<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Senators Clinton and Obama: Try Talking To Each Other</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:48:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-854152</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-854152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-853046&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;mui @ 132&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am completely flummoxed by the dynamics of this whole Dem presidential primary, particularly Clinton and Joe-Bama, who I always considered peas in a pod.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edwards — seeing the big picture and leading the way&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinton &amp; Obama…not so much&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-853046"><em>mui @ 132</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I am completely flummoxed by the dynamics of this whole Dem presidential primary, particularly Clinton and Joe-Bama, who I always considered peas in a pod.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Edwards — seeing the big picture and leading the way</p>
<p>Clinton &amp; Obama…not so much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markg8</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853956</link>
		<dc:creator>markg8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853956</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;CNN and Hardball? Who watches that garbage? Christ sometimes I think the blogosphere is like the nutritionist who spends all day telling people how to eat right and then goes home and has a liter of coke and a giant bag of chips for dinner. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the content of the post, you’re never going to win hearts and minds if you’re unwilling to talk to those who disagree with us. We now have Romney and McCain chiming in on Hillary’s side of the argument. What does that tell ya? I know what it tells me. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also know what Hillary’s “it’ll take a month to get each brigade out” answer during the debate means. With 15 to 20 brigades in the country she’d take a year and a half to end the war in Iraq.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The more I see of Hillary the more I see of the triangulating manipulator trying to appeal to the Dick Morris’s of the world who are never going to vote for her anyway instead of moving with the rest of the country to the sensible left.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN and Hardball? Who watches that garbage? Christ sometimes I think the blogosphere is like the nutritionist who spends all day telling people how to eat right and then goes home and has a liter of coke and a giant bag of chips for dinner. </p>
<p>As for the content of the post, you’re never going to win hearts and minds if you’re unwilling to talk to those who disagree with us. We now have Romney and McCain chiming in on Hillary’s side of the argument. What does that tell ya? I know what it tells me. </p>
<p>I also know what Hillary’s “it’ll take a month to get each brigade out” answer during the debate means. With 15 to 20 brigades in the country she’d take a year and a half to end the war in Iraq.  </p>
<p>The more I see of Hillary the more I see of the triangulating manipulator trying to appeal to the Dick Morris’s of the world who are never going to vote for her anyway instead of moving with the rest of the country to the sensible left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaleidescope</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853594</link>
		<dc:creator>kaleidescope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853594</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Word.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftdcin72</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853526</link>
		<dc:creator>leftdcin72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853526</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For what it’s worth, I would like to say that I could not understand the diffidence and seeming support (albeit somewhat passive) shown to the Clintons by CHS and JH and others who write on this site. Now I did some homework and I understand that CHS and JH did not live through the Vietnam era (at the level of intensity that I did due to age difference) and their optimism and perhaps tolerance levels remain much higher than mine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I for one refuse to give the Clintons a second chance. Their 8 years were an utter waste of this country’s time and resources. Nothing progressive was done and the Clintons revealed themselves as simply nothing more than petty office seekers and careerists. Gore has always been something of a pathetic figure to me, forced into politics by his parents without the intellectual capacity to figure out what makes him happy and to go for it which is clearly not politics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My particular intolerance of the Clintons come from knowing Bill Clinton and their cohorts way back when in the McGovern campaign when it was clear to me that many in that campaign (Hart and Clinton) were going to be unimaginative careerists who had avoided any direct consequence of the Vietnam war operating from an elitist perch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HRC is an utter waste of time. I am not interested in her petty goals. She cannot write well, she cannot think independently and she is goddamn boring.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it’s worth, I would like to say that I could not understand the diffidence and seeming support (albeit somewhat passive) shown to the Clintons by CHS and JH and others who write on this site. Now I did some homework and I understand that CHS and JH did not live through the Vietnam era (at the level of intensity that I did due to age difference) and their optimism and perhaps tolerance levels remain much higher than mine.</p>
<p>I for one refuse to give the Clintons a second chance. Their 8 years were an utter waste of this country’s time and resources. Nothing progressive was done and the Clintons revealed themselves as simply nothing more than petty office seekers and careerists. Gore has always been something of a pathetic figure to me, forced into politics by his parents without the intellectual capacity to figure out what makes him happy and to go for it which is clearly not politics.</p>
<p>My particular intolerance of the Clintons come from knowing Bill Clinton and their cohorts way back when in the McGovern campaign when it was clear to me that many in that campaign (Hart and Clinton) were going to be unimaginative careerists who had avoided any direct consequence of the Vietnam war operating from an elitist perch.</p>
<p>HRC is an utter waste of time. I am not interested in her petty goals. She cannot write well, she cannot think independently and she is goddamn boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeddySanFran</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853391</link>
		<dc:creator>TeddySanFran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853391</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another Edwards supporter weighs in: more of this from the two “front-runners,” please.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Edwards supporter weighs in: more of this from the two “front-runners,” please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redX</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853339</link>
		<dc:creator>redX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853339</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am glad, all the more room for Edwards. If these are who the candidates are then we will see it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad, all the more room for Edwards. If these are who the candidates are then we will see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blub</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853334</link>
		<dc:creator>Blub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853334</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-853143&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Joe Klein’s conscience @ 146&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don’t forget, Rethugs no longer control Ohio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…and we need to remember to keep a 24/7 eye on Kitty Harris down in FL :).. what’s she doing now anyway?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-853143"><em>Joe Klein’s conscience @ 146</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Don’t forget, Rethugs no longer control Ohio.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>…and we need to remember to keep a 24/7 eye on Kitty Harris down in FL :).. what’s she doing now anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DNS</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853200</link>
