<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gonzales Presser Live at 10:30 am ET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:57:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923908</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923908</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923332&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;looseheadprop @ 206&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;musicsleuth @ 93&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rove and Gonzales — is this designed to take the winds out of Dems sails for having a smackdown in the Fall with these guys over the attorney scandal? You can’t impeach a resigning AG.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s my working theory at the moment.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry! But you are both wrong…one can still impeach a resigned official…in fact it was done with Secretary of War William Worth Belknap. Belknap resigned while hearings were occurring in the House over whether he should have articles of impeachment voted upon. The House debated whether he could evade impeachment through resignation and voted almost unanimously that he could not escape the process as the Constitution holds that impeachment also precludes someone convicted from holding FUTURE office of “honor, trust or profit”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate held the same thing but by a smaller majority…but when the actual vote on the articles of impeachment occurred..several Senators decided that Belknap’s resignation was sufficient, and joined with those who considered the action Unconstitutional. Belknap thus was not convicted ~ despite the legal issue of the Constitutionality of the act being decided already. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Belknap&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Belknap&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-923332"><em>looseheadprop @ 206</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-923209"><em>musicsleuth @ 93</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Rove and Gonzales — is this designed to take the winds out of Dems sails for having a smackdown in the Fall with these guys over the attorney scandal? You can’t impeach a resigning AG.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s my working theory at the moment.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry! But you are both wrong…one can still impeach a resigned official…in fact it was done with Secretary of War William Worth Belknap. Belknap resigned while hearings were occurring in the House over whether he should have articles of impeachment voted upon. The House debated whether he could evade impeachment through resignation and voted almost unanimously that he could not escape the process as the Constitution holds that impeachment also precludes someone convicted from holding FUTURE office of “honor, trust or profit”</p>
<p>The Senate held the same thing but by a smaller majority…but when the actual vote on the articles of impeachment occurred..several Senators decided that Belknap’s resignation was sufficient, and joined with those who considered the action Unconstitutional. Belknap thus was not convicted ~ despite the legal issue of the Constitutionality of the act being decided already. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Belknap">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Belknap</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923787</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923787</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923332&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;looseheadprop @ 206&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;musicsleuth @ 93&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
…&lt;br /&gt;
You can’t impeach a resigning AG.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s my working theory at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…&lt;br /&gt;
Dems got played AGAIN, b/c Nancy took impeachment of the PRes/VP off the table.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t recall her specifying that impeachment of the Veep was off the table. I thought she was only referring to the Prez.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cite?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-923332"><em>looseheadprop @ 206</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-923209"><em>musicsleuth @ 93</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
…<br />
You can’t impeach a resigning AG.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s my working theory at the moment.</p>
<p>…<br />
Dems got played AGAIN, b/c Nancy took impeachment of the PRes/VP off the table.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don’t recall her specifying that impeachment of the Veep was off the table. I thought she was only referring to the Prez.</p>
<p>Cite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923668</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923668</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Poor Shumer. He’s going to “quietly” help the king pick an AG; and the king may have an epiphany and act like a grown-up.  Laugh of the day. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cornyn has all Gonzales’s attributes, and then some.  Bestest lapdog ever to guard the king’s secrets.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Shumer. He’s going to “quietly” help the king pick an AG; and the king may have an epiphany and act like a grown-up.  Laugh of the day. </p>
<p>Cornyn has all Gonzales’s attributes, and then some.  Bestest lapdog ever to guard the king’s secrets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorskeFlamethrower</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923651</link>
		<dc:creator>NorskeFlamethrower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923651</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1,580 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firepup Patriots:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today is a great day for progressives and the next few days will tell us a lot about where we need to focus our energies to win the battle to restore constitutional government in this country.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, the anti-Bush pro-Clinton faction of the oligarchy represented by Murdoch and the Rockefeller insitutions has won the day in the battle for control of what happens next.  If the progressives in the Democratic Party can succeed in blowin’ the breath of truth through the open window of confirmation hearings, then I think we have a great chance to de-rail the Clinton locamotive for succession.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But what happened today just clarifies where the fascists are puttin’ their money for ‘08.  Mrs. Clinton must be stopped…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KEEP THE FAITH AND REMEMBER YOU DON’T NEGOTIATE WITH FASCISTS!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1,580 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..</p>
<p>Firepup Patriots:</p>
<p>Today is a great day for progressives and the next few days will tell us a lot about where we need to focus our energies to win the battle to restore constitutional government in this country.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the anti-Bush pro-Clinton faction of the oligarchy represented by Murdoch and the Rockefeller insitutions has won the day in the battle for control of what happens next.  If the progressives in the Democratic Party can succeed in blowin’ the breath of truth through the open window of confirmation hearings, then I think we have a great chance to de-rail the Clinton locamotive for succession.</p>
