In Chicago, we don’t have many stars. Al Capone was a star criminal. Almost single handedly, with a baseball bat and machine gun, he created the nation’s first permanent criminal enterprise which almost eighty years later runs smoothly. Mayor Richard J. Daley (the older guy) was a star politician, creating, maintaining and even strengthening the nation’s smoothest running political machine, so powerful that it could hand John F. Kennedy the Presidency by holding back the vote in Chicago precincts till he knew exactly how many ballots would have to be created out of thin air to win. Michael Jordan was a star athlete, the Baryshnikov of basketball, bringing millions of Chicago victory-starved sports fans trophy and trophy after trophy.
But when Assistant United States Attorney Brian K. Frazier called Jose Padilla, Chicago’s not-very-bright--wanna- be, a star recruit for Al Qaeda, he gave hyperbole a whole new meaning. Then the prosecution dug back in their paltry bag of cookies to the original indictment to proffer three chilling acts, telling jurors that Mr. Padilla attended a training camp in Afghanistan “to learn how to kill, kidnap and maim according to Al Qaeda’s techniques.”
In case the jury had forgotten 9/11, the prosecutor produced this outrageous bit of bigot-theater:
On Monday, the prosecution set up a a slide projector showing black and white pictures of the three defendants wearing kaffiyeh, an Arab headdress, as 12 jurors heard the closing arguments.
''What al Qaeda did writ large, these defendants did on a smaller scale,'' Frazier said.
Get it?
Al Qaeda big! Twin towers collapsing. Defendants: small: zucchini Busch Gardens. All wearing kaffiyeh.
There was not one shred of testimony, not one witness who testified to Al Qaeda drill sergeants teaching Padilla anything.
Worse, was the crime of being evasive.
Mr. Frazier recalled how the F.B.I. agent who arrested Mr. Padilla at O’Hare International Airport had testified that Mr. Padilla had been evasive. Mr. Padilla acknowledged living in Egypt, the agent said, yet claimed not to remember simple details of his time there, including his wife’s phone number.
“Why wouldn’t he give simple information at O’Hare?” Mr. Frazier asked. “Why would an official Al Qaeda document be recovered from Afghanistan with his prints on it? These are not coincidences.”
No, they are not coincidences. They are the normal kinds of responses almost any kind of American citizen would give when abruptly arrested and taken into custody without being allowed – as is his constitutional rights – the Miranda warning.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you at interrogation time and at court.
I didn’t read about the Supreme Court ruling that Miranda applies to everyone except for Padilla.
Did prejudice enter into the indictment? Yes, said William Swor, attorney for Kifah Wael Jayousi.
"Why use the word Islam?" Swor asked jurors during closing arguments in Miami federal court Tuesday morning. "Because it's frightening. We have a recent history. We have fears and we have a cultural prejudice going back almost 1,000 years."
There’s one story that summed it up for me by Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor.
As Richey tells it, it becomes a tale that makes implicates all those who participated – from the lowest ranking military person to the highest ranking officials of the Justice Department and the White House, with the President himself knowing what was occurring under his watch. Read this..and weep.
For a month, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation had been questioning Padilla in New York City under the rules of the criminal justice system. [Note: without an attorney.] They wanted to know about his alleged involvement in a plot to detonate a radiological "dirty bomb" in the US. Padilla had nothing to say. Now, military interrogators were about to turn up the heat.
Padilla was delivered to the US Naval Consolidated Brig in Charleston, S.C., where he was held not only in solitary confinement but as the sole detainee in a high security wing of the prison. Fifteen other cells sat empty around him.
The purpose of the extraordinary privacy, according to experts familiar with the technique, was to eliminate the possibility of human contact. No voices in the hallway. No conversations with other prisoners. No tapping out messages on the walls. No ability to maintain a sense of human connection, a sense of place or time.
In essence, experts say, the US government was trying to break Padilla's silence by plunging him into a mental twilight zone. Padilla was not the only Al Qaeda suspect locked away in isolation. Although harsh interrogation methods such as water boarding, forced hypothermia, sleep deprivation, and stress positions draw more media attention, use of isolation to "soften up" detainees for questioning is much more common.
