The GOP nomination race just got a whole lot more interesting. Via the NYTimes:
...The threat emerged from a group that broke away for separate discussions at a meeting Saturday in Salt Lake City of the Council for National Policy, a secretive conservative networking group. Participants said the smaller group included James C. Dobson of Focus on the Family, who is perhaps its most influential member; Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council; Richard A. Viguerie, the direct-mail pioneer; and dozens of other politically oriented conservative Christians.
Almost everyone present at the smaller group’s meeting expressed support for a written resolution stating that “if the Republican Party nominates a pro-abortion candidate we will consider running a third-party candidate,” participants said.
The participants said that the group chose the qualified term “consider” because it had not yet identified an alternative candidate, but that it was largely united in its plans to bolt the party if Mr. Giuliani, the former New York mayor, became the nominee....
Some players in the movement not present at the meeting may be open to Mr. Giuliani as the lesser of two evils. For example, the Christian Broadcast Network, founded by the Rev. Pat Robertson, has provided relatively generous coverage to Mr. Giuliani and his campaign.
I think we can officially say that Reagan's 11th commandment has been retired. So much for that whole judge not (in public) thing. But it looks like the various factions and egos and belief systems are showing some significant cracks in the public morality play that is the "Christian Coalition." It's been going on behind the scenes for years, but seeing it spill out into deliberate public media leaks is a refreshing change, and indicates a broader set of questions on the struggle for dominance and power -- and money control -- in the GOP. Let the games begin.
(Image from an illustration by Gustave Dore. Incredibly detailed work.)
PS -- Huge congratulations to John Amato and Crooks and Liars for surpassing the 115 million visitor mark. Kudos and great work! Love ya...
UPDATE: NickM in the comments points to Digby's post on the Salon take on all of this. This from Digby is exactly right:
My point is that a significant conservative constituency is actually threatening to run a third party candidate if they don't get their way and yet all we ever hear about is how the Democrats are being led down the path to perdition by the Move-On hippies who are pushing them to respond to the large majority of Americans who want the US to begin withdrawing from Iraq.
As I said in the comments in response to NickM, everything with these people is, first and foremost, about fundraising. How better to rattle the collection plate than a sham kabuki dance on "principle" that you never intend to really follow through but, instead, will end up settling back into the GOP lockstep line after the primaries, coffers full.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
GOOD MORNING!!
Thank heavens the games are finally happening in a stadium! (Rather than subrosa)
Good morning Christy!
Morning, Christy!
Yes, I read about that and chortled. Way to split the Republican vote, guys. Wide stance, anyone? ;-)
It would be interesting to see exactly how many of these hardliners there are–they wouldn’t be able to hide behind the notion of a moderate, broad basis party.
I suspect that before it got the a stage where Guiliani would be in a position to be ‘blackmailed’ (and I suspect that he wouldn’t capitulate, but would probably try to reach out more to the centre-ground to make up for lost numbers) that the GOP themselves would try to covertly stymie his candidacy in favor of someone more
appealing to the loony tunes Christians.
I think we are rapidly approaching that point where, to paraphrase Norman Mailer, we don’t have to attack the fortress anymore. All we have to do is surround it, make faces at the people inside and let them have nervous breakdowns and destroy themselves.
Pass the popcorn.
It’s a show. The religious right ain’t going nowhere - they’re just trying to squeeze the Republicans for more juice. See Digby’s take on this - especially her update.
Can’t Giuliani just pretend to be their type of Christian? That’s always worked for Bush.
Morning Christy,
Having successfully celebrated my 39th birthday for the seventh time, I’m ready to jump back into the fray.
The cast of characters also includes Gary Bauer, who unsuccessfully ran for President in 2000. I’d say he becomes the odds-on favorite to lead this ragtag bunch.
While I love that St. Ronnie’s 11th commandment has been broken, my concern is that there’s some fraction of people leaning back to the Democrats who might get drawn into a “family values” (cough cough) party/campaign.
Also appreciate Crooks and liars. Congratulations!
If only the Christian rights views were consistently pro-life. If their views were consistent they would support health care for all, living wages, equity in education. They would NOT support wars in Iraq or Iran which are not Pro-Life.
Being Pro fetus is a long way from being Pro-Life.
