In order to have a properly functioning government, you must believe in the inherent underpinnings of liberty and justice and to work toward the greater goal of equal and even-handed application of the law. Under the Bush Administration, the opposite has occured, time and time again — and that is no coincidence. For the Republicans place self-dealing power grabs and loyalty to party above everything else, including what is best for the nation as a whole.
From Walter Mondale today:
The corollary to Cheney’s zealous embrace of secrecy is his near total aversion to the notion of accountability. I’ve never seen a former member of the House of Representatives demonstrate such contempt for Congress — even when it was controlled by his own party. His insistence on invoking executive privilege to block virtually every congressional request for information has been stupefying — it’s almost as if he denies the legitimacy of an equal branch of government. Nor does he exhibit much respect for public opinion, which amounts to indifference toward being held accountable by the people who elected him.
Whatever authority a vice president has is derived from the president under whom he serves. There are no powers inherent in the office; they must be delegated by the president. Somehow, not only has Cheney been given vast authority by President Bush — including, apparently, the entire intelligence portfolio — but he also pursues his own agenda. The real question is why the president allows this to happen.
No respect for anything other than what they want when they want it. Rules and laws need not apply.
From Sen. Patrick Leahy: (H/T to reader Carolyn Urban for this superb link.)
The accumulated and essentially uncontroverted evidence is that political considerations factored into the unprecedented firing of at least nine U.S. attorneys last year. Testimony and documents show that the list was compiled based on input from the highest political ranks in the White House, that senior officials were apparently focused on the political impact of federal prosecutions, on whether federal prosecutors were doing enough to bring partisan voter fraud and corruption cases, and that the reasons given for these firings were contrived as part of a cover-up.
What the White House stonewalling is preventing is conclusive evidence of who made the decisions to fire these federal prosecutors. We know from the testimony that it was not the president….the evidence we have been able to collect points to Karl Rove and the political operatives at the White House. The stonewalling by the White House raises the question: What is it that the White House is so desperate to hide?
And it goes on and on. The above YouTube is from a Bill Moyers special on corruption — dealing with the Jack Abramoff Republican Party money laundering KStreet operation, Tom DeLay, and a whole host of still-to-be-answered questions. Questions which are supposedly being investigated by the Bush Department of Justice, but they appear to be moving awfully slowly, even with proffers of cooperation by Abramoff. (Go ask Alice why that is…)
There is also the matter of media manipulation and story plants (YouTube) — something we we saw through the WHIG, and which we are currently seeing again with the attempt to sell the surge. And the corrupting influence of the neoconmen (YouTube) across the board, for domestic and foreign policies. And the war profiteers. (YouTube) And on and on and on… (H/T to Rick Perlstein)
Republican government…a spectacle of corruption and failure. Which makes this advice from Rove all the more laughable. (H/T to Atrios.) Jeebus, guess learning from one’s mistakes would be too much work.
Thank goodness we have oh so serious journalists like Glenn Beck on CNN to look into this sort of thing and tell us the facts straight up without turning down the long, winding lane toward WingNutville. Oh…wait…… (H/T to Steve Benen.)
Related posts:
- NY-23: The Failure Of Blue Dogging
- Dr. Tiller, FACE, and the Failure of the Bush DOJ to Enforce the Law
- Rush Limbaugh’s Failure Paradox
- How to Misread the Lessons of 1994 Health Reform Failure
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Bruce Bartlett, The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Wonderful!
Leahy!
darn. missed it by that much. only because I’m checking in while doing dishes, and I had rubber gloves on.
Howdy!
Can we start a boycott of CNN and its advertisers till they acknowledge what a racist asshat Beck is and that they fire him as well?
Oversight! Leahy! Waxman!
Christy,
Is there going to be anyone live blogging the Tillman hearings (I believe) on Wednesday?
No pressure or anything… ;})
Joe Klein at 5 — I think pointing out Beck’s inherent tendencies every chance we get is a great start. Why not e-mail a transcript of Beck’s remarks to folks at CNN and to his advertisers — that might be a good way to start.
dakine at 6 — I’ll be on a flight to Chicago on Wednesday, so it’s unlikely but it’s also several days ahead. It’s all I can do to get posts up today between thunderstorms…so no idea as yet.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 8
That’s kinda what I thought, that folks would be in route to Chicago.
btw, gang, do click through the links above. The Rick Perlstein one is a great read all by itself. Tried to be sure and lable the video links for those of you on dial-up.
whichis perlstein’s
Wonder how long it will take our media to report this:
Sydney Morning Herald reports al-Maliki HAS asked Bush to replace Petraeus.
