It's finally official: President Bush nominated the Judge Michael Mukasey today as AG. Looseheadprop did a fantastic post for us a couple of weeks ago on what she knew about him from the SDNY -- and the fact that he would represent a bit of a push from Sen. Chuck Schumer.
Glenn digs into Judge Mukasey's rulings on past cases, including the first World Trade Center bombing (a case, btw, in which a lawyer named Patrick Fitzgerald served as one of the prosecutors) and the Padilla case. The AP (via Guardian UK) has more background on his terrorism cases. And Anonymous Liberal also has some comments on judicial temperament questions for the nominee.
Andrew Cohen, of the WaPo's Bench Conference blog, says:
Mukasey may be conservative, but he clearly is not a craven ideologue like former Attorney General John Ashcroft, and he is certainly not the presidential lapdog that Alberto Gonzales always was. Mukasey thus is a perfect "caretaker" official who can begin (over his first and last 16 months in office) to restore moral and integrity to the Justice Department, ravaged by the skullduggery of his predecessor. Federal prosecutors know him and have reason to trust his judgment. As one New York lawyer told me yesterday, Mukasey is a "judge's judge." Former and current government attorneys, believing Mukasey to be tough, demanding and incisive, were said to be "elated" at the choice.
Here's hoping he brings that judicial temperament and objectivity to his new position -- here's hoping, in other words, that he makes the Justice Department once again a haven for career professionals and dedicated nonpartisan attorneys willing and able to exercise judgments independent from the political pressures brought to bear by the White House. Judge Mukasey has a daunting job ahead of him.
There is a lot of behind-the-scenes discussion about Mukasey and how unlikely he is to be able to make the wholesale changes in the DOJ that are needed to sweep out all the DOJ politicized dreck -- mostly because he'll be hamstrung by the political appointees put in at Rove's and others' behest, and by George Bush and Dick Cheney. We shall see if and when Mukasey is confirmed. But first, there must be a full and thorough confirmation process and this from Sen. Russ Feingold hits all the right notes with me:
The next Attorney General will take over a Justice Department plagued by scandal and low morale. As Attorney General and White House Counsel, Alberto Gonzales disregarded statutes, treaties and the Constitution to help this administration consolidate more and more power in the executive branch, and he misled Congress and the American people repeatedly. As a result, Congress and the public now lack confidence in the administration’s commitment to impartial justice....
To that end, Judge Mukasey must demonstrate that his first loyalty will be to the rule of law, not to the President. In particular I will be interested in his views on executive power and the need to protect the rights of law-abiding Americans while fighting al Qaeda and its affiliates aggressively. I will also expect Judge Mukasey to commit to reversing the course set by Alberto Gonzales by fully cooperating with ongoing congressional oversight of this administration’s misconduct, and by always telling Congress and the public the truth, starting with his confirmation hearings. Congress, the Department’s many committed employees, and the American people deserve nothing less from their Attorney General.
Amen. Much more as we get it, as we dig into prior opinions and other information on the Judge. In the meantime, especially for the SDNY legal beagles in the audience -- if you have some experience with Judge Mukasey, I would love to hear about it.
Interestingly, President Bush also announced that Peter Keisler, former Bork clerk, co-founder of the Federalist Society and DC Appeals Court bench nominee, will stay on as acting AG rather than Paul Clement, who had been rumored to be the choice. Clement is back in the Solicitor General spot -- and Keisler, whose nomination is still pending according to my search on it, will take his very conservative activist credentials to the helm of the DOJ until a new AG is confirmed. If this is some sort of pressure tactic for a speedy confirmation, it's a weird one, I have to say, considering the recent repudiation of Keisler and the Bush Administration by a big chunk of Keisler's staff in the civil appellate division.
Would LOVE to know the back story on this. May just be a huge case load on Clement's appeals docket plate for the upcoming court term, but what it screams is a sop to wingnuttia for the loss of the Olson nomination.
Login Here
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
zed
I just hope they ask him if he’ll enforce contempt papers on Rove et al, ans deliver the subpoenaed papers and emails that have been withheld.
Mr. Mukasey’s handling of a case that involved abortion could come up in a confirmation hearing. In the 1994 case, Mr. Mukasey denied political asylum to a Chinese man who said he had fled to the United States after being persecuted for violating China’s forced abortion policies. The man said his wife had been forced to have an abortion but he said he expected to be severely punished for helping her try to defy the single-child policy.
Christy! Just a drive-by, then back to housekeeping.
It’s looking like Mucousy will be greeted as warmly as Harriet Meiers.
Looking forward to the GOP internal bloodletting.
It’s like watching a cockfight except you don’t feel bad.
-GSD
Interestinger and interestinger…
peter kleiser is the carrot for the wingers - tho wingers are making noise already….
So, I guess this is all about Bush picking a Giuliani ally. Oy vey.
Will he be eaten alive by repukes?
and now its oj again 24-7 to ease the masses - a damn shame with all the news on the poli front oh well let me get going…
OT, but did anyone see Hillary’s latest healthcare proposal? She’s dead to me now.
Here is a pic of Mukasey swearing in Rudy.
I believe the judge was an advisor to Rudy the G.
