Anointing the GOP as the “National Security Party” makes about as much sense as choosing Ulysses S. Grant to lead the “Temperance Party.” Their record at protecting the nation from terror and military threats is one of ignominious failure, and the next attack – if and when it happens – may well be a preventable horror.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. America: Your child is failing to perform at acceptable standards …
The GAO Report Card issued today is the latest in a litany of documents detailing Republican-led failure and mismanagement in the national security arena. It repeats the dim assessment the 9/11 Commission gave the Administration in 2005. (Broderites, take note: Both reports are bipartisan.) The Lieberman-promoted merger of multiple departments that created the “Department of Homeland Security” has given us a behemoth that’s met less than half of its performance objectives.
Reality to GOP/Lieberman: You’ve flunked.
The report indicated weak results on DHS’ most important goals: emergency preparedness, Manhattan Project-like initiatives to develop new capabilities, and – this was Lieberman’s pet justification for DHS – “eliminating bureaucratic and technical barriers to information-sharing.”
We know the Administration’s been claiming progress, against all reality. And Lieberman’s response to this bipartisan report was that the DHS “has made important progress,” although “we have a long way to go.”
For his part, Chertoff (what – he’s still there?) is still clinging to the fact there have been no further attacks since 9/11. He’s like the drunk behind the wheel of a car going 90 miles an hour toward a brick wall: There’s no reason to stop having fun … yet.
It’s Not “Bush” or “Cheney” – “It’s the GOP, Stupid”
The Republicans will clearly try to run from their own national security record in 2008. The horrible mistakes – ignoring the Bin Laden memo before 9/11, the mismanagement of Katrina, the failures in this report – will be placed at the feet of two individuals, but it’s a party-wide problem.
For example, here’s a list of nine major failures in national security on the GOP watch. They include Republicans in Congress shutting down the oversight unit investigating defense cost overruns and failures, repeated test failures by airport screeners, 4,000 missiles that disappeared because we didn’t secure Iraq’s arms depots … had enough yet?
Smoking Guns and Mushroom Clouds
Oh, but wait. There’s more. The GOP record on radiological materials is … um, not too good. Quick quotes for speed readers: “Some radiological waste storage areas may lack adequate protection against sabotage which could cause wide-area radiological dispersal.” “US Defense Department failed to secure sources of radiological material in Iraq for six months .. some were looted or scattered.” “An unknown number of radiologic sources remain unsecured in Iraq.”
A message to you, Rudy
Where were John McCain, Mitt Romney, or Mike Huckabee, as America remained unsafe? And as for Giuliani, he’s the weakest national security candidate in the pack. If he had listened to his advisors, the anti-terror nerve center wouldn’t have been in the WTC on 9/11 where it was immediately destroyed. He failed to act on urgent requests for a communications system that would allow police and firefighters to speak with one another during an emergency. That failure may have contributed to the high number of first responders’ deaths on 9/11.
Will any Democrat take him on, face to face, on national security? Let’s see.
Oh — and he’s cronied up, too.
Ideology Over Security
Islamists are bad people we must stop – but an existential threat to the West? Conservatives want us to think they’ll place us all under Sharia law and force burkas on Jane and Christy. (”They’re coming to enslave our women!“) So the righties make videos like this loony one, from ex-Trotskyite David Horowitz. (He was an extremist as a leftist, but fits in very nicely on the right.)
You know what this is about: They can push a totalitarian agenda by promoting Islamism as the new Communism. What they can’t do is manage the terror problem very well, since that takes police tactics rather than state-to-state military warfare.
The video is straight out of the 1950’s Red Scare, down to the Russian Army Chorus music in the background. Do svidanya! But meanwhile, we’re no safer. Why? Here’s my theory: Because a party that doesn’t believe in government can’t use government to keep us safe.
(This just in! Sean Hannity’s holding a “Freedom Alliance” concert on 9/11. Joe Lieberman will be there, with Ann Coulter and Ollie North. Perfect! I can’t wait to see them all hold hands to sing a rousing chorus of “We Will Rock You” as helicopters drop confetti made from shredded copies of the Constitution.)
