<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Labor Is Strong Democrats Win&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:09:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watson</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938707</link>
		<dc:creator>Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938707</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Unions are unpopular due in part to relentless media hostility which promotes the middle class contempt that Ian mentions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unions also tend to be undemocratic, which engenders corruption, alienates union members, and creates negative word-of-mouth among unorganized blue and pink collar workers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need national laws making union membership the default setting, and requiring uniform by-laws that will guarantee internal union democracy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unions are unpopular due in part to relentless media hostility which promotes the middle class contempt that Ian mentions. </p>
<p>Unions also tend to be undemocratic, which engenders corruption, alienates union members, and creates negative word-of-mouth among unorganized blue and pink collar workers.</p>
<p>We need national laws making union membership the default setting, and requiring uniform by-laws that will guarantee internal union democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disgusted</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938598</link>
		<dc:creator>disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938598</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Organized Labor is in trouble of its own making as a supporter of it I have watched for years as it ignores people who want to start Unions and participate in Unions I know for a fact at least ten people that have written to various local, regional and national unions and have been ignored they didn’t have enough members etc. etc. etc.. Same old story if you can’t make headlines have 10,000 members and raise 1,000,000 dollars a week the UNION wants NOTHING to do with you. The union is about money money for them it is about vacations vacations for them and it is about power, power for them, much like the republicans they care NOTHING for anyone other then themselves and how the system serves them and generates money for them.&lt;br /&gt;
So please do not whine and cry about the Unions and the Democrats they are there to serve their own purposes we as supporters and believers are just stepping stones nothing more oops! I forgot their bankers they do want us ONLY for our money.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organized Labor is in trouble of its own making as a supporter of it I have watched for years as it ignores people who want to start Unions and participate in Unions I know for a fact at least ten people that have written to various local, regional and national unions and have been ignored they didn’t have enough members etc. etc. etc.. Same old story if you can’t make headlines have 10,000 members and raise 1,000,000 dollars a week the UNION wants NOTHING to do with you. The union is about money money for them it is about vacations vacations for them and it is about power, power for them, much like the republicans they care NOTHING for anyone other then themselves and how the system serves them and generates money for them.<br />
So please do not whine and cry about the Unions and the Democrats they are there to serve their own purposes we as supporters and believers are just stepping stones nothing more oops! I forgot their bankers they do want us ONLY for our money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938416</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938416</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-937110&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jonathan @ 55&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-937106&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @ 51&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;chris hedges makes the argument that the abandonment of the working class by the democrats, and the consequential economic hardship many communities are dealing with, is one of the driving forces of the fundamentalist “christian” political movement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sometimes hardship can breed extremism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if this is so, then it is just one more reason to HATE the dlc corporatists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;selise,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most every time I read your posts, I think you hit the nail on the head.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the only tool you have is a hammer, every thing (every solution) looks like a nail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-937110"><em>Jonathan @ 55</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-937106"><em>selise @ 51</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>chris hedges makes the argument that the abandonment of the working class by the democrats, and the consequential economic hardship many communities are dealing with, is one of the driving forces of the fundamentalist “christian” political movement.</p>
<p>sometimes hardship can breed extremism.</p>
<p>….</p>
<p>if this is so, then it is just one more reason to HATE the dlc corporatists.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>selise,</p>
<p>Most every time I read your posts, I think you hit the nail on the head.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>When the only tool you have is a hammer, every thing (every solution) looks like a nail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB_Gypsy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938262</link>
		<dc:creator>SB_Gypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938262</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-937132&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;ccmask @ 72&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-937112&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CTuttle @ 57&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Insane, hamstring the Teamsters…  I wonder if the Mexican Insurance Companies will pay for the accidents… So much for cargo scrutiny… Hmmm.. I know I left a bunch out…!!!  8-(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Is it WalMart stuff coming in the trucks or veggies?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem with Mexican trucks on our highways is that they load them up with three trailers. Sounds good until you realize that the trailers going over the road start this rocking motion that bangs the hell outa the pavement - which is one reason their roads are all torn up. To allow them to drive on our roads like that will cost mucho bucks from our taxpayers to repair all the freeways. Another reason that Walmart is not really cheap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    Just FWIW&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    In the summer of 1965, I worked in a union shop doing piece work. In Aurora, Illinois. While in college.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    Management: do piece work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    Union: Don’t produce more than the established limit of piece work per hour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    Union: Must pay us dues, even if you don’t belong to the union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason that most unions try to limit the piecework is so that the company cannot take the fastest worker and make that the new benchmark. This is what they did early on in China. They just keep speeding up the line, and burning out the employees. The young girls who work the lines in China start in their teens, and are discarded within ten years or so - too broken with repetitive stress to work any more. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The movie: Take This Job and Shove It! did a great job outlining this problem. We in america see this in the deep south chicken processing factories, where the women dressing chickens are unable at 25 to pick up their babies or their groceries because of Repetitive Stress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps we need a movie marathon - &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Take this job and shove it&lt;br /&gt;
