Grossly EPU’d, but herein I march, pad pad pad.

Halllooooooo! Anyone home?

Kathleen?? U still out & about, you earlybird/nightowl you?

This is a small start, anyway – eh?

I’m gonna bookmark this thread, follow up up on the links, and pack some learnin’ into my headbone. Thank you much!

One question for you, and anyone else out there who wants to wade in:

Do you think Ahmadinejad’s bold visit to the U.S. might make it LESS likely our very own crew of nuttywarmongers will be able to summon the courage and substance to go forth with any plans to carry out another pre-emptive strike?

He is obnoxious, yeah, even odious, but mebbe that, plus packs of lies aren’t enuf to enable our own version of the beast to proceed with nefarious agenda(???). I do hope that is so.

Thank you again, Kath. for bringing all that info in to the Lake. Lots to chew on. Gotta git some coffee, but then some much-needed further education starts in this house.

Bye for now…

The national papers lean towards bashing the Iranian President. Today on the Diane Rehm show Barbara Slavin repeated the “cakewalk in Iraq” unsubstantiated claims about Iran. “IED’s, involvement in Syria, Lebanon, nuclear”weapons” program. Her willingness to repeat these unsubstantiated claims and the fact that most of the people who repeat these unsubstantiated claims go unchallenged does not look good for Iran.

CIA analyst Bill Christison, Zbigniew Brezinski, Scott Ritter and many more believe the “cakewalk” zealots will be successful at convincing the Bush administration to pre-emptively attack Iran. The majority of Americans sleepwalk it is as if the bomb all ready dropped in the U.S. There are millions of walking dead.

Lots of articles at Salon today in response to the Iran issue

Halllooooooo! Anyone home?

Kathleen?? U still out & about, you earlybird/nightowl you?

This is a small start, anyway – eh?

I’m gonna bookmark this thread, follow up up on the links, and pack some learnin’ into my headbone. Thank you much!

One question for you, and anyone else out there who wants to wade in:

Do you think Ahmadinejad’s bold visit to the U.S. might make it LESS likely our very own crew of nuttywarmongers will be able to summon the courage and substance to go forth with any plans to carry out another pre-emptive strike?

He is obnoxious, yeah, even odious, but mebbe that, plus packs of lies aren’t enuf to enable our own version of the beast to proceed with nefarious agenda(???). I do hope that is so.

Thank you again, Kath. for bringing all that info in to the Lake. Lots to chew on. Gotta git some coffee, but then some much-needed further education starts in this house.

Bye for now…

I don’t quite understand the Iranian President story from one basic point of view:

Why does a University invite a speaker if they just plan to insult him? They couldn’t wait until he spoke. They just insulted him outright in his introduction. Even Wm. F. Buckley shows has more courtesy than that when he laces his intros with snide comments. It may be silly for the Iranian President to walk into this, but I think the whole thing speaks volumes about Columbia University too. It it ain’t good.

At the Salon website you can read many articles responding to the Iranian Presidents address.

Also if you really want to widen your understanding on Iran, go to the New American Foundations website and read everything you can by Middle East Expert Flynt Leverett. Flynt quit the Bush administration based on his disagreement with the invasion of Iran and the Bush administrations foreign policy.

The Iaea’s (International Atomic Energy Agency) website is a treasure of information. The Director of the Iaea Mr. El Baradei (who told the world in early March of 2003 that the Niger Documents and other WMD intelligence was false). Keeps asking all sides to stop repeating the inflammatory language on this issue. Micheal Ledeen, Reuel Marc Gerecht, James Woolsey, Cheney, John Bolton, Bill Kristol, etc all refuse. They have been repeating unsubstantiated claims about Iran for years now.

i guess we’re all just trying to contribute in what ever ways we can. well, thanks again, your help is very much appreciated and i’m sure i’ll be asking more questions in the future *g*.

p.s. if there is a way for me to get cocoajt working, i’ll use it to rip video of interesting hearings, especially for committees that don’t maintain archives and that are not covered by c-span… (just like i try to do with audio now).

twȝk @ 319

double click down in the bottom right where it says the number of errors et.al and it’ll show you the specifics.

I think I had atleast 3 errors and that many warnings.

oh shoot, i just closed x-tools…. the SJC hearing has started, and i have audio hijack pro running now to rip audio. think i’d better wait until after the hearing, as i don’t know if my little g4 ibook can handle more than i already have open.

will pick this (cocoajt) back up later… thanks for the handholding through this bit!

No problem, the least I can do for you with all the great work you do!

double click down in the bottom right where it says the number of errors et.al and it’ll show you the specifics.

I think I had atleast 3 errors and that many warnings.

oh shoot, i just closed x-tools…. the SJC hearing has started, and i have audio hijack pro running now to rip audio. think i’d better wait until after the hearing, as i don’t know if my little g4 ibook can handle more than i already have open.

will pick this (cocoajt) back up later… thanks for the handholding through this bit!

build failed (1 error, 498 warnings)

twȝk – any suggestions? is this what happened to you?

double click down in the bottom right where it says the number of errors et.al and it’ll show you the specifics.

I think I had atleast 3 errors and that many warnings.

build failed (1 error, 498 warnings)

twȝk – any suggestions? is this what happened to you?