The satanists of the religious-right wingnuts are stuck with what they got. Of course, they have Alan Keyes. Oh, wait, he is not quite the right color.
Salon also carried this story
It’s good to confirm with a better source anything written in the New York Tims
http://www.salon.com/news/feat.....=whitelist
Ghouliani can always say that God told him to marry and divorce each time. That he was born-again everytime.
Kathleen @ 9
it isn’t even profetus.. it’s .misogyny
Supreme Court topic of the Diane Rehm show the first hour
http://wamu.org/programs/dr/
Nick at 6 — It’s always a show. But, in this case in particular, the Tony Perkins/James Dobson/Gary Bauer friction has been both real and show on various levels lately. Bauer has been sending out these weird little e-mails trying to show that he’s in Dobson’s corner, etc., because there have been a series of anti-Dobson leaks attributed to his camp and he’s been getting heat for it.
There is something simmering there — whether or not it is real or kabuki, though, is something we’ll have to wait to see. With these folks, it is always — ALWAYS — primarily about leveraging fundraising. Everything else takes a back seat.
Morning Christy. Funny that old Newt was hoping to have the religious right pony up for his presidential run - but 30 mil is hard to come by when all you want to do is tease the base to sell your book.
Sounds like things are getting interesting over there in Gooperville. It always was a fragile, unstable coalition between the big money conservatives and the social conservatives, since their core interests are diametrically opposed. It is not surprising that the “base” (the social conservative foot soldiers needed to win elections) would rebel when the big money conservatives (the generals who have always run things) decided to put their class interests first and back candidates unappealing to the social conservatives (Romney & Giuliani). Personally, I am going to stock up on popcorn. This could be fun to watch.
Good Morning Christy!
I can’t wait for a third party run from the right!
GiddyUp!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 15
OK, this really is worth getting out the popcorn. It’s not just that the religious right are spinning off from the Rethuglicans — it’s that they’re going after each other. I wouldn’t mind a cage fight with James Dobson and Gary Bauer.
Hee hee. Haw haw. Giggle, chortle, guffaw.
The fundies whuppin on Rudie…..
The mighty Base……CRACKING…..
woooHOOOOOO!!
Sell the house, Martha, I’ve died and gone to Heaven……
Viguerie must have real problems getting both of his personalities in bed at the same time.
He’s a principal of the American Freedom Agenda, as are Bob Barr and Bruce Fein are; they formed this organization to protest and unwind government actions they believe are unConstitutional.
And yet at the same time, he’s all for encroaching on the rights of more than 50% of the population and for encouraging theocrats in doing so.
What a freak.
I posted this on DK yesterday, in response to a midday openthread:
—————-
Christianists act on principle? Bullshit! (0 / 0)
No way the “religious” right abandons the Republicans, even if it is Rudy and all the things about him they may find anathema.
Why?
Because they’re about power, and not prinicple or policy or anything else. Power, raw and simple. In that way they’re sort of the ultimate distillation of the true, cynical heart of Republicanism. And they’re smart enough to realize that a third party approach would marginalize them and put them far away from the levers of power.
More likely, if given no choice but Rudy, is that they somehow marginalize him, and manipulate him to get their agenda advanced.
—————
Rayne @ 21
.
and he’s made a nice living at it, too:
I updated the post above to reflect the Digby post that NickM referenced and the ever-present collection plate in the Dobson repertoire.
Off topic:
May I suggest that you reinitiate that book delivery to all CongressCritters.
Only this time, deliver that little book known as the constitution. And highlight the pertinent sections that apply re; the seeming abdication of by Congress of it’s constitution perogatives.
May I suggest the yellow highlight pen to mark, key passages to make sure they read it.
The constitution hand delivered to each member of Congress, along with some balls.
under an assumed identity i’ve been getting email alerts from the american family association for the last year or so, ever since they went crazy about ford mortor company supporting the “homosexual agenda”. it’s been interesting to see what gets them worked up into action. last week their mailing concerned a membership poll, “would you vote for a presidential candidate who supported abortion and gay marriage”. it was obviously aimed at rudy and trying to drum up some sort of fake “statistics” they could used to try to brow-beat him and any other politician who thinks they can stray from the chosen path.
Kathleen @ 9
As some of us have been saying for a long time now, the Pro-lifers only care about the kid till he/she is born. After that, they don’t give a damn. The kid becomes more bodies for their war machine.
