On November 8, 2006, I celebrated along with the rest of the country over the election of Jerry McNerney. As one of the principal writers on the blog SayNoToPombo, I had worked incredibly hard to get McNerney elected, first in the primary and then again in the general. So you can imagine my confusion two weeks ago when McNerney returned from a weekend trip to Iraq spouting off Republican talking points. A few days ago the AP breathlessly reported a story, ”Democrats Praise Military Progress” that pushed the new Republican meme going into September that even anti-war Democrats are acknowledging that conditions in Iraq are improving. The article quoted a handful of Democratic senators, each one of whom was extremely careful to qualify his praise. The narrative traveled along the lines that, yes, indeed, our troops were performing admirably, but that without a political solution anywhere in sight, military progress was meaningless.
That is, right up until the last two paragraphs:
California Democratic Rep. Jerry McNerney had a different take. After visiting Iraq last month and visiting with Petraeus, McNerney said signs of progress led him to decide he'll be a little more flexible about when troops should be brought home. "I'm more willing to work with finding a way forward to accommodate what the generals are saying," McNerney said.
Now, since this trip was McNerney’s first visit to Iraq, it’s hard to know exactly how he was able to judge these “signs of progress.” Back when he was running for Congress as a Blue America candidate, Jerry McNerney was very definite about the lack of progress in Iraq and his opposition to Bush’s war: (emphasis added)
I called for a public timetable for withdrawal from Iraq at the San Joaquin County Central Committee in October 2005, about one month before Congressman Murtha took a stand on the issue. I stand by that position. I was against the invasion of Iraq because it was obvious that Iraq did not have WMD's and that the war was a vendetta by our President on Saddam. Against the advice of foreign policy experts like Colin Powell and Brent Scocroft, Bush and his hawk advisors pushed for a war by dividing our country and fueling fear instead of uniting America. We are now paying the price for this failed policy. Our troops are trapped in a civil war with no possible good outcome, a war that has been leveraged by terrorists to incite sectarian violence.
It seems to me that as stakeholders in McNerney’s 2006 Congressional campaign, those of us who supported him with both our dollars and our boots on the ground are owed an explanation for his sudden decision to embrace the rhetoric of “progress” in Iraq and his new policy of accommodation. If you contributed to McNerney, if you walked a precinct for him, please contact Jerry McNerney and ask him why he’s reneging on his campaign positions. Ask him why he’s providing talking points for Republicans. Or better yet, if you live nearby, attend one of his “Congress at Your Corner” sessions next week and ask him in person:
Tracy: Monday, August 20, Barnes and Noble West Valley Mall, 3150 Naglee Rd., Noon to 1 p.m.
Woodbridge: Tuesday, August 21, Woodbridge Crossing, 18939 N. Lower Sacramento Rd., 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
First?
and second?
Twain you’ve made your mark, doubly, congrats1
David W. Bartoo @ 3
David, I think it’s just you and me.
what would you like to talk about?
McNerny’s got a great smile.
He knows how to dress.
He knows how to be photographed, with a flag in the background.
What else does he know, other than how to get elected and how to keep his seat?
Babaloo - Welcome to Firedoglake and thank you so much for raising this!
The willingness of some folks who ran as Democrats and even as Progressives to drink the koolaid on Iraq is something we have to address - and stop.
I’ve heard rumblings about trouble with McNerney for a bit but this is over the top.
Dang, I had to read it first!!!
The question of accountability must be pursued.
I do believe that something happens to many elected officials, just what is hard to say, but Gunga’s applecart comes to mind. The wrong sort of person is all too often attracted to this line of ‘work’.
Siun @ 6
Didn’t he cave on FISA, too???
As a Californian and someone who sent money to McN I have to say this is infuriating. Of course, you want the guy’s judgment, but this is just totally opposite of what he was saying and why he got our support, money and love.
I get letters and calls from the DCCC and the DNC every week. I have told them in the past two months that they can have my money when they show balls. they cant vote to give abu more FISA and not vote to withdraw, to send more money and lives into this quagmire.
Look at the recent (maybe one down) atrios post about polling that says most americans wont believe the Patreaus report and it wont change their minds.
This thing is over. Talk to the people. we want out. Not only that, it is the smart thing to do.
What are the DEMS in Congress afraid of and who has their cocks in a knot?
