David Satterfield of the US State Department: We demand high standards. We’re in constant contact with the Iraqis about this stuff, including the events of September 16. Condi Rice cares really really a lot about that and is conducting three different reviews. The FBI is sending a team to Iraq to investigate at her request, you know. They’re even going to look at CPA 17 (fondly known as “Blackwater’s license to kill“) and the effects it may be having.
Waxman: Why did the State Department help Blackwater get the employee the hell out of Dodge after the incident?
Richard Griffin: Can’t comment on an ongoing investigation.
Waxman: Not asking you about that. The State Department even told Blackwater to pay off the family and “sweep the whole incident under the rug.” What’s up with that?
Griffin: I would say that the area of what should be prosecuted is very murky.
Waxman: You mean there’s a question as to whether this is criminal, when a person hired by a contractor shoots and kills an Iraqi in the green zone, that this isn’t criminal? And then the State Department suggested how much should be paid, and helped him get out of the country?
Griffin: That’s your judgment about what happened.
Waxman: If there’s an investigation going on, and the man’s not there any longer, it makes investigation a little tough. Hard to say you “acted responsibly.” The State Department acting as an “enabler” of Blackwater tactics, demands no accountability.
Griffin: We referred it to the DoJ (no politicization there — jh)
Waxman: And there’s been no action, nine or ten months later.
Tom Davis: The US has been using private contractors for decades. Why is this unprescedented?
Satterfield: The scale of this is unprescedented.
Davis: Would you go back 5 years and do the same thing again, or take it in house?
Griffin: We did this to try and stand up the civilian side of the government. In order to fulfill the security mission in the near term, private contractors were used. If we were going to train people for the job, it would take 18 months. And they have real cool specialists.
Tom Davis: But it’s been a longer term duration.
Griffin: But we’ve used contractors back to 1994 when they were first used in Haiti.
Davis: Is it cheaper to go outside, or to start a bureaucracy within the government?
Griffin: The cost for a State Department special agent to be deployed in a high threat area is $500,000.
William H. Moser, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Logistics Management, Department of State: Costs run about $400,000 for an American Diplomat overseas to $1 million in Iraq (”fully loaded costs”).
Tierney: How many agents do you have there?
Griffin: Thirty six of our agents in Iraq.
Tierney: There are about 800 personnel to protect embassy personnel in Iraq?
Griffin: 845 Blackwater personnel from Blackwater in Baghdad, and with two other contractors, about 1150 total.
Tierney: Blackwater engaged in 195 shooting incidents in less than 3 years, 1.4 times per week.. Are there any other embassies where there have been that many shootings?
Griffin: We’re operating in a combat zone.
Tierney: Is that a no?
Griffin: Not that I can think of.
Tierney: Blackwater has also caused at least 16 casualties, and fired weapons over 160 times in the last three years, and caused serious property damage. Blackwater thinks these shootings were justified. There are policies that allow them to operate under special rules that allow things like shooting at cars that get too close. Are there any other places, besides Afghanistan, like that? My point — it appears to me that this might not be a mission for private security contractors. The question is not whether this is something that 800 troops should be taking over.
Griffin: Standard procedure — whenever a weapon is fired on a security detail, the team comes to the tactical operations center. Members of the team are segregated, they’re interviewed, within 24 hours they have to provide written sworn statement, they’re reviewed by management for consistency, and people who manage contractors having weekly meetings with them.
Dan Burton: Would it be more effective to used armed military personnel?
Griffin: Provided they got the training, which they don’t normally get. They’re not supposed to stay and fight. They’re supposed to get out of there.
Burton: Was the Blackwater contract a sole source?
Moser: In 2004 we decided to do a sole source contract for Blackwater. That was the only time it was sole source. The reason we did that was for urgent compelling reason. We were under urgent situation to make that transition to secure the embassy. We had an audit and were able to negotiate their fees down from $140 million to $106 million. Then in 2005 we went to a competitive bidding situation.
Burton: Are these people well trained:
Griffin: All of the WPPS contractors who are employed must have one year of prior military or law enforcement experience. They have to undergo a background check and qualify for secret clearance for our government. They also have to undergo 160 hour training course.
Burton: When your contractors fire at a vehicle speeding towards a chief admission motorcade, is that a violation of the contract rules of engagement?