Interesting
http://www.informationclearing.....e18780.htm
You know something? Good for them. The Republican candidate is going to lose in 2008 anyway. There is no reason for the fundie whackjobs to support a (from their perspective) lesser-of-two-evils candidate who isn’t going to win regardless. If the left understood that, we wouldn’t have Bush in the WH today.
if I could ever bring myself to support an act of censorship, which I could not, I would dearly love to see “prolife” deleted from the lexicon.
I can’t think of any other single word that so completely epitomizes hypocrisy.
It’s always a pleasure to see the religious wingnuts come unglued. I await the day one or some of these idiots really lose it on a national platform. Now that will be fun to watch.
Maybe they a trying to pull a “Reverse MoveOn” having seen the reaction to the Sense of the Senate.
I’ll believe it when I see it. The Dobsons and Vigueries of the world are after power, and they know it doesn’t come from a quixotic 3rd-party bid. This is about leverage, pure and simple. They’re after something; whether it’s derailing Rudy, or trying to make him kiss their rings, or raising money, or something yet subtler I don’t understand, I don’t know. But I do know they’re not really going to run a third party.
Little OT,
This morning, did I just hear Newt say that Bill Clinton was the smartest politician around today? or, was that just a sexist slam on Hillary?
It is so hard these days without a scorecard…….
none @ 29
uh oh…..I feel a Ralph Nader debate coming on…..
twȝk @ 32
MoveBack.
yep, that’s them, awright.
oddmommy at 36 — LOLOLOLOL
oddmommy @ 36
707! MoveBack. good one.
Yes! If the goopers run a third candidate . . .
The leadership of the fundies may be cynical manipulators looking to raise a buck, but the flock is deadly serious about the issue of abortion. If Rudy is nominated, they will either bolt or sit it out. They will not engage in relativism and vote for the lesser of two evils. That is antithetical to their world view.
The Christian Coalition is neither Christian nor a Coalition.
Discuss.
old gold at 40 — This is the devil’s bargain that the GOP made with them in the first place, and one that has a bill that will come due in the next few years. There has been a simmering and ever-widening divide and coming conflict between the fundamentalist/religious fealty crowd in the GOP and those who style themselves the “fiscally responsible.” I hear that debate a LOT around here among conservatives of both stripes, and it has grown ever louder as time has marched forward with the Bush Administration.
The mounting pile of failures is increasing the pressure on the whole mess, and I see more and more tension mounting. If it blows before the 2008 election, I won’t be entirely shocked — but it is more likely to be driven by a wholesale loss in 2008 for the GOP — if that happens, then I really am buying popcorn stock, because it will be an ugly, vicious gutter fight to point the finger of blame on all sides.
It’s always been about the money with these people. Getting government to give it to them, and not folks who need it, fundraising based on an agenda of Fear (OMG! Hillary!) or Wingnut Welfare.
It always comes Back to the Benjamins.
Gee, has karma taken a bite outta Walmart? Walmart rolled out christmas toy sales early.
10/1/07″The price cuts also come after millions of toys bearing the “Made in China” label were recalled in recent months mainly due to unsafe levels of lead paint. Lead paint has been linked to health problems in children, including brain damage.
Wal-Mart has already asked its suppliers to resubmit testing documentation for the toys it sells in its stores and has hired independent laboratories…It is also looking to stock its shelves with more products made closer to home.”We have increased our orders with a couple of made-in-the- U.S. suppliers,” Phillips said, adding that those items, such as plastic cars and kitchen sets, should reach its stores in November.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/200....._toys_dc_1
Walmart was responsible for American industry moving to China. Well, Well, Well, it seems US regulations and oversight really are important to the US Consumer.
11/16/04…”Wal-Mart and China are a joint venture,” Gereffi replied. “And both are determined to dominate the U.S. economy as much as they can in a wide range of industries.”
This hand-in-glove partnership increases the squeeze on U.S.-based manufacturers to outsource or shut down. Privately, they report that Wal-Mart house brands, made in China, are undercutting their American-made products. Some add that Wal-Mart buyers “advise” and push them to move a certain share of their production abroad, up to 30 percent, and then periodically check to see whether American firms are meeting Wal-Mart’s quota for overseas production.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/.....shots.html
hmmm… the anti-choice crowd is getting frustrated with the Rs.
and the anti-war crowd (and pro-constitutional crowd) is getting frustrated with the Ds.
government approval levels are near all time lows.
not alot of happy citizens around here… i don’t think i like where i can see this going… no popcorn for me, thanks.