O/T here, but interesting.
many are reporting on the
excessive redactions in
f.b.i. director robert mueller
notes from march of 2004,
released today. . .
but what IS there, is damning:
vice president dick cheney, according to
several (widely-published) sources, gave then
white house counsel alberto gonzales an order
to go to the hospital bed of john ashcroft, and
prevail upon him to allow warrantless wiretapping
of united states citizens to continue, without
any probable cause — despite the insistence of
james comey, then acting attorney general (be-
cause john ashcroft was recovering from surgery),
that the program then in operation violated
the constitution, and thus must either
be amended, or cease, altogether. . .
alberto gonzales and dick cheney
are both liars. alberto gonzales
lied, under oath, before congress,
about what happened on march 10, 2004.
dick cheney lied, on cable televsion,
most recently to larry king, about “not
recalling” whether he ordered the
above visit.
though pale in comparison
to the above, that the yellow-highlighted
portion of f.b.i. director mueller’s
notes (above) recite that james comey — as
then-acting attorney general — was being
prevented from getting relevant information
about this program from. . . where? from. . .
that’s right! — the white house. that
obviously had to be one vice president
dick cheney. what was dick cheney doing,
withholding information crucial for the
re-authorization of this supposedly-highly
effective, and urgently-needed, surveillance
program? why — but of course! — dick cheney
was acting as a fourth branch, usurping
the legitimate role of the f.b.i., and the
united states attorney, in these matters.
Siun,
Thanks for the welcome — it’s great to be here!
Actually, McNerney did vote against FISA, along with the entire California Democratic Congressional delegation.
nolo @ 11
Cheney and Rove were hiding the surveillance of domestic opponents, including elected opponents, not terrorists.
babaloo @ 12
that’s not true, at least Feinstein voted for it. I dont know about the all the House members, but certainly the Goopers voted for it. I live in Rohrab-land andhe voted for it.
But I was disheartened to learn about this bit of information earlier today. Could this have anything to do with McNerney’s conversion to Republican talking points?
Looks like Boehner got exactly what he hoped for in exchange. This is from the Republican House Leader’s website:
babaloo @ 12
My apologies… Welcome to the Lake, nice splash…!!! ;-)
babaloo @ 12
I believe Costa (District 20) voted for it–the only CA Congressional Dem to do so.
Thanks for this post–I, too, am disappointed with McNerney.
peterboy at 14
Yes, indeed, Feinstein voted for FISA and I’m ashamed to say that Boxer did not vote. But the entire California Democratic Congressional delegation did vote against FISA.
He’s not getting another nickel from me. I’ve been sorely disappointed in some of the frosh Dems who I contributed to.
Ah well. Maybe 2008 will be better.
Nolo @ 11
Where are the patriots?
I think the U.S. is broken.
Every man (woman) for himself (herself).
Escape the ship before it sinks.
And yes:
Princeton - a degree to Petraes
Yale - a degree to GWB
Yale - a professorship for Wolfie
Harvard - an MBA for shrub
Why do the smart alums of these universities underwrite such awfulness?
McNerney has been bought, paid for, and possibly intimidated. The other side has the full resources of the NSA at their disposal. In any case, he has to be punished, even if that requires supporting the most vile opponent on earth. For the education of the rest, he must be punished.
Has McNerney explained his recent remarks or how he reconciles them with those he made during his campaign?
I put up a list a couple times today of 20 reasons why the surge is not working. It would be interesting to know how McNerney would maintain his newfound optimism in the face of them.
I think Babaloo’s suggestion that we let him know is a very good one … so many of us backed McNerney with enthusiasm … we need to let him know he won’t be getting our backing again with this sort of nonsense.
In Jerry’s March 2007 visit to FDL for a Blue America chat, Howie Klein wrote this in the setup post:
This was in March. According to his website, he’s still holding these “Congressman on the Corner” events, and will be in Tracy on Monday 8/20 and Woodbridge on Tuesday 8/21.
It might be worth having a couple local Blue America supporters ask him in person about his apparent change of heart on Iraq. For example . . .
Whatever happened to public timetables for withdrawl that you once supported unconditionally?
You said last year that this “war that has been leveraged by terrorists to incite sectarian violence.” How does staying longer (for an indefinite period) help to reduce the leverage of terrorists?
This has been an interesting day. Politically. And legally.
