I've just finished reading Dan Rather's complaint against CBS, Viacom et. al. and I have to say, it really got me going. There's never been anything quite like it, and it has the potential to lay bare the sleazy, compromised relationship between the White House and corporate media in a dramatic and oh-so-entertaining way.
Sidney Blumenthal seems to agree:
If the court accepts his suit, however, launching the adjudication of legal issues such as breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference with contract, it will set in motion an inexorable mechanism that will grind out answers to other questions as well. Then Rather's suit will become an extraordinary commission of inquiry into a major news organization's intimidation, complicity and corruption under the Bush administration. No congressional committee would be able to penetrate into the sanctum of any news organization to divulge its inner workings. But intent on vindicating his reputation, capable of financing an expensive legal challenge, and armed with the power of subpoena, Rather will charge his attorneys to interrogate news executives and perhaps administration officials under oath on a secret and sordid chapter of the Bush presidency.
In making his case, Rather will certainly establish beyond reasonable doubt that George W. Bush never completed his required service in the Texas Air National Guard. Moreover, Rather's suit will seek to demonstrate that the documents used in his "60 Minutes II" piece were not inauthentic and that he and his producers acted responsibly in presenting them and the information they contained -- and that that information is true. Indeed, no credible source has refuted the essential facts of the story.
The complaint reads like a potboiler, and throws into broad relief the way the GOP bullies and intimidates its enemies while its friends wallow in spin. If Rather can rip the lid off that at this critical juncture when the fourth estate has fallen down so badly just at the time we need them most, it may be the crowning achievement of his journalistic career.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
zed?
Yes, Dan.
Jane!
Hi Jane. I do hope that this case goes forward. Heard rumors that Rather plans to call GWB to testify. Now THAT will be something to see.
YAY JANE! You go Dan!
A Twofer!
Jane, (or anyone else) is the complaint available online?
Bush will be subpoened. He won’t respond, of course.
Discovery will be tampered with and/or not forthcoming or non-existent.
Somebody will squeal.
Rather probably already has something big or he wouldn’t be doing this, and maybe this will crack the nut.
Good on him! Go for it!
TexBetsy @ 4
If for no other reason, hearing someone who can speak with a real Texas accent going against the fraud.
Maybe after all of our worry and fretting Dan Rather will be the person that comes through for this democracy. What a coup!
I’ve always thought Dan Rather was set up. I smell me some Rove.
Good one, Jane!
I just got through reading the Blumenthal piece 15 minutes ago. That, plus FDL’s own piece by David Niewert, shows that there was serious fuckery going down. All thanks to Dan for not slinking off into retirement, but for bearding the lion in its lair instead. May he live long, and reveal more of the truth that will set us free!
Didn’t Dan always use to end his news broadcasts with the word “Courage!”? He’s got it, and he’ll need more of it! Is there any way for us to let him know of our enCOURAGEment?
Bob in HI
Why don’t we invite Dan here to have a chat?
Ok, whose got the contacts? Jane? Would Arianna lend a hand?
TexBetsy @ 4
Oh, don’t make the Decider unsheath his ’signing statement’ pen…You know, the one that when you tilt it just so Jeff Gannon’s thong ‘magically’ disappears…
;>)
darkblack @ 14
You are so bad. Good.
darkblack @ 14
Don’t you dare draw that image on your computer DB!
OT: Glenn Greenwald has more on Hillary’s shills (and potential future advisors):
See: http://www.salon.com/opinion/g.....index.html
From your lips to God’s ear, Sweet Jane.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again:
George Bush was too yellow to fight.
That’s mighty harsh. But I think that’s what needs to be said…..publicly, and often.
Ghostman
PDF - the complaint:
http://blogs.trb.com/news/poli.....can002.PDF
Go, Dan! If nothing else, it might save me dental bills from tooth-grinding every time I hear the wingnut talking point about how the document “looked like it was created in Microsoft Word,” the one piece of “evidence” that was conclusively proven false.