While Democrats Slept
Naomi Wolf missed the point when she called the netroots ‘naive’ for criticizing Sen. Clinton. Hillary had said the GOP would benefit politically from another terror attack. She was right to raise the issue – but she, like other Democrats, need to stop reinforcing that paradigm and start changing it. Today’s report is Exhibit A. Why aren’t we hearing about these failures, and what could happen as a result, every day?
Let’s hope we don’t have another attack. But if we do, the country should see it for what it really is: Katrina with a terrorist’s face.
Related posts:
- Condi & Hadley Determined to Strike in U.S.
- Rick Scott Determined to Strike in US
- Lieberman to Whip Up Anti-Muslim Hysteria With Homeland Security Hearing on Fort Hood Shooting
- Silvestre Reyes Announces Investigation into Violations of National Security Act
- Richard Clarke Reminds Cheney and Condi of Their Incompetence





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

zed
zed
durn it
Impeach the criminals…
“Iraq is George Bush’s War. The next one belongs to all of us.” Sign stayed up over I-80 for 4 hours.
http://freewayblogger.blogspot…..-from.html
the films (about one minute each) tell you all you need to know to do what I do. And seriously folks, more of us need to do it.
Attack Rudy on security issues? Very Rovian.. Might work- but it would take umpteen millions of dollars and the media would have to pick it up. This is “swift boatin” at it’s best. The initial commercials won’t do the job- you’ve gotta have the media come back to the story daily. To do that you’ve got to have an INFURI
ATING story—good news is that it doesn’t have to be true!
Then ya get Rudy denyin- and the press plays that TOO.
Brief ThinkProgress post: Judge strikes down part of Patriot Act
Hello RJ, great post.
We can be bipartisan and just say no to more war.
It just boggles my mind how addicted washington is to killing people. I’m wracked up trying to get through political gameplaying to save lives and end the travesty.
Good on Edwards for calling everyone out, too.
Thank you for this excellent post. It certainly gets right to the point on a lot of issues.
Now if we can just get that point through the smokescreen of the Republican media.
Sheesh, Orwell was an optimist.
Well, thank goddess Chertoff is off the AG list:
http://rawstory.com//news/2007….._0906.html
I’ve always thought that a simple montage of Bush trying to form a sentence, which he has yet to do over the six plus years of his presidency, and then the tag line, “Does this man make you feel safer?” would be pretty effective
If dems can link the gooper nominee to Bush- game, set, match.
RJ Eskow
WTF! indeed!
This rhetorical question should be posited on all Patriotic Media Outlets:
Why did President Bush let Paul Bremer disband the Iraqi Army without telling him?
In defense of Grant he only drank when he was bored. Failed at most, but in the heat of battle was sober and had powers of concentration and steely resolve that was a source of genius. As President-too many cronies. sound familiar?
“The president had no interest in the intelligence,” a CIA officer disclosed. “Bush didn’t give a fuck about the intelligence. He had his mind made up.”
“No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq,” Blumenthal writes. “The information, moreover, was not circulated within the CIA among those agents involved in operations to prove whether Saddam had WMD.”
http://rawstory.com//news/2007….._0906.html
RJ – Smokin’ post!
As usual, it takes me so long to put together something cogent to say that I end up being in the caboose of a prior thread…but I’m going to repeat this because I think it explains everything about today’s GOP and how they think, act and strategize. This is from John Dean’s column today at Findlaw and talks about his examination of research linking political conservatives with authoritarian personalities:
“At the outset of Conservatives Without Conscience, I provided a quick and highly incomplete summary of Altemeyer’s findings, explaining that his empirical testing revealed “that authoritarians are frequently enemies of freedom, antidemocratic, anti-equality, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, power hungry, Machiavellian, and amoral.” To be clear, these are not assessments that Altemeyer makes himself about these people; rather, this is how those he has tested reveal themselves to be, when being anonymously examined.”
There you go. Now you know. This is why everyone from Tom Delay to George Bush to Dick Cheney behave the way they do. This is the basis of their world view and personal belief system. This is why they feel extremely comfortable throwing people who were friends and colleagues “under the bus”. This is why they feel no remorse or show no question or have any long term thinking about the implications of what they do. They’d sell their grandmothers for their teeth. They’d send other people’s children into harm’s way. It doesn’t matter to them.