Mukasey currently serves as a judicial adviser to GOP presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani; the White House said he would sever ties with the campaign.
Tom @ 11
How Hillary Won Over the Health-Care Industry
She was persona non grata in the early 1990s, when the then-first lady’s dramatic health-care reform package went down. These days Hillary Clinton is winning raves among health-care-industry groups—and attracting their campaign dollars.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20...../newsweek/
“In a previous, similar matter, we obtained a very sizable negotiated settlement for our client who had exposure to several hundred million dollars in a number of poorly performing subprime deals. That matter involved claims relating to both origination and servicing of the loan pools.
If there are allegations of wrongdoing, we call upon our white collar defense and investigations team, which is uniquely qualified to handle attorney general investigations and other matters. Our group includes Peter Harvey, the former New Jersey Attorney General, and Michael B. Mukasey, the former Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.”
http://www.pbwt.com/PracticeAr.....26c1e624bb
It kinda bothers me, that, from a liberal pov, Bush would take one of the better judges off the bench and put him in charge, sorta like the business canard of taking ones best salesperson and putting them in charge, basically losing your best salesperson and putting an unknown in a management role.
I’m sure that’s part of it. Along with it, though, comes a certain amount of polish for Keisler’s resume, and a bump in his federal pension (though I’m not clear on all the details of that).
I don’t know the status of his nomination and its likelihood for success, but if it looks to be in trouble, this could also be a bit of a “thanks for playing” parting gift from Bush.
From Bill Kristol: Thumbs up!
http://weeklystandard.com/Cont.....1rpxqa.asp
IntelVet @ 17
The judge is retired — already off the bench.
Tom @ 11
She has been, is, and will always serve the corporate masters. Individual mandate…as if the poor buying $4 a gallon gas and milk feel the pressure of insurance mandates.
HRC…go fuck yourself!
“He also presided over major cases involving the dispute between Larry Silverstein and his insurers concerning insurance proceeds related to the World Trade Center site”
http://www.pbwt.com/PracticeAr.....b1a0bd13a6
Well, I made the mistake of reading the post before I get back to housekeeping, and now I’m hooked.
I suggested in the last thread that Leahy & Co. call up Keisler to answer to the Judicial Committee again and again, as they did Abu. Now that I read (or reread) Christy’s “Raise Your Hand” post, I see there’s plenty of reason to call him up to explain why so many in his own department would risk mutiny rather than handle “any of the government’s cases against detainee appeals.” This could actually be fun. Harass the guy out office. Keep up the pressure until he says, “I was quitting, anyway. I don’t need this. I won’t let them use me as a pawn while I take the heat. I’m outta here.” Gee, another win for the guys in the white hats! Now, that employing strategy part wasn’t so hard, was it?
Senate Democrats declared no outright opposition to Mukasey. But they made clear that there would be no confirmation hearings until the administration answers outstanding questions about the White House’s role in the firings of federal prosecutors over the winter.
juslin @ 7
Maybe so, but for us he’s the stick!
kdh22 @ 21
Yeah, no shit. This is just Mitt Romney’s bullshit proposal in Mass writ large (why is Hillary taking pages from Republican playbooks?). I know because I live in Mass and wondered what the fuck was wrong with Romney (and the Dem legislature) at the time, and I’m still wondering.
40 million uninsured in the US? We’ll fix this: just pass a law requiring them to buy health insurance!
PROBLEM SOLVED.
Thanks for nothing, Hillary.
At this late date I don’t think it makes any difference who the Republicans put in as AG.
dov12348 @ 19
Kristol sez:
hahahahaha
“The lawsuit, filed by the National Congress for Puerto Rican Rights, asked Judge Michael B. Mukasey of Federal District Court in Manhattan to authorize a class action suit on behalf of all people who had been subjected to the stop-and-frisk practices. Two people were also named as plaintiffs.
Using police statistics, the suit estimated that the Street Crimes Unit had stopped and searched 35,000 people and then released them without further action during the last two years.
The suit, which seeks unspecified damages against the city, also accuses the unit of requiring officers to meet monthly quotas for arrests and seizures of illegal guns. The policy intensifies the pressure on officers to search, or ”toss,” people indiscriminately, the suit says, in hopes of finding a firearm, without regard to whether the search was justified. The suit also asks that the department be ordered to improve screening, training and supervision of the unit’s approximately 380 officers.
Ron Daniels, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, whose lawyers filed the lawsuit, said the group had found ”a sweeping pattern of aggressive policing that is out of control and, at the heart of it, we believe, unconstitutional.”
The lawsuit was filed as calls have increased for greater Federal intervention in the investigation of the shooting death of Amadou Diallo, who was killed by four officers from the Bronx Street Crimes unit. Last Friday, the Civil Rights Commission in Washington said it would open an investigation into the city’s police practices, at which Mayor Giuliani and Police Commissioner Howard Safir are expected to be asked to testify.
Yesterday, Mr. Giuliani, Mr. Safir and other city officials seemed anxious to squelch any suggestion that the officers were involved in selecting members of minority groups, an allegation that has surfaced less formally during previous criticism of the Mayor’s quality of life efforts.”