Griffin: Absolutely not. In the use of force policy in Baghdad, one does not have to wait until the protectee is physically harmed before taking action. We have an escalation of force policy where they must take prior steps before the use of force.
Diane Watson: Do you feel private security companies do a good job protecting state department personnel?
Satterfield: Yep
Watson: One of the major reasons this committee has expressed skepticism is because we have high regard for our military. Many have been very critical of private security, esp. Blackwater. Brigadier General Karl Huse said, “these guys run loose in this country and do stupid stuff…there’s no authority over them, so you can’t come down on them when they escalate force. They shoot people and someone else has to deal with the aftermath. It happens all over the place.”
An army lieutenant colonel serving in Iraq said of Blackwater, “They are immateur shooters and have quick trigger fingers. Their tendency is to shoot first and ask questions later. We are all carrying their black eyes.”
Related posts:
- Blackwater Bribed Iraqi Officials After Nissour Square Massacre
- DPC to Continue Drive for Oversight, Accountability for Iraq and Afghanistan Contractors
- Scahill: Blackwater Rent-an-Assassin Service Integral to Bush Counterterrorism Plan
- Liveblog Alert: Two House Committee Mark-ups Webcast Today
- Why Can’t CIA Handle the Same Level of Oversight the Military Gets?





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Jane!
Take off the gloves!
My take
Fighting the nefarious
is blackwater’s gig
in Iran, Irag or
the Guantanimo brig
Highly paid mercenaries
they live just to kill
they waterboard prisoners
and they rape for the thrill
They do it all privately
for profit and fun
steal billions of dollars
at the point of a gun
For Bush and his cronies a
praetorian guard
a privatized army
to take over the world
There’s no Bush out of pocket
the tax payer pays
and for every guard
its 1200 a day
They’re answerable to none
and don’t give a damn
and the more that they kill
its more cash in the can
They give kick-backs to bushies
when he starts a war
they pay in blood money
and he always wants more
Will it ever be over
this nightmare too long
should we ask blackwater
“get bush hell and gone”
Hi Jane…geez, this war and administration just gets uglier and uglier.
That’s it, Nomolos!
Shorter State Department: “We love our Blackwater Rambos. They’re better than ponies.”
Condi: I heart bad boys.
say, can the Iraqi government declare BW to be a terrorist organization? sorry if someone already asked this…
do-si-do @ 7
Good question. A couple of years ago, I looked at some militia magazine to read about Blackwater (and others). I said at the time they sounded like a terrorist organization.
The State Department appears to be embracing private security firms – it’s a mutual back scratching festival today.
David Satterfield on the A*P*C subpoena list
http://anti-war.com/justin/?articleid=11695
“Their subpoena wish-list includes Condi Rice; Stephen Hadley; Richard Armitage; William Burns, U.S. ambassador to Moscow and former chief U.S. envoy to the Middle East; Burns’ former deputy, David Satterfield, who now advises Rice on Iraq; and Anthony Zinni, also a former U.S. Mideast envoy (and a prominent critic of the Lobby)”.
David Satterfield “The A*P*C spy nest has been burrowing deeply into Washington’s official secrets without regard for propriety or party. The indictment describes the duo’s extensive contacts with a wide range of U.S. government officials, Israeli diplomats, and other individuals, none of them identified by name. However, two have been subsequently outed in the media by sources close to the investigation: they are David Satterfield, a deputy assistant secretary for Near Eastern affairs and now the second most senior U.S. government representative in occupied Iraq, and Kenneth Pollack, who served on the National Security Council in the Clinton administration. Said Pollack: “I believe I am USGO-1,” identified in the second indictment as having met with Rosen and Weissman on Dec. 12, 2000. Pollack handed over classified information about “strategy options” against an unidentified “Middle Eastern country.”
(((Jane)))
I love the ad-lib: ‘and they have really cool specialists’ hehehehe
There is a “don’t believe your lying eyes” argument going on with State maintaining that private security is actually cheaper if you add in the costs of the kitchen sink enough times.
nomolos @ 3
As you are often poet
in residence,
I look forward to
the day when
you can pen:
‘Poetic justice
today was done…’
You caught the
essence well.
Mods: forgot the asterisks in spec*al*sts. Damn that drug!