Thanks for the H/T Christy, cool.
What I have realized in the past while is that as bad as I ever thought chimp and his minions were – and I read them as utterly corrupt and venal back in 2000 – they are much much worse. They are not people with a different vision for America, they are people who see this country as something to use for their own gain.
Why don’t we just drop the war on terror and declare war on corruption and incompetence?
What do you think the bag limit should be on Rethuglicans?
peterboy — the “on and on and on” one
grazie…starting to feel a little guilty about spending Sunday AM with the bats and the pups.
Thunder rumbling int he distance here. Third day in a row of storms for us. We need the rain, but the dahchshund is none too pleased…
Walter Mondale (quoted by Christy @ Top):
I’ve just got one question on this.
Almost?
…and on and on. More corruption.
(I’m beginning to feel like I’m putting together a scrapbook!)
Christy Hardin Smith @ 17
rumbling here in northern VA too
JGabriel at 18 — I read that as politice Washington-speak for “Cheney is an imperialist jackass.” But maybe that’s just me. *g*
Christy Hardin Smith @ 21
Bless his heart.
Wow CHS what a post. Walter Mondale will be at Yearly kos. The list of speakers at the conference is overwhelming
http://yearlykosconvention.org/speakers
The clip you have of Vic Gold was insightful. I want to get the book. Vic shared that he believe the neo-cons have a mission a “benevolent hegemony” he referred to them as the “theocons”, and pointed to the National Review. Hello Micheal”faster please” Ledeen. Vic Gold said that the “Holy Rollers” want a “theocracy”.
This guy is spot on. We need to push these right wing kooks back into their corners and keep them there.
Bill Moyers and Vic Gold give me hope
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYQDwHPSF5A
“We didn’t get elected to be popular.”
- Dick Cheney
I love it that this story was first generated by a jilted girlfriend of Abramoff’s partner Michael Scanlon.
We weren’t supposed to find out about this gigantic money laundering scheme. They were SO smart, they had it all figured out, but they forgot that the biggest schemes can become unhinged by the seemingly insignificant details, like how you treat your friends.
we need more jilted girlfriends speaking up…
Heh. Remember the slides White House aide Scott Jennings provided to Lurita “Cookies” Doan at the GSA for one of those so-called “informative” sessions on how the GSA could help “our” Republican candidates in 2006?
The slide show conveyed the same gist that Rove is still selling today; the presentation showed that in districts where the Republican member of Congress was dogged by scandal, the voters moved for Dems. And Rover is STILL pushing this line across the party, even after we’ve all of us seen it during hearings before the House…
In other words, Rove’s got NOTHING. He’s trying to sell his own party and he’s not doing it. He can’t deliver.
Worse, we know from the Abramoff scandal that there were at least 60 members of Congress implicated; what happens if we impeach Gonzo, actually press for more and deeper investigations into the Abramoff connections, and we find those 60 members??
There won’t be any Republican left who can run from the corruption of the Beltway, because they are the corruption.
There is no daylight between the Republican Party and the Culture of Corruption, and it’s about time that real conservatives snapped out of their somnambulistic torpor, wiped up the mess and started over.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 21
I’m sure you’re right, but I think Mondale might have overdone it.
But then, I’m a vulgar, left-wing, partisan.
This morning I heard a rebroadcast on C-span of Thursday’s House Armed Services Committee hearing titled Upholding the Principle of Habeas Corpus for Detainees.
During that hearing Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) was a breath of fresh air—both defending the concept of habeas corpus for all and reclaiming Congress as a coequal branch of government. Calling out Patrick Philbin (former DoJ Assoc. Deputy Atty General) on his reference to Congress as the “political” branch of government, she stepped on his smirk with the forceful remedial lesson “I am a legislatTOR. I am not from ‘the political branch’. I am part of the Legislative Branch of government.”
Philbin thought he dug himself out of that hole with the rejoinder that unlike the Legislative and Executive branches which are elected and therefore are ‘policital’, he is from the judiciary where “they are not political.”
Umm, Philbin, where have you been recently?
AND what Digby said.
carolyn urban @ 13
No matter how bad you think they are, they’re always worse. Even if you try to take this into account.