"It is clear that the intent of this isolation was to break Padilla for the purpose of the interrogations that were to follow," says Stuart Grassian, a Boston psychiatrist and nationally recognized expert on the debilitating effects of solitary confinement. Dr. Grassian conducted a detailed examination of Padilla for his lawyers.
We are no longer in a situation where we are waiting for the barbarians. The barbarians have arrived and they are us.
I don’t give a damn what the jury says about these three hapless wannabes. I want to know what we’re – you and me -- going to do to protest this terrible injustice perpetrated by the nation’s most powerful leaders Rather than a “star recruit” for Al Quada, our “leaders” have made Jose Padilla a star victim of civil rights and Bill of Rights abuses.
Regardless of the verdict, which should come the middle of next week, the name Padilla will now go down around the world, next to those of Sacco and Vansetti and Koramatsu and Gideon and Miranda as people who put our United States Constitution to the test.
(With Christopher Austin)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Zed?
Dos zed.
Hi Lew
zero?
Hey all!
Uh Lew? I think the star athlete in Chicago was Michael Jordan, not Michael Jackson.
er, I think you meant Michael Jordan as the ballet basketball player, not Michael Jackson.
Oh God, please someone fix that!11
(Unless of course, you’ve never seen Michael Jackson at Neverland.)
Torture never goes away. It sort of sticks to you.
Howd @ 7
er, I think you meant Michael Jordan as the ballet basketball player, not Michael Jackson.
I don’t even wanna think about Michael Jackson’s best sport.
Hi lew!
BTW Lew, I saw a story in yesterday’s NY Times on the prosecutor’s closing and the byline reporter (Abby Goodnough) pretty much called BullSh*t on the prosecutor.
A manly man can get away with conflating Michael Jackson with Michael Jordan (they both tripped the light fantastic) *g*
jayt at 11
Good to see you. Yeah, puhleeze! One for the ages!
And Sacco and Vanzetti… Lew!!! Excellent post, Lew!!!
Hi Lew! Congratulations on your superb coverage of the most media-invisible Constitutional crises ever. As Amy Goodman asks, “If we had state-controlled media, how would it look any different?”
That the MSM is ignoring this case is a disgrace.
dakine01 at 12
That is what is so insane about these claims. Frazier will be leaving government soon, one way or another and I’d like to track him down and ask him several questions. The answer I’d probably get was “I was just following orders.”
Hey Lew,
Another fine post!
One additional little correction - the linky to the “In case the jury had forgotten 9/11, the prosecutor produced this outrageous bit of bigot-theater:” has a double http in it (i.e. http://http//) which means you can’t get to the site without doing some hands-on editing of the URL.
That said, I kinda like the idea of Michael Jackson playing b-ball with the big boys.
RonD @ 16
Fortunately, the Lake is blessed with his presence!!! *g*
CTuttle at 15
Thanks…I was going to go back to Haymarket (ah, those were the days) but I thought that would have been a bit much.
Just a quick note on another item.
Republican Congresswoman Deb Pryce who represents voters in the Columbus, Ohio area has announced she is not seeking another term.
Her last opponent Democrat Mary Jo Kilroy narrowly lost ( well in Ohio who can tell ) her bid to unseat Pryce.
This is another victory for the Netroots in my opinion. Good work.
Lew Koch @ 20
Keep ya sharp, hombre!!! ;-)
Mad Dogs at 18
Sorry about that one as well. I was pushing the edge on time today. My fault completely.
EPU’d per LooHoo’s request:
wesgpc says
August 15th, 2007 at 6:13 pm
Regarding Iran, some good things I see are
–word is already out that forces from Saudi Arabia is just as responsible for insurgent violence as Iran, so we need to ask both Congress and public whether this designation is bogus or not. Why not declare the elements in Saudi Arabia funding the insurgency as terrorist? Or is the administration so incompetent at its GWOT that it doesn’t know who they are?
