Top 1% income to 2004
Related posts:
Top 1% income to 2004By: Ian Welsh Saturday August 18, 2007 1:03 am |

| Tell Ft Hood to Disinvite Sarah Palin by Teddy Partridge |
| While The Legacy Media Republicans Babbled about Bowing, Obama Rescued Copenhagen from the Dumpster by Phoenix Woman |
| Arianna is using her very large megaphone to plead for a substantive jobs bill. Let us hope she is successful! Bonus: two-part video on out-sourcing by KarenM |
| Kill the Bill by marcos |
| Single Payer Advocates To Help With Sanders' S703 Amendment and HCR Updates! by libbyliberal |
| Grand Bargain: Robust Public Option for Cross-State competition by mikesong |
| The Long Hot Summer For Harry by Oilfieldguy |
| Tivo alert: PBS does Dreams and Credit Cards tonight by Elliott |
| Your Enbrel, Herceptin, and Epogen Dollars at Work by ralphbon |
| Because Recovery Works, 3.5 Million Americans to Work Too by Congressman John Garamendi |

| Chemicals In Your Food: The Body Toxic | |
| View Show |
Zed
Wow, that’s quite a graph! Looks like we’re approaching Roaring-20s levels of income disparity.
The wealthiest 1% had to make do with a measly 9-12% of all income for the first three decades of the post-WWII era. Makes you wonder how the poor things scraped by.
Then thanks to Ronald Reagan, their share climbed to 15%, and then the dot-com bubble briefly pushed it into the low 20s. I gather that the extended graph would show that it’s right back up there again.
John Edwards is right about two Americas, one for the extremely wealthy, and another for the rest of us. Time to undo this latest Gilded Age.