Hugh @ 11
it’s really bizzare that ANYONE believes private industry can do ANYTHING from the commons better then the government can
it can’t happen, private industry needs to compete in order to be efficient, when they don’t need to compete they charge as much as is conceivable possible
they waste where can be wasted, they steal where can be stolen, they abuse what can be abused, the exploit the need whenever and wherever they can exploit
We have armed militias – contractors
We have warloads = Erik prince
We have death sqauds = Blackwater, Caci, Triple Canopy etc.
leslie @ 8
the new american militia?
Hey dipshits, are you comparing these gun-totin’ yehaws to diplomats and special agents? Well, never mind.
I’m looking forward to Waxman reigning in those mercenaries. A harshly-worded letter to Blackwater should do it…
In fact one of the right wing mantras is that government can’t do anything better than the private sector EVER.
All things private trump government bureaucracies.
http://jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/blogs/posting/767.html
Calling out Satterfield
By Ron Kampeas
“USGO-2 will be taking your questions now.
If that sounds cryptic it’s not entirely inappropriate – USGO-2 is kind of cryptic. He’s otherwise known as David Satterfield, the top Iraq adviser to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. But, as U.S. Government Official no. 2, he’s the unindicted co-conspiratorin the classified information case against Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, respectively the former foreign policy chief and top Iran analyst for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Count one in the August 2005 indictment includes meetings between Rosen and USGO-2 as an “overt act,” in which Satterfield – then second in charge at the State Department’s Middle East section – allegedly relayed classified information to Rosen, and which Rosen allegedly re-relayed to colleagues at A*P*C and to Israeli officials.”
Edited and released by Mods
The interest in privatization was never to save money, it was for the treasury to provide funding for corporate political contributions.
Thanks to H.WaxMAN for shining a SPOT LIGHT on this scum. This is a good day when Jane is bringing us F.D.L. pups the story! Thanks Jane
AkaDad @ 18
Lol, we have seen how that worked in the past. Maybe it you keep beating the dead horse it will actually get up and run someday.
AkaDad @ 19
Oh come on! I think he’s serious this time. I bet he has a press conference in addition to his sternly-worded letter.
SanderO @ 20
Beyond the all-you-can-steal embezzlement-fest transfer of billions to crony contractors, a core Bu’ush regime motive here is that private sector entities are not accountable under the Constitution. They can violate your rights at will. Your only potential recourse would be tort remedies, and we all know what Bu’ush thinks of those.
Privatization aims to get the US treasury revenues to corporations and all the debt financing as a burden to the tax payers.
The private sector is jonsing for the social security trust fund to roll into the financial sector.
You know if these guys are so well trained how come there have been so many incidents?
Also if the original need for security was so pressing instead of no bid contract, why didn’t State get the Pentagon to provide security?
AkaDad @ 19
Akadad. It’s reining in, as in horses’ reins. That said, it’s a brilliant pun worthy of Punaise, as what needs reining in the reign that gave Blackwater the reins in Iraq.
more seriously, Bmaz, anywhere? Anything contemptible in our not financially-minded testimony?
Ever an optimist, BSRH
SanderO @ 19
All things private DO trump government bureaucracy. In a past life, I worked for NASA. Just getting laptops and various sundries necessary to do our jobs had to go through procurement. Instead of going down to Dell or Best Buy where you get a better deal, you had to deal with lesser equipment that some bureaucrat had let a contract on. you had to account for all the paperwork …and the time it took to fill it out. Private industry ALWAYS can do things faster than government. WIthout exception. Including providing security.
leslie @ 8
So what’s to say that the Iranian govt. can’t name Blackwater as a terrorist org.? Seems symmetrical to me.
jeffreyw @ 21
Privatization’s goal is to use taxpayer dollars, regardless of an individual taxpayer’s political leanings, to fund Republican political campaigns.
SanderO @ 26
That about sums it up. Privatize the profits, but socialize the investment and risk.
The rich get richer and the poor and middle class become just “the poor.” It’s a story that’s been repeated over and over in human history.
Hi guys, really sorry to go OT, but David Obey (house aprops chair) just came out and said he will block any supplementals that dont provide for a Jan ‘09 end withdrawal date.