–Karzai said Iran was a constructive force. Maliki meeting with Iran, So need to make a huge fuss about why Cheney is not listening to our allies. (Well, we know that already, because Cheney considers them to be tools, like a shovel or hoe, but need to make fuss over it anyway)
–Can press congress to have a new vote to make sure Prez must come to Congress before any attack (Congress can do that, right? If they pass a resolution that says that ambiguous wording in authroization does NOT permit any action without authorization, then Cheney can’t use badly worded authorization as an excuse, right?)
–It is becoming clear that the September report will be bogus. WH, it turns out, will write it, with ‘input’ from Petraeul and Crocker
it. http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c....._again.php
Patreaus in an interview (can’t find link now) emphasized that the the whole civilian leadership, including Congress, needs to look at the report carefully -it will be AN IMPORTANT NATIONAL DECISION. I figure that means either he senses he will be on the chopping block if the September fib fest doesn’t go well, or he has lost battle over Iran attack, knows where this is headed, and is getting scared of the batshit insane VP. Wonder if Patraeus will be cooperative with administration any longer.
Anything wrong with those ideas?
Certainly need to do something, make a big fuss.
CTuttle @ 19
And we are blessed with the ‘Lake.
RonD @ 25
Sooo True!!!
I know this is OT but
“The U.S. Geological Survey said the 7.5 magnitude earthquake hit about 90 miles southeast of Lima at a depth of about 25 miles.” tsunami warnings,
I think I’d have ruined both my voice and my knees jumping up screaming objections at this farce of a trial.
Mr. Frazier said the government had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Padilla had spent time in Afghanistan. In fact, it never produced a witness who saw him there.
And “following orders” is not an excuse for the willful misrepresentation of evidence.
Anyone willing to guess on the jury outcome?
So, if you are Muslim and have ever spent time in Afghanistan, you can be convicted of being a terrorist..
Lew, Our elected leaders in Congress caved on the FISA law because of fear of 9/11. Fear is a great motivator, I hope that I’m wrong. You have done excellent work covering this trial and enlightening us all and I thank you even though your not a foul mouthed fem.
Lew Koch @ 29
I trust the jury.
City of Milwaukee votes for acquittal by unamimous consent. We loves us the Lake too.
Elliott @ 27
True, A Cat 2 hurricane and a 5.3 tremblor isn’t enough excitement for the Big Isle, Peru has to pile on…
http://www.prh.noaa.gov/ptwc/m.....002055.txt
Lew Koch @ 29
You know, I was really afraid that the jury in the Libby case would fall for the koolaid, but they didn’t. So, I think there is hope. It just depends.
CTuttle @ 34
Holy Crow! You take care!
IANAL-is there any way jury nullification could play into this? Rule on the law as well as the charges?
Jonathan @ 32
I say “guilty as charged” - we do, after all, have to protect the children.
LS @ 35
Aah, too early to assume, LS…!!!
Lew Koch @ 29
Anyone willing to guess on the jury outcome?
Not without having demographic info and the ability to eyeball the jury.
That being said, it’s going to take some strong people to bring back a Not Guilty.
My guess: Hung Jury - Mistrial.
It’s sad to know that there are some out there who will interpret the canes’ and quakes’ as God Almighty’s crying for Roves resignation.
RonD @ 16
But as Dakine says, at least the NYT is covering it. Somewhat. I can’t wait to hear the decision.
JPL at31
The fact is I am a both//foul mouthed and a feminist. I have so radically censored what is normally a conversation that is constantly strew with foul language…which is why someone who knows me thought that I was The Rude Pundit. As for being a feminist, I was a househusband and shared all the work and child rearing. The syndicated columns, articles and books We wrote had Joanne’s name first.
He should probably never have been arrested in the first place, so they’ll find him guilty. In record time.
If I remember correctly, the supposed electoral shenanigans of R. Daley were investigated for years by Repulican lawyers (including DoJ lawyers) and nothing was ever found.