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/f.....ence/Times Topics/Subjects/S/Suits and Litigation
From Glenn’s analysis of the Padilla case rulings:
Hmmm . . .
. . . channelling Sen Feingold . . .
“Sounds like we’ve got a lot in common, Judge. Let’s talk about multiple occasions of failing to comply with legally issued subpoenas . . .”
OT New Froomkin up
Tom @ 11
No, but do you have a link? I would be interested, since I just fell into the donut hole for prescription drugs. Now I can’t afford to keep any Dr. appointment until Jan. 1, because I will be too busy paying for some of my more affordable drugs that I can’t get as samples (they’re for a nebulizer), to afford the copays for my spec*al*sts. Maybe I shouldn’t even look; hard telling what it’ll do for my blood pressure or my heart.
Edited and released by Mods
Peter Kleiser knows how to work the DOJ shredders and wipe those hard drives. In some cases, it is more important to have a loyal interim guy than a loyal permanent one.
Keisler as acting AG can’t be the best they can do as a pressure point to slambang Mukasey through the confirmation hearing.
To beat out Al Gonzales in the “Jeebus, get rid of this guy” category, it would have to be David Addington as acting AG.
Or Salem witch trials’ finest, John Hathorne. Or Torquemada…
“May just be a huge case load on Clement’s appeals docket plate for the upcoming court term, but what it screams is a sop to wingnuttia for the loss of the Olson nomination.”
Maybe. Or maybe Mukasey is yet another diversion and they have a plan to have the far right wing senators torpedo him; and all the time Keisler is there doing their bidding. Sometime AFTER Keisler’s appropriate stay as “Acting” is up (200 days? can’t remember exactly at this moment); they slide Clement back in and all of a sudden it is January 2009. Not saying I belive this; just a random thought to consider. Frankly, I think they have gamed how to work around Mukasey’s higher ethical standards; so he really is ok by them, but who knows.
Well, I think we have to assume we won’t get a nominee that we actually “like.” We have to be prepared to evaluate if this is as good as we can get at this juncture.
I’d be thrilled if we could get someone who would enforce congressional subpoenas and consider a special prosecutor when warranted (which would be ASAP).
I don’t really feel competent to judge his legal credentials, but I think there are quite a few people here who do have that competence, so I look forward to this discussion.
OT. CNN Exec. producer just on and writing a book on Blackwater. She sounds like she will carry lots and lots of water for them. Didn’t hear one negative thing. hmmm.
Kristol also says:
While it’s unfortunate that
the first thing many conservatives will hear about Mukasey is that his home-state senator Chuck Schumer has praised him, that shouldn’t disqualify him. [my emphasis]
Double hahahahahaha
SufiLizard @ 36
Check out LHP’s post that Christy linked to above. It’s a good place to start.
Why in the world would anyone want to be George W. Bush’s Attorney General?
The model the SJC needs to dust off is the Elliot Richardson confirmation hearing for Nixon’s third AG, when a promise was extracted that the new AG would appoint a Watergate special prosecutor.
Nothing less is acceptable, and the SJC has the power to do this. Schumer needs to back off his home-state stars-in-his-eyes or whatever attracts him to Mucousy. This needs to be a full-court press with written guarantees and concessions.
Specifically, this AG nominee’s views on closing Gitmo, “reforming” FISA, firing USAttys, and connecting the White House political operation with his DoJ need to be explored and exhaustively vetted.
He needs to make some timeline commitments for prosecutions of California & Alaska Congresscritters as well, with classified reports to the SJC on their status. We need Doolittle, Lewis, Miller, Young, and Stevens in the dock, pronto.
Ann in AZ @ 32
Here’s the msnbc link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20819827/
I have to admit, the thought crossed my mind as well that if this guy truly is independent, he may just be a smokescreen that Republicans will actually block from being confirmed.
I wonder how this will play out…
SufiLizard @ 43
Miers Redux
“These days Hillary Clinton is winning raves among health-care-industry groups—and attracting their campaign dollars.”
From Newsweek.
I can’t see why everyone is so happy about this.
He’s one of Giuliani’s best buds, and an adviser to his f’g campaign. His son runs the white-collar defense practice at Bracewell & Giuliani.
No. I think he’s the first member of the putative Giuliani cabinet and is expected to shape DoJ work over the next 18 months or so to (a) protect Bushie and (b) ensure Rudy gets elected. Go read my analysis.
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/9/17/113014/257
Particularly the part about how Mukasey’s trashing the government’s arguments in the trial court decision in Padilla guaranteed they’d be able to raise them on appeal. I don’t know if he was a willing participant in that kabuki, or merely got played, but the result was the same.
And, remember, if he’s confirmed now and a Rethug should be elected, he won’t have to be reconfirmed.
Not for nothing did Bush put Keisler into Clement’s job as Acting AG - it was not rumored that Clement would be the acting AG. (Bush) had announced that Clement would be the acting AG in conjunction with Gonzo’s resignation.
I think Keisler is there more to force the Senate’s hand, by putting someone seriously odious into the job until Mukasey is confirmed. Clement was too well regarded to be an odious goad to the Senate - Keisler is accurately viewed as a partisan hack.
