It’s all lies. Issue the damned inherent contempt citations and get it over with. These people are protecting the king. The American People want answers. Not more lies

Yes! Write or call the House Juciary Committee and tell them that the measure will fail in the DOJ unless inherent contempt is used instead of an ordinary contempt citation.

Thank you.

chowderhead

Support Peace

Jane Hamsher @ 190

I had popcorn during the hearing. S’true.

Happy Birthday Jane! The late night crowd sent this over for you.

The fact that there’s even debate about whether to hold Miers in contempt of Congress is a disgrace. It’s a disgrace to our constitution, our founding fathers and to everyone who has ever fought and/or died for our system of government.

This should be a quick, unanimous vote to hold her in contempt. How much more “black and white” could it get. She was subpoenaed to appear and she refused. Case closed!

Anyone who would vote against it is either a clear enemy of the United States Constitution, or is so blinded by partisanship they are incapable of performing their duties as an elected representative.

you sayin’ the party line vote speaks volumes?

agreed!

dakine01 @ 222

Defendant’s option to choose between jury or judge only. The cop chose judge only.

Did he choose which judge as well?

That’s most likely luck of the draw. My guess is the judge is named first then during early proceeding, the defendant makes the choice of which way to go.

This should be a quick, unanimous vote to hold her in contempt. How much more “black and white” could it get. She was subpoenaed to appear and she refused. Case closed!

Anyone who would vote against it is either a clear enemy of the United States Constitution, or is so blinded by partisanship they are incapable of performing their duties as an elected representative.