Hello, all. Had to snicker at Grant’s party of temperance :-)
hackworth @ 14
Bremer had a pretty good defense of his conduct today. How I didn’t disband the Iraqi army. in the NYT.
rwcole @ 12
None of the gooper candidates can talk about rescinding Bush tax cuts. In fact, they are all clamoring over who will create more tax breaks for the wealthy (by rescinding the death tax – inheritance tax, really).
The only effective plan to repair the deficit must include rescinding Bush tax cuts. None of the rethugs can repair the deficit.
Don’t know if Grant was a genius- don’t know that he did anything tactically or strategically that was out of the ordinary- he was just willing to keep at it even though he was suffering heavy casualties.
The Civil War was a watershed. The rifled musket was new to warfare and was lethal for a thousand yards or more–that changes everything and means that frontal attacks on dug in positions result in massive losses.. tactics needed to catch up- but Grant didn’t solve the problem- he just took the casualties and won.
He also made Georgia howl- through Sherman’s march to the sea. Nothing revolutionary about it- but it may have made the confederacy lose enthusiasm for their war.
Jim Clausen @ 15
He also learned and gained in his experiences. Can’t say that for Bush.
because he’s so Special…
A message to you, Rudy
Stop your fooling around
Time you straightened right out
Better think of your future
Else you’ll wind up in jail
BigMitch @ 20
Sounds a lot like “What I Didn’t Find In Africa.” Is Bremer’s wife a spook? I guess we’ll soon know.
rwcole @ 22
oops , meant to say I luve talking hitory with you!
JF
Agree– this thing should be big news- but so far it’s not. Unfortunately most americans are now ignoring everything about the pres. They’re just waiting for him to go away.
The Israeli/Syria overflight/bomb/anti-aircraft attack is getting some heavy coverage in Israel.
-GSD
Repugs want you to forget that they had absolute control of Congress and the WH for six years. All the fuckups in the first four years of Bush were blamed on Clinton.
Such lazy Grant revisionism – how many here would love to have him as president, and put Bush harmlessly on some dollar bill? (I vote for the $1,000)
Mods,
clean up my 26 please. Thanks
ModNote: Refresh now.
Sad Good News:
River (of the Riverbend blog) and her family have made it out of Baghdad and are now in Syria.
Good, because they made it. Sad, because we created the situation that forced them to leave.
O/t -
Wonder if this had anything to do with Craig’s decision to re-re-re-re-rethink resigning?
http://www.boiseguardian.com/2…..inues.html
Mike E @ 30
I’d take Herbert Hoover back for that matter.
I mean, previous presidents, whatever their shortcomings, with the sorta exception of Nixon, at least behaved within restraints.
The Republicans will clearly try to run from their own national security record in 2008. The horrible mistakes – ignoring the Bin Laden memo before 9/11, the mismanagement of Katrina, the failures in this report – will be placed at the feet of two individuals, but it’s a party-wide problem.
I say absolutely attack them on the security issue. Attack them on their (lack of) patriotism too. Even attack them on their wimpiness, and other than McCain they are susceptible to this. I believe Howard Dean would have if he had gotten the nomination in 04. And I believe he would have won.
AZ Matt @ 23
Much of Grant’s bad reputation came from historians who didn’t like his actually giving a crap about the welfare of the freed slaves. There were more strides for blacks under Grant than under any other president from Lincoln’s time right up until Roosevelt’s.
GSD @ 28
Sounds like a big provocation..this is worrisome.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/…..refer=home
Waccamaw @ 33
oh my, what were they thinking?
stupid question, obviously there’s no thinking going on there.
punaise @ 24
Huh? If Rudy winds up in jail, it’s simply got to be due to a Kerik-al error….
This is the “foundation” that produced that terrifying video:
http://www.horowitzfreedomcent…..ea=mission
BigMitch @ 20
Thanks for the link. Before I go read so maybe Bremer addresses this. How does he explain away his Order No. 2 which disbands the Iraqi army?
I want to underline, however, that this is all a false issue. If Bush or his top advisers had wanted the Iraqi army kept intact. They could have told Bremer quite simply to reverse his order.
There is this dopey narrative out there that Bremer announces his order and everybody including Bush is just left standing there and saying well now that he has done that there’s nothing we can do about it. Guess we will just have to live with it.