And I had knew a guy in CA whose grandfather had a body shop in Chicago and used to repair the bullet holes in Al Capone’s cars. Al would hand out $100 tips. Probably like getting tipped $5000 or more today.
jayt @ 40
Not without having demographic info and the ability to eyeball the jury.
That being said, it’s going to take some strong people to bring back a Not Guilty.
My guess: Hung Jury - Mistrial.
Oof, words from a practiced litigator… Hmmm…???
Elliott @ 27
Wow. When I checked earlier, they said no tsunami threat. Yikes.
GordonM at 45
You’re correct. The Republicans could never find anything on Daley’s ballot stuffing. That’s how good those guys are.
Lew Koch @ 43
Cool, Thanks for the great posts. My opinion is that the 9/11 photos will sway the verdict, although there could be a sane hold out. What do you think?
This is OT (but about Chicago) BP (Beyond Petroleum) !? is planning to dump sewage into Lake Michigan.
We Illinoisians have been told there’s nothing we can do about it, but maybe measures can be taken to lessen the sewage’s impact.
I usually buy BP or Citgo gas……
Lew Koch @ 43
Dang, Lew, I emote with ya on all counts…!!! *g*
CTuttle @ 39
So true.
JPL at 49
In my mind I have “created” every verdict possible, except for jury nullification.
CTuttle @ 46
I just can’t imagine 12 people agreeing to guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Unfortunately, neither can I imagine that some jury members’ belief that it is their patriotic duty to help fight terrorism, that it is their *duty* to convict, won’t surface simultaneously in the jury room.
So I’m guessing they hang, and Padilla goes back to jail. The case *will* be retried, should that happen.
Some of the best writing and posting I have ever seen in my entire life is happening here.
Lew Koch @ 53
Really, even if one has drunk deeply from the Koolaid pitcher???
I can’t even see how his initial arrest was even remotely legal. How could this be allowed to even come to trial? I shudder to think that a jury could become so brainwashed as to believe the government’s scant evidence. It says a lot about us.
Lew Koch @ 48
Now c’mon Lew, you have to know the story that Nixon declined to protest the Chicago vote in ‘60 because it would have also brought out all the downstate shenanigans as well.
jayt @ 54
Heh, see my 56!!!
Mary H. @ 50
BP=British Petroleum
Lew:
I’m an old-timer too. Your coverage has been a real treat.
Unfortunately, as an ex-public defender, I suspect the jury will find all defendants guilty.
Then we’ll see whether the appellate courts will throw this out. There just isn’t enough evidence.
I did have one case where the judge essentially ordered the jury to convict. They did - on no evidence.
Three years later, the NY appellate court threw the case out for insufficent evidence, dismissed the indictment, and ordered my client released immediately. But that was New York - and a long time ago.
Thanks for all your hard work - much appreciated.
Lew, an analyst I heard yesterday said that the cases against Padilla’s co-defendants were much stronger than against Padilla himself, and that Padilla might actually be tarred guilty by association more than evidence. Do you think this is a valid concern?
They’ve started calling themselves ‘Beyond Petroleum’ - that’s a kicker!
I hope that the jury has the good sense to look at what the government has done in this case.
Dirty bomb? Where?
Afghanistan, maybe, but where’s the terrorist link.
Mostly, though. The treatment of Padilla and the others. That’s not what our system looks like.
I think sane people have seen enough to know that this executive branch and this judicial branch is corrupt. I’ll bet on a not guilty, and hope to hell I’m right.
mjames @ 61
Puhlease, join the conversation more often!!! The Lake thrives on intelligent discourse…!!! *g*
Lew Koch @ 23
You have so little to apologize for that we all must take our pride where we can find it in the minutia that only nit-pickers knit!
dakine01 at 58
Yes, that was the line “For ever grave that voted in Chicago, a cow voted downstate.”
But here is a story seen with my own eyes and I will leave out the identifying names. I was in the room with Richard J and two others, one of whom was a high elected officials. The “election” was for one of those “do good” measures. The three of us waited until 2:00 am, when most of the other votes were in, and then Daley, by phone, released the number of “yes” ballots necessary to push the measure way over the top.