Chick Daney gets a new heart device
he has a long, long history of disease
superior posting as always, CHS.
Russert presented some poll with Gulliano ahead of all Dem candidates. Huh? My only question on these polls: if these are phone-polls, how is it that the demographic seems to be people over 70, without internet access, or otherwise disinclined to understand, hear, or see what information they do have access to? I think the DNC ought to start grassroots visits to all senior residents. :}
Replay of Gonzo tesifying on Cspan. Schumer is playing with him like Oscar the Cat wpuld.
I’ve got a very large family/friends boatload of those real conservatives living in AZ & up in Rhode Island & Maine. They vote every election (including tiny municipal ones) & they have dough & contribute to candidates. They’re pissed off in the extreme w/BushCo, the corruption of the DOJ in particular, since several attorneys, a former judge, & a former USA are numbered therein.
I’ve heard Rove described as many things by these folks, “damned polecat” being the gentlest among them…
Even Tony El Lapdog Blair’s MI5 is being corrupted. Another CIA-CYA special
Arnie @ 36
Thanks for that link, Arnie. We often forget how far the rot spread outside our shores.
It’s CYA time for Mueller etal who know how bad this is gonna hit.
Marie Roget @ 35
And yet if you have a discussion about the Republican Party, they still defend the President’s/Vice President’s agenda. Bugs the hell out of me that they cannot see the very belief system they embrace with a death grip is embodied in Bush/Cheney and cabal.
They got what they wanted, and they’re not happy with it.
And you know it’ll be our fault somehow.
The fundamental problem is that modern conservatives do not believe in the concept of the public good. To them there is only private, personal good. From this it automatically follows that they view politics (and everything else) as a winner-take-all zero sum game. They also believe that everyone else operates under the same principles and assumptions. They literally cannot imagine anyone behaving in an altruistic fashion.
Rayne @ 39
Know it.
Marie Roget @ 35
But isn’t that a compliment among Republicans?
Anyway, I suspect Rove is quite safe, until you hear them calling him a ‘liberal’.
pdaly @ 29
Do you have a link to the broadcast? Or is it on the website? Thanks.
Great read…terrifying but a great read
Dangers of a cornered Bush
http://www.informationclearing…..e18081.htm
The “Holy Rollers, Neo-cons/theo-cons, and Oil cons” have plenty of time to make a very bad situation far worse.
DrDick @ 40
DING! (to thegooddoctor *g*)
The voice of Barbara Jordon keeps running through my head these days. I found only one short 18 second) video of her talking about the constitution. But I found this site, which has an audio recording that is longer, and so applicable to where we find ourselves now. Only the names have changed. (Fielding is mentioned, however, and the major players today were in that corrupt admin as well.
How I wish we still had Barbara around to deal with this admin as she so brilliantly dealt with the Nixon admin. To get to the audio link, scroll down about 1/3 down the page, and it’s right above a mosiac:
http://virgotex.wordpress.com/tag/barbara-jordan/
kathleen @ 44
bum link, Kathleen.
“it’s almost as if he denies the legitimacy of an equal branch of government”? There’s no “almost” about it. As Samuel Alito discussed at his Supreme Court confirmation hearing, this President and Vice President believe in the “unitary executive.” That’s a euphemism for “unilateral executive,” and it means precisely that Congress is not co-equal to the Executive Branch. Unless this Congress fights for its equality, it may lose it for many years, no matter which party is in charge of Congress and the White House. That is a fight that is much bigger than Leahy vs. Bush or Democrat vs. Republican.
Looking over all the recent criticisms of Hillary, I’m getting the feeling that the latest Republican talking point is:
“We’re not afraid of Hillary because she’s a woman, we’re afraid of her because she has breasts.”
It’s mind-boggling.
I mean, that’ll really close the gender gap.
pdaly @ 29
Tauscher is one of the most cravenly political of all House members.
Philbin, by contrast, was fired by the Bushies because he didn’t go along with them, in lockstep, at all times.
Maybe Philbin had a point. Maybe not a locked-down, lead-pipe cinch point, but a point, nevertheless….
pet wrecker @ 32
parts is parts i always say. give Chick Daney a new battry …….
CHS “In order to have a properly functioning government, you must believe in the inherent underpinnings of liberty and justice and to work toward the greater goal of equal and even-handed application of the law.”