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/…..l_date.php
Here’s Obey’s site, don’t see it referenced yet. I called to say and the phone person sounded like they didnt know what I was talking about.
http://obey.house.gov/hor/wi07/
Smarter people than me will have to digest this and see if it’s really a true change, but it sounds like it.
SanderO @ 25
they’ve already pillaged social security, the most successful, self funding, efficient program in history and they’ve squanered all the assets our parents and grandparents invested over two generations
those stolen assets must be returned frome whence they came, reoovered from those that recieved these assets that were not and are not theirs
LibertyLee @ 30
Faster is not necessarily better. And it definitely is NOT cheaper. Or do you think we don’t have to pay for that speed?
Edit: as an example of how private industry might do things. I worked as a DoD contractor. Fortunately I knew enough to NOT let the other folks go out and buy Toshiba laptops while they were on the banned list. But I’m sure the contractor without oversight would do exactly that.
Question I wish someone like Waxman would ask:
Do any of your US contract employees speak Arabic?
No? And how then do you tell Iraqis to back off?
“Well…ahmmm…some of mah boys speak a little Tex-Mex, and saying ‘Vamanos’ or ‘Arriba’ works purty good.”
Don’t make the mistake of underestimating these people! They are well trained at killing people, not at informed decision making. All of these dudes had the “look” in their eye. SEALS are simply trained assassins, not guards. But they are very good at what they do-killing.
Grouch Potato @ 32
Don’t worry. When it comes to crunch time (i.e. showing some spine) a majority of Dems won’t obey Obey.
The RNC connection must be followed up, because Prince’s attorney seemed really worried about that line of questioning. Are there RNC connections monitarily into the Dept of State? Is there RNC money coming in to Lurita Doan, for example? Something is up with the whole RNC thing and the Christianization of everything in the government. D’oh…
It sounds like there is a ton of paperwork on the alleged 195 shooting incidents by Blackwater – it would be highly informative to review those ‘after action reports’ to see what passes for provocation, the actual ‘escalation’ of force procedures used, and the follow-up with the Iraqis.
Good luck to any Senators traveling abroad after asking Blackwater questions…
D. Watson is our cheerleader for the armed forces (in a good way). If any Reptilican wants to say Dems don’t support the troops, they need to listen to Watson’s speech of UStroops v. Blackwater.
AkaDad @ 19
it’s gets better, IMHO, cause the reining is is of the reign of the Prince.
Now describing their “shoot first” policy. Supposedly there is a whole spectrum of “escalating of force”. The problem with this is that if these bozos are flying down the highway sometimes the wrong way, they come upon a situation or a potential situation and start firing. This escalation of force is a work of fiction for CYA and bureaucratic purposes.
ccmask @ 42
I heard the regulars troops are ok.
dakine01 @ 36
In a war, speed is of the essence. You have to get people to the point of a firefight to eliminate the enemy and save the friendlies…
ccmask @ 40
Good point. Accidents happen.
kdh22 @ 30
dakine01 @ 34
privateization is fascism
it’s also the least efficient method for accomplishing any commons
again, when a service or product is needed, a for profit corporation will charge as much as can possibly be charged and run it as ineficiently as can possibly be run
these fascists that make believe “privatization” is is efficent are nothing but puppeteers pulling the strings of the of the maroionettes that buy their rubbish
AkaDad @ 19
NITPICK ALERT!!!
The phrase you want is “reining in” as in the leather straps on the bridle of a horse which attach to the bit and are used to stop the horse.
“Reign” means “to rule;” for example:
“‘Tis better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven…” Milton, Paradise Lost
nonplussed @ 38
If YOU are the protectee, you want “that look” in their eyes. They’re covering YOUR back.
Shays is so embarrassing. I think Im going to have to volunteer for Himes if I can after all this.
What I think is incredible is that these folks work for the STATE DEPARTMENT– our diplomatic core. What difference does it make if a diplomat makes it across town for a meeting under the protection of BLackwater if the trip KILLS innocent Iraqi’s in the process? Is that the way they plan to win hearts and minds? We pay out massive money to render impossible our own diplomatic goals. It’s all so disheartening and disgusting…
My grandparents were successful diplomats. This would have been abominable to them.
Wow, Shays is in meltdown mode.
