<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Itching For Another Fight?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:58:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarktheSpark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006277</link>
		<dc:creator>MarktheSpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well if, as the story says, the propaganda rollout now is like that of fall ‘02, then the next war of aggression is undoubtedly scheduled for spring, in hopes of influencing the ‘08 elections the way DeLay’s corrupt toadies made huge gains in ‘02. Classic KKKarl Rove, these people learn nothing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, lack of any opposition party, in fact Demo. enabling, means the attack will go ahead. “We the people” have no voice anymore, &amp; can’t stop it. As everyone above notes SHillary &amp; the Demo hierarchy care far more for Commander Codpiece and their A*P*C sponsors than for the voters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Expect the price of oil to skyrocket when Iran &amp; Venezuela cut off our addicted nation. And the Iraqis likely to pair up w/ their Shi’ite brethren &amp; attack the invaders more fiercely.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our leadership is (a) delusional/ (b) cynical beyond belief, but expects that they’ll profit financially. (a)’s most ReThugs, with the “Gott Mit Uns” motto their SS Brethren wore on belt-buckles in WWII/ (b)’s the Demo. “leadership” &amp; elected officials, incl. “antiwar” folks like Jim (”F**k MoveOn”) Webb &amp; Carl (”I love Holy Joe”) Levin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, a permanent war economy, outsourcing all the manufacturing, destroying union jobs &amp; stealing the treasury blind (say bye-bye to your Social Security, boomers, Grover Norquist will get his wish after all!) do not promise a bright future for most of us.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if, as the story says, the propaganda rollout now is like that of fall ‘02, then the next war of aggression is undoubtedly scheduled for spring, in hopes of influencing the ‘08 elections the way DeLay’s corrupt toadies made huge gains in ‘02. Classic KKKarl Rove, these people learn nothing.</p>
<p>Of course, lack of any opposition party, in fact Demo. enabling, means the attack will go ahead. “We the people” have no voice anymore, &amp; can’t stop it. As everyone above notes SHillary &amp; the Demo hierarchy care far more for Commander Codpiece and their A*P*C sponsors than for the voters.</p>
<p>Expect the price of oil to skyrocket when Iran &amp; Venezuela cut off our addicted nation. And the Iraqis likely to pair up w/ their Shi’ite brethren &amp; attack the invaders more fiercely.</p>
<p>Our leadership is (a) delusional/ (b) cynical beyond belief, but expects that they’ll profit financially. (a)’s most ReThugs, with the “Gott Mit Uns” motto their SS Brethren wore on belt-buckles in WWII/ (b)’s the Demo. “leadership” &amp; elected officials, incl. “antiwar” folks like Jim (”F**k MoveOn”) Webb &amp; Carl (”I love Holy Joe”) Levin.</p>
<p>Still, a permanent war economy, outsourcing all the manufacturing, destroying union jobs &amp; stealing the treasury blind (say bye-bye to your Social Security, boomers, Grover Norquist will get his wish after all!) do not promise a bright future for most of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodiddley</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006239</link>
		<dc:creator>bodiddley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006239</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How about redress of intolerable insults to the ethnic Germans in Sudentenland? Wouldn’t that be an even better reason for strikes against Iran?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well maybe not better but just as good, surely.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about redress of intolerable insults to the ethnic Germans in Sudentenland? Wouldn’t that be an even better reason for strikes against Iran?</p>
<p>Well maybe not better but just as good, surely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006192</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My comment here is intended to point out why the top two candidates in the primaries are just unbelievably lame, considering how so many of us want to end our warmaking in the middle east:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton voted to authorize war with Iraq, back in 2002.  Now, she’s voted for war against Iran in 2007.  By voting for Kyle/Lieberman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Barack Obama was absent from the Kyle/Lieberman vote.  Good lord, that was an important vote! His absence effectively puts him in favor of war on Iran, too, no matter what he might say about it later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Harry Reid also voted in favor of the Kyle/Lieberman amendment. With leaders like these…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why in the world can’t we sway these people? I hope in some small way my comments encourage others to support a different frontrunner than Clinton or Obama.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment here is intended to point out why the top two candidates in the primaries are just unbelievably lame, considering how so many of us want to end our warmaking in the middle east:</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton voted to authorize war with Iraq, back in 2002.  Now, she’s voted for war against Iran in 2007.  By voting for Kyle/Lieberman.</p>