I think, this time, Kristol is right - with Mukasey you get the same pro-Admin/Rethug results and decisions as Olson would have given, without the Olson partisanship baggage. The wingnut noise is just a false flag.
ReneND @ 36
OT Blackwater. I was thinking about this earlier today from a historical perspective. It should be of grave concern whenever a power-hungry executive power has access to a large, well-equipped private army.
With rumors of some quiet dissent in the ranks of the U.S. Army (see B52 nuke posts from last week) you have to wonder if there aren’t some serious power plays going on right now behind the scenes.
The view here is that the appointee for AG was thoroughly vetted by the GOP.
The Mukasey nomination process is another opportunity for the Dems to apply much need pressure to BushCo. Every opportunity to task them from now until 11/08 should not be squandered. And, I think we should all be watching for the interim (via Bush) to try some funny business while the nomination process is ongoing. History is a wonderful teacher.
OT, but as this is Constitution Day, I thought I’d share this email from my work mailbox:
My rhetorical question is: do the President and Vice-President receive little refresher course like this?
kdh22 @ 49
Like drag out the confirmation with the Repubs obstructing, withdraw him right before the recess, and then recess appoint Olson.
scribe @ 45
I think you’re right that we should be wary that the Bush Admin. is playing this for a quick confirmation.
I can’t imagine Bush Inc. would put up anyone for nomination that was even remotely independent if they didn’t have a larger plan.
OT from Froomkins column, discussing Bush meeting with group of “military friendly” bloggers on Friday:
My bold. Truer words hard to find.
LS @ 51
That’s probably Option C, D or E for BushCo. I’ll bet they have several contingency plans.
Pressuring the Republicans will probably be a waste of time. Pressuring the Democrats has perhaps a better chance of doing some good.
1,601 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Firepup Patriots:
Action alert to all FDL anti-fascist partisans, go read Bill Kristol’s homage to Makasey AND Gruppenfuehrer Ted Olson too!) and then tell me that the fix is not in between the A*P*C Clintonites and the Bush fascists.
Chuck Schumer gets a “twofer”… he gets a judge friendly to Wall Street AND Israel and he gets mainlined into the Wall Street political money machine. Look for Spitzer to get attacked from the right within the Democratic Party in New York and for Bloomberg to get Schumer’s money to run against the sitting governor.
Look out folks, Emmanuel and Schumer are Mrs. Clinton’s pimps and control the leadership in both houses of Congress…let’s find out more about this guy. A good, hard, far-reaching confirmation hearing ken expose Mukasey if he’s a closet Nazi, gain promises in public and make the Democrats look like the adults are in charge again.
But the Democrats won’t do it unless we put the heat on ‘em…let’s practice for the next Iraq budget fight.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, NOT ALL FASCISTS ARE STUPID!!
I long for the tranquil days of Watergate.
LS @ 51
I’m perfectly happy with a recess appointment. The term of office for a recess appointee would end at the end of the Senate term. Someone confirmed by the Senate can remain in office through the end of the President’s pleasure with him - which could be many years from now, depending on how much of a lackey he proves himself to be.
A quick driveby off topic, but on the topic of personnel changes: I just heard on Air America that my congress man in Minnesota, Jim Ramstad (a craven and inveterate Bush supporter), will be retiring at the end of his term. This actually opens the door for some real voter activism in a region that has had nothing but conservative representation for some time. I couldn’t be more excited!
NorskeFlamethrower @ 56
A very hard sell. But probably true.
From The Hill Not So Fast
scribe @ 58
Uh, the end of the current Senate term is the end of the Bush presidency so it’s the same regardless
Marcy makes a “wildarseguess” (read spot-on theory)about why Dubya chose Keisler for Acting AG
Why Keisler
Just ask yourself: why hasn’t Joe Lieberman been dealt with harshly by the Democrats. And I’m not interested in any of this “but we need his vote” business.
Glenn Greenwald:
‘…Mukasey … should certainly be questioned aggressively about whether he believes that the president’ … has the authority to …
‘detain’… and incarcerate a U.S. citizen
‘without charges being brought and a conviction obtained in a court of law.’
These are, of course, neither minor or frivolous points, but go precisely to the heart of the matter: specifically, constitutional guarantees which protect INDIVIDUAL U.S. citizens, not the alleged prerogatives of the Executive. Where, on balance do Mukasey’s sympathies lie?
Notwithstanding LHP’s seeming approval of the man (?); As an actor,playing a quite different role, Judge Mukasey will, most certainly, advocate in the interests of Bush et.al. There is no compelling evidence or reason to presume otherwise.
A grain of salt please; as per TeddySanFran @ 41.
OT but the lawyers here will probably be relieved to know this: Chemerinsky will be dean at UCI Law School.
Hooray for common sense!
http://www.latimes.com/news/lo.....ome-center
Attorney General for the Bush Administration: sorta like Interior Decorator for a Sensory Deprivation Chamber.
1,601 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
YOU GO, SENATOR LEAHY…HOOOORAH FOR A REAL DEMOCRAT!!
johnSwifty @ 59
Congratulations! Doesn’t your Congressman have a son or daughter that he’s bent on promoting into his seat, though? Could this be an opportunity for a pickup? Is there an active Democratic party? Is there a declared Democratic candidate?