Does this story pass the smell test? No.
a really good read and a pleasure rj
now to revisit a few minutia; (I love the sound of that word minutia)
we need this cia officer deposed before congress and we need tenet to testify afterward to acknowledge or refute this vital informaton
and sanity might yet return to our government
i don’t have the link but in recent days we find out cheney was doing what ever was neccessary to eliminate his fisa requirements
why do they not want to show who they are spying on?
because they want to steal, there is no other explanation, there is no added expediancy when following fisa requirements a search can be condutcted before they even apply for the search
the ONLY reason they don’t want to show who they are listening to is because they are stealing information…stealing bussiness data they are not entitled to and stealing personal data to hold over their oponents heads
as far as bush “respecting the miltary”?
bullcrap;
he ignors the military when they give him sage advice, he shops till he finds someone that will aquiesse even though it goes against any strategy a real military scholar would recomend
oh I could go on and on but I am at work and only get to do snippets here and there
Wow, this is a doozy of a post. Sharp writing, RJ.
In a way, of course, none of us are surprised; it’s just more evidence of what we expect from Bush.
btw-I like this sentence from Blumenthal’s Salon piece, quoting the CIA people trying to get Sabri’s info out, but finding their report had been re-written:
I see more people recognizing the royal pretensions lately.
Hugh @ 40
But that would mean he’s not the Decider.
Phoenix Woman @ 36
I was just going to say that. Here is a book to that effect: http://www.amazon.com/Ulysses-…..0805069496
Just saw something on CNN about some comedians in Australia, one of whom dressed as B*n L*den, making it past two security checkpoints. There was a segue into the story, but during the entire story, in Brooklyn at least, the transmission broke up and the story was lost. I hope they repeat it eventually. The signal was fine both before and after the story…
JF @ 44
None of this means a goddamn thing. They keep saying we are where we are and have to figure out what to do. Everyone knows the lied and fucked up and nobody cares. . .except us.
BigMitch @ 20
I just saw Paul Bremer on the street five minutes ago. What on earth is he doing walking around like a person with a job? What would he be hired for, and by whom? Max Bialystok?
Elliott @ 38
From the link: “Chances are she may not have been aware of the warrant…”
Chances are? Really? You mean that in Idaho, a Senator’s daughter can be found in contempt of court, and nobody bothers to tell her? I think they’d at least send a postcard. Don’t they have phones in Idaho?
OT: In two recent reports Human Rights Watch has accused both iides in last summer’s war in Lebanon of indiscriminate attacks on civilians:
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/isra…..09,00.html
* http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08…..ref=slogin
The U.S. provided weaponry to one side. Iran provided weaponry to the other.
So, who’s the world’s greatest state sponsor of terrorism?
TERRORISM: the actual or threatened use of violence against civilians for political purposes.
RJ, you hit the nail right on the head. I have nothing more to add.
Thanks.
peanutbutter @ 33
It seems to me that previous Presidents, of whatever stripe or philosophy, even Nixon, all tried to do a good job. Nixon,IIRC, with all his faults, also signed Clean Air,Clean Water,(OSHA too?) advocated for a guaranteed income for all, and withdrew from Vietnam(though only after running out of options). Bush, I believe, is the first one that really and truly does not give a shit.
Hugh @ 41
Amen. Wolfowitz and Feith: http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..ge=printer
Not to mention Cheney and Bush.
Digby to the “baby boomers”:
As a pre-boomer I could still relate
link
brendan @ 48
Where are you, in the Black Hole of Calcutta>
OT: Heh. Clifford May of the “non-partisan” neo-con front group Foundation for the Defense of Democracies just got his ass repeatedly handed to him on Forum this morning. Don’t know who was debating him, but the guy dissected each and every lame talking point May regurgitated.
The audio transcript isn’t up yet, but Google “Michael Krasny KQED” and it should be up within the next couple days.
Big Mitch:
That op-ed is a rehash of the justifications he’s been uttering for a couple years now. But it’s beside the point, as Hugh says @41.
I seem to have offended the Moderation Goddess again.
raven:
Another black hole. Maybe I was hallucinating.
lf @ 46
montag:
Thanks for the long response. I followed with two responses on the other thread.