<p>Barack Obama was absent from the Kyle/Lieberman vote.  Good lord, that was an important vote! His absence effectively puts him in favor of war on Iran, too, no matter what he might say about it later.</p>
<p>Harry Reid also voted in favor of the Kyle/Lieberman amendment. With leaders like these…</p>
<p>Why in the world can’t we sway these people? I hope in some small way my comments encourage others to support a different frontrunner than Clinton or Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheckingIn</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006003</link>
		<dc:creator>CheckingIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1006003</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I truly hope that this site is not going to be censored about Israel, A*P*C and the substantial substantial influence it has over the Democratic Party, my supposed party…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If so, then democracy in the US is dead, because it means that we will never be able to discuss the real reasons behind why our congress members vote and act…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are killing this country, but suppressing dialogue and reason.  Shame Shame.//&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly hope that this site is not going to be censored about Israel, A*P*C and the substantial substantial influence it has over the Democratic Party, my supposed party…</p>
<p>If so, then democracy in the US is dead, because it means that we will never be able to discuss the real reasons behind why our congress members vote and act…</p>
<p>You are killing this country, but suppressing dialogue and reason.  Shame Shame.//</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheckingIn</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005993</link>
		<dc:creator>CheckingIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005993</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s not just Hillary, but the rest of the war-mongering Israel-firster DEMOCRATS…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It makes me ill seeing what is happening with the Democratic Party — out hawking the republicans.  Seems Wexler is taking over AIPAC Harman’s position &lt;i&gt;[after she’s been outed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/doj-congress/&quot;&gt;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c.....-congress/&lt;/a&gt; ]&lt;/i&gt;, hyping up the fear and rhetoric, and covering Israel’s == PRE-EMPTIVE ATTACK ass == at the same time providing absolutely no evidence to the public whatsoever.  Unbelievable!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congress Throws Covert Israeli Attack on Syria Out Into the Open&lt;br /&gt;
Florida Rep. Robert Wexler: ‘This Is the World’s Worst-Kept Secret’ &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“…Democrat Robert Wexler from Florida introduced a resolution this week supporting Israel’s covert operation and backing the country’s right to defend itself “in the face of an imminent nuclear or military threat from Syria.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…A congressional source told the Forward that both the administration and Israel had expressed no opposition to having Congress play this role and that they did not ask lawmakers to abide by the rule of secrecy that both governments imposed on themselves. [Yeah get the Jewish Caucas to HYPE IT BOYS!!]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…According to Wexler, who is a strong backer of Israel and a member of the foreign affairs committee, &lt;b&gt;congressional support for the Israeli &lt;i&gt;[NOTE PREMPTIVE]&lt;/i&gt; attack is needed,&lt;/b&gt; since it will pose “an obvious contrast” to the lack of action on behalf of Congress when Israel attacked an Iraqi nuclear reactor near Baghdad in 1981, effectively putting an end to the Iraqi nuclear program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Wexler added that he is pushing forward the resolution, also, in order to make clear to Syria that it will have no support if it attempts to complain about Israel at the United Nations or any other international forum.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;[Wexler now espousing Israel foreign policy from the floor of Congress now?]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to Wexler, the Israeli operation “has an important positive impact on America” since Israel has “proactively negated what is seen as a Syrian nuclear effort.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forward.com/articles/11715/&quot;&gt;http://www.forward.com/articles/11715/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WAKE THE HELL UP PEOPLE!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not just Hillary, but the rest of the war-mongering Israel-firster DEMOCRATS…</p>
<p>It makes me ill seeing what is happening with the Democratic Party — out hawking the republicans.  Seems Wexler is taking over AIPAC Harman’s position <i>[after she’s been outed <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/doj-congress/">http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c.....-congress/</a> ]</i>, hyping up the fear and rhetoric, and covering Israel’s == PRE-EMPTIVE ATTACK ass == at the same time providing absolutely no evidence to the public whatsoever.  Unbelievable!</p>