LibertyLee @ 30
That’s absurd. I know from personal experience in the private sector that corporate America is often more wasteful and less efficient than government bureaucracy, but I won’t speak in absolutes and say ALWAYS.
You completely undermine your credibility when you make such absurd, blanket statements.
Especially when common sense would indicate that with corporate profits, shareholder dividends, etc. a private entity has way more overhead than a government-run, or non-profit that only needs to operate at, or slightly above cost.
In the real world that doesn’t always happen, but with better oversight and some reforms it could, and often does.
mui @ 46
Plus the regular army probably doesn’t have any of Pinochet’s good ol’boys quite like Blackwater.
Shays is really pulling a power trip on these guys for some reason…pull the mike closer…answer the question…that’s it, case closed…pull the mike closer…that’s not what I asked…these are basically simple questions you ignorant sluts…
160 hours of training? Wait a minute. It would take our troops at least 18 months of training to get up to speed with a Blackwater op but Griffin just said these guys get 160 hours of training? That’s less than 3 weeks, on top of one year of military or law enforcement experience…
Shays if I don’t get the answer I want let me answer it for you so I do get that answer.
Boris Karloff seems befuddled by Shays (as am I).
Kathleen @ 60
He musta had a drinkie in between last appearances.
LibertyLee @ 45
We won WWII without the help of Blackwater.
Dee @ 57
Math anyone?
I just got back from a brief work interlude…
Shays is working for whom?
what a tool.
((screeeam)Shays we don’t want to hear about YOUR experience as a peace corps volunteer to justify the presence of blackwater. Not again, not now , not ever.
Shays: “I don’t want to put words in your mouth”. But I will
Shays, Shays, Shays…Blackwater is high profile, you nincompoop.
Cooper: which contractor made the rock video where the good olboys were shooting Iraqis. You seen it.
Nope
Nope
Yes, but
Dont respond to Liberty Lee, he/she is a professional TROLL
“That film footage is outrageous and we did nothing. That’s how strongly we feel about it.”
Good on Cooper for talking about “No End in Sight” and the footage that was shown all over America… Strangely, some of those people have never heard of the movie or seen the footage.
Well, then ask him about the “turkey shoot” footage too!!!
theWalrus @ 61
Too Funny…thanks for the laugh. I think my blood sugar is getting low.
The answer to the current needling Republican question about “do you want army or civie guards?” is US THE SECRET SERVICE. There. If you MUST have civies then use the Secret Service, NOT mercs.
Now then, what I really wish is that there was a rule that all House and Senate hearings be conducted like a thesis defense. The questioner actually asks questions rather than pontificating about what the questioner believes. The questioner should ask questions or not speak. Questions should NOT be softball questions but actually intended to obtain information that the questioner did not have.
Simple, really. Hearings should be handled like a thesis defense.
Kathleen @ 74
He just gave me every reason to run down to fairfield and see what’s up with himes.
leslie @ 65
exxon mobile!!!!
I Griffin on drugs?
He sounds snowed to me.
Oh crap I really just did volunteer for HImes. I thought I was signing up for emails. I’ll take it as a sign. Shays OUT.
Here we go.
“I don’t recall.”
This administration is the “short-term memory dysfunction” administration.
Praedor Atrebates @ 75
Yeah and I’d like a no-bid fed gov’t contract too, but I don’t see that happening either!
Now I’d SWEAR that the US Marine Corps is the traditional source of Embassy guards. Why use Blackwater thugs or any other outsider rather than the NORMAL Marine guards?
mui @ 75
Good for you! It’s a crying shame Shays wasn’t dumped in 2006.
Praedor Atrebates @ 74
Or the FBI — the folks who run the Witness Protection Program, remember? We’ve got plenty of people who have the bloody training in protection AND law enforcement.
Praedor Atrebates @ 82
that is my understanding as well
I can’t stop looking at Griffin as Boris Karloff now.
I think I need something to eat and drink they are all starting to look like Disney characters
You don’t hire people if you think you are only going to be there a couple of years. Well, we have been in Iraq for nearly 5 years and Bush and the Republicans are talking about being there for decades. Sounds like they should have known that this was not a brief mission.