Just because the cheeto-eaters think Microsoft invented proportional type doesn’t make it true!
Valley Girl @ 7
Here’s a pdf of the complaint, hosted by the Wall Street Journal.
Thank you, Jane. I agree this has to be kept in the spotlight. That will be our responsible as the people seeking the truth and demanding sunshine on Bush’s record. We know they will do everything they can to destroy Rather. It worked in the past. But with the people behind him, a civil case may just work. It is amazing what people power can do!
hayduke @ 11
That’s what Blumenthal claims.
Bob in HI
Dan Rather saw a version of the Zapruder film on, like, November 23, 1963, from which he described stuff that didn’t appear in subsequent versions.
I support Rather completely. The GOP has hated this guy since he bested Richard Nixon way back. “No, sir, Mr. President. Are you?”
ahhhhhhhhhh jane
d’ya think so? dan is being painted now as an old kook - amazing innit - went from sugar to shit in nano-seconds…..
George W. Bush is a crook and a coward. And Dan Rather knows it.
Oh you just gotta love it. I used to watch Rather as a kid, every night, reporting from Vietnam. I’m glad he’s still in the trenches.
Mad Dogs @ 13
You might try going thru Mark Cuban. Cuban keeps a blog and is very active on his blog. Cuban now employs Rather.
Ghostman
I have no doubt that Rather will prevail.
I thought, at the time, that Rather would eventually go public, with devastating results to the powers that be.
It’s a wonderful irony on another level, too. Network news is so consumed with egotistical personalities as anchors (instead of just reading the effing news like they do on BBC), and now it looks to bite them in the ass.
Go Dan!
it’s going to be veryyyy interesting watching how this lawsuit plays out…. MSM solidly against him with their well-connected and high powered attorneys…..yes indeedy dan is in for a real ride!!
Peterr @ 22
thx much, Peterr.
And, Mad Dogs, I very much doubt that Rather would be willing to tip his hand by appearing on FDL or any blog prior to the court case.
Ghostman @ 19
Ghostman,
Many ducked Viet Nam.
Others got drafted.
Some, like me, volunteered.
I disrespect shrub.
But I know he isn’t alone.
If Bush is called- he may be forced to testify - the gooper surpreme court established that with Clinton..Sometimes it doesn’t take long for somethin that looked really good ta come back and bite ya in the ass.
now having had a laugh at this… c’mon legal types here… will this suit see the inside of a courtroom??
Bush being forced to testify under oath and being questioned about the TANG. (evil chuckle)
Ironic retribution on a grand scale.
The World Famous- “case of the pepperoni blow job” is still makin news.
from Blumnethal’s piece:
rwcole @ 39
SPEW!
WTF?
Maybe sometime we’ll get the whole ugly fuckin story about Bush and the national guard.. There must be some out there who know it.
What really repulses me is the fact that George W. Bush used his father’s connections to go to the front of the line to join the reserves. How many “regular” guys tried this? And because of the huge wait, ended up dead grunts in ‘Nam? Disgusting.
Ghostman @ 30
Do you mean this place: blog maverick - the mark cuban weblog?
The current post there is all about his “Talk about a range of emotions and a humbling experience… as he’s hopping from foot to foot awaiting his appearance on “Dancing With The Stars”.
Are you sure this guy is all there? *g*
On a vaguely related note (news anchor is the connection), my local news radio station has in the past year or so unfortunately started having Fox News “journalists” on to comment a few times a day. I normally switch it off, but today I just had to listen to the train wreck.
So did you know that the Democratic leadership is being urged to stop the war by just never bringing any of the funding bills up for a vote, so it’ll run out of money? It must be true, Brit Hume said so, and he wouldn’t lie, right?
Feh. Time to write to them again and tell them I immediately switch stations whenever they have these propagandists on…
Oklahoma kiddo @ 26
What was the question?
I’ve only read the first couple of pages of the Complaint, and I’m already wondering why Mary Mapes didn’t join as a co-Plaintiff.