Good luck!
Oklahoma kiddo @ 57
Ain’t that the truth!
NorskeFlamethrower @ 56
Questioning whether or not an Orthodox Jew is a closet Nazi is not really a good choice of words. Actually, rather offensive. The Attorney General is not a big player on the field of foreign relations, and his attitude toward Israel is of dubious relevance. I am much more interested in his attitude toward separation of powers, and the unitary executive.
dakine01 @ 62
And Mukasey is a legal adviser to the Giuliani campaign and one of his best buds. Who’s to say that all the Voting Rights Section manipulations won’t be used under a (confirmed) Mukasey AGship to further his best friend’s campaign, to be rewarded by no replacement AG being named if/when Rudy wins the election in a close battle decided in the courts, and largely upon the timing, placement and positions taken by the AG’s office…?
Specter’s remarks make my teeth ache, as usual. Where’s RevDeb w/that Janus mask she likes as a visual for his two-faced attitude on cleaning up the DOJ…
Ann in AZ @ 70
The people involved in Watergate were interesting, at least. These are just a bunch of thugs.
Helen @ 63
Hiya Helen!
Mukasey is the shiny object we’re all supposed to be distracted by while Keisler is doin’ dirty work. see my @49 above.
Sounds like Spectre’s playing his Bush-enabling role quite well today.
Semi-related: I greatly enjoyed pointing out to marchers this weekend when we were marching past Prettyman Courthouse. *g*
Ann in AZ @ 70
Watergate was a serious matter….
But you-all are right, that historical blight on US history appears to be nickel dime stuff compared to the multi-faceted quagmire FOBAR nightmare novella we are dealing with right now….
Mitch,
Strange times these are.
You must have seen the article about the Israeli neo-Nazis.
Now we have an Iranian Schindler’s List.
-GSD
scribe @ 72
Well, maybe your crystal ball is better than mine but I don’t see Rudy winning the gooper nomination, much less the presidency. YMMV
Redshift @ 77
Thanks for marching.
TeddySanFran @ 69
I will find the answer to these questions, and more! Thanks Teddy!
Twain @ 74
good points.
One can imagine Shakespeare writing a play about Nixon. Boosh, not so much.
This is the recent Wall Street Journal op-ed that Judge Michael Mukasey authored following the Jose Padilla trial (in both senses of the word) and conviction:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/.....=110010505
I had a hard time reading it, knowing what little I do about the Padilla case from Lew Koch’s posts here at FDL, and detect a heavy dose of “guilty until proven innocent” and a rather obvious lack of concern about Constitutional rights that were so quickly snatched from Padilla on the “Top Secret” word of government authorities - including by Mukasey himself. So it does not endear me to this guy at first glance (especially in combination with the close Giuliani connections of both the Judge and his son).
Judge Mukasey doesn’t seem to have much appreciation or respect for the openness of the proceedings of our Judicial Branch, and seems to want a new sort of secret FISA court to keep the world and the nation in the dark about “national security” prosecutions. Of course using the Padilla case, of all cases, to justify such a move - without a word about the mistreatment to which Padilla was subjected - just underscores the Soviet-style mindset that Mukasey seems to advocate for our Judicial Branch, and presumably by inference for our Justice Department.
There also seems to be a backhanded swipe at either the ACLU or the CCR (to whom we owe so much for fighting to protect the Constitution these last six years) in his piece - “the director of an organization purporting to protect constitutional righrts has” - with regard to the atrocious treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay - treatment which Mukasey just ‘takes on faith’ they deserve and have apparently earned because of their ‘guilt unless ever proven innocent’ [guilt perhaps simply because they practice a “foreign” faith] allegedly extreme threat to this nation.
This approach lines right up with that of Cheney and Addington, as far as I can see. And this very “state secret,” can’t use the ordinary courts to prosecute suspected terrorists, subject area - with its inordinate secrecy - is what this guy will be called upon to focus on as AG, to a large extent, I assume. I think caution is called for here, Senator Schumer’s parochial biases notwithstanding.
Norskeflamethrower: “A good, hard, far-reaching confirmation hearing can … gain promises in public and make the Democrats look like the adults are in charge again.”
I agree with that part.
Marie Roget @ 73
Gah. Yes, by all means, let’s not make cleaning up the problems that are causing the vacancies and morale problems a condition that might delay the AG getting appointed and dealing with the vacancies and morale problems.
Shorter Arlen Specter: “Thank you, sir, may I have another?”
1,651 dayz and the killin’ goez on and on and..
Citizen BigMitch:
“Questioning whether or not an Orthodox Jew is a closet Nazi is not really a good choice of words.”
OK…make that “closet fascist” and I stand by my statement. Not to be able to attach the word fascist to someone’s politics because they are Jewish is no longer a flak-jacket for right wingers…we call ‘em like we see ‘em up here in the frozen tundra.
KEEP THE FAITH AND DON’T PUSSYFOOT AROUND WITH ‘EM!!