		<dc:creator>DNS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is the essence of the disagreement.&lt;br /&gt;
The YouTube contributor’s question was, “Would you be willing to meet such foreign leaders within the first year?”&lt;br /&gt;
Obama answered, “Yes”. In other words, he’d be willing; he wouldn’t rule it out.&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton pounced: “It’s naive and unwise to commit to meeting such leaders within the first year”. But Obama never said he would definitely meet them. So she misrepresented his position.&lt;br /&gt;
The truth is that both of them take the position: “It depends.” Even Clinton is not saying that she definitely would not meet with such leaders. So it’s all a waste of time and energy based on a misrepresentation or misunderstanding. Let’s all Move On, shall we?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the essence of the disagreement.<br />
The YouTube contributor’s question was, “Would you be willing to meet such foreign leaders within the first year?”<br />
Obama answered, “Yes”. In other words, he’d be willing; he wouldn’t rule it out.<br />
Clinton pounced: “It’s naive and unwise to commit to meeting such leaders within the first year”. But Obama never said he would definitely meet them. So she misrepresented his position.<br />
The truth is that both of them take the position: “It depends.” Even Clinton is not saying that she definitely would not meet with such leaders. So it’s all a waste of time and energy based on a misrepresentation or misunderstanding. Let’s all Move On, shall we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarecrow</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853164</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarecrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853164</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-853121&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tim Irving @ 142&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems that both the author and the commentators have lost sight of the fact that Hillary and Obama are running against each other for the nomination. This is exactly the sort of conflict that Obama needs to separtate himself from Clinton without initiating the attack himself. She offered him an excellent opportunity to liken her to Bush and remind voters of her support for the war.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Primary candidates have to spar with each other - that’s why we have these debates. I would be happy to see them engage more often like this - especially since this is an actual issue and their differing positions are nuanced disagreements, not personally destructive attacks. Although Hillary’s irresponsible and naive were perhaps a bit below the belt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  Of course they may need to spar with each other when there are genuine disagreements — but there was none here once you understand that the question had multiple parts and each candidate chose to respond to a different part — not give different answers to the same part.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary is free is suggest Obama has less experience than she, but his response decrying the Bush propensity not to talk to anyone on the “evil” side of his duality way of thinking was not an honest vehicle for that — and in the process, she managed to give cover to Bush’s intransigence. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama is free to call into question Hillary’s judgment wrt to the Iraq vote as a way of saying experience is not everything; judgment and instinct matter, too. But her response to the would you talk to them question was not the vehicle for making that point. I don’t disagree that once she attacked him for inexperience/judgment, he had to respond with something. But if your response is that you’re competent and have good judgment, you can’t convince people by sending out Axelrod on national tv.  And anyone could have told him that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-853121"><em>Tim Irving @ 142</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>It seems that both the author and the commentators have lost sight of the fact that Hillary and Obama are running against each other for the nomination. This is exactly the sort of conflict that Obama needs to separtate himself from Clinton without initiating the attack himself. She offered him an excellent opportunity to liken her to Bush and remind voters of her support for the war.</p>
<p>Primary candidates have to spar with each other &#8211; that’s why we have these debates. I would be happy to see them engage more often like this &#8211; especially since this is an actual issue and their differing positions are nuanced disagreements, not personally destructive attacks. Although Hillary’s irresponsible and naive were perhaps a bit below the belt.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>  Of course they may need to spar with each other when there are genuine disagreements — but there was none here once you understand that the question had multiple parts and each candidate chose to respond to a different part — not give different answers to the same part.  </p>
<p>Hillary is free is suggest Obama has less experience than she, but his response decrying the Bush propensity not to talk to anyone on the “evil” side of his duality way of thinking was not an honest vehicle for that — and in the process, she managed to give cover to Bush’s intransigence. </p>
<p>Obama is free to call into question Hillary’s judgment wrt to the Iraq vote as a way of saying experience is not everything; judgment and instinct matter, too. But her response to the would you talk to them question was not the vehicle for making that point. I don’t disagree that once she attacked him for inexperience/judgment, he had to respond with something. But if your response is that you’re competent and have good judgment, you can’t convince people by sending out Axelrod on national tv.  And anyone could have told him that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Klein&#8217;s conscience</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853143</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Klein&#8217;s conscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/27/dear-senators-clinton-and-obama-try-talking-to-each-other/#comment-853143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-853068&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Woodhall Hollow @ 141&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-853022&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mojo @ 111&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gore/Edwards ‘08…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best ticket, for me at least…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This should lead to a wipe out of the rethugs for at least a few election cycles..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First thing they need to do is get rid of Diebold and ChoicePoint (voter roll scrubbers) to restore faith in our elections..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BINGO!  A real dream ticket, which would lead to an absolute landslide of a victory for the Dems.  Gore is amazing at being Gore, when he is not being “handled,” &amp; Edwards is also good at being Edwards.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Run Al, run!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t forget, Rethugs no longer control Ohio.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-853068"><em>Woodhall Hollow @ 141</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-853022"><em>Mojo @ 111</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Gore/Edwards ‘08…</p>
<p>Best ticket, for me at least…</p>
<p>This should lead to a wipe out of the rethugs for at least a few election cycles..</p>
<p>First thing they need to do is get rid of Diebold and ChoicePoint (voter roll scrubbers) to restore faith in our elections..</p>
</blockquote>
<p>BINGO!  A real dream ticket, which would lead to an absolute landslide of a victory for the Dems.  Gore is amazing at being Gore, when he is not being “handled,” &amp; Edwards is also good at being Edwards.  </p>
<p>Run Al, run!!!!!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Don’t forget, Rethugs no longer control Ohio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