Jonathan @ 35
Whether drafted or volunteered, at least they showed up and went overseas. As to the ones that ran off to Canada, at least they don’t go strutting around about their so-called bravery; and they don’t deny that they ran off to canada.
I stand by my comment. It’s the way to attack the shadow of a man now in the WH. Sometimes, my beloved Democrats are just too sensitive over hurting someone’s feelings. Jonathon, I imagine there were plenty of times when you were scared shitless….quite understandable. But, at least you showed up.
Ghostman
1969
got drafted — sorry, bad luck
got a deferment — good for you
had an in with the draft board — what a dude
volunteered for the Nam — well, good fucking luck
4F — hey, great
For once in his selfish, spoiled and miserable existance, George W. Bush, thanks to Rather, may be exposed for exactly what he is. Oh… you’re going to get your legacy all right, Mr. Prez.
TexBetsy @ 46
Nixon to Rather: “Are you running for something?”
So if deposed- would Clusterfuck tell the truth or lie? and if he lies under oath– is it impeachment time?
Man, it’s a doozy. They allegedly created an independent “panel” to investigate the authenticity of the documents, etc., all hand-picked Busheviks…they allegedly never met with the expert about the authenticity, who went on to say that the documents appeared authentic and that the events surely happened…
Heh.
Valley Girl @ 34
He’s already appeared on Larry King sans attorneys, so why not here?
Dan appears to be mounting a PR campaign to some extent and an FDL chat might fit right in.
rwcole @ 52
A), lie, and
B) yes.
TexBetsy @ 46
It was at a tense news conference. Prez. Nixon asked Rather if “he was running for anything”.
Watch Obama live stream at New York City rally:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/nyclive
Oklahoma kiddo @ 43
Personally, if I had been an American male of military age during the Vietnam era, I would have done whatever it took to avoid military service. It was a bad, ugly, pointless war.
What I do have trouble with is, given that past, GW’s enthusiasm for sending other people to fight bad, ugly, pointless wars.
Oh, yea! I’ve always loved tortious interference with contract - even had a chance to throw that one around once!
Go, Dan!
Mad Dogs @ 54
Yes, but Larry King is no attorney, either. Christy, Looseheadprop, and others around here are — and that’s a big, big difference.
rwcole @ 52
So if deposed- would Clusterfuck tell the truth or lie? and if he lies under oath– is it impeachment time?
hasn’t this question come up before? with some other president? Damn, what was that guy’s name…?
RonD @ 51
There was instant shock then a slow simmering seethe to this very day. All on national TV.
Sha at 59
Are you a lawyer?
Glad you are bringing more attention to this Jane. It’s true this case may blow the lid off of how the MSM not only goes along with special interest but fires anyone who challenges those special interest.
Let’s hope that Dan Rather is able to let the light into the darkest recesses of the MSM and show the world just who they really answer to.
Nixon had a tactic he used to try and unsettle reporters known to be hostile. He would call on them at a presser, then ask them something they couldn’t possibly be ready for, before letting them ask their question. Rather drilled it right back at him. They’ve hated him ever since.
Aside from everything else that would be grrrrreat about this, I have a personal stake in it. Scuse me, while I kiss the sky!
Ghostman @ 48
And they don’t talk to real soldiers about how they really wish they could go fight in Iraq, but they’re too old now!
AP - Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday he’s inclined to approve an Army proposal to spend nearly $3 billion extra to accelerate the expansion of its active-duty force.
Mad Dogs @ 44
Yes, that’s the one. As to Cuban…sigh. He’s something of a “boy genius” who sold his internet invention (I think it was streaming audio?) to…..Yahoo?….for like, a Billion dollars. true! I think his old company was named Broadcast.com….I think.
Ghostman
My congresscritter, Brian, voted in favor of letting kids die rather than having the govt. pay for their health insurance. His argument is that he ain’t gonna let no illegal immigrants get free health care, He is also letting me know that he is the co-sponsor of a bill making illegal immigration a felony- among other things.