TeddySanFran @ 81
Watching the anti-anti-war rally, I couldn’t believe it when I heard a mother of a fallen soldier claim several times that her son had been “re-deployed to heaven”.
The relationship between Washington and Jerusalem is one of the finest examples of ‘mutualism’ I’ve ever seen. That is not to say this relationship is in the best interests of each country’s peoples.
Also from the same The Hill story:
But Reid also said he would back Leahy’s decision on a timeframe for considering Mukasey, presaging a possible proxy fight wherein Democrats would seek testimony and documents before proceeding to a vote.
oddmommy @ 83
A Boosh movie would be a Three Stooges - with nukes.
Amen to Big Mitch @71. This is just the indiscriminate tossing of epithets and, frankly I think it rude to both Big Mitch and the host of the thread, though either can contradict me there if I’m wrong or if it’s not my place to scold. Scarecrow posts on relevant topics, as does Pachacutec sometimes.
pow wow @ 84
More excellent truth(ing)!
Let the sanguine beware.
way OT: anybody catch WaPo reader ombudsman L’il Debbie Howell on Talk of the Nation today? After the initial double-take at hearing her rather scratchy gravelly voice*, I found that she actually made some sense (rebutting the WaPo’s decision to pull the Opus cartoons).
* (I know, physical attributes are not fair game….)
LS @ 88
On one of the local news segments about the counter-protest, they had a young woman who talked about how our leaders have been granted wisdom, so they know what they’re doing. Apparently not up on the idea that we got rid of the divine right of kings well before the founding of this country. Very creepy.
I’d like to now what Mukasey’s thoughts are on Civil Rights and Voting rights. I would hope that along with trying to clean up the partisanization of the DOJ he would focus on the travesty that has occurred to the Voter Rights Act and the the way that career attorneys at DOJ were overruled by GOP hacks. I wonder if he will stop the partisan election fraud scam and stop the BS prosecutions, and prosecute those folks actually caging and doing other illegal disenfranchisment.
Wow. Homeland Security is getting really irrational and nasty…this is alarming:
http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/9/17/135336/923
More crazy Homeland Security actions:
http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/9/17/9846/64393
AZ Matt @ 90
It is not a proxy fight, although that may become the TradMed meme. It is “takin’ out the trash” or “unfinished business.” It must be resolved prior to a new appoinee being confirmed.
We must support Leahy and Reid on this; there will be pressure from Schumer to move quickly on his friend’s nomination.
I am going to mention for record’s sake that when Mukasey :
that the “them” he was excoriating included then USA SDNY, James Comey. Comey was the guy in there arguing for Padilla to be blackholed with no lawyer. So for those who think Comey might be a fine AG, remember that the pick that is up is the man who was trying to prevent Comey from denying an attorney to Padilla. Just a fwiw.
I think the status of the GITMO and Hepting cases are why they put Keisler in overall control. They are a mess and he needs as much monstrosity of authority as they can give him for them. Wonder who is filling in to run Keisler’s dept?
LS @ 88
If he could talk… I’d have to wonder what this woman’s dead son would have to say about that. My mother who spent the entire WWII in Europe, was a pacifist. God rest her soul.
punaise @ 94
Didn’t catch the talk but read her column on the topic Saturday. I guess she can get one correct occasionally.
pow wow @84 - I agree. I am extremely hard pressed to find all the positives in Mukasey’s handling of Padilla that Greenwald, Horton and several others have. Right to counsel was the only real positive, and I found that could have been a lot tougher on the government than it was. Mukasey is VERY much a ‘national security” guy, and will be of no help on the privacy issues. With all that said, he is the best Bush will nominate; I am just not sure that BushCo really intends for him to get through, as opposed to having Keisler and then Clement or another “Acting” toady run out Bush’s term of office.
Why exactly would anyone want to even consider this appointee until the documents, tape recordings, emails, sworn testimony, (and those other requirements for a legal system to function) are all provided to the congressional committees that are investigating crimes. Numerous potential crimes. This is not a high priority to have another cabinet level swindler anointed by president hooky.
Why in the hell would we not be outraged by this appointment to cover the tracks of the former toad? An AG that is going to be immune and help justice sort out their problems?
This is ridiculous. We have a criminal enterprise instead of an executive branch that doesn’t require an AG to do business.
I hope some senator stands and says, no god damn way we are going to talk to anyone about anything except subpoenas.
Regardless of whether she’s correct, I relished seeing Deb Howell relegated to discussing the funny papers.
oldtree @ 104
All we can hope is that the SJC will remember how impotent they were in the face of Abu’s ongoing wrongdoing, and therefore require ironclad assurances in writing of this new toady.
Greenwald didn’t endorse Mukasey. He said given the fact that we will have to accept a conservative of some sort, at least this guy is not an idealogue or Bush innercircle crony. But he said he should be fully questioned. FITZ.
i hope mukasey is a nut buster……
ot sorry-
i’m trying to find the link from this weekend about one of the ‘bloggers’ that was at the white house conference………the one where he said meeting the president was so great that it was his number two best experience of his life, right behind ’sitting in’ with cheap trick…….
yeah, i know………[insert many jokes here]
i can’t find it in my bookmarks or history from this weekend….figured someone might have it….need it to send to someone……thanks.
