<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Extremely Partisan Individuals&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:10:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Lightfoot</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-998756</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Lightfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-998756</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-996929&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RickinSF @ 45&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;One gets the impression that DiFi is in a diving bell or something. She’s not getting it. I’m being charitable, actually. She does get it and does not give a damn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder if she’s being coerced in some way. We all know that the Republicans don’t shrink from doing out in the open things so outrageous that it takes my breath away. Do any of us doubt that behind the scenes they are exerting pressure in ways even more reprehensible? Things on the order of “we’ll sic the IRS and the Justice Department on your husband and his business interests” or “no more fat no-bid conracts for him” or “we know things about you and your husband that would be profoundly embarrassing if leaked to the media” or even “we know where you live.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-996929"><em>RickinSF @ 45</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>One gets the impression that DiFi is in a diving bell or something. She’s not getting it. I’m being charitable, actually. She does get it and does not give a damn.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I wonder if she’s being coerced in some way. We all know that the Republicans don’t shrink from doing out in the open things so outrageous that it takes my breath away. Do any of us doubt that behind the scenes they are exerting pressure in ways even more reprehensible? Things on the order of “we’ll sic the IRS and the Justice Department on your husband and his business interests” or “no more fat no-bid conracts for him” or “we know things about you and your husband that would be profoundly embarrassing if leaked to the media” or even “we know where you live.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Lightfoot</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-998724</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Lightfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-998724</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-996903&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;LS @ 23&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ummmmm…like I said…I’m detached, because images like this and stories like this…make me c..r..a..z..y, ummmmm….I don’t like my tax $ being spent for this…like I said…I’m detached now, and floating above it….where I can see this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Navy_to_spend_600000_to_mask_0926.html&quot;&gt;http://rawstory.com//news/2007....._0926.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why not save the $600,000? Just use the building complex (the swastika-shaped one) to house all the apparatchiks of the Bush/Cheney  Military-Industrial-Corporate-MultiNational Combine (aka the Let’s Trash the Planet and Impoverish, Smear, and Disenfranchise Everyone but Filthy Rich Republicans Movement).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-996903"><em>LS @ 23</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Ummmmm…like I said…I’m detached, because images like this and stories like this…make me c..r..a..z..y, ummmmm….I don’t like my tax $ being spent for this…like I said…I’m detached now, and floating above it….where I can see this:</p>
<p><a href="http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Navy_to_spend_600000_to_mask_0926.html">http://rawstory.com//news/2007&#8230;.._0926.html</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Why not save the $600,000? Just use the building complex (the swastika-shaped one) to house all the apparatchiks of the Bush/Cheney  Military-Industrial-Corporate-MultiNational Combine (aka the Let’s Trash the Planet and Impoverish, Smear, and Disenfranchise Everyone but Filthy Rich Republicans Movement).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alecia</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-998579</link>
		<dc:creator>Alecia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-998579</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If some minority votes were to be suppressed, say before the primaries it would benefit HRC. Low informed minority voters may go the way of the other candidates, which is probably a worry for the DLC on behalf of HRC.&lt;br /&gt;
If there are already enough Democrat senators who will vote to help confirm Van Spakovsky, how Schumer votes, do not matter. What we need is an overwhelming no.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If some minority votes were to be suppressed, say before the primaries it would benefit HRC. Low informed minority voters may go the way of the other candidates, which is probably a worry for the DLC on behalf of HRC.<br />
If there are already enough Democrat senators who will vote to help confirm Van Spakovsky, how Schumer votes, do not matter. What we need is an overwhelming no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997518</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997518</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-996995&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eureka Springs @ 109&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-996994&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;dakine01 @ 108&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coultergiest WPITW for asking for her very own fatwa.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She should try eating solid foods.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She should be careful about eating fatwa…all that fat in it ya know. It might interfere with her bulimia or anorexia or whatever is addling her brain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, why isn’t she in jail? Don’t they have orange jumpsuits in her size?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-996995"><em>Eureka Springs @ 109</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-996994"><em>dakine01 @ 108</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Coultergiest WPITW for asking for her very own fatwa.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>She should try eating solid foods.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>She should be careful about eating fatwa…all that fat in it ya know. It might interfere with her bulimia or anorexia or whatever is addling her brain.</p>