If the GoOPers field a 3rd party candidate, it’s going to be instructive to watch the race thru the view of 1992 and 2000 when Perot and Ralph Ego turned the election on a pin. The interesting thing is the numbers that the Fundies can turn out; and would the IRS all of a sudden “discover” politics being conducted in churches (Oh. My. God. There’s Gambling at Ricks, I’m shocked)
RockPaperScizzors
thank you so much for the link at the end of the last thread!
If ever there were a time for a third party the time is now.
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/63986/
Seymour Hersh: Bush ‘Has Accepted Ethnic Cleansing’ in Iraq
WE SURE ARE NOT HEARING MUCH ABOUT EDWARDS IN THE MSM…SOMEONE FEELS REALLY THREATENED BY HIM.
Elliott @ 47
Welcome!, I don’t know what I’d do without google:)
RockPaperScizzors @ 44
Lately when I watch tv I notice these PR (trying very hard too woo the public) type ads. Like Walmart #1 for getting health insurance ?!? There was another ad that was akin to Exxxon #1 for the environment, can’t remember what it was. But it’s completely fascinating in a stupifying way, watching these corps with bad raps trying to show themselves as being in the publics interest.
From the Salon link:
Meanwhile, on MSNBC’s Morning Joe this morning, Ron Silver, billed as “Giuliani’s Adviser,” was going on and on about Rudy, saying 9/11 made Rudy the ideal candidate to be president.
I don’t understand why the Fundies are complaining, they’ve gotten the SC justices they’ve always wanted & promises from Rudy to keep em coming.
old gold @ 40 They will not engage in relativism and vote for the lesser of two evils. That is antithetical to their world view.
Their weakness, our strength.
none @ 29
Maybe there really are consequences for having foisted Bush on the country after all.
Diane @ 52
It’s hard when you want to bring on the big R.
Incidently, I went to a library book sale the other day, and I was completely offended that all the LeHaye books took up most of “SF”. Now I suspect that is cause I got there late and all the good books were taken, but still . . .
OT - just want to make sure that everyone knows that tomorrow Erik Prince, chairman of Blackwater USA, is scheduled to testify before the house oversight committee tomorrow AND Jack Goldsmith (The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration) is scheduled to testify before the SJC… at the same time (10 am)! more here.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/20062.html
link to story on the demise of the snakehandlers.
And here I thought Pat Buchanon was going to save the day. He combusted early.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 42
Christy - Help me out, please - I can’t get my head around a group of people who seem ready to “throw it all away” because they might end up with a candidate who they see as being pro-abortion and/or pro-gay. Is this really some sort of “hey, guys, remember who brung you to the dance” sort of message where they feel the RNC is going to either marginalize Rudy - or get him to “make the right noises” (which at this point, I doubt that Conservatives will actually believe - how many times do they have to be beaten in the head with news that the Republicans despise them but feel it’s ok to use them)? Or, are they being really strategic - have they found someone who they think can beat Rudy…AND Hillary? Or, take the votes of people who are uncomfortable with Hillary and Rudy in enough numbers to bring the election to a stalemate? Just trying to think through the logic (whatever it is) here.
mui @ 55
at least they were in the science fiction section!
Diane @ 52
That would be the SC that just let stand a New York court ruling upholding a state law that forces religious-based social service agencies to subsidize contraceptives as part of prescription drug coverage they offer employees.
My prayers may be answered yet. A new 3rd party from the Christian right! It could only get better if they were well funded and organized. Then with everything going their way they might wind up with 10% of the vote! Then perhaps we could get politicians that think the End of the World is a bad idea. At least Brownback will have a home when Rude Boy gets nominated.
Rayne @ 21
Politics do, indeed, make strange bedfellows.
selise @ 56
that’s at the top of the recommended list, thanks selise!