BTW here is my item 245 of my scandals list on the GAO report.
brendan @ 58
:0 oh no!
Re: Sen Craig.
He’s guilty! He’s not guilty! He’s NOT GAY! He’s resigning! He’s not resigning! He really IS resigning!
One of my friends pointed out that for someone who’s NOT GAY, he’s quite the drama queen.
Finally, the unholy trio of Joe Lieberman, Ann Coulter, and Ollie North pretty much says it all. Maybe as an encore, they will take up Joe’s BFF McCain’s rendition of “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” as they do chorus line leg kicks on stage.
RonD @ 52
Can’t argue with that. You’re right, even if there’s some disagreement on “good” they seemed to try and improve things. I see only selfish improvements here…
Paul Bremer is up to his eyeballs in this mess in Iraq. He followed White House and Pentagon orders with great alacrity. Where did his flag redo come from? Blue, modeled after Israel. Bet the Iraqi people never forgot that one either. It’s right up there with “crusade”.
Now L. Paul Bremer is crying he was made a scapegoat. Guess he shouldn’t have accepted that Presidential Medal of Freedom. If he really thinks he is a scapegoat, he can always give it back. Throw it over the White House fence.
NeoCons whine and bellyache non-stop and never admit their own failures. Yes, dear L. Paul Bremer – throw the damn medal over the fence if matters are as you say.
Poor, poor
LewisPaul.re: Bremer’s employability – didn’t he just go back to his job w/ Henry Kissinger’s consulting business? Anyone know? (I’d do a search, but in the time it’d take I’d be epu’d!)
It’s nice to see that Bremer has finally gotten around to rearranging those pesky deck chairs. Unfortunately, he’s going to need a lot more than good feng shui to absolve himself of his role in this whole mess.
Hugh @ 61
very nice assesment hugh.
CSPAN 3 has one of the committee meeting discussing the Independent Assessment Commission report. I really get the impression that so much of this debate is on the level of: Let’s get down to the bottomline. What should angels wear as they dance on the head of a pin?
Hugh @ 61
Nice!
Wow, Hugh, 245!
thanks so much for keeping it so up-to-date, it’s a much appreciated resource!
Bremer is just another piece of refuse that Bush has tossed onto the slag heap of disdain and disrepute.
To think anyone would want to work for, with, or near Bush is an amazing concept.
If one does not toe the line one is defamed, ridiculed and destroyed.
Only those without a shred, a shred of self-respect(ahem, Ron Christie, Karen Hughes) are allowed to leave with a quiver full of arrows shot into their backs.
All hail the king and his queens.
-GSD
Too Whacky!
tejanarusa @ 66
he probably just needs a “front” job while waiting for the Swiss bank account number to clear.
AZ Matt @ 74
What…??? What does public distrubances in a public space have to do with private property ownership…????
AZ Matt @ 74
In a related story, a nearby municipal airport has reported an uptick in restroom solicitations.
-GSD
AZ Matt @ 73
707!
you can’t make this stuff up.
Excellent post RJ. Thank you for putting that all together.
perris, Elliot, thanks
Quaker girl,
Tenet was the first of the Medal of Freedom to whine about setting the record straight.
Paul Bremer is the second.
Only Tommy Franks is left but so few go back to how fundamentally flawed the original war plan was that we probably won’t hear from him.
punaise @ 75
I was closer than I thought with that Max Bialystock reference:
Bremer currently serves as Chairman of the Advisory Board for GlobalSecure Corporation, a company whose focus is “on securing the homeland with integrated products and services for the critical incident response community worldwide,”.[39] and on the board of directors of BlastGard International, Inc., a company located in Florida that manufactures materials to mitigate the impact of explosions. (Standard and Poor’s Register)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Paul_Bremer
The thing that has always mystified me is that they’ve gotten away with crowing “we’re so good at protecting the country, we haven’t had any terrorist attacks since the worst one in our history.“
I mean, I can kinda understand how they ducked responsibility for their huge failure, since they have no shame and people generally were too shocked to think about assigning blame. But to keep reminding people of it and pretending it’s some kind of success… I just don’t get it.
@ 78
Hi TexBetsy!
