Comments on: Invisible Again http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/ Firedoglake weblog Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:19:58 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: PunditMom http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892598 PunditMom Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:13:16 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892598 <p>Pozner and I have both been blogging about this issue. While I don’t have the profile of being the executive director of an institute, I am a woman political blogger. If Erbe needs another guest, I’m available and not too far from her studios!</p> Pozner and I have both been blogging about this issue. While I don’t have the profile of being the executive director of an institute, I am a woman political blogger. If Erbe needs another guest, I’m available and not too far from her studios!

]]> By: NTodd http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892494 NTodd Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:50:09 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892494 <blockquote><p>I’m sorry Jennifer. You are not yet in FDL’s category. But if you decide at some point in your life after major surgery to come prematurely out of convalescence to cover a major trial and work your butt off for the good of the nation in a turning point Senatorial race, then maybe I will respect your lecturing. Until then, please defer to your betters.</p></blockquote> <p>Jesus fucking christ. Are you serious? Did I just read a thread wherein people lambasted a feminist blogger for not being “good enough”?</p> <p>Somebody alert Althouse…</p> <p>[<em>CHS notes</em>: No need to alert anyone. I have to say, taking a condescending tone with someone in the comments is not appropriate. Whether Jane and I work our butts off is beside the point. And that “betters” crap really has to stop. Thanks.]</p>

I’m sorry Jennifer. You are not yet in FDL’s category. But if you decide at some point in your life after major surgery to come prematurely out of convalescence to cover a major trial and work your butt off for the good of the nation in a turning point Senatorial race, then maybe I will respect your lecturing. Until then, please defer to your betters.

Jesus fucking christ. Are you serious? Did I just read a thread wherein people lambasted a feminist blogger for not being “good enough”?

Somebody alert Althouse…

[CHS notes: No need to alert anyone. I have to say, taking a condescending tone with someone in the comments is not appropriate. Whether Jane and I work our butts off is beside the point. And that “betters” crap really has to stop. Thanks.]

]]> By: Lew Orban http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892333 Lew Orban Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:16:37 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892333 <p>Wow sounds like alot of whining to me. If you have something of substance to say that has true meaning…your blog will have value. If you are not part of the solution your part of the problem. Often I wonder why bloggers blog…there are real jobs out there where whining is welcomed.<br /> Obewan</p> Wow sounds like alot of whining to me. If you have something of substance to say that has true meaning…your blog will have value. If you are not part of the solution your part of the problem. Often I wonder why bloggers blog…there are real jobs out there where whining is welcomed.
Obewan

]]> By: Realist http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892255 Realist Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:44:25 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-892255 <p><em>I don’t know how you have a media panel on women in the blogosphere with no actual woman bloggers</em></p> <p>The same way you have a “war President” who’s never actually, you know, been to war.</p> I don’t know how you have a media panel on women in the blogosphere with no actual woman bloggers

The same way you have a “war President” who’s never actually, you know, been to war.

]]> By: Jane Hamsher http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891803 Jane Hamsher Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:25:49 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891803 <p><a href="#comment-891720"><em>BAC @ 163</em></a></p> <blockquote><p><em>To Jane and portia.vz</em>:</p> <p>If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. </p> <p>BAC</p></blockquote> <p>You have made an assertion that you have failed to back up. Ad hominum attacks and mau-mauing people for being “sexists” do not take the place of facts. I think it’s incumbent on you to provide some specifics or withdraw your allegation and apologize to all involved.</p> BAC @ 163

To Jane and portia.vz:

If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

BAC

You have made an assertion that you have failed to back up. Ad hominum attacks and mau-mauing people for being “sexists” do not take the place of facts. I think it’s incumbent on you to provide some specifics or withdraw your allegation and apologize to all involved.

]]> By: raven http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891768 raven Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:27:40 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891768 <p>Boy this thread takes a lickin and keeps on tickin!</p> Boy this thread takes a lickin and keeps on tickin!

]]> By: rich http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891762 rich Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:13:55 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891762 <p><a href="#comment-891724"><em>Alex @ 164</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>gee…you’re a woman??? I just assumed cos you kind of single-handedly blogged the scooter libby affair, that, that you were a guy. I guess I’ll have to stop reading all you’re stuff now…sorry…</p></blockquote> <p>Translation: men are one-handed typists.</p> Alex @ 164

gee…you’re a woman??? I just assumed cos you kind of single-handedly blogged the scooter libby affair, that, that you were a guy. I guess I’ll have to stop reading all you’re stuff now…sorry…

Translation: men are one-handed typists.

]]> By: Alex http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891724 Alex Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:59:01 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891724 <p>gee…you’re a woman??? I just assumed cos you kind of single-handedly blogged the scooter libby affair, that, that you were a guy. I guess I’ll have to stop reading all you’re stuff now…sorry…</p> gee…you’re a woman??? I just assumed cos you kind of single-handedly blogged the scooter libby affair, that, that you were a guy. I guess I’ll have to stop reading all you’re stuff now…sorry…

]]> By: BAC http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891720 BAC Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:45:16 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891720 <p><em>To Jane and portia.vz</em>:</p> <p>If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. </p> <p>BAC</p> To Jane and portia.vz:

If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

BAC

]]> By: yellowdog jim http://firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891696 yellowdog jim Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:32:37 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/08/12/invisible-again/#comment-891696 <p><a href="#comment-890582"><em>nomolos @ 5</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Are there any sandwiches that you specialize in Jane?</p></blockquote> <p>knuckle sandwich?</p> nomolos @ 5

Are there any sandwiches that you specialize in Jane?

knuckle sandwich?

]]>