Here, in Pennsylvania, we’ve got Sen. Robert
Casey, who can’t decide if he wants to be Santorum-lite or Specter-lite. But he most definitely plays a ‘timid middle’.
Who’s running against McNerney? I contributed hard earned money to this man, and I am so pissed… I
Are no Democrats mentoring McNerny?
It looks like he wandered alone right into Boehner’s kitchen, climbed into the high chair and let himself get spoon fed the talking points.
And then Boehner burped him for the press.
Congress will be on your corner for an entire hour! So keep those questions brief and insist that Jerry (I would have to think you’re on familiar terms with him now) tamps down those replies as well.
Thats the big difference between Dems and republiclowns, you see. My so called representative can’t be bothered to meet with his constituency, at least not with those not possessing the proper pedigree. I’d damn sure take sixty minutes with Lamar Smith. Thirty…ten?
babaloo @ 18
Just checked again. Jim Costa, District 20, a Blue Dog dem. Voted for.
Barb in DC @ 19
Ditto. Anyone who goes to one of McN’s “meet-n-greets,” please give him a message from ME and the other out-of-staters who contributed to his campaign, who are disappointed at his hanging with Boehner and spouting Republican talking points, and who WON’T be giving again!!!
babaloo @ 18
Hi Babaloo, good to see you here.
Was there any explanation offered for Boxer’s failure to vote?
Hi
I live near by and have the day off. Maybe DNC bought him with the promise of money for the next round. He doesn’t need the street anymore.
jo6pac
Hugh @ 22,
No public explanations, no public retractions.
Laura Doty @ 30,
I just checked too (probably while you were checking). I stand corrected. Talk about a Dem who needs to be primaried…
Sunny Nobility @ 32,
Thanks! If Boxer has offered an explanation, I haven’t heard of it.
Siun @ 23
I donated to his campaign too. From Columbus, Ohio. I’d like to hear his answer to the point that combat deaths in Iraq in July 2007 were HIGHER than any previous July since cheneyco lied us into this disaster.
Hmmm . . . still poking around on McNerney’s site, and found this press release about the same trip:
The word that jumped out at me is “reasonable.” Not just any timetable, but a “reasonable” one. OK, Jerry, let’s talk: what do you mean by “reasonable”?
Do you measure it in days, weeks, months, or years?
Do you measure it in dollars spent by the pentagon that could have been spent on the Children’s Health and Medicare Protection (CHAMP) Act that you’re pushing?
Do you measure it by the dozens of US troops injured and killed?
Do you measure it by the hundreds of Iraqis injured and killed?
Do you measure it by the thousands of Iraqis turned into refugees?
What do you mean by “reasonable,” sir?
Will the real Democrats please stand up! We need to be more circumspect, suspect and prudent with our affections. I’m feeling wronged and radical.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 25
As in the old Chinese curse, “may you live in interesting times”?
Jonathan @ 20
And Berkely, a law school position for YOO.
I imagine Boxer made an accommodation with an absent Republican. Isn’t that sort of thing commonplace in the “collegial” Senate? Darned if I understand why they feel the need to be so civil to the opposition which has shown themselves time & again to be anything but willing to play “nice”.
Hey babaloo
Do you have the link handy to that post you did at Calitics about how Jerry is trying to be one of the kewl kids (DC insider) now? You did it in April, I think
I think it’s totally relevant to his current behavior
Peterr @ 36,
Interesting that you picked up on that word “responsible.” It looms large in McNerney’s rhetoric. McNerney issued this press release after voting against McGovern last spring:
Democrats were elected in November 2006 to get us out of Iraq, period.
McNerney bailed.
I guess if I had one question to ask McNerney it would be what part of this did he not understand.
peterboy @ 13
Badda-bing
Here you go.
My feelings of betrayal by this man mimic my antagonistic perceptions of a certain Democratic candidate for president. I suppose I didn’t couch that in camofladge very well. Now did I?
radiofreewill @ 28
Nice analogy… I fervently hope the 9th Circuit will allow standing in the FISA/AT&T charade!!!
To add another note about the Congressional blues….my old-dog Dem critter is apparently going to retire after this term. In his honor, our gooper state legislature is going to retire his number. Our district will get redrawn to get rid of any chance of a Dem congressman from central Missouri. (sigh)
“Reasonable” = whatever he thinks will get him elected again = vote like a fucking Republican. I am furious.
jo6pac @ 33
I have a more sinister thought. Maybe Karl knew that republicans couldn’t win and….