SufiLizard @ 56
In general the reason private companies work with more efficiently is because they are incentived to make a profit; in government, there is no such incentive. At NASA we had the incentives of making the missions work and the dreams a lot of us had. But in the post-Challenger era that was lost and a great deal of expertise went with it. I have also worked for state welfare type agencies in the Information Systems area. There was no incentive to save money; indeed the incentives were all to cut the checks. SO…perhaps ALWAYS and Never overstate the issue, but in my experience it is always true that private industry is more competent than Government simply because there is always pressure to get more budget in Government; in industry, it is to maximize shareholder benefit. And you are compensated accordingly.
Brisingamen @ 83
Per wiki, FBI only does witness protection for incarcerated witnesses, the balance are protected through US Marshalls service.
Issa: “I’m trying to understand..”
Unfortunately, without a brain that will be difficult.
Now talking about rotation of RSOs. Again if this is a problem, use regular military.
If blackwater guards diplomats what about who guards those in the WH and congress? Are they too, from blackwater? Or does anyone really know, just because they were fancy suits and look american, does not mean in any form that they are?
Issa: Mr. Satterfield, Griffin and Davis may I ask you have you seen the Move On add yet?
mui @ 51
And you’re surprised? He and Joe are two of a kind. If I were closer I’d help you. Sam Bennett may be my focus next summer.
Hugh @ 43
Hugh, this is exactly right. Having an “escalation of force continuum” means absolutely nothing when the Blackwater’s designed approach tactics to any situation is designed to immediately provoke the most serious end of the force continuum. They openly pride themselves for “moving fast” “unexpected” and with “overwhelming numbers and firepower”. The net result is that EVERY situation is immediately off the deep end of the “force continuum”.
Issa to Griffin: “Sir, do you still believe you were a better actor than Lugosi?”
I have been listening to this hearing while working, so I may have missed other comments, but when I hear references to the choice being between hiring govt employees that they say they are stuck with for 25 years OR outsourcing, this seems to miss an option. The temporary employee.
The IRS probably still hires temporary employees during tax filing season to cover the tax question hotlines, and I would imagine that other agencies still hire temporary employees.
I see no reason why they couldn’t hire temporary employees for these jobs that may be for 2 years or so, not 25. Have I missed something? This is the second time today I’ve seen them use this (’we don’t want to be stuck paying these employees for 25 years’ BS).
Hugh @ 87
But…this takes us back to the Marines (or Secret Service) because the Marine embassy guards are there 24/7 365 days a year. They are ALREADY there by nature of the embassy guard job. Clearly there is no need to go outside the normal “channels”. I doubt that embassies lack for SS personnel either.
Nice. Some of you had to go and rein on my parade…
dakine01 @ 89
There you go then. Use the Marines OR if you need a civilian “look” then go with US Marshalls.
AkaDad @ 94
Was it Rayne?
Lynch; “was their an investigation yes or no”
Excellent!
Instead of refusing to answer, say:”I can’t answer to the precision that you deserve.”
Roll me over.
I was waiting for Welch to say “Have you no shame, sir?”
The FBI and the Marshals are busy
perpetuatingfighting the WOD.Wax: we’ve had better responses from Blackwater (to requests for info) than we’ve had from the State Dept.
I’m working again and missed things, but it seems that DoS is less forthcoming than Blackwater. Is it because this is televised that DoS won’t answer?
bmaz @ 95
You to can learn to drive fast and the wrong way at Blackwater’s school
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1P8bQxfNRFY
I guess Abu made the phrases, “I can’t recall…I don’t remember” nearly unusable in hearings any more.
That must be why the stonewalling is so awkward. Their phrases have been so trivialized.
Lynch and Waxman just tag-teamed one of the premier liars.
The bullies just got bullied…
And they are gonna get real mean, now.
Beware the cornered beast…
Amb. Griffin is quite the liar!
Hugh @ 87
The continued morphing of a fabricated and ill defined mission to support the energy delivery system of Exxon Mobile et als, predicated on a war against a terrorists network from SA and UAE. Not Iraq or Iran. This is fucking gross!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Salem Witch hunts and illogical associations…………………
LibertyLee @ 47
That’s exactly what the United States military does.
Praedor Atrebates @ 97
Certainly not in this administration
Kathy/Fozzetti @ 70
Ummm, I have never gotten paid to be here. I keep hoping I will change someone’s view at some point. I do hope my reports to Ed Gillespie are useful, though…
DOS is cornered here, they have no option but to not answer, anything else equals truth and they can’t afford any of that leaking out.