Cows may vote but they don’t have Daley holding them back to see how many are needed.
Loo Hoo. @ 64
I’ll drink to that. I also hope to hell you’re right.
Mary H. @ 63
Gettin’ into the coal liquification business, are they? /snark
mjames at 61
There is “evidence” or indications that if Padilla is found guilty, the Supreme Court has indicated that it wants the case placed before them immediately.
We are certainly a country of laws. We are definitely not a nation of justice. It is not the law that is failing justice, it is men and women failing the law. And it is humans who are failing Padilla. And ultimately, us. Either way, (verdict) Padilla is toast. Of course this sap has been propaganda fodder for a long time. And many of us have eaten this fodder.
LS @ 30
Perhaps it is more correct to say:
Or perhaps even this:
Excellent post Lew.
Unless they stacked the jury there may be hope. In selecting a jury do we knew what was the criteria for dismissal? I think that will make the difference.
Lew Koch @ 67
Hold it one moment! I could’ve swore that cows could only contribute to our greenhouse gas emissions!!! WTF??? ;-)
CTuttle at 74
You are soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad!
Lew Koch @ 67
Many years ago I lived in Springfield. It was always so interesting when the Statehouse was in session.
Hi mjames! Welcome, sir or madame.
Lew, with permission I’d like to bring up two of selise’s brilliant comments from the last thread.
Lew Koch @ 67
In Ohio, they had Blackwell, cow rangler extraordinaire.
Michael Jackson was from Gary Indiana, which is within 3-point-shot distance of Chicago for someone like Michael Jordan.
Tito Jackson, on the other hand, would have been harder to explain.
RonD @ 62
Lew, an analyst I heard yesterday said that the cases against Padilla’s co-defendants were much stronger than against Padilla himself, and that Padilla might actually be tarred guilty by association more than evidence. Do you think this is a valid concern?
I’d look at it more as a prosecution strategy than a “valid concern”.
Lew Koch @ 70
Normally, that could be construed as a good thing, however, with the current crop, it’s a dicey proposition!!!
Actually, when factoring anything about anything be it politics or say… even gardening, here in Wisconsin we are always dealing with the Favre Curve.
If Brett has a good day then the guy is acquitted. If Brett tosses a few interceptions well he goes to the slam.
It’s tough, but we like Packer justice here in Dairyland.
Since, I believe this case is in Miami the Favre Curve will not likely have an impact.
LS @ 47
You can call me a left wing wacko whatever… I do not mind:
There are tectonic forces that must balance as a result of global warming and ice melting. Billions of tons of water ice is moving annually from the poles to a liquid form that bulges around the equator. It is now subject to tidal effects from the moon and planetary alignments. The historical record shows land mass sinks as the sea level rises. It’s like a scale, it will seek balance of mass & location. In order to achieve a newly balanced system there are going to be a lot of major earthquakes and Tsunamis that accompany land subsidence.
Welcome to the 21st Century.
JPL at 76
Were you in Springfield when they found one million dollars in cash in shoe boxes in the apartment of the just deceased Secretary of State Paul Powell.
That was the cash the state police REPORTED they found after several hours in the apartment.
as the lawyers here know - you can indict a ham sandwich and get a conviction…..particularly in bushco land
Mad Dogs @ 72
Rene Descartes: I think, therefor I must turn myself in.
Lew Koch @ 75
I try…!!! ;-)
The Padilla case has this eerie sense of something like Guantanamo. The Bush administration makes a mistake. Hauls in innocent people, tortures them a bit, or let’s say, more than a bit, and then discovers they have nothing to do with Al Qaeda, and let’s not get into whether torturing was right or wrong (it’s wrong) in the first place.
Now they’re stuck. The Nazi’s would just have dumped them in the ocean, but we’re not there yet as far we we know, and to be honest, we don’t know. But giving the benefit of the doubt they are stuck. So in poor Padilla’s case they are forced by the Supremes to indict and convict.
I would have thought the absence of Miranda was prima facie to throw the case out, but what do I know?