Brave, brave Sir Brian- Dildo!
The other thing that is so prevalent about this case, for example, and Congress, etc., is their incredible “fear” of the administration. What the heck is causing the fear? There must be some kind of blackmail going on or something…what else could it be? It cannot be money. It cannot be publicity. It must be rooted in something else.
Judy Woodruff on the NewsHour interviewing Steny Hoyer. She does a pretty good imitation of Dana Perino. “Are you going to give the President what he needs to support the troops?” Hoyer actually comes across as quite reasonable in his criticisms of the war. There was a time when the NewsHour was on the cutting edge of news reporting. Now it veers between irrelevant and sad.
darkblack @ 14
Thanks for the no visual on that, DB!
Go Dan Rather!!
JayT, sent you an email. Thanks to the Firedogs for getting us in contact!
So begins chapter One of the current president’s legacy, “Dubya: The Inexplicable Rise and Inexorable Decline of the War Criminal Bush the Lesser”.
OT plea for a little help - this diary needs some recommendations.
Fini, who is doing incredible work for the Barry Welsh campaign, says:
we are announcing a telethon for Barry taking place on BlogTalkRadio this Sunday night hosted by ClammyC and ThereIsNoSpoon from Heading Left and DKos fame, Brian Keeler is gonna call in and so is Jane Hamsher and we are gathering other guests. We’re gonna have an auction of memorabilia and other items and more.
Joh
Would appreciate the help. thanks.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/27/155758/239
From Howie Kurtz, completely off the record , naturally:
In Georgetown, the chattering classes are nervous.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 26
What was that?
any idea on the time frame for this case? what happens next? what might we look forward to? are depositions public?
jayt @ 76
done!
Loo Hoo. @ 78
See a couple of comments above perhaps re:this ;0)
LS @ 71
fear of the tapped phone, the read mail, the surreptitious search, the camps out west, “enemy combatant” status, a military commission, blackwater, martial law, false-flag terror, faithless public officials, Gitmo, an oppo research campaign…
Fear is a rational reaction to this situation.
selise at 79
questions about non-violence
what to do if you are Viet Cong facing a U.S. propped-up government
what to do if you are russians facing Nazis in the spring of 1941
Oklahoma kiddo @ 68
He’s got an extra $3 billion?
I have high hopes but it sure feels like Dan’s gone from sixty minutes to sands through an hour glass..
Jane,
The good news is that, unless it’s in one of those districts where Gonzo installed a “loyal Bushie”, the judiciary can’t get its filthy fingers on this case. Booyah!
Wonder how many reserves and guard units are re-upping currently?
Loo Hoo. @ 84
He’s already got a military bigger than the rest of the world’s combined and he needs more?
Jonathan @ 83
As Gandhi, MLK, and Mandela proved, Civil Disobedience works! Let’s give it a try first…!!!
Twisted Martini @ 74
Hey Twisted - don’t think it got through:
foster7833 at yahoo dot com.
I don’t begrudge Bush for doing what he could to get out of Vietnam. Many, many people did.
But then his real character piles up: he doesn’t complete his service; he hides behind the military; he slanders people who actually served; and he uses the military as scapegoats for his failed policies.
I think LS@71 is on the right track. I think the press have been thoroughly punked via misuse of the national security apparatus, hiding behind the ‘uncovering contacts’ excuse, and this was the focus of the bedside bum rush on Ashcroft.
That being said… Rather now has nothing to lose. He can afford the lawyers. He’s got a wedge straight into the center of this (and I bet that Heyward d00d is going to be seen violating every journalistic principle before the end of this).
And I’m going to make popcorn.
Hi, pups!
If anybody cares, Mark Cuban is a bit, umm, quirky? Egotistical? Power-mad?
Here in San Antonio we know him as the owner of our in-state NBA rival, the Dallas Mavericks. I don’t recall what his company was, either, but it was something high-tech, internet-related, something like that.