<p>BTW, why isn’t she in jail? Don’t they have orange jumpsuits in her size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997432</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Lament from Georgia:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m not even sure there is a Saxby Chambliss. Every time I write him I get the same I-support-the-Administration letter back. When I look at his votes and his comments, they are parroted Talking Points &lt;em&gt;du jour&lt;/em&gt;. We have had some genuine Statesmen from Georgia in times past. Chambliss is more like a character from &lt;b&gt;Invasion of the Body Snatchers&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing out what a dufus he is…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Lament from Georgia:</b></p>
<p>I’m not even sure there is a Saxby Chambliss. Every time I write him I get the same I-support-the-Administration letter back. When I look at his votes and his comments, they are parroted Talking Points <em>du jour</em>. We have had some genuine Statesmen from Georgia in times past. Chambliss is more like a character from <b>Invasion of the Body Snatchers</b>. </p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out what a dufus he is…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporkovat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997256</link>
		<dc:creator>sporkovat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Loo Hoo … &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Careful here, we don’t want anyone drinking oily liquor and finally giving up the fight…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the point is, there is no fight between the (D) and the (R) branches of the War Party. It’s kabuki, for the rubes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is the neo-con, imperialist War Party that the fight should be against, don’t be fooled that the (D) sock puppet is on our side. … with a few isolated exceptions, like Feingold and Kuchinich, they are all just variations on a theme between Feinstein and Lieberman, some with exceptional coats of camouflage like Obama.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;see  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/09/23/feinstein/index.html&quot;&gt;http://www.salon.com/opinion/g.....index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loo Hoo … </p>
<blockquote><p>Careful here, we don’t want anyone drinking oily liquor and finally giving up the fight…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>the point is, there is no fight between the (D) and the (R) branches of the War Party. It’s kabuki, for the rubes.</p>
<p>it is the neo-con, imperialist War Party that the fight should be against, don’t be fooled that the (D) sock puppet is on our side. … with a few isolated exceptions, like Feingold and Kuchinich, they are all just variations on a theme between Feinstein and Lieberman, some with exceptional coats of camouflage like Obama.</p>
<p>see  <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/09/23/feinstein/index.html">http://www.salon.com/opinion/g&#8230;..index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobschacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997124</link>
		<dc:creator>bobschacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997124</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-996915&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @ 33&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;did i understand mcconnell correctly (during the hearing), that the only way he would “allow’ these nominations to come  up for a vote in the senate is if they were all voted on together in a block?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-996915"><em>selise @ 33</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>did i understand mcconnell correctly (during the hearing), that the only way he would “allow’ these nominations to come  up for a vote in the senate is if they were all voted on together in a block?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yup.</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W. Bartoo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997072</link>
		<dc:creator>David W. Bartoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997072</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good Evening all you feisty folk!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As some of you know,&lt;br /&gt;
there are times when I’m&lt;br /&gt;
reduced to simply making&lt;br /&gt;
faces about what is going on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The last few weeks have been&lt;br /&gt;
rough (!_!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I question the integrity of&lt;br /&gt;
much of the d. ‘leadership,’&lt;br /&gt;
(?_?) (if not their sense of&lt;br /&gt;
the world).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some days they actually make&lt;br /&gt;
me feel damned bitchy (d_b)!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, I think that they are&lt;br /&gt;
just in it for what they can&lt;br /&gt;
personally get ($_$).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it wink, wink (o_-)?&lt;br /&gt;
Or are they sleeping at&lt;br /&gt;
the switch (-_-)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wish they’d open their&lt;br /&gt;
eyes (o_o) and see the needs&lt;br /&gt;
of our times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, then I worry, when they&lt;br /&gt;
finally do so, will it be too&lt;br /&gt;
late (8_8)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh well …&lt;br /&gt;
This is now the democracy&lt;br /&gt;