Waxman’s suggesting they’re scared of their own protectors.
And how did Griffin’s memory just get so clear?
As a Democrat I find this suspect and disturbing.
From the Wall St. Journal:
Some well-known business leaders have openly changed allegiances. Morgan Stanley Chairman and Chief Executive John Mack, formerly a big Bush backer, now supports Democratic front-runner Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. John Canning Jr., chairman and chief executive of Madison Dearborn Partners, a large private-equity firm, now donates to Democrats after a lifetime as a Republican. Recently, he told one Democratic Party leader: “The Republican Party left me” — a twist on a line Ronald Reagan and his followers used when they abandoned the Democratic Party decades ago to protest its ’60s and ’70s-era liberalism.
David Satterfield “allegedly” US Go 2 in A*P*C case
http://jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/printblogs/posting/767
.html
“Count one in the August 2005 indictment includes meetings between Rosen and USGO-2 as an “overt act,” in which Satterfield – then second in charge at the State Department’s Middle East section – allegedly relayed classified information to Rosen, and which Rosen allegedly re-relayed to colleagues at A*P*C and to Israeli officials.
So why is Rosen out of a job, under constant FBI watch and facing an Espionage Act trial — and Satterfield climbing the diplomatic ladder? It’s a question begging for an answer.”
Edited and released by Mods
I thought the attacks were down? What did Petreas say about that ?
OK I’ll stop, I don’t need another not so subtle hint.
Did he just say this is the BS talking points?
Oh, no, it was DS….hah
6,000 Attacks per Month in Iraq!
Gee, that’s not a Civil War…
6,000 attacks per month in Iraq per Griffin “that is the kind of environment we are dealing with”. Does that match what Petraeus said??? I thought attacks were way, way down….
Don’t these Bush lackeys realize they are involved in and enabling a huge scam to line the pockets of neocon warmongerers? That’s all this tragedy is about. Unbridled greed.
Emma @ 97
You’re not missing anything – except the “need” to create contracting opportunities (for Bush supporters).
Loo Hoo @ 114
And the US military can’t be everywhere at all times. And there are certain ROE that are different…
Oklahoma kiddo @ 116
…someone should post that at the Democratic Partybuilder site…
LS @ 119
Good point! makes one wonder what they are really covering up?
Legalsleeze and horse shit go hand in hand!!!
interesting… in justifying some of the violent acts of Blackwater, the execs keep drawing a picture of the “environment” in which their people operate in Iraq… “thousands of (insurgent) attacks,” one of them just said…
DOES THIS HURT THE US GOVT’S CASE THAT WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS IN THE AREA?
in defending their company before Congress, they may inadvertantly be giving war critics ammunition… no pun intended…
“Sole source award”.
Why couldn’t I get any of those in college?
Satterfield is protecting the contracters involved in extraordinary rendition I believe. He said it is a global problem, not just Iraq, regarding accountability via US domestic law and international law.
War criminals. The Administration is scared. They have a big problem brewing.
“sole source award” = no-bid contract
you’ve got to love this corporatespeak…
market research? who, when and how long?
he is a lier.
Blackwater is my vehicle for depression.
Boy, I bet Jan wants to smack that smirk out of Satterfield’s voice. He’s John Bolton without the white hair and mustache.
These guys are taking lying and stonewalling to new levels. Having watched all the previous hearings since the Dems took over, that’s saying a lot.
If a contract was let on an emergency basis to Blackwater, how did they find the time to do the comparative analysis?
And as noted, if Blackwater went from $3 million to $300 million, how did they get so capable so fast?
qualification? urgency?
Oh, I get it, war has no qualification and is a urgency to up and build that big embassy and protect all those diplomats at a cost of billions and will reach trillions!!
theWalrus @ 136
Their boss is the premiere liar. Don’t let the Ferragamos fool ya.
Hugh @ 133
bingo!
Reviewed by Procurement Executive of the Department of State who is an “independent” entity? When the Embassy was “stood” up (2004).
Waxman: Who approved it?
Head of Acquisition Activity, reviewed by Deputy Assistant Secretary at the time.
LS @ 141
and, who, may I ask, was that?
anne @ 136
like to see the state dept come up with this paper trail on the comparative analysis.