I think Rep Lee was a shining example of your words on Matthews program
If folks missed Rep Sheila Jackson Lee on Chris Matthews the other evening it is worth taking time to listen and watch her summary of the Gonzales and Muellers testimony. What an incredibly brilliant, articulate, graceful and diplomatic representative. Does not get any better than this.
Fired U.S. Attorneys
go to Gonzales potential perjury problem to watch Rep Lee
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/
“Let’s clear it all up” “The Rule of law has to be the most prominent and most important concern for U.S. members of congress and the President of the U.S. Appoint a Special Prosecutor”
JGabriel @ 49
they’ve been OD-ing on Althouse again
When is Tom DeLay going to jail?
TribeScribe @ 54
Not nearly soon enough.
on the corrupted Office of National Drug Control Policy…my NY Times link @ 32 passed me first to an ad for ONDCP…theantidrug gets much money from the corrupted bushie drug czar office and it smells…
Unitary executive is the Republican Politically Correct Speech word for dictator.
-GSD
GSD @ 57
DING!
DrDick @ 58
DONG!
fahrender @ 53
Whine in a box?
Then we should be calling Shrub “Dear U.E.” or perhaps, “Baby U.E.”
Someone should post a picture of Senator Clinton, Cokie Roberts and Andrea Mitchell all in the same style and same color jacket this week.
I am generally not into what candidates or anyone else is wearing but this fashion statement just smacked me in the face.
I found another even more appropriate audio of Barbara Jordan talking about impeachment. Wow…she talks about all the important other things that Congress has on it’s plate and they are the same as today…the environment, campaign finance reform, etc. And she says that what they are embarking on is not petty. I wish every congressperson who doesn’t favor impeachment could hear this. She speaks through the ages.
This is under the Barbara Jordan Speaks #5 section.
http://virgotex.wordpress.com/tag/barbara-jordan/
“In other words, Rove’s got NOTHING. He’s trying to sell his own party and he’s not doing it. He can’t deliver.”
Never stopped him before. Rove is nothing if not imaginative at packaging (or supressing) do-do.
Boston1775 @ 59
The witch is dead. And besides, that was another country.
Either that or I’ve inadvertently stepped into a book club discussion of Dorthy Sayre’s ‘The Nine Tailors’.
Oops.
DrDick @ 40
Those you describe know no remorse, shame, guilt. They have no conscience. They are sociopaths. Really, in my opinion.
Oscar, I don’t believe we’re in Fenchurch St. Paul any more!
fahrender @ 51
One of the Sunday news programs listed how many investigations the Democrats have going since they now have the majority
300 investigations
400 document request
600 oversight hearings.
So much corruption so little time to hold them accountable
Out of Matthews guest this morning all four thought Gonzales would stay. Matthews indicated that he thinks Gonzales will go. Place your bets.
suzinmpls @ 33
Giuliani might be the anointed one after all.
Ted Olsen is one of the people bundling contributions for him and if I’m not mistaken with Ted’s allegiance to the dark side, Rudy might be getting some significant help from the extreme right-wing of the GOP including the theocrats and the Eric Princes in the crowd.
Just a thought.
In addition to all of the vacancies at DOJ that were mentioned a couple posts back, the tax administration also looks remarkably like a piece of Emmental.
Commissioner of the IRS — vacant.
Deputy Commissioner of the IRS (and acting Commissioner in the absence of a sitting Commissioner) — resignation announced.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Regulatory Affairs) — vacant.
Treasury International Tax Counsel — vacant.
For a little fun, check out Bob Novak’s latest post.
Poor Bob, still stuck carrying Karl Rove’s water at his advanced age.
Rove is still trying to use his broken wand to convince the Republicans that the reason they lost the election was because of “congressional corruption” and not the war.
Funny stuff, Rover.
For a bonus, read the comments section where a staffer to Sen. Nelson chimes in and calls Novak a liar for misreporting the truth.
-GSD
Oscar, the Death Kitty says:
July 29th, 2007 at 10:13 am
Kathleen @ 93
This is what a few other cats think of Karl
Rove. http://isfullofcrap.com/oldcra…..ca_60.html
Oscar what is your opinion of Mr. Rove?
Oscar says
Asshole. Overrated. Minor demon. Friendly, if he thinks he can use you.
Rove actually has *horns*, though they’re invisible. Only reason I know about them is because he picked me up and put me on his bald, clammy head — like I was some sort of frickin’ toupee. One o’ the horns poked me in the eye.