He’s fairly young, maybe early ’40’s.
We love to hate him here, because since he’s owned the Mavs they’ve become dangerous to our continued NBA dynasty. *g*.
However, I went to a Spurs-Mavs game some years ago, and he was all over the Mavs section of the audience (we were sitting behind it), chatting with the Dallas fans, shaking hands, having a good time. Overall impression - energetic! I’d have to say he is, umm, not your ordinary rich guy.
selise- OT linky for you here.
CT,
do we wait like sheep for a takeover?
and then act like Ghandi?
The Rather case may provide a road map of how Bush has manipulated the media. In the case of CBS it was an FTC ruling that they badly needed that became the blackmail chip…threatening to deny a ruling unless CBS pulled an embarassing story is- well- embarassing- one would think that it might also be illegal.
tejanarusa @ 92
I’m a native of Dallas….I think you pretty much accurately describe him!
Ghostman
CTuttle @ 89
I have to agree with a caveat I once heard about that…non-violence works when you’re dealing with an adversary that cares about its public/international image. If it doesn’t - not so much. Viz. –Burma/Myanmar the last couple of days. Monks seemed to be succeeding…but the Myanmar generals have no interest in the world’s good opinion.
Not that I think we’ve reached that point here, yet.
god-i-wish-i-had-the-power-a_d-the-i_telle_t-to-take-these-_other-fu_kers-dow_
_ut-si__e-i-do_’t-i’_-glad-that-da_-rather-does
go-da_-i-hope-you-get-what-you-wa_t
(i_-_ase-you-_issed-it-a_d-are-wo_deri_g-why-i’_-posti_g-i_heiroglyphs-_y-key_oard-died_
Hi Loo Hoo!
Ghostman @ 96
Thanks, Ghostman!
dmac @ 98
707!
Civil Disobedience and Witnessing: There are small groups of citizens around the country who consistently meet a particular time and day often in front of a Federal Building or in front of their Rep’s office.
Some since before going into Afghanistan. Rain, shine, heat, freeze they are there - standing to witness.
In San Francisco, there is a group that’s been meeting in front of the Federal Building every Thursday at noon. Another in San Mateo on El Camino Real I think on Saturday (sorry don’t know times) in front of Tom Lantos’ office. Often these people have candlelight vigils. Their visual presence brings attention to thousands of people in their area.
Capt. Underpants at91
yeah
Jonathan @ 83
In situations like those, people die. Not really worth arguing about whether more or less if they’d been non-violent in their resistence - depends too much on how sick a fuck you’re facing.
But as soon as the resistance shoots back, the oppressors have the excuse to treat the whole of the populace as resistance (resistors don’t have uniforms so everyone’s suspect).
Non-violence works best when it is televised (or at least web-cammed). If it gets out to a global audience, you’ve won. Ghandi was very careful in planning his protests and made very sure the story would get out. Same with MLK.
Jonathan @ 94
No! We pro-actively head it off, like your participation in the DC march… We hold their feet to the fire…! All my congress critters have heard from me personally, I’ve only been disappointed by one vote from Akaka, (still waiting for an explanation…)other than that they’ve voted properly!!!
Dan Rather on Larry King
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVM7Wdkmogc
Have you seen these pieces that Rather did on independent military contractors in Iraq ?
http://www.blogmaverick.com/20.....-it-right/
Civil disobediance involves doin something illegal- gettin arrested- and goin to jail…You have to be willing to be beaten with batons, bitten by dogs, and gassed. It’s not exactly like holdin a candle.
I’m on a conference call with Hillary’s camp and Hillary will be on soon. No door to door, it social/family networking.
Both Wes Clark and Jerry McNearney have emailed me this afternoon all upset about Rush limpdic* calling some soldier phony.
What is this reverse moveon?
Hi Jonathan!
rwcole @ 107
I’m there…!!! *g*
Eureka Springs @ 109
<