TeddySanFran @ 41
Hate to be the killjoy here, but the deal appears to already be done.
USA EDNY Roz Mauskaupf finally got the nod on her long stalled appointment to the fedral bench. Schumer would not ahve given the ROz if he was not getting Mukasey in return.
In fact, when the tab comes due I suspect it will be Mauskaupf, court of Appeals judge, 2 NFL second round drat picks, a shortstop and a partridge in a pear tree—
all in exchange for Mukasey.
I doubt he will give the Dems –anything– no guarantees about special prosecutors, no nothing (Please let me be wrong)
The good news. He will be a true caretaker. The damage to DOJ should get no worse than it is.
dakine01 @ 80
Your mouth to God’s ears, but until we get some positive feedback from that, answer me this:
Are you willing to take that chance on Mukasey?
I’m not.
looseheadprop @ 109
Nothing? Not even a nod toward obeying lawfully issued subpoenas?
If this is the good news, it’s a real sign of how bad things have gotten.
Totally OT, and sorry if this was posted before - it’s a week old. But this letter to Tom Davis from Henry Waxman made my day.
Wanna compare oversight, Tom?
Why the rush for a new AG? I think we should stick to a strict no hearings until the remaining subpoenaed deliverables are delivered policy… Frankly, I don’t care if they nominate Fitzpatrick.
In other news, Blackwater has been BANNED from Iraq, for wanton murder:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/.....index.html
….but evidently they’re still good enough for NOLA. Urghhh!
Oklahoma kiddo @ 57
Snicker
shiny near-new thread upstairs, pups!
Leahy needs to bring all the unanswered subpoenas to the first confirmation hearing and get Mukasey’s on-the-record testimony about his intent to honor them, and on what date exactly.
Then Gitmo.
Then the USAtty firings.
The the corruption of the Voting Rights section.
Then a commitment to prosecute for contempt on behalf of Congress, in the case of Miers, Bolten, Rove, et al.
LS @ 97
So, this means that when the five members of our family want to travel to my daughter’s wedding in Scotland next year, that any one of us could be stopped, deprived of our passports, prevented from getting on the plane and traveling?
punaise at 94 says-”way OT: anybody catch WaPo reader ombudsman L’il Debbie Howell on Talk of the Nation today? After the initial double-take at hearing her rather scratchy gravelly voice*, I found that she actually made some sense (rebutting the WaPo’s decision to pull the Opus cartoons).
* (I know, physical attributes are not fair game….)”
yeah, i did, was half-listening when he was introducing people, was more interested in what the opus cartoons said…….so, i didn’t know who it was until the segment was over……
havta say, i was shocked when i heard who it was………wanted to listen to it again…….i would never have attributed what was said by her to her, not in a million years……….and her “scrachy gravelly voice”? i took her as being a bit of a ‘dry’ personality. matched her voice. sounded like an old-fashioned school-marm kind of person.
johnSwifty @ 59
Oh, Yay Yay Yaaaay!!!! I am in his district, and didn’t know how we would get rid of him! You can bet *I* will be active in this! We turned Minnetonka and Eden Prairie Blue for the first time 3 years ago with our state representative! She won by only 70 votes in 2004, by over 700 votes in 2006. There is indeed hope in the world . . .
Ann in AZ @ 70
The biggest difference is that in those days, the Democrats hadn’t pulled impeachment off the table. In those days, I was excited by how well our system of checks and balances worked. Today, I’m ashamed of it.
Bob in HI
Senator Leahy speaking on the floor now on the Mukasey nomination, on C-SPAN-2.
http://c-span.org/watch/cs_csp.....p;Code=CS2
scribe @ 110
We are not going to have any choice on the matter. The Dem leadership has more than likely already made promises to Schumer and Bush about this nomination, so prepare for the kabuki. Unless Leahy really puts his foot down and flat refuses to go along unless he gets what he needs, I think this is probably done deal.
David W. Bartoo @ 65
It’s not approval or disapproval. He is a republican and should be expected to act according to the priciples of his party. He should also be expected to view things in a light favorable to his own side.
That being said, no one that I know of has ever accused him of acting dishonorably or sellig out. He is not a hack.
Nor, is he the sort of transformation leader who can set DOJ to rights. What he is likely to be is a competant faithful caretaker for the Department.
It would thenleave it up to the next President to set a tone for the new DOJ, almost out of whole cloth.
IMHO, this is the sort of “politics is the art of the possible” kind of outcome one can expect from beltway folks.
It is also quite dangerous. If the next president is not commited to restoring DOJ to its former state……
A weakened DOJ that is a pale replica of its former self would not provide an obstical to another meglomaniac in the WH.
I realize, this scenario COULD work out OK, if the next president does the right thing–but if we get the wrong president….. I don’t like taking chances with things that are this critical
drive-by but not OT.
leahy on the senate floor now on cspan2… describing his position on AG nomination.
selise @ 124
Selise - I can’t get Cspan here - what’s he saying?
TeddySanFran @ 116
Amen, if this whole AG nomination process turns out to be a half-baked he appears to be a nice guy so let’s give him a blank check by not demanding answers regarding exactly where he stands kind of deal, we’re simply screwed again….