Is it me, or was the contract no-bid in 2004, but the analysis wasn’t done until 2005 or 2006? How did they know BW was going to be better if they didn’t do the audit until after the contract was bid?
Toby Wollin @ 138
Hum…Issa? was he on any of those committees?
rendition. slaughter. indefinite detention.
we have met the enemy. nd. it iz us.
theWalrus @ 93
Stop/ I am having flashbacks
Toby Wollin @ 141
Possibly Elizabeth Cheney, who became Dep.Sec.State for Near Eastern Affairs in 2004.
No “War” profiteering here!!! The dysfunction is so ripe, it reeks like a drunken bum who is servile to the alcohol which is killing him.
Blackwater profits, American soldiers die, and Exxon Mobile records record profits. American steel workers support Iraqi opposition to “Iraq Oil Law” aka “Exxon Mobile Iraq Immunity Rape Law,” and little is stated in MSM. Rape Iraq for Oil while Americans die. Does not seem very American to me!!!!
I love it when Waxman bitch-slaps Issa.
liz @ 140
Wow, i think you have something here! I hope that this chairman finds them in contempt of lying to congress.
Poor ISSA just got shut down… now he’s pouting….
theWalrus @ 122
There is your infamous trickle down theory in action.
Issa having a hissy fit. Waxman saying no to the brat.
6,000 attacks…
txlvn @ 152
Issa always is a sour puss! Give him a bone and kick him down the hall to be a good dog to BW.
LLG @ 145
What was Laurita Doan’s role in all of this?
Taxpayers are being raped just like the Iraqis…………
Toby Wollin @ 157
Boy, you guys are good! Hope waxman has a flashback…
New thread;
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…..x/#respond
You won’t change anyone’s mind here, LibertyLee: putting propaganda aside obvious facts isn’t going to be enough to fool anyone who isn’t already drinking the kool-aid. I will say, though. that I don’t mind you posting because it’s a good display of how weak and specious (not to mention utterly, sociopathically self-interested) wingnut “logic” arguments often are.
I love Henry!
I hate the State Department Jackals!
Waxman to Issa: “Your time is expired”
Issa: but but but I just wanted to ask have they seen the Move on Add?
James Joyce @ 149
When does the investigation of Feinsteins war profiteering start?
LibertyLee @ 125
What the heck is the implication that goes with the trailing ellipsis? That there are some things that need doing that it would be unethial/illegal/??? for the military to do?
LLG @ 127
Treason, how this adminstration fabricated intel to further the corporate oil agenda policy under the guise of a war on terror while using the US military to achieve its economic goals, to maintain America’s addiction to thier prooduct. Just like booze and butts. America just do not get it!!!!!
behindthefall @ 165
It’s time to fight the Global War on Dumbasses. I have been reading this thread and turning various shades of red(anger) and green (sick). I am sorry to say that Henry Waxman is not the guy to make anything happen to change this situation and this committee hearing is just another Democratic Weak-Tea Party, but if it so much as causes a ripple in the conscience of America it will have been worth it.
Waxman can go suck eggs for all anyone cares. Blackwater is Bushs private army and they’re not going anywhere. Well, except to your home town where they will be taking over policing duties from your local police. I’m sure they’ll have blanket immunity from all crimes commited by them against the ‘local population’. I’m also sure that right this very minute there is an executive order giving Blackwater federal marshall status. They will use this to put down dissent when the Republicans either steal and/or cancel the ‘08 election. We’re facists, we’er here, get used to it.
LLG @ 127
Well thank-you kindly for the linkage, given that even now we don’t know the full truth of Vietnam invasion atrocities I hope Waxman is inspiring the next generation of politicians, this’ll be a long fight. How long it will be until Iraqis forgive what was done could be somewhat longer.
the below link clearly shows, from Blackwater footage that Blackwater’s aircraft are mounted with heavy machine guns, belying the statement that BW helos are unarmed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6dyQtq1heI
Late for the train, but:
Richard “the Tool” Griffin spake thusly:
(emphasis added)
“Reviewed for consistency”– i.e., to make sure they’ve got their stories straight? Isn’t this kinda like witness tampering?
Doesn’t Griffin fit the profile for ideal corporate exec of, say, Enron?
Bob in HI