Anyway, while I was up there, I thought I’d scratch the number 666 into his skull. But it was already there!
Oscar, the Death Kitty @ 65
Good one, Oscar. Who doesn’t like a literate deathly cat sitting near their keyboard, except a few names now in the news.
Let’s all wait for the other knells…
burnspbesq @ 72
However I’m sure the post of Head of Audit the Middle and Working Classes is fully staffed.
kathleen @ 70
He’ll stay. Matthews, as usual, doesn’t get it.
kathleen @ 70
Matthews is so infrequently right about anything that common sense would be to bet against him, if “go” means being fired or resigning.
If the SJC can’t get a special prosecutor of reasonable independence, and impeachment is, therefore, seriously entertained, I’d go for that. There’s already enough evidence from his testimony alone to pitch him out on his plump ass.
But, Bush will never push him out the door. Never.
burnspbesq @ 72
In contrast to DoJ (where the rats are rapidly bailing), some of this situation in tax administration may well be deliberate. The Bush administration has demonstrated a long standing and consistent pattern of nonenforcement of tax laws (at least as it affects corporations and the very wealthy). The deliberate reductions in the numbers of case officers conducting audits is a case in point.
dalloway @ 61
On a serious – if similiar – note, this opening paragraph from the Times’ story on Specter yesterday bothered me:
When did it become *common practice* to refer to the President as ‘commander in chief’ at the Times, outside of the President’s military role?
Looks like someone ignored the stylebook for that intro, but I could be wrong.
Anyway, it definitely reinforces the Bushies preferred conception of themselves, rather than the more neutral, and more contextually honest, ‘President’.
burnspbesq @ 72
Novaks and Judy Millers are the reason we need an Official Secrets Act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Secrets_Act
It can be used sparingly
Laura Doty @ 68
Sorry, that was supposed to be under my handle. Forgot to change it back after adding a comment to the previous thread.
kathleen @ 81
Hope you’re joking. An Official Secrets Act would be the last nail in this country’s coffin.
The `pugs tried to get one in 1996, and very nearly did, but Clinton vetoed it because they wouldn’t deal on something else. It’s the worst possible thing to have in a supposedly free society.
And, once implemented, it would never be used sparingly. Ask the people in the UK who were recently jailed for trying to reveal a document indicating that Blair had advance notice of Bush’s intentions to go to war no matter what.
kathleen @ 81
No we don NOT need an “Official Secrets Act.” Bush is attempting to establish a de-facto one with all of his claims of Executive Privilege and look at the mess we are in. What we DO need is more sunlight and more fed up career people coming forward to stop these liars in their tracks.
Novak and Miller are but symptoms of the problem. An “Official Secrets Act” would wind up having all the people that are helping to clean up the mess going to jail.
montag @ 83
Also absolutely unconstitutional as it directly contradicts the first amendment.
While I was out searching for Barbara Jordon clips, I started thinking about one part of the Watergate scandal. They broke into the office of Daniel Ellsburg’s psychiatrist to try to get dirt on him. I still think that a lot of the data-mining was used to get blackmail material against members of Congress. There are so many parallels.
I wonder if someone asked the Rep and Dem congresscritters if they thought Nixon’s impeachment was wrong, would any of them say it was partisanship, that it was over-reaching? I doubt many would say that. What we have now is so much more damning, and yet they are so afraid of impeachment. Makes zero sense.
DrDick @ 40
I’d take it a bit farther. They really believe that they are insulated from the consequences of their greed. They really believe that a system set up to benefit no one but them will work just fine, and that there will never have to pay for the consequences of their greed.
I hope they are wrong, and that as a nation we still have the strength to prove them wrong. If we don’t, I’m moving to France, where the government is still afraid of the people.
masaccio @ 87
The Bushies *are* afraid of the people. It’s just that the Bush response is to cover up or deny problems instead of fixing them.
dakine01 @ 84
I completely disagree. Journalist who manipulate the news with outright lies and manipulations. When journalist participate fully with the outing of an undercover agent whose job it is to protect the U.S. When that agent is outed by sicko Bush administration officials and a spoon fed journalist and this outing effects National Security, they need to pay a very serious price. More than either Miller or Novak have paid.
One of the affadavits for the Rosen espionage trial said that Rosen was taped by the F.B.I. saying that he sure was happy that the U.S. did not have an “Official Secrets Act”. He “allegedly” said this as he was receiving classified intelligence from either Larry Franklin or a journalist
I should add to my post @85 that preventing laws like the Official Secrets Act is the express purpose behind including the first amendment in the constitution.