that was (”_”).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it is just really&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to face the future&lt;br /&gt;
( _ ).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Evening all you feisty folk!</p>
<p>As some of you know,<br />
there are times when I’m<br />
reduced to simply making<br />
faces about what is going on.</p>
<p>The last few weeks have been<br />
rough (!_!).</p>
<p>I question the integrity of<br />
much of the d. ‘leadership,’<br />
(?_?) (if not their sense of<br />
the world).</p>
<p>Some days they actually make<br />
me feel damned bitchy (d_b)!</p>
<p>Then, I think that they are<br />
just in it for what they can<br />
personally get ($_$).</p>
<p>Is it wink, wink (o_-)?<br />
Or are they sleeping at<br />
the switch (-_-)?</p>
<p>I wish they’d open their<br />
eyes (o_o) and see the needs<br />
of our times.</p>
<p>But, then I worry, when they<br />
finally do so, will it be too<br />
late (8_8)?</p>
<p>Oh well …<br />
This is now the democracy<br />
that was (”_”).</p>
<p>Sometimes it is just really<br />
difficult to face the future<br />
( _ ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Wollin</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997049</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Wollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997049</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-997007&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Blub @ 121&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-997001&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;LS @ 115&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wait…we have coultergeist, and we have Ghouliani…that..folks is it.  We are being influenced by ghosts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;most rethugs are undead.  you think Cheneymort is actually alive?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think he would only qualify as “alive” if he was running his heart from his own power. As it is, what’s keeping his ticker going and going correctly runs on batteries, so he’s one Eveready Bunny away from, ahem, well, that great grouse shoot in the sky.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-997007"><em>Blub @ 121</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-997001"><em>LS @ 115</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Wait…we have coultergeist, and we have Ghouliani…that..folks is it.  We are being influenced by ghosts.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>most rethugs are undead.  you think Cheneymort is actually alive?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think he would only qualify as “alive” if he was running his heart from his own power. As it is, what’s keeping his ticker going and going correctly runs on batteries, so he’s one Eveready Bunny away from, ahem, well, that great grouse shoot in the sky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesgpc</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997045</link>
		<dc:creator>wesgpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/26/extremely-partisan-individuals/#comment-997045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Could the Blackwater masscre be the straw that broke the camels back? Could it galvanize Iraqi government to do cooperate and lead their country? I hope so:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;via Let Coaster:&lt;br /&gt;
Did Blackwater Undermine Bush’s Korea-Type Dreams?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Steve Soto&lt;br /&gt;
…the Blackwater massacre in Baghdad is causing a serious breach between the State Department and Central Command. State is trying to defend Blackwater by saying the Defense Department has more contracts with them than they do, which the Post points out is a lie. The Defense Department says that Blackwater is out of control, that the massacre portends more trouble for the United States than Abu Ghraib,… undermine Bush Administration efforts to sell the Iraqis on a long-term presence for American troops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fears of CENTCOM are being realized. …Maliki said he now doesn’t foresee a long term presence for American troops in Iraq, … parliament would have to approve such an agreement at a time when … civil war has been averted[,] and that the Bush Administration is overstating Iranian influence. …now it appears that State is no longer going to be shielding Blackwater from congressional inquiries, after al-Maliki met with Bush yesterday at the UN and probably indicated that the Iraqis will not be backing down on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/011076.php&quot;&gt;http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/011076.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the Blackwater masscre be the straw that broke the camels back? Could it galvanize Iraqi government to do cooperate and lead their country? I hope so:</p>
<p>via Let Coaster:<br />
Did Blackwater Undermine Bush’s Korea-Type Dreams?</p>
<p>by Steve Soto<br />
…the Blackwater massacre in Baghdad is causing a serious breach between the State Department and Central Command. State is trying to defend Blackwater by saying the Defense Department has more contracts with them than they do, which the Post points out is a lie. The Defense Department says that Blackwater is out of control, that the massacre portends more trouble for the United States than Abu Ghraib,… undermine Bush Administration efforts to sell the Iraqis on a long-term presence for American troops.</p>
<p>The fears of CENTCOM are being realized. …Maliki said he now doesn’t foresee a long term presence for American troops in Iraq, … parliament would have to approve such an agreement at a time when … civil war has been averted[,] and that the Bush Administration is overstating Iranian influence. …now it appears that State is no longer going to be shielding Blackwater from congressional inquiries, after al-Maliki met with Bush yesterday at the UN and probably indicated that the Iraqis will not be backing down on this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/011076.php">http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/011076.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
