrase is “You Dirty Rotten Bastard”.
Biodun @ 24
Even a blind pig finds an acorn now and then…
Waccamaw @ 19
The link seems to be broken.
Bargain Countertenor @ 27:
LOL!
Helpless Dancer @ 28
try this link…
Peterr @ 18
I know there is a guy who regularly gets his letter published in the Philly Inquirer. Every six weeks or so like clockwork.
twolf1 @ 30
Thank you. That one worked.
on SCHIP….
does anyone know if indeed legal immigrant children are excluded in the bill vetoed by president bush, but not the original bill approved by the house (as kucinich claims)?
i confess, i haven’t read the bills yet (although peterr helped me find them)… but i do have a call into kucinich’s office from last week.
if legal immigrants are indeed excluded from this bill, wouldn’t it be better to use the opportunity of bush’s veto to correct this and resubmit a better bill?
Dear sur,
You are are an insufferible twit and I hat you.
Thank you for your time,
Hugh
Oilfieldguy @ 14
I haven’t read MoDo lately, but my guess is that she was translating Clarence Thomas’ words. If you saw his 60 Minutes interview, he probably says that stuff in private. The dude has one big chip on his shoulder.
Hugh @ 34
I feel a Monty Python moment coming on.
OT, re prevthread:
Bargain Countertenor @ 27
This might be a good time to write one of the “you did a good thing” letters to get you in the door. Then, when you send a critical letter next time, you won’t be seen as automatically against him.
One thought I was thinking this morning. Vetoing SCHIP could be tied to dragging the whole “compassionate conservatism” canard down…as in: “if compassionate conservatives don’t think every kid in the US should have health care, then no thanks, compassionate conservatism isn’t for me. I want real compassion.”
Oilfieldguy @ 14
Re: Clarence Thomas:
From Frank Rich in the NYtimes yesterday:
I think I’ll also write CBS and 60 Minutes as well.
Weerd, after I posted that the first time it did the same thing–refreshed the page and it showed up. Try refresh and go to my original comment.
For those writing a letter on SCHIP:
Families USA has a chart detailing, by state, the number of children who could gain coverage under the bill.
http://www.familiesusa.org/ass…..chipra.pdf
They also have a resource center with more info on the bill and talking points
http://www.familiesusa.org/res…..on-center/
Oilfieldguy @ 42
Weird.
And yes, it is MoDo snark. It was, however, “ripped from the pages . . .” as they say.
Jeffrey Fager, executive producer of CBS’s 60 Minutes.
(In case anybody is interested…)
CBS 60 Minutes info:
ADDRESS:
60 Minutes
524 West 57th St.
New York, NY 10019
EMAIL: 60m@cbsnews.com
PHONE: (212) 975-3247
TeddySanFran @ 37
They should use blogs, the quote button is right there!!!111
OT–
On Tula’s thread on Thursday, I posted something about the worldwide network of “homeless” and/or nomadic people who offer their couches to sleep on for other people’s couches around the world.
(Most of these people are writers, graphic designers, web developers, freelance journalists, and so on: in other words, people who can do their work anywhere in the world as long as there’s an Internet connection.)
For those interested, here’s the couchsurfing website.
selise @ 33
Editor Onion-
SCHIPS without SALSA does not follow the will and spirit of the American people who want universal or single payer health care for every person in need, be they citizen or visitor. Let us all demand our efforts care for every individual instead of denying health care to someone because they may not have their papers in order or were born in London, Puerto Vallarta, or Rome. So let us step back, perhaps lower the salt content, cut back on the whack a mole’ and be the best we can be in America.
A well balanced diet, even when snaking, makes a healthier society for all.
ES, AR
The Times of London has a large section of outstanding and amusing letters to the editor every day. Their Parliament has really sharp debates too. Could we have a congress like this please?
This is good advice. I’ve had quite a bit of success in getting LTE’s published. You’re pretty much a shoe-in for small-town papers, but as long as you’re concise and professional you can generally get published in larger city newspapers too.
And if you can find a way to tie your letter into a recent story run by the paper, you’ll have a much better chance of getting published.
And try your best to keep your emotions out of it. Sure, Bush is the Anti-Christ and it’s difficult not getting emotional with the delusional, inbred, numbskulls who still support him, but we have to reign in our frustration and anger to sound like calm, rational people who DON’T simply have some sort of political agenda (even if we really do).
One time Dubya was coming to Indianapolis for some kind of fundraiser/speech and at the very last minute it was moved from the original location to the state fair grounds.
I couldn’t resist speculating in a LTE that it was moved because the State Fair Grounds was the only location equipped to handle that much horse shit.
That one didn’t get published.
Eureka Springs @ 49
You sure that isn’t while snarking?
Dakine – heh. Snark (snack) before coffee will get me in trouble every day..)
Most newspaper also allow comments after stories in their on line editions. It is worth registering to be able to comment.
Also weekly and monthly papers are always looking for materials and also have opinion sections.
For me this usually means writing different versions of the same letter (the insane, angry one, my keep) and the one I send out.
Good morning. Thanks Christy. Points well presented. You remind me I haven’t written a letter to the editor for well over a year.
I confess that it was a lot easier to get my letters published (many years ago) in a SF local paper where I was a long time friend of the editor. He’d call and let me know they were going to publish my letter. Ahhhhh, connections! Now I have to honestly earn the merits of my letter in order to get it published.
What is that Op-ed piece in NYT by Maureen Dowd about? Is that for real? There is a linky @14.