<blockquote><p>Congress Throws Covert Israeli Attack on Syria Out Into the Open<br />
Florida Rep. Robert Wexler: ‘This Is the World’s Worst-Kept Secret’ </p>
<p>“…Democrat Robert Wexler from Florida introduced a resolution this week supporting Israel’s covert operation and backing the country’s right to defend itself “in the face of an imminent nuclear or military threat from Syria.”</p>
<p>…A congressional source told the Forward that both the administration and Israel had expressed no opposition to having Congress play this role and that they did not ask lawmakers to abide by the rule of secrecy that both governments imposed on themselves. [Yeah get the Jewish Caucas to HYPE IT BOYS!!]</p>
<p>…According to Wexler, who is a strong backer of Israel and a member of the foreign affairs committee, <b>congressional support for the Israeli <i>[NOTE PREMPTIVE]</i> attack is needed,</b> since it will pose “an obvious contrast” to the lack of action on behalf of Congress when Israel attacked an Iraqi nuclear reactor near Baghdad in 1981, effectively putting an end to the Iraqi nuclear program.</p>
<p><b>Wexler added that he is pushing forward the resolution, also, in order to make clear to Syria that it will have no support if it attempts to complain about Israel at the United Nations or any other international forum.</b> <i>[Wexler now espousing Israel foreign policy from the floor of Congress now?]</i></p>
<p>According to Wexler, the Israeli operation “has an important positive impact on America” since Israel has “proactively negated what is seen as a Syrian nuclear effort.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forward.com/articles/11715/">http://www.forward.com/articles/11715/</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>WAKE THE HELL UP PEOPLE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shootthatarrow&#62;&#62;&#62;</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005934</link>
		<dc:creator>shootthatarrow&#62;&#62;&#62;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005934</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone who still harbors ideas,thoughts or point of views here in late 2007 that whatever George and Dick do still in Iraq or intend to do to Iran is not now endorsed by the DC DEMS and the “leading DC DEM herself,Hillary Clinton, consider Lieberman/Kyl a heads-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton has been greenlighting Bush/Cheney Iraq stay,play and pay lead-ons and with her vote FOR Lieberman/Kyl she surely gave big notice where Hillary Clinton is on any Bush/Cheney Iran meddling or worse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And it will be worse. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DC DEMS are honoring the power/influence of ME tilt/slant money throw.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;American tilted/slanted money politics certainly are what fuel the likes of someone like Joe Lieberman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where was Hillary Clinton last year when Joe Lieberman could have been taken down by Ned Lamont?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where was Bill Clinton?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where were the DC DEMS?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where is Joe Lieberman now and what is he doing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has Hillary come out against Joe Lieberman at any point during 2007? Hillary Clinton has not been a outfront leader against Joe Lieberman in the U.S.Senate but now wants to be the next American President? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has Hillary ever rebuked or repudiated Joe Lieberman anytime during 2007?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where was any “new leadership of opposition” on Hillarys part by voting for Lieberman/Kyl?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lack of information,lack of prior record from which to judge,not “knowing” or just plain being stupidly ignorant are no longer the “playable excuses” they were for Hillary Clinton back there in 2002.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton clearly is sending signals that should she get to the WH as President she will be taking Bush/Cheney/Lieberman styled warmongering attitudes and aggression desires there with her.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now is the time for the light to shine on in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who is backing Hillary Clintons ME  More ME WarMake support and greenlighting?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who has put the money and sway on Hillary Clinton and what are the expected pay-outs and policy goals?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone who still thinks getting Hillary Clinton into the WH as President is going to undo,slow or truly alter what George Bush and Dick Cheney did or do is surely a victim of low information intake or some very convoluted wishful thinking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Look at Hillary Clintons record on Joe Lieberman,look at her warmongering,pro-occupation tilt for American ME policy and action takes.Look at Hillary Clintons record of votes,what she has said or done about Joe Liebermans poisonous/venom laced DC politics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not “knowing” here in late 2007 is no longer a valid or legitimate reason.