I like popcorn as much as the next person, but here’s the downside to a Republican implosion. The ‘moderates’ who were the backbone of the country club clique will bring themselves (and their money) to the Democrats, who will be only to happpy to welcome them at the expense of the progressive wing of the party. This will make the Democratic party a conservative formation without the nuttiness that characterizes the goopers. This means, among other things, no significant alteration in our foreign policy stance short of it being forced upon us by military defeat, and no serious attack on the deteriorating income distribution. In other words, more of the same, but with a bit more legality.
The good news is that by moving the Overton window leftward, it means we can push for reforms, instead of just holding fingers in the dike to prevent disaster.
I find it interesting that they aren’t getting behind Huckabee.
Toby Wollin @ 59
Fred Thompson?
*insert involuntary shudders here*
Toby at 59 — It’s a bit of the forcing of the hand, tied into a fundraising pitch to their supporters, I would suspect. But I think that old gold also has it right in terms of where a lot of the rank and file stand — they will not vote for someone that they feel is not morally worthy, because in their minds it means the damnation of their eternal soul to do so. Logic isn’t the key factor for them, it is faith — and they will not vote for a candidate in whom they do not have faith. They will sit it out — and both the RNC and the Christian Coalition leadership know that — hence the pre-primary dance to jockey for whatever advantage can be gained before an actual election happens.
If the Coalition leadership can’t turn out the vote, they lose stature and power — and access to money — from the GOP. If they do turn them out, but in a third-party bid, the GOP loses sure thing voters in droves. There is a LOT of fear swirling around there, and the question is how do we leverage that for our own agenda’s advantage?
The Bush Administration, through Rove and his ilk, sold them a false bill of goods, but kept them in line with government money hand-outs in the form of faith based initiatives. As that era winds down, they have to find a new method of bribery — and they have, thus far, come up a bit empty.
mui @ 53
I agree. Politics is the art of compromise. When your instructions come from God, you can forget the artsy-fartsy.
Elliott @ 60
As opposed to religion & ethics or some other such category. Hmm you’re right. But still, I think the LeGuins,the Herberts et al deserves a world better than to be classified along with *cough* Lehaye. Of course, librarians are supposed to [edit] NOT BEpolitically judgmental, exercise superhuman restraint in not drawing horns on Russert, excising text and all that.
Heh. Maybe they don’t want Armageddon after all.
LS @ 66
I think you’ve just put your finger on it, LS. Kind of gives the game away, doesn’t it?
Professor Foland @ 72
Horrors, Clinton said good things about Huckabee the other day on MtP.
KestrelBrighteyes @ 67
is there such a thing as a voluntary shudder?
While hesitating to take Richard Viguerie at face value, I will say that he has been talking about this stuff for some time now. I remember him talking on Thom Hartmann’s show several months ago about how the republicans needed to stop looking for their “next Reagan” and to start looking for their “next Goldwater.” I took this to mean that he was conceding ‘08 in order to rebuild their “brand” and position for next election.
That’s not a bad strategy for the republicans on the face of it, as they have various means of policing the left even when they are out of office, including media, the federal reserve, the security apparatus, and lots and lots of money. They destroyed Carter through these means to set the stage for Reagan and had Clinton pushing their agenda for much of his presidency.
Viguerie’s the guy who built the vaunted “ground game” of the right so he may know a thing of two.
mui @ 70
laughing
LS @ 66
I agree
Maybe they have realized that their deal was with the…..d
Maybe they have realized that they were used…
Maybe they have realized that Abramoff referred to them as whackos…
Maybe they have realized that the party they have supported has methodically and repeatedly broken all of the 10 commandments…
Maybe they have realized…
Interesting that their new “revelation” about who to support happened “after” Dicky gave his talk about more war…..
Just thoughts…
So Many Right-Wing Christians So Few Lions
right before the quote pulled from Digby, she says:
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm….
Digby says threatening to bolt to a 3rd Party is an effective way to try to use leverage on a major political party that depends on your votes…
doesn’t that come close to violating the axiom of automatic support for the Least Worst?
Maybe they’ve changed beverages.