2. Network&lt;br /&gt;
3. On the Waterfront&lt;br /&gt;
4. Good Night and Good Luck&lt;br /&gt;
5. Red State&lt;br /&gt;
6. Inconvient Truth&lt;br /&gt;
7. Erin Brockovich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…any other ones I forgot??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-937132"><em>ccmask @ 72</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-937112"><em>CTuttle @ 57</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Insane, hamstring the Teamsters…  I wonder if the Mexican Insurance Companies will pay for the accidents… So much for cargo scrutiny… Hmmm.. I know I left a bunch out…!!!  8-(</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Is it WalMart stuff coming in the trucks or veggies?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The problem with Mexican trucks on our highways is that they load them up with three trailers. Sounds good until you realize that the trailers going over the road start this rocking motion that bangs the hell outa the pavement &#8211; which is one reason their roads are all torn up. To allow them to drive on our roads like that will cost mucho bucks from our taxpayers to repair all the freeways. Another reason that Walmart is not really cheap.<br />
<i><br />
    Just FWIW</i></p>
<p>    In the summer of 1965, I worked in a union shop doing piece work. In Aurora, Illinois. While in college.</p>
<p>    Management: do piece work.</p>
<p>    Union: Don’t produce more than the established limit of piece work per hour.</p>
<p>    Union: Must pay us dues, even if you don’t belong to the union.</p>
<p>The reason that most unions try to limit the piecework is so that the company cannot take the fastest worker and make that the new benchmark. This is what they did early on in China. They just keep speeding up the line, and burning out the employees. The young girls who work the lines in China start in their teens, and are discarded within ten years or so &#8211; too broken with repetitive stress to work any more. </p>
<p>The movie: Take This Job and Shove It! did a great job outlining this problem. We in america see this in the deep south chicken processing factories, where the women dressing chickens are unable at 25 to pick up their babies or their groceries because of Repetitive Stress.</p>
<p>Perhaps we need a movie marathon &#8211; </p>
<p>1. Take this job and shove it<br />
2. Network<br />
3. On the Waterfront<br />
4. Good Night and Good Luck<br />
5. Red State<br />
6. Inconvient Truth<br />
7. Erin Brockovich</p>
<p>…any other ones I forgot??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshuasGrandma</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938257</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshuasGrandma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Unions provide organizing space, they provide media surrogates, they conduct training, they support think tanks and so on. They provide a lot of the infrastructure that keeps the party going - and that pushes the party to pursue liberal and populist policies when in office.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s not just the unions - it’s the continuing strength of the organizing skills at the local and state level.  Media politics has undercut this essential process of local organizing and Dems have paid the price because the Repugs latched onto the Christian Right to do this for them (and the faith-based initiative has continued to fund them).  This is why Dean’s 50 State Strategy is so important to start and continue building the  party infrastructure at local and state level, particularly in red states that are still voting 40-49% Democratic. (Hillary has not yet accepted this and is still counting on big money/media.)&lt;br /&gt;
The local strategy has a double whammy because it also gets Dems and Progressives elected at the local and state level which continues to build party strength over the long haul. Lasting change happens from the bottom up-not top down. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One example of how this is working on state level is in SC - where the SC Dems are coalitioning with the Universal Health Care initiative, which is bringing people who think health care is important, including small business leaders, into the democratic fold.&lt;br /&gt;
And once you’re working with people on an issue you care about, trust builds, and educating them about others is lots easier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unions served much of this purpose in manufacturing states in the past but with the outsourcing of those jobs - they’ve had nowhere to go.  I agree it’s time to get a new ‘union label’ but we must continue to tap the organizing skills around the important issues: environmental groups, global warming, children’s health, protecting SS/pensions, etc.  Coalition-building is all about finding common ground - and the Dem priorities give the focus for that search.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember: the bottom line is “all politics is local.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Unions provide organizing space, they provide media surrogates, they conduct training, they support think tanks and so on. They provide a lot of the infrastructure that keeps the party going &#8211; and that pushes the party to pursue liberal and populist policies when in office.”</p>
<p>It’s not just the unions &#8211; it’s the continuing strength of the organizing skills at the local and state level.  Media politics has undercut this essential process of local organizing and Dems have paid the price because the Repugs latched onto the Christian Right to do this for them (and the faith-based initiative has continued to fund them).  This is why Dean’s 50 State Strategy is so important to start and continue building the  party infrastructure at local and state level, particularly in red states that are still voting 40-49% Democratic. (Hillary has not yet accepted this and is still counting on big money/media.)<br />
The local strategy has a double whammy because it also gets Dems and Progressives elected at the local and state level which continues to build party strength over the long haul. Lasting change happens from the bottom up-not top down. </p>
<p>One example of how this is working on state level is in SC &#8211; where the SC Dems are coalitioning with the Universal Health Care initiative, which is bringing people who think health care is important, including small business leaders, into the democratic fold.<br />
And once you’re working with people on an issue you care about, trust builds, and educating them about others is lots easier.</p>
<p>Unions served much of this purpose in manufacturing states in the past but with the outsourcing of those jobs &#8211; they’ve had nowhere to go.  I agree it’s time to get a new ‘union label’ but we must continue to tap the organizing skills around the important issues: environmental groups, global warming, children’s health, protecting SS/pensions, etc.  Coalition-building is all about finding common ground &#8211; and the Dem priorities give the focus for that search.</p>