TRex upstairs
Our favorite therapod is upstairs with a priceless post.
neoconservatives believe in the divine right of kings and THEY ARE KINGS make no mistake about that! we are not to question them or their motives at no time………
It should be pretty clear by now that the national leadership of the Republican Party is essentially a criminal conspiracy. No bid contracts, agencies politicized into turkey farms, blatant stone-walling, wars of aggression, political operatives giving marching orders to the government…
kathleen @ 89
The Intelligence Protection Act was written to specifically exclude the recipient of the classified information because of the 1st amendment. That’s why we HAVE the first amendment. Or do you prefer that we not even have that level of protection from the BS. Would you really want BushCo to have another tool to block getting information out given what they’ve done with what they have? An Official Secrets Act would not stop them from using lap dog pseudo journalists to do their bidding. It would only allow them to prosecute the other folks who didn’t do their bidding.
kathleen @ 89
There are other, more direct and effective means of dealing with problems like those you mention. An official Secrets Act would ultimately benefit those engaged in official misconduct (like the Bush administration) far more than it would prevent abuses of the sort you mention. Changing and slightly broadening the Intelligence Identities Act would prevent outing covert agents by making it apply to members of the press. The Official Secrets act most effectively obstructs public oversight and prevents the press from exercising its rightful role in revealing government misconduct (which they seem to have abandoned lately).
Kathleen @ 81
If this is done, kiss any expectation of democracy goodby, only the fraud of democracy will remain, as it is in Britain today. This idea has no redeeming qualities and is an open invitation to unconsciable, uncontrollable governmental abuse. If you see this “buddha” on the road, kill (metaphorically) it. Tony Blair lead Britain into Irak II using “official secrets act” having the support of less than 30% of the population (IIRC) making Britain subject to crimes against humanity and war crimes and will stand in the same dock as the US for the trouble. Tony Blair is a right cute hoor, truth be known.
RIDDLE: WHAT WOULD THE GOP LEADERSHIP SAY IF BUSH LITERALLY CRAPPED ON THE CONSTITUTION?
kathleen @ 89
Sorry, to be blunt, but do you not understand what an Official Secrets Act is? It cuts off all ability of the public to understand what its government is doing in secret. All. Period.
And, moreover, neither Novak nor Miller would ever have been prosecuted under an Official Secrets Act if Bush and/or Cheney have the ability to declassify, at will, the information given them. Which, they do. And, in the case of the NIE pending at the time, they claim to have done.
The only way we ever find out about what the government is doing in our names is via leaks to the press. No president, of either party, voluntarily gives up information that makes him look bad.
The war in Vietnam was ended, in part, because Daniel Ellsberg took the Pentagon Papers to the NY Times. Why? Because they showed, unequivocally, that Nixon and Johnson had lied and that the war was known to be a lost cause, at that time, for fifteen years. Without that disclosure, we might still be fighting there, and certainly would still be lied to.
It’s a genuinely horrible idea–which I don’t think you’ve considered except in a very limited and abstract way. We overclassify way, way too many documents as it is–tens of million every year, and most of them aren’t state secrets.
An Official Secrets Act, in this country, would be our downfall. Remember, and remember this very well: it was government officials who gave that information to Novak and Miller–likely with the full knowledge and permission of their superiors, the President and Vice-President of the United States. When you give such people the right to do just as they did, but imprison the press for publicizing their failures and their scheming, you have the definition of tyranny.
This caught my eye this a.m. Matt Stoller @ Open Left has a post up about an Impeachment Coalition forming:
“The Center for Constitutional Rights, Human Rights Watch, MoveOn.org and others are joining together to launch a campaign to help citizens defend democracy. The American Freedom Campaign (AFC), which will be launched with a teleconference call on Tuesday, July 31, is an online and offline effort to build grassroots support to restore checks and balances and reverse abuses of power by the executive branch.”
JGabriel @ 42
They call him worse than a liberal. He’s “jumped up, not one of them, & his brand of governance by politicization has made them all look bad.” A lot of them even feel bad ;-)
He doesn’t play by their rules, & I’m going to be both generous & truthful in saying quite a few are of the Eisenhower school of Republican thought.
