Top 1% income to 2004
Related posts:
Top 1% income to 2004By: Ian Welsh Saturday August 18, 2007 1:03 am |

| The Horrible Toll of Underemployment by Jim White |
| We are political chumps by TPAZ |
| Time for us to Take the Pledge by RevDeb |
| When Did We Become a Nation of Hyenas? by TobyWollin |
| Afghanistan Is About More Than the War by danps |
| The Demise of Global Capitalism by glennp |
| Molestus Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc by Cujo359 |
| James Nachtwey's Image of Afghanistan by JacobFreeze |
| Weekly Address: Tragedy at Fort Hood by twolf1 |
| Was Goldman Sachs "selling short" the U.S. economy? 5-month McClatchy investigation - "hedged" to the brink of disaster by KarenM |

| Was I hired to stand in the way of health care reform? | |
| View Show |
Zed
Wow, that’s quite a graph! Looks like we’re approaching Roaring-20s levels of income disparity.
The wealthiest 1% had to make do with a measly 9-12% of all income for the first three decades of the post-WWII era. Makes you wonder how the poor things scraped by.
Then thanks to Ronald Reagan, their share climbed to 15%, and then the dot-com bubble briefly pushed it into the low 20s. I gather that the extended graph would show that it’s right back up there again.
John Edwards is right about two Americas, one for the extremely wealthy, and another for the rest of us. Time to undo this latest Gilded Age.