Hugh @ 71
angel costumes, gold halos
Elliott @ 83
Hey Elliott.
Do me a favor and email me with your email add. TEX Betsy at g mail
punaise @ 75
You got that right! NeoCons don’t work. That’s for peons, like me and thee.
Tula–New thread
brendan @ 81
what a racket!
I mean that literally.
@ 85
Ellie Elliott gmail
Hugh @ 71
It’s their big chance to go naked without being accused of flashing Mother Mary.
Just read today’s Washington Watch by Froomkin @ the WaPo on-line site.
In it he quotes from something Gen. Odem wrote. To me it’s SO important, I wanted to bring it over here so it could be sent to all the Blue Dogs and others before the “dog & phony” show next week [and the subsequent ‘$ for Iraq’ vote].
[Mods, I’m sorry this is such a long quote, but I don’t think it violates copyright, and it’s REALLY important. Fingers crossed.]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..00879.html
Anyone dissing Grant will have to answer to Maha.
Federal Court Strikes Down part of the USA Patriot Act http://rawstory.com//news/2007….._0906.html “>LINK
OK, I read the Bremer op-ed. OTOH Bremer argues that the Iraqi army had dissolved itself and could not be recalled. But then he says there was a decision not to recall it which would seem rather superfluous if it was indeed beyond recall.
Also Bremer doesn’t get into why Garner (who wanted to keep the Iraqi army and prevent a power vacuum) was so quickly and unceremoniously kicked out of his job, and that job given to Bremer.
Bremer does inadvertently I think admit that the decision was made precipitately. He met with Rumsfeld on May 8, 2003 and there was already a draft order prepared the next day. So yes, he must have given it just oodles of thought in the less than 24 hours he had to do his reflections.
But it is the conclusion of his op-ed that goes to show his sheer mendacity.
This is all a bald-faced lie, completely at variance with reality. The Iraqi army is a joke and the police are filled with militiamen, not Saddam’s holdovers. This is a man whose word should not be trusted on anything. It is a wonder that anyone anywhere ever did.
At a bare minimum, we should break the connection between a possible future terrorist attack *and* the increasing power in the hands of conservatives.
Because if there is no disincentive for conservatives to deter or thwart another terrorist attack, why the hell would we expect them to do so?
We *had* the Project for a New American Century *announcing* that they needed an attack to justify expanded national security power.
We *had* Tommy Franks say that if there’s another attack, the Constitution could disappear.
We *have* David Addington saying, “We’re one bomb away from getting rid of that obnoxious [FISA] court.”
With so much power looming so close — at the mere price of a new terrorist attack, which more than a few conservatives have spoken of in glowing terms — there is *no* *fucking* *WAY* we can rationally expect these guys to do *anything* to stop such an attack.
Why would they? They’d only be reducing their own power.
And they never, *never*, *NEVER* voluntarily do *THAT*.
Might as well start calling them on it, before it’s too late.
mauimom @ 91
What Gen. Odom is essentially saying is that we are arming all sides in a civil war, and you would have to be stupid (Bush) or desperate (Petraeus) to believe that this will lead to a more stable situation.
National Security Party is very close to the National Soc*al*st Party. Can’t we cut the bullshit and start calling them thier true name – Nazis?
~~~ModNote: Edited for content to clear filters.~~~
LS @ 40
This is also the AIP*C affiliated group that supports the group: Students for Academic Freedom that is about everything but. They go on the attack of professors and students that discuss anything other than the AIP*C line on things related to the M.E.
Richmond @ 98
Here are related items from the weekend:
Norman Finkelstein’s classes cancelled:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..00526.html
Noam Chomsky book reviewed, but essentially censored through unprofessional disdain (inevitably by a slimy little supporter of invading Iraq):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..01568.html
And, de rigueur, “The New Anti-Semitism”:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..00719.html
Larry Johnson has some great questions for Petraeus
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2…../#more-818
brendan @ 99
Finkelstein resigned yesterday:
From: http://insidehighered.com/news…..inkelstein
wigwam:
It’s enough to recommend Finkelstein that Leon Wieseltier said he’s “something that crawled out from under a rock”.
For anyone who’s ever read his eminently uncontroversial “The Holocaust Industry” it comes as a shock to hear the lie — and, more importantly, libel — that he is a holocaust denier.