As was implied upthread, these folks are necessary to the calling of BushCo to account- you may not love ‘em, nor they you, but a common goal of accountability unites us. For the rest, we’ll see afterwards…
Down here in EPU-land I want to thank Emma for the Barbara Jordan website. Run Barbara speaking to us in the background while you do your FDL reading….thanks again, Emma!
Several posters have listed examples of which top posts in Bush’s [sic] govt have been allowed to remain vacant. Take just one example cited above: int’l tax counsel for the Treasury.
Consider which post might be most critical in analyzing and revising the policies about taxing foreign income of US companies – who two years ago were given a virtual amnesty on bringing back their “foreign” profits to the US with a small fraction of the usual taxes due on them. Which post would be a key member of any panel assessing the impact of non/compliance with int’l tax treaties that apply to US and foreign tax payers.
Oil and defense contractors figure heavily in these discussions. I believe it was Halliburton, for example, which recently “moved” its top two executives to the Middle East (because that’s where their work is, not for tax reasons, of course).
Perhaps not all the empty chairs are empty by chance.
montag @ 98
I think a huge story is hiding in plain sight.
I think the Justice Department got lied to and suckered by W and Gonzo…over and over and over again. I think this dispute blew up when the found out about what they were supposedly authorizing.
The WaPo four part series describes Cheney and his habit of working in small groups and excluding those who have the delegated authority and responsibility for policy.
This story is filled with tales of “no disagreement”. The reports are vague about exactly who authorized what and when they so authorized it. All we hear is that the NSA and Bush said it was OK. It’s all about the decider’s authorization. What did Justice know and when did they know it?
You can’t disagree with policy if you don’t know about the policy. This applies not only to Congress, but to the Justice Department as well.
The disagreement that blew up at Justice about the wiretap programs may be about process as well as policy. They may have objected as soon as they found out about it…whatever “it” is.
This wouldn’t be the first time the President and his close circle sandbagged those whose responsibility, authority, and their reputations are on the line.
Has anyone heard Ashcroft talk about what he knew and when he knew it?
Perhaps Justice didn’t disagree previous to the hospital visit time frame because The President and his Attorney (Gonzo) lied to them about the program they were tricked into authorizing.
Which would explain the anger of those on the receiving end of the sandbagging.
JGabriel @ 42
Well, he is Liberal. Didn’t you know that? He drives a Prius hybrid ‘green’ car. Isn’t that a clear indication he’s a Socialist Liberal? I tell ya the man is dangerously Liberal. Heh.
Most Republicans can’t wait until Bush & Co are gone, so they can get back to their politics-as-usual Congressional earmarks and transitioning to lobbyist jobs.
What ought to be more apparent to the general public is that it’s the Congressional Conservative Bush Republicans who are complicit in all this garbage Bush, Cheney, Gonzales et al are doing since they won’t help Dems put an end to it.
Sorry to be TOTALLY O/T, but I am just logging on after a day away. This had me laughing out loud this morning:
Non Sequitur by Wiley
Apparently this is how the “yellowcake from Niger” made it into the State of the Union address…
I’m late returning to this thread.
JML at 43: Here is the link to Cspan videos this past week. Scroll down to House Hearing on Guantanamo Bay Detainees
and check for Tauscher at 2h 36min.
Also check out Lt Col. Stephen Abraham (US Army Reserves Atty & Fmr. Intelligence Officer) as he describes (at 1:53) the lack of provenance for evidence against Guantanamo detainees and the wall he ran into trying to learn about any exculpatory evidence (at 2:07) and his belief that the tribunals were based on “command influence” rather than rule of law.
Montag at 50: Thanks for the FYI. I am sorry to learn Tauscher is less than a stateswoman which makes her “I am a legislator” comment less effective. Philbin’s comment about the judiciary not being political is a few minutes into Tauscher’s comments at 2h 36 min (above link)
clarification for above time stamps on the video clips: “1:53″ indicates 1 hour 53 min (or 1:53:00), and 2:07 similarly should be 2:07:00
the Abramoff investigation –
when does the statute of limitations come into play?
Ronald Reagan started displaying dementia in the waning years of his presidency.
George W. Bush started displaying dementia the moment he and Cheney entered the White House after stealing the November 2000 elections…and it’s been one dementia-generated scandal after another since then.
There’s “inherent contempt,” but after these dementia-ridden years of the Bush administration and his incessant garbling of the English language, it is obvious that Bush has nothing but “incoherent contempt” for all that We The People hold dear.