GordonM @ 38
I used that one at work today, meself!
Shadowstalker @ 47
Gerrymandered out of existence… Sickening!
I believe the record is clear. We have failed miserably in Iraq. We have killed and maimed far too many people. And any Democratic candidate for president who does not support immediate withdrawal of our soldiers, is not a candidate for peace.
Babaloo @ 42
Thanks for that. Here’s another one, from this past July after he voted for the Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act:
This leads me to pose a new question: So, Jerry, what did the generals say or propose that made you seem to change course on changing the course?
Margot @ 48,
Of course, what is so discouraging about this is that he got elected with 53% of the vote when he was standing firmly in support of withdrawing our troops from Iraq. I’m afraid he’s fallen prey to a bad case of DC insider-itis. They clearly don’t understand the district or the political dynamics at work. And I think he’s decided it’s safer to play ball with the DC crew than stand up to them.
OK, really the last time I’m going to put these up today.
Iraq surge critique
I agree the responsible word is the tip off. It allows McNerney to ignore the will of those who elected him. But while the surge is not working, the dog and pony show clearly is.
I contributed, too - sadly, this may make me more careful about who I give my contributions to. Not that they’re all that much, but it’s not money I’m in a position to throw away.
Hugh @ 55
Given your list, why does any Dem want to become president?
Your list is what’s going to be handed to the next president on 1/20/09.
I’m distrustful.
Thanks, Hugh. Really. You do the work.
OT - Anyone watching Al-Haramian v. Bush? -> C-Span 2.
I *knew* the government would do this. they’re saying that the document which the plaintiff previously had in his possession, but was subsequently re-seized by the govt., can’t now be talked about because any recollection of the contents would be inadmissible hearsay.
I hate the fucking justice Department.
We really need to create a cost for Dem’s backing the rethugs agenda. I keep suggestion we go after the Freshman class who vote the reThug program by standing primary challengers. This is the only way we will be heard. There will probably not be a better time than this election to make the statement. The only other way to let the Dem’s know that betraying progressivism is a 3′rd part and that will ensure another reThug WH. Damn Nader! He was right but he was very wrong!
So this guy McNerney played us for a sucker? Lets not get fooled again. OK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zydAs5bRW1U
Hugh @ 55
It would be irresponsible of us not to ask Jerry for “clarification” of his shift in his position on Iraq.
If Lieberman was rewarded with a chairmanship postion after having deceived CT voters about his position on the war, so why can’t McNerney think that he can get away with repeating GOP talking points.
OT: Tinfoil hat time: I got this link from Cliff Shechter’s blog. He claims to have gotten from Thom Hartmann. http://64.233.167.104/search?q.....id=1208571 “president for life bush” site:familysecuritymatters.org&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=firefox-a
jayt @ 59
And McNerney’s part of the problem. Any chance we can get America back?
Someone said a week or so ago that Howie has candidates we endorse agree to certain guidelines in terms of their votes on very specific issues. Does anyone have more info? Howie, are to here to answer this? Not that any of this is your fault; you are a respected AMERICAN.
Oklahoma, I wish you would articulate again and again, as necessary, what a real Democrat should be. You speak from the heart and the soul of what that means. Hilarious should get the message often, and yet again. And so should the people. If the r’s are on thin ice, so too, by their actions are the d’s. I would also expect EVERY d candidate for the Presidency to address the travesty of the Padilla trial. Do these candidates feel any shame about anything? And Hugh @ 55 - tedious though it may be, those points need a daily exercise.
Alecia @ 63
I’m not sure Lieberman deceived most of those who voted for him. I think…it doesn’t matter what I think.
now the guy from Justice is insinuating that the U.S. District Court, even in an in camera setting, does not have the right to view the document in question.
“No Fair! Secret, Secret, Secret!!!”
Another press release from McNerney’s website, this time from May:
Another question: Given these kinds of injuries, wouldn’t the most responsible thing of all be to remove the troops from Iraq, thus preventing even more of these injuries from occurring in the future?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 61
War? What Is It Good For?
It’s hard to believe that the domestic spying was for political blackmail. But that would sure explain the paranoia about revealing what they were after and what they got from this.