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton is sending the signals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She is for more American WarMake in ME.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not less. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton  wants to stay in Iraq as the occupier. Hillary Clinton wants an invaded Iran. Hillary Clinton supports Joe Lieberman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where then are you? For more Bush/Cheney? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton is giving Bush/Cheney political cover by voting for Lieberman/Kyl and Hillary Clinton supports Joe Lieberman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is Hillary Clinton who you truly want in WH after Jan.2009?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who still harbors ideas,thoughts or point of views here in late 2007 that whatever George and Dick do still in Iraq or intend to do to Iran is not now endorsed by the DC DEMS and the “leading DC DEM herself,Hillary Clinton, consider Lieberman/Kyl a heads-up.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton has been greenlighting Bush/Cheney Iraq stay,play and pay lead-ons and with her vote FOR Lieberman/Kyl she surely gave big notice where Hillary Clinton is on any Bush/Cheney Iran meddling or worse.</p>
<p>And it will be worse. </p>
<p>The DC DEMS are honoring the power/influence of ME tilt/slant money throw.</p>
<p>American tilted/slanted money politics certainly are what fuel the likes of someone like Joe Lieberman.</p>
<p>Where was Hillary Clinton last year when Joe Lieberman could have been taken down by Ned Lamont?</p>
<p>Where was Bill Clinton?</p>
<p>Where were the DC DEMS?</p>
<p>Where is Joe Lieberman now and what is he doing?</p>
<p>Has Hillary come out against Joe Lieberman at any point during 2007? Hillary Clinton has not been a outfront leader against Joe Lieberman in the U.S.Senate but now wants to be the next American President? </p>
<p>Has Hillary ever rebuked or repudiated Joe Lieberman anytime during 2007?</p>
<p>Where was any “new leadership of opposition” on Hillarys part by voting for Lieberman/Kyl?</p>
<p>Lack of information,lack of prior record from which to judge,not “knowing” or just plain being stupidly ignorant are no longer the “playable excuses” they were for Hillary Clinton back there in 2002.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton clearly is sending signals that should she get to the WH as President she will be taking Bush/Cheney/Lieberman styled warmongering attitudes and aggression desires there with her.</p>
<p>Now is the time for the light to shine on in.</p>
<p>Who is backing Hillary Clintons ME  More ME WarMake support and greenlighting?</p>
<p>Who has put the money and sway on Hillary Clinton and what are the expected pay-outs and policy goals?</p>
<p>Anyone who still thinks getting Hillary Clinton into the WH as President is going to undo,slow or truly alter what George Bush and Dick Cheney did or do is surely a victim of low information intake or some very convoluted wishful thinking.</p>
<p>Look at Hillary Clintons record on Joe Lieberman,look at her warmongering,pro-occupation tilt for American ME policy and action takes.Look at Hillary Clintons record of votes,what she has said or done about Joe Liebermans poisonous/venom laced DC politics.</p>
<p>Not “knowing” here in late 2007 is no longer a valid or legitimate reason.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton is sending the signals.</p>
<p>She is for more American WarMake in ME.</p>
<p>Not less. </p>
<p>Hillary Clinton  wants to stay in Iraq as the occupier. Hillary Clinton wants an invaded Iran. Hillary Clinton supports Joe Lieberman.</p>
<p>Where then are you? For more Bush/Cheney? </p>
<p>Hillary Clinton is giving Bush/Cheney political cover by voting for Lieberman/Kyl and Hillary Clinton supports Joe Lieberman.</p>
<p>Is Hillary Clinton who you truly want in WH after Jan.2009?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheckingIn</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005911</link>
		<dc:creator>CheckingIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005911</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1005538&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;IntelVet @ 30&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1005506&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Laura Doty @ 3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is unlikely that Cheney and Bush are going to figure out how to redeem themselves in this lifetime, but we have got to do some serious work to redeem our country. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To redeem ourselves as a country, we must subject Cheney/Bush to the same process they subjected Saddam, with, possibly, the same result.  