SufiLizard @ 51
Sad. And you were probably right.
Thoughts on clouds from some it dude.
I have looked at clouds from both sides now
selise — My understanding is that legal immigrant children were not included this time around — precisely because otherwise they could not have overridden a veto with this particular Congress. It was a get everything we can now and do better on the next round decision based on what was achievable. Sometimes you take everything you can get on the first round and work the edges the next go around, which is what is planned, as I understand it. It’s one of those “don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good” things for me — knowing how necessary this sort of care can be for the well-being of millions of kids across the country, and the potential to add in a few million more, we don’t have the votes now to get every single thing on the wish list. But we do likely have the votes to get most of it.
Dear sur,
I regret to inform you that you are an idiot. Your dismal efforts at political repartee and badinage show not only a want of finesse and the mot juste but a callous disregard for the brain cells of your readers. I must ask you to desist.
Respectfully saddened by your nitwittery,
Hugh
Eureka Springs @ 49
excellent!!
Jane upstairs with some more pressure tactics for the children.
Jane’s upstairs…
Hugh @ 60
More, more!
Dear sur,
Your incoherent ravings upset the dog. Please stop.
Disappointedly yours,
Hugh
PS The canary does not care for you much either.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 59
well, i think the possibility of getting health care for immigrant children goes down significantly if they have to get it on their own (and not as a package with citizen children). can you tell me that you really think otherwise?
isn’t this EXACTLY the same kind of issue as teddy has been writing about on ENDA?… about how it’s important to not leave behind the weakest and most vunerable?
and in this case, isn’t it pandering to the worse kind of racist bigotry – because immigrant children are more likely to be brown?
i don’t think this has anything to do with getting “every single thing on the wish list” – if it was, we’d be talking about universal single payer. it’s about whether or not we really believe in immigrant rights.
What you are talking about is the emotional end of it, and you are correct — it is rooted in bigotry, no question. What I am talking about is the reality of who is in the House — and some of the people there fall prey to that sort of argument in their districts and will not vote for the bill under those circumstances — which is why the last time they tried to push it through, the bill failed so spectacularly.
They were up against a timing wall this time and it was either pass a measure that covered the children already in the program so that they can continue to have healthcare. Or stand on principle and have none of the children get healthcare.
It’s unfortunate, but that is the reality at the moment. And no amount of wishing people in Congress were more decent human beings makes it different. It is how things are — which is why we keep working to get more and better Democrats into the mix. It’s an incremental process, and one we are not — ever — going to let go. But sometimes you have to look the harsh reality right in the face and, frankly, this is about as harsh as it gets — and the truth is, that’s juts how it is at the moment, whether we like it or not, no matter how much we know that decency dictates that they take this further.
The way to get it moved further is to get better people casting the needed votes.
p.s. to christy at 59:
are you sure about that? it looks to me like the original bill got more votes in the house than the modified version: 360 – 45 vs 265 – 159, from the time line here.
or do i have it wrong?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 67 –
but if that’s true, then why did the bill that covered immigrant children get more votes than the one that didn’t?
i could be really wrong. but at least, that’s the way it looks to me. i wish we’d discussed all this out in the open before getting to this point.
The 360-45 vote you link above is the Small Business Tax Relief Act. The reason we didn’t discuss it beforehand is that these were closed-door negotiations for the most part — and I didn’t see the bill until it became public, so I didn’t know about the compromise until it was already made. I’m not omnicient, neither is Jane — we do the best we can with what we have.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 70
christy, my wish wasn’t meant as a complaint… that part of my comment really was wishful thinking. and if it was anyone’s fault, it was mine if i’m the person who cares about it.
about the other stuff though…
1) if i linked to the wrong roll call vote, where is the roll call vote for house approval of the original bill? i’m confused.
2) do your really think that it won’t be more difficult to get coverage for immigrant children if they have to get it on their own (and not as a package with citizen children)? isn’t it more likely that by cutting them out now, they are locked out?
Here’s a good example of REALLY BAD journalism and ethics.
Just saw this verbatim, on Brian Lamb’s c-span, on the abbreviated Capital ‘News’ briefs given at the bottom of the screen:
“Sandy Berger who stole documents from the national security archives endorses Clinton.”
-That’s language right off Tom Delay’s desk -hardly worthy of c-span.
But would Brian Lamb do the same oh, say with a Republican Senator?
We hope so!
Beside the great advice of keeping it short, sticking to a single point, proofreading, and adding some humor if you can, one thing that I think has helped me is that I send LTEs almost exclusively in reference to an article or Op-Ed that the paper has published, and always use that paper’s style when making the reference.
In other words, I make sure that my letters, as I send them, are as close as possible to the way they would finally be published. My thinking is that there’s less for the editor to do, and that may sway him/her. I know my references have been retained, as I sent one in which I had referenced an article with the incorrect date, and the letter was published with the wrong date.
My local paper is the Balto. Sun, and they print most of the ones I send. I’ve also had 7 letters in the NYT over the last 4 years.
I’m EPU’d to the twentieth power, but I wrote a LTTE last month, and e-mailed it to the local metropolitan daily. I’d thought about doing it for a long time, but never did so until something happened here (the latest visit from the Boy King in support of his extra-special pal, Rep. Dave Reichert,) that left me so incensed I had to speak up. I got an e-mailed response an hour later that they were printing it.
Thanks to Christy and TRex for the great tutorials.
-S