But unless it is only JUST about power and control… it seems pointless. It’s what they want to DO with all that power and control.
It’s ego and money… I don’t know what drives these people. The typical bonehead republican just wants lots of cash… but after you are up there in the millions what drives these SOBs? I simply don’t get what these people do with their billions?
Can anyone explain?
jayt @ 59
I was watching on the tele, when all of sudden the Jewelry channel pre-empted it… Aargh…!!!
Peterr @ 70
BINGO!
CTuttle @ 72
Get some new pearls!
SanderO @ 72
The more money they accumulate, the more they show their intrinsic worth. Winning isn’t the most important thing; it the only thing.
I was watching on the tele, when all of sudden the Jewelry channel pre-empted it… Aargh…!!!
Consider yourself lucky. Otherwise you’d be screaming even louder!!
Twain @ 74
Heh, it would be my first set!!! ;-)
As another Californian donor and volunteer, I look forward to reports from those who go to his events as the conclusion his post trip letter is not quite as bad as the AP article sounds http://mcnerney.house.gov/Iraq-Codel.htm
.
McNerney needs to understand that “better than Pombo” is not the only standard we expect him to uphold. Progressives all over the country worked and contributed to his election, and there’s no reason for him to get chummy with Boehner, of all people.
What is it about the Beltway that corrupts these guys? Jerry was one of the good guys — and I don’t want to see him become one of the bad guys. We need to let him know that this parroting of GOP talking points and accommodation with the pro-war party simply will not help him. He needs to hear from lots of us, and get back on the right path.
Don’t try to run from being called a “Pelosi lockstep voter.” If our party has the correct answers, be proud of voting to support our plan for America.
Get with the program, McNerney!
Hugh @ 43
My congresman bailed too.
I guess he thinks Republicans here want this war. Wrong.
Loo Hoo, I emailed Howie with a link to the current thread. He didn’t respond, and usually he is very quick. So, I assume he’s off-line. My guess is that he will have something to say about this after he’s talked with McNerney/ staff. Just my guess. But, Howie is incredibly good about following up on what BA candidates are doing, and I”m sure this will not pass unnoticed.
jayt @ 76
I’m streaming it… and I’m screaming at Eisenberg…!!! 8-(
SanderO @ 71
I don’t find it difficult to believe the domestic spying was for political blackmail.
J. Edgar Hoover was the most powerful official in the U.S. precisely because he had files on and could blackmail anyone.
Bobby Kennedy, you say?
Just sent this to McNerney:
Did you leave the Green Zone without your handlers when you went to Iraq? Did you speak with Iraqis that were free to speak their minds? Is 500 dead in one bombing an improvement? Are 3 and 4 rotations in Iraq the proper way to maintain our forces? Is the highest suicide rate in the armed services in 26 years acceptable? Why are we in Iraq? Do the Iraqis want us to leave? I think you are a sell out or a fool.
OT - msnbc says another collapse in the Utah coal mine… 3 ambulances, 2 medivac helicopters sent… looks like rescue workers this time…
TeddySanFran @ 79
From Jerry’s site, it appears that science and the environment is the place he is most invested in as a member of Congress. That makes sense, given both his background and his district. Could it be that Jerry’s trying to walk a tightrope to get some GOP support for some environmental bill, and this careful parsing of “responsible withdrawl” is how he’s trying to make that happen?
Just a guess — but that’s part of the way DC works. Especially if you’re a freshman member.
I just update the graphic here tracking casualty trends against the seasons. Anyone want to bet that the non-Petraus report won’t claim casualties are down indication some success. Who should we make sure the right congress-critters are ready to shoot this one down when it come up?
Jonathan @ 20
Dumb crooks get caught.
“better than Pombo,” i.e. having a pulse and able to go out in daylight without turning to ashes.
Hurricane Dean is barreling towards the Gulf coast….
6 miners still trapped in Utah….Reports of another accident involving the rescuers…
Minnesota is still pulling the dead out of the bridge collapse….
NASA sez they won’t patch the shuttle…..
Massive bombings in Iraq….
The world markets in a shambles…
Everything is fine people. George W. Bush is at the helm offering his steady hand.
-GSD
marymccurnin @ 84
But don’t you understand? We must be responsible in leaving Iraq.
OldCoastie @ 86
More blood on Murray’s hands…!!!