Who knows, the way things are going, it could even be worse….
LHP
Thank you for clarifying. I value your thoughts very highly and appreciate your speculation.
leahy says he will schedule nomination hearing after getting info the WH owes the SJC. says he spoke with fred fielding and reaction seems positive. said a few nice things about bush - it’s a strain, but i think he was trying to come off as not being confrontational while at the same time playing hard ball about owed info.
here’s hoping. yeah leahy!
sorry for the bad typing - i’ve got a bandaid on the end of one finger and it’s made me even more clumsy than usual.
leahy now talking about the necesity of restoring habeas corpus…. good stuff, but i think he’s done on the AG nomination. hopefully c&l or tpm will have video.
The upshot seemed to be that “in the fullness of time” Senator Leahy will get around to scheduling a nomination hearing for Mukasey, after he’s had his FBI background check, etc., and after ‘all the papers and materials’ Leahy needs from the White House/DOJ have been provided to the Senate (as Leahy said he told the White House last night).
If Leahy was more specific about exactly what he will require be turned over before proceeding - beyond the reference to Fielding (thanks, selise - I missed that reference) - I didn’t hear it. But the definite impression was given that Senator Leahy is in no rush to do the White House’s bidding on this nomination.
pow wow @ 130
pow wow, i also did not hear any specific info he expects (would love to have a really complete check list). agree with your impressions.
selise @ 128
Excellent bargaining chip….
What a guy, that Leahy, doesn’t even have to be mean about it….
Yes, that was very, very good….
OT, Thanks all for the education, I couldn’t get a better one if I went to, gasp, Yale. This is the nuts and bolts you don’t learn in any classroom.
Still the end result that is imperative to me is the impeachment of both bush and cheney. I know patience is a virtue but I am on empty.
kdh22 @ 66
{{{Erwin}}}
Now, about that letter to the California Commisision on Judicial Performance re Chief Justice George’s role in this tawdry affair …
Helen @ 112
Heh.
Well done, Sir Henry!
Bob in HI
Twain @ 91
I think the movie should be Hamlet with Cheney as the New King, Condi Rice as Queen, and Bush as Hamlet going crazy be degrees.
First question:
Will you enforce Congressional Subpoenas even if they are written for Executive Branch employees inclusive of the Office of the Vice President?
.
Just a guess, but it’s not likely that BushCo’s hidden motive in either of these appointments has anything to do with restoring the Department of Justice to being the department of justice.
William Kristol said yesterday:
I expect Mukasey has agreed to the rulings that BushCo wants on these “key” issues.
Bush said today:
What’s the hurry? What rulings does Bush need on the “key issues?” There’s no hurry I can see. We’ve not had a Department of Justice for six years. Maybe we’d be better off without one, than with whatever Bush is offering us.
NO NO NO NO NO!!!
Mukasey is a Giuliani hack! Did everyone forget Giuliani is running for PRESIDENT next year?
ABC NEWS: “Mukasey serves on the Justice Advisory Committee of Republican presidential candidate and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani. The two are longtime friends and Mukasey’s son Marc works at Bracewell & Giuliani.”
Do you see it yet? GONZALES GETS THE BOOT BECAUSE HE’S FIXING ELECTIONS!
SO WE PUT GIULIANI’S CLOSE FRIEND INTO THAT SAME JOB FOR THE NEXT ELECTION?
We now know who the White House plans on being the next president. Mukasey is responsible for fixing Attorneygate. He’ll fix it. In swing states where Giuliani runs a close second, Mukasey will have all those “improper” ballots tossed out, and launch investigations into Giuliani’s opponent’s misdeeds.
Deja vu, all over again.
How about he (Keisler), gong in to fix or better, to HIDE Gonzo’s potential (read that as bush’s potential) illegal doings. Plus it gives cover to Mukasey during his nomination, allowing him to say “he will investigate”, but will find nothing in the end, because it has been covered-up. And THESES GUYS ARE VERY VERY GOOD AT COVERING UP THEIR TRACKS.
Food for thought. Bb
I’ve been involved in two cases before Mukasey. Both involved commercial law issues unlikely to be relevant to his tenure as AG. In one of the cases, there was a contested substantive motion involving complex issues that he ruled on promptly. His ruling cut right to the heart of the contested legal issues, took into account all of the relevant facts (I can’t tell you how many judges ignore key facts), and basically made the right call. He also moved both of the cases along FAST — a little faster than we would have liked, but hey, considering what he needs to do right now, I consider that a good thing. Finally, he was acted respectfully and professionally towards the lawyers at all times, which is not something I can say for every judge.
So, overall, I was favorably impressed. That’s all I got.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....64803.html
[Morning, lhp… Want to be sure you see this well-deserved praise about your Mukasey scoop, from one of the good guys engaged in the frontlines of Constitutional defense.]
This schmuck, Mukasey said that they could hold a US citizen indefinitely, uncharged. He’s flunked the constitution, as well as turned back Habeus Corpus, as well as removing confidentiality in consultation of counsel. He shouldn’t get any consideration at all. Ditch him. NEXT!