Let the law steer due process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To regain our status and credibility, we must emphasize the “rule of law” and that there are consequences to lying about facts to justify criminal intent, holding no “leader” above the law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally, I would like to see both hang after due process, but I can accept the results of a truly independent court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But remember: Pelosi said impeachment was absolutely, absolutely, and saying it again absolutely off the table…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the ‘rule of law’ == out the window…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1005538"><em>IntelVet @ 30</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-1005506"><em>Laura Doty @ 3</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>It is unlikely that Cheney and Bush are going to figure out how to redeem themselves in this lifetime, but we have got to do some serious work to redeem our country. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>To redeem ourselves as a country, we must subject Cheney/Bush to the same process they subjected Saddam, with, possibly, the same result.  Let the law steer due process.</p>
<p>To regain our status and credibility, we must emphasize the “rule of law” and that there are consequences to lying about facts to justify criminal intent, holding no “leader” above the law.</p>
<p>Personally, I would like to see both hang after due process, but I can accept the results of a truly independent court.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But remember: Pelosi said impeachment was absolutely, absolutely, and saying it again absolutely off the table…</p>
<p>So the ‘rule of law’ == out the window…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005902</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shoulda added, guys; we’re at the point that anyone who still supports Clinton, really hasn’t got much room to criticize bush, since there’s not a nickels worth of difference in their policies regarding Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   AND, dear hearts, Iraq trumps EVERYTHING.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoulda added, guys; we’re at the point that anyone who still supports Clinton, really hasn’t got much room to criticize bush, since there’s not a nickels worth of difference in their policies regarding Iraq.</p>
<p>   AND, dear hearts, Iraq trumps EVERYTHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005898</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005898</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m sorry, I lost the specific post, but someone asked one HELL of a good question on this thread about Hillary’s putative appointments:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Can’t you just see Joe Lieberman as Sec. of State?”   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    A dagger.  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m sorry, I lost the specific post, but someone asked one HELL of a good question on this thread about Hillary’s putative appointments:</p>
<p>“Can’t you just see Joe Lieberman as Sec. of State?”   </p>
<p>    A dagger.  :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheckingIn</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005896</link>
		<dc:creator>CheckingIn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/30/itching-for-another-fight/#comment-1005896</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1005549&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Waccamaw @ 41&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not familiar enough with the British press to know whether this is one of their rags or not but via Democratic Underground wrt war with Iran:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=484762&amp;in_page_id=1770&quot;&gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pag.....ge_id=1770&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Be sure to take a close look at the photo attached to the article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A middle of the road (often aimed at the woman reader) paper == However, not as low as the Murdoch “Sun” tho’../   Has some hit and misses on some political ‘exclusives’… Also Simon Walters has some street cred as he won a presigious press award == &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,,2043403,00.html&quot;&gt;http://media.guardian.co.uk/pr.....03,00.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, yeah - IT CAN BELIEVE IT!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1005549"><em>Waccamaw @ 41</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Not familiar enough with the British press to know whether this is one of their rags or not but via Democratic Underground wrt war with Iran:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=484762&amp;in_page_id=1770">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pag&#8230;..ge_id=1770</a></p>
<p>Be sure to take a close look at the photo attached to the article.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A middle of the road (often aimed at the woman reader) paper == However, not as low as the Murdoch “Sun” tho’../   Has some hit and misses on some political ‘exclusives’… Also Simon Walters has some street cred as he won a presigious press award == </p>
<p><a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,,2043403,00.html">http://media.guardian.co.uk/pr&#8230;..03,00.html</a></p>
<p>So, yeah &#8211; IT CAN BELIEVE IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