Kathleen @ 77
Did you hear Big Dawg say that Huckabee was “very conservative but he’s not mad about it”?
mui @ 50
Everyday Low Wages:
The Hidden Price We All Pay For Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart’s Labor Record
CONGRESSMAN GEORGE MILLER
Democratic Staff of the Committee on Education and the Workforce
U.S. House of Representatives
16feb04
http://www.mindfully.org/Indus.....6feb04.htm
The Democratic Staff of the Committee on Education and the Workforce estimates that one 200-person Wal-Mart store may result in a cost to federal taxpayers of $420,750 per year – about $2,103 per employee. Specifically, the low wages result in the following additional public costs being passed along to taxpayers:
$36,000 a year for free and reduced lunches for just 50 qualifying Wal-Mart families.
$42,000 a year for Section 8 housing assistance, assuming 3 percent of the store employees qualify for such assistance, at $6,700 per family.
$125,000 a year for federal tax credits and deductions for low-income families, assuming 50 employees are heads of household with a child and 50 are married with two children.
$100,000 a year for the additional Title I expenses, assuming 50 Wal-Mart families qualify with an average of 2 children.
$108,000 a year for the additional federal health care costs of moving into state children’s health insurance programs (S-CHIP), assuming 30 employees with an average of two children qualify.
$9,750 a year for the additional costs for low income energy assistance.
Kathleen @ 77
because he is really running for the Senate and not available
maybe the fundies will apply the voltage and try to shock some life back into poor old brain dead McCain. He may support the killing of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, but he always has been a staunch supporter of the zygote.
Then again, there is that little matter of supporting stem cell research, and not the federal boy-girl marriage thingie…
tsk tsk. What is a fundie to do….?
Elliott @ 60
That’s where old L. Ron got his start, too. There’s no end to what any single human will choose to believe, given time and inclination. That is, for good or for ill, the founding concept of the new world in the Americas, that all people should be free to believe what they want. The upside is freedom of thought. The downside is the basic inclination of humans to make shit up and then capitalize on it.
Knut Wicksell @ 65
That sounds logical to me. The Dem moderates are already Republican in their votes and would have to the big money donors than all the noisy lefties.
Well with the IRS cracking down on political activities by entities with non-profit status, I think this raises some interesting questions.
If these religious leaders are threatening to “leave” the Republican Party, then aren’t they admitting that they currently are a part of the Republican Party?
Therefore donations to the groups headed by these “leaders” should not be tax deductible.
(I realize in practice, they’re only looking at political activities that help Democrats, but let’s argue what they say, not what they do).
They could claim to be focusing on the issue of abortion, but why don’t they make a similar threat to the Democratic Party? There certainly are anti-choice Democrats out there, and I’m willing to bet these religious leaders don’t support them — illuminating the fact that they are not actually focused on their supposed single-interest.
OT: Om Mani Padme Hum
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pag....._id=484903
Elliott @ 76
Yes library school question: How does one Dewey Decimal a dripping piece of dogpile like Dinesh D’Souza or Ann Coulter’s works. *cough* political science *cough* *hack* *spew*
RockPaperScizzors @ 83
Luv the way Republikans believe in a federally subsidized work force.
Why Clinton is Culpable
Iraq’s WMD Myth
By ANDREW COCKBURN
A former senior UN diplomat has revealed to me details of how, just over 10 years ago, the Clinton administration deliberately sabotaged UN weapons inspections in Iraq.
American officials were fearful that Iraq would be officially certified as weapons-free, a development that was seen as a political liability for Bill Clinton. Thus the stage was set for the manufacture of the Iraqi WMD myth as the excuse for George Bush’s catastrophic invasion of Iraq.
It was March 1997. For six years the UN inspectors had been probing the secrets of Saddam’s weapons programs, in the process destroying huge quantities of chemical munitions and other production facilities. To enforce Saddam’s cooperation, Iraq was subject to crushing sanctions.
http://www.counterpunch.org/andrew09292007.html
Weapons inspector Scott Ritter wrote about Clintons involvement in undermining the UN inspections in “Iraq Confidential”
http://books.google.com/books?.....p;dq=scott ritter Iraq confidential&sig=D1wmJtQAvugWK-AKUmpgAxF0_8A
and yes, OT, but still of note:
“The Supreme Court on Monday declined to enter a church-state dispute over whether some religious organizations can be forced to pay for workers’ birth-control health insurance benefits, a growing trend in the states.
The court let stand a New York court ruling upholding a state law that forces religious-based social service agencies to subsidize contraceptives as part of prescription drug coverage they offer employees.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200.....tives_suit
selise @ 45