You do want to express yourself don’t you? — Office Space  This clip has the NYTimes written all over it…as does this one.

The NYTimes is obsessed with candidate flair, going so far as to analyze the various lapel-wear moments from recent debates with gusto.  And to specifically interview Barack Obama about his lack of flair, in a snippet so remniscent of Office Space that I thought it might be a parody for a moment or two.  (Oh wait, two stories on the same issue…clearly this is groundbreaking journalism.  Or maybe it’s just building some self-manufactured buzz.  You decide.)  And then followed up with John Edwards, in short order, making me certain that it was not, after all, intended to be a parody but instead to be taken as the Wise Beltway Flair Patrol teaching wayward candidates about the art of expression in a backhanded, weird, obsessive way.

Cue the flair patrol, news at eleven.

The WaPo has picked up the badge of shame, because you can’t let the NYTimes hog all the flair, I suppose.  So have the BaltimoreSun, Fox News (predictably, their no demogogue left behind policy kicked in…), the Chicago Sun-Times (likewise), the WashTimes (natch), the ChiTrib (noticing a trend, yet?) and the kings of manufactured outrage at Investor’s Business Daily try to build it into some sort of federal case.   The NYDailyNews does a whole piece on the manufactured qualiy of outrage, and the fact that in a free country we ought to be free to choose whether or not we wear or not some pin on our lapels.

Media Matters chronicles the genesis of all of this:  from Drudge to mainstream press in the blink of a traffic meter.  Shocked?  I’m not.  But, as Steve Benen points out, people who have glass lapels shouldn’t make public asses of themselves. (I’m talking to you, Hannity.)

What do I think about all of this?  I think what you do ought to count more than what you are wearing — actions speak louder and words and lapel flair ever could.  Putting a flag on your house or your lapel doesn’t make you patriotic, it just makes you more colorful.  Unless you couple that flag display with standing up for the Constitution and American values when it counts, you have a public display akin to those folks who sit in the front pews on Sundays so that everyone can see them in their “piety,” and then go forth and sin the rest of the week with abandon. 

You earn your patriotism, you don’t just slap on a pin and expect respect that you haven’t worked — every day — to get.  Being a patriot is not something that you are, it is something that you do.

I’m sick to death of the media focusing in manufactured outrage minutiae, instead of digging into the issues that really matter to all of us.  I’m with Todd on this one:

…There was a headline in last Sunday’s LA Times asking if John Edwards’ “rich-guy image” would trip him up in Iowa. I responded by asking why a self-made man from a small rural town would have a “rich guy” image problem but blue-blood scions of political families like Romney or Bush don’t.

Of course, the writer had to bring up the “widely derided” haircut, which I said was only widely derided b/c lazy writers keep bringing up the narrative. I asked if we would be hearing how much Romney spends on a tan or Guiliani on a suit. (they cut all of the Romney comments out).

Ended by saying that this country is facing dire problems, and that media should focus on those rather than such trivialities.

If anyone can find Todd’s LA Times letter to the editor online, I’d love to link it up. Good on you, Todd. More of this please…

UPDATE:  Here’s the link to Todd’s letter.  Thanks to everyone who found it for me.

Related posts:

  1. Early Morning Swim
  2. Village Logic
  3. Chuck Todd’s Law
  4. They Fired Froomkin for THIS?!?
  5. Joe Lockhart Wanted to Say “Blow Job”