Lew -
What about the jury? What was cause for disqualification?
GordonM @ 86
LOL!
Lew Koch at 70
I hope so - but I wouldn’t put it past these guys to dismiss the case (after a guilty verdict) when it looks like the S.C. is ready to review - and then hold him forever as an enemy combatant. The goal being to peel off Kennedy who will say that the matter is moot or that there is no case or controversy. (?)
CTuttle at 65
Thanks for the welcome!
OT - CNN reporting Rescuers say noises heard in mine, drilling increases
Knut Wicksell at 88
I am just finishing reading a terrifying novel/mystery story about Guantanamo and torture. I recommend it without reservation: The Prisoner of Guantanamo by Dan Fesperman.
Hysteria on trial, hysteria a ’spyin… here’s another horror story. Remember domestic spying? Well, here’s what they plan to do…
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITI.....index.html
deploy eyes in the sky over border regions (I would guess that means Mexican-American border, not Canadian-American border). …not even a pretense about the War on Error here. Just plain spyin’
rwcole, if you’re here, perhaps we should schedule a cook-out in this city, this coming October, which is when McConnell has just announced that he’s going to start spying on our back yard (literally)
QuakerGirl at 89
My “guess” is that jurors were accepted or rejected by prosecution and defense without the slightest serious scientific evidence. Where is John Grisham when you really need him?
mjames @ 91
I swear O’Connor is envious of Kennedy’s sway within Scotus!!!
Some more Justice Department fuckery:
Department officials,” Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski wrote to Feinstein in a letter last week.
But if her question was answered, Sen. Feinstein must have missed it. The Justice Department’s reply is “wholly unsatisfactory,” Feinstein says.
The letter was a follow-up to Feinstein’s questions to Gonzales during a hearing last month. When Feinstein asked then whether Gonzales had fired more than the nine U.S. attorneys that are publicly known, Gonzales said, maybe:
Thanks again for this, Lew. You are a shining beacon.
If Romney or Rudy or Freddy or whatever Republican is elected as prez, then the GOP will take that as a blessing of everything the Bush administration has done. And perhaps they will be right.
Lew Koch @ 84
A little later, 79 to 81. I had a friend in Social Services and she tried to convince me to go court and listen to the abuse cases. The court system was a tad backwards at that time in protecting children. Although I couldn’t help her because of two boys under three, she used to visit to look at normal bruises compared to afflicted types. I’m from MA but had lived in CT and LA before hand and I have to say the Statehouse in IL was the most vocal.
Loo Hoo at 97
Can you send on — either here to to my Gmail — the links to that story.
Knut Wicksell @ 88
you’re assuming this is a mistake, and not just the admin not caring who they haul in, as long as they have somebody they can torture just to show Congress that they have unitary executive power. This may not have been about catching ter’rists at all.. just more of their power and fear agenda. If they had wanted to catch ter’rists, they would be serving up OBL or one of his other top lieutenants we haven’t even come close to catching by now. Catching ter’rists is hard work, its expensive and it takes too long. Grabbing wierdos off the street and pretending that they’re ter’rists is so much easier.
Loo Hoo. @ 97
Some food chain they have there @ DOJ.
BP’s outfall is located approximately 7 miles from the City of Chicago’s southern-most drinking water intake crib. It is located less than 2 miles from the City of Hammond’s water intake crib.
There is existing technology available for BP to properly treat their sludge and ammonia. The argument for why they cant do this is a “lack of space”. Take a look at their property in Whiting, Indiana on GoogleEarth to see how much land they really have.
Phoenix Woman at 98
Oh my…thank you so very, very much. You people rock, except for being — what — foul mouthed, lefty fems (my kind of town!)
In Indiana, jury nullification is a constitutional right:
Art.1, Sec. 19:
In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts.
Makes for a great jury instruction, and for an inevitable fight with the judge when he/she tries to tell the jury that they really *don’t* have that right - that they are bound (in some way) to follow the law as presented.
And Mr. Gonzales will never spend one hour in jail. What are the little people like me