<p>Remember: the bottom line is “all politics is local.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938031</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-938031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-937993&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Arnie @ 123&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Christine @ 83, 102, 113, 117&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was once a union member, what your “burr under the sadle” is about is that there is a “cost” involved in creating the contract you are working under (as well as benefiting from). It appears that the cost is &lt;2% of the gross wage, not a particularly heavy cost as administrative costs can be. It is by your statements, your choice not to become a member of the union which means it is your choice NOT to have a voice in that organization and consequently imput into their barganing process. If the employer absolutely violated the contract, that union would be all over the employers case, but if you are not, by choice, a member of the union, you will probably not be kept informed, that is the consequence of your choice. Cry that you are abused, try working in a “right to work” state, you would be lucky to get 12K a year for the same work - I would guess. Seriously EPU’d&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is in a ‘right to work’ state.  Yes, I’m aware of ‘overhead’ costs of the union and yes, I know what unions have done for this country.  But, I still don’t get where they can take your money, but not represent you in all aspects of the place of employment/terms of contract.  It’s like they want the money, but only 50% of the work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-937993"><em>Arnie @ 123</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Christine @ 83, 102, 113, 117</p>
<p>I was once a union member, what your “burr under the sadle” is about is that there is a “cost” involved in creating the contract you are working under (as well as benefiting from). It appears that the cost is &lt;2% of the gross wage, not a particularly heavy cost as administrative costs can be. It is by your statements, your choice not to become a member of the union which means it is your choice NOT to have a voice in that organization and consequently imput into their barganing process. If the employer absolutely violated the contract, that union would be all over the employers case, but if you are not, by choice, a member of the union, you will probably not be kept informed, that is the consequence of your choice. Cry that you are abused, try working in a “right to work” state, you would be lucky to get 12K a year for the same work &#8211; I would guess. Seriously EPU’d</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is in a ‘right to work’ state.  Yes, I’m aware of ‘overhead’ costs of the union and yes, I know what unions have done for this country.  But, I still don’t get where they can take your money, but not represent you in all aspects of the place of employment/terms of contract.  It’s like they want the money, but only 50% of the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937993</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 11:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937993</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Christine @ 83, 102, 113, 117&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was once a union member, what your “burr under the sadle” is about is that there is a “cost” involved in creating the contract you are working under (as well as benefiting from). It appears that the cost is &lt;2% of the gross wage, not a particularly heavy cost as administrative costs can be. It is by your statements, your choice not to become a member of the union which means it is your choice NOT to have a voice in that organization and consequently imput into their barganing process. If the employer absolutely violated the contract, that union would be all over the employers case, but if you are not, by choice, a member of the union, you will probably not be kept informed, that is the consequence of your choice. Cry that you are abused, try working in a “right to work” state, you would be lucky to get 12K a year for the same work - I would guess. Seriously EPU’d&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine @ 83, 102, 113, 117</p>
<p>I was once a union member, what your “burr under the sadle” is about is that there is a “cost” involved in creating the contract you are working under (as well as benefiting from). It appears that the cost is &lt;2% of the gross wage, not a particularly heavy cost as administrative costs can be. It is by your statements, your choice not to become a member of the union which means it is your choice NOT to have a voice in that organization and consequently imput into their barganing process. If the employer absolutely violated the contract, that union would be all over the employers case, but if you are not, by choice, a member of the union, you will probably not be kept informed, that is the consequence of your choice. Cry that you are abused, try working in a “right to work” state, you would be lucky to get 12K a year for the same work &#8211; I would guess. Seriously EPU’d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937430</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Instead of wasting time and money on “candidates” the left would be far better served by expending our efforts on organizing labor. Unions are the one thing the wingnuts truly fear.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of wasting time and money on “candidates” the left would be far better served by expending our efforts on organizing labor. Unions are the one thing the wingnuts truly fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watson</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937331</link>
		<dc:creator>Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Involuntary union membership and dues payment are galling to a lot of people. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One way to look at it is that unless you’re an owner/employer/manager, you’re a member of the working class, like it or not. It’s kind of like being a citizen of a nation, entitled to the benefits, but also subject to the burdens.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Involuntary union membership and dues payment are galling to a lot of people. </p>
<p>One way to look at it is that unless you’re an owner/employer/manager, you’re a member of the working class, like it or not. It’s kind of like being a citizen of a nation, entitled to the benefits, but also subject to the burdens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LS</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937290</link>
		<dc:creator>LS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/09/01/when-labor-is-strong-democrats-win/#comment-937290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, Philip Morris acquired Kraft foods for $12.9 billion in 1988, and eventually merged it with General Foods, then they acquired Nabisco in 2000.  So, the leading Homeland tobacco company, owns all our crapola food.  Figures.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, Philip Morris acquired Kraft foods for $12.9 billion in 1988, and eventually merged it with General Foods, then they acquired Nabisco in 2000.  So, the leading Homeland tobacco company, owns all our crapola food.  Figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