Thanks for the post– great stuff!
OT– Interesting interview with profs Mearsheimer and Walt on their new book “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” here:
http://www.onpointradio.org/sh…..a_main.asp
more here:
http://www.npr.org/templates/r…..e=4-Sep-07
…sorry if already posted…
Looseheadprop has a new thread Thursday Afternoon As I Don My Tin Foil Chapeau
Toby Wollin @ 18
Thanks for this comment. It’s truly baffling to me that so many people wind up being authoritarian and mean-spirited. I can only conclude that their primary caregivers when they were children must have been at least very unloving, if not downright abusive. To quote W. H. Auden: “what all schoolchildren learn/Those to whom evil is done/Do evil in return.” True when you raise children, True when you wage war.
Having just watched that video on Jihad, it strikes me that all the incidents recorded caused under 25% of the deaths of Americans resulting from the Iraq war. And all the costs of Jihad, including 9-11 add up to well under 10% of the Bush adventure. Hence if we are after the Jihad associated criminals we ought be begin by getting rid of the near enemy – Bush and Cheney – before pursuing the far enemy. It is Bush and Cheny who have wrought the major havoc in lives and in treasure
This is how well duhbya’s sekuratee plan works.
Fake motorcade causes summit stir
• STORY HIGHLIGHTS
• One “motorcade” participant was dressed to resemble Osama bin Laden
• Comedy group’s stunt an embarrassment to Sydney security officials
• Police arrest 11 cast and crew members from TV program
• Fake motorcade included motorcycles, cars with Canadian flags
SYDNEY, Australia (AP) — Members of an Australian TV comedy show, one of them dressed as Osama bin Laden, drove through two security checkpoints Thursday before being stopped near the Sydney hotel where U.S. President George W. Bush is staying.
Police officers were not amused by the comedy group’s stunt. Eleven people were arrested.
The stunt embarrassed Sydney police who have imposed the tightest security measures in city history for a summit of leaders from Pacific Rim countries, including Bush.
Police arrested 11 cast and crew members from the TV program, “The Chaser’s War on Everything,” and impounded three vehicles, the Australian Broadcasting Corp., which airs the show, said on its Web site.
Cast members put together a sham motorcade, hiring two motorcycles and three large cars on which they put Canadian flags. Police waved the motorcade through two checkpoints before pulling it over near the Intercontinental Hotel where Bush is staying.
Cast member Chas Licciardello got out of the car dressed in a white tunic and cap and wearing a long, fake, Osama bin Laden-style beard. Watch the arrests after the “motorcade” stopped »
Don’t Miss
• Bush, China’s Hu tackle thorny issues
• APEC divided on global warming
“No particular reason we chose Canada,” cast member Chris Taylor was quoted as saying on The Sydney Morning Herald’s Web site. “We just thought they’d be a country who the cops wouldn’t scrutinize too closely, and who feasibly would only have three cars in their motorcade — as opposed to the 20 or so gas guzzlers that Bush has brought with him.”
Bush is a frequent target of “The Chaser,” as are Australian politicians. Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said the stunt proved security was working.
“Whatever you think of the humor of ‘The Chaser,’ the honest truth is they were clearly not going to harm anybody in a physical way,” Downer said. “They presumably were, as is the nature of their show, aiming to humiliate a lot of well-known people.”
Video link
APEC security breach 1:41
Arrests were made after a fake motorcade breached security at the APEC summit. Seven Network’s Chris Reason reports
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITI…..nnSTCVideo
Article text source
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITI…..cnnSTCText
Do you feel safer? I don’t.
It’s not a fact that there have been no terrist attacks in Merica since 9/11, unless you think they sectarian terrists and decide that all those anthraxed postmen were really ’street crime’ victims.
Bush-Lip
Bush-Lip
Bush-Lip
scarlet p. @ 5
First time shame on Dubya.
Second time shame on all of us.
Great sign!
Frank Probst @ 49
Do ya think this gives us another vote to impeach Dick & Dubya?
Hang in there Senator, you can still get revenge on those creeps!
peanutbutter @ 76
Shhh, don’t interrupt while the Republicans are feeding on one another.