<p>But what happened today just clarifies where the fascists are puttin’ their money for ‘08.  Mrs. Clinton must be stopped…</p>
<p>KEEP THE FAITH AND REMEMBER YOU DON’T NEGOTIATE WITH FASCISTS!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiredFed</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923595</link>
		<dc:creator>TiredFed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923335&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;punaise @ 209&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;perhaps 9/17 effective resignation date is a head-fake? watch out for a midnight insta-resignation plus recess appt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exactamundo!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-923335"><em>punaise @ 209</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>perhaps 9/17 effective resignation date is a head-fake? watch out for a midnight insta-resignation plus recess appt.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>exactamundo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realworld</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923577</link>
		<dc:creator>realworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923577</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923538&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;pma @ 297&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yep, per GWB, “fine honorable man’s name dragged through mud for partisan political reasons.”  I just wonder why Bush feels he can now do without this stonewall between him and investigations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;because he realized congress doesn’t have any gonads.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-923538"><em>pma @ 297</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Yep, per GWB, “fine honorable man’s name dragged through mud for partisan political reasons.”  I just wonder why Bush feels he can now do without this stonewall between him and investigations.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>because he realized congress doesn’t have any gonads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorskeFlamethrower</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923570</link>
		<dc:creator>NorskeFlamethrower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923570</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1,580 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Citizen pma:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I just wonder why Bush feels he can now do without this stonewall between him and investigations.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good question but I think it is answered by the phrase “impeachment is off the table.” There have been some serious knock-down drag-out fights these last few weeks between the factions of the oligarchy and I think that the Murdoch-Rockefeller faction offered the Chimp the guarantee of no impeachment as a Linus blanket if he just shuts the fuck up for the next 15 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, THE FASCISTS ARE STILL RUNNIN THE SHOW!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1,580 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..</p>
<p>Citizen pma:</p>
<p>“I just wonder why Bush feels he can now do without this stonewall between him and investigations.”</p>
<p>Good question but I think it is answered by the phrase “impeachment is off the table.” There have been some serious knock-down drag-out fights these last few weeks between the factions of the oligarchy and I think that the Murdoch-Rockefeller faction offered the Chimp the guarantee of no impeachment as a Linus blanket if he just shuts the fuck up for the next 15 months.</p>
<p>KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, THE FASCISTS ARE STILL RUNNIN THE SHOW!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landofthefree</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923568</link>
		<dc:creator>landofthefree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923553&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;FRN @ 300&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;musicsleuth @ 93&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can’t impeach a resigning AG.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Says who? The only Cabinet official ever to be impeached was Secretary of War William Belknap, who was unanimously impeached after he had already resigned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ooh, they can do that? Nifty.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-923553"><em>FRN @ 300</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-923209"><em>musicsleuth @ 93</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>You can’t impeach a resigning AG.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Says who? The only Cabinet official ever to be impeached was Secretary of War William Belknap, who was unanimously impeached after he had already resigned.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ooh, they can do that? Nifty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRN</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923553</link>
		<dc:creator>FRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923553</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;musicsleuth @ 93&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can’t impeach a resigning AG.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Says who? The only Cabinet official ever to be impeached was Secretary of War William Belknap, who was unanimously impeached after he had already resigned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-923209"><em>musicsleuth @ 93</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>You can’t impeach a resigning AG.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Says who? The only Cabinet official ever to be impeached was Secretary of War William Belknap, who was unanimously impeached after he had already resigned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LS</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923546</link>
		<dc:creator>LS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/27/gonzales-presser-live-at-1030-am-et/#comment-923546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-923538&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;pma @ 297&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yep, per GWB, “fine honorable man’s name dragged through mud for partisan political reasons.”  I just wonder why Bush feels he can now do without this stonewall between him and investigations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fielding and Addington?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking of investigations…what about this break-in at Chris Dodd’s office.  The burglars went to a great deal of trouble to get in there.  Baby Watergate??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-923538"><em>pma @ 297</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Yep, per GWB, “fine honorable man’s name dragged through mud for partisan political reasons.”  I just wonder why Bush feels he can now do without this stonewall between him and investigations.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Fielding and Addington?</p>
<p>Speaking of investigations…what about this break-in at Chris Dodd’s office.  The burglars went to a great deal of trouble to get in there.  Baby Watergate??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.240 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-14 08:00:24 -->

