<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HJC Contempt Hearing, Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:39:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smgumby</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847669</link>
		<dc:creator>Smgumby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847669</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nadler flat out called Gonzo a liar.  Thank Jeebus some straight talk!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nadler flat out called Gonzo a liar.  Thank Jeebus some straight talk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theExile</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847647</link>
		<dc:creator>theExile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-847444&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;AnnieW @ 48&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over at TPM, it was mentioned they are going the judicial (not inherent) route first.  Following the steps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s it, take it slow and easy, let the Thugs start a few more wars before they are called to account….hell let ‘em declare martial law and cancel elections…….Long Live King George and the ugly power behind the throne - DickHead Cheney.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-847444"><em>AnnieW @ 48</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Over at TPM, it was mentioned they are going the judicial (not inherent) route first.  Following the steps.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s it, take it slow and easy, let the Thugs start a few more wars before they are called to account….hell let ‘em declare martial law and cancel elections…….Long Live King George and the ugly power behind the throne &#8211; DickHead Cheney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chancre Man</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847627</link>
		<dc:creator>Chancre Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847627</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After watching the vote a few minutes ago, I conclude the Republicans are officially the party of White Men.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They do not represent America in any form or fashion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching the vote a few minutes ago, I conclude the Republicans are officially the party of White Men.</p>
<p>They do not represent America in any form or fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smgumby</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847595</link>
		<dc:creator>Smgumby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AMENDMENT FAILED&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMENDMENT FAILED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bearpaw</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847588</link>
		<dc:creator>Bearpaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847588</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-847520&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;eCAHNomics @ 108&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;What’s the difference between a clash between branches of govt and a constitutional crisis?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A clash between branches of government is — or should be — a sign that the system is working.  They’re essentially designed to be adversaries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Constitutional crisis is what happens when one branch expands its powers in such a way that it takes extraordinary measures by one or both of the other branches to restore balance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-847520"><em>eCAHNomics @ 108</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>What’s the difference between a clash between branches of govt and a constitutional crisis?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A clash between branches of government is — or should be — a sign that the system is working.  They’re essentially designed to be adversaries.</p>
<p>A Constitutional crisis is what happens when one branch expands its powers in such a way that it takes extraordinary measures by one or both of the other branches to restore balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pordon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847584</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847584</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1. If they serve at the pleasure of the president, why didn’t the president have any direct knowledge, according to multiple witnesses playing for his team?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Regardless of whether GWB’s frivolous privilege claims have any merit, Miers (and Bolten?) did not bother to assert it. Instead, she (they?) chose to ignore a lawful subpoena. Republican stonewallers can try to blow smoke up our asses all day long, but that doesn’t change the fact that this is an open and shut case. Either you support the rule of law and thus contempt charges, or you’re a republican debating this today. It’s that simple.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. If they serve at the pleasure of the president, why didn’t the president have any direct knowledge, according to multiple witnesses playing for his team?</p>
<p>2. Regardless of whether GWB’s frivolous privilege claims have any merit, Miers (and Bolten?) did not bother to assert it. Instead, she (they?) chose to ignore a lawful subpoena. Republican stonewallers can try to blow smoke up our asses all day long, but that doesn’t change the fact that this is an open and shut case. Either you support the rule of law and thus contempt charges, or you’re a republican debating this today. It’s that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847581</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847581</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So.&lt;br /&gt;
Does ActBlue have an opponent lined up for each of these Repub fools? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I sent my money to FDL again today.   Will be sending to ActBlue going forward.  Would appreciate a comment — based on effectiveness — what is better:&lt;br /&gt;
1- supporting the flow of information or&lt;br /&gt;
2- the campaigns of replacements.&lt;br /&gt;
(if you had to pick one.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So.<br />
Does ActBlue have an opponent lined up for each of these Repub fools? </p>
<p>I sent my money to FDL again today.   Will be sending to ActBlue going forward.  Would appreciate a comment — based on effectiveness — what is better:<br />
1- supporting the flow of information or<br />
2- the campaigns of replacements.<br />
(if you had to pick one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve-AR</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847580</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve-AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847580</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-847571&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;brendan @ 152&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-847560&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Knut Wicksell @ 147&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agree with &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:Bluetoe@139.&quot;&gt;Bluetoe@139.&lt;/a&gt;  The thugs must be scared shitless to pull out this stuff.  I think they are afraid because Rove has stuff on them, and if they don’t bend over, he will drop it on them in the primaries.  We are dealing with criminals in the White House.  There are no holds barred with them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No one need “have stuff” on them.  They’re hired hands.  You’re making the mistake of believing the trappings of power these supposed representatives of the people have are equivalent to real power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are all felons..Rove could have his DOJ send them to prison..a bigger threat than loosing an election.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-847571"><em>brendan @ 152</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-847560"><em>Knut Wicksell @ 147</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Agree with <a href="mailto:Bluetoe@139.">Bluetoe@139.</a>  The thugs must be scared shitless to pull out this stuff.  I think they are afraid because Rove has stuff on them, and if they don’t bend over, he will drop it on them in the primaries.  We are dealing with criminals in the White House.  There are no holds barred with them.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No one need “have stuff” on them.  They’re hired hands.  You’re making the mistake of believing the trappings of power these supposed representatives of the people have are equivalent to real power.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There are all felons..Rove could have his DOJ send them to prison..a bigger threat than loosing an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluetoe</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847579</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluetoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847579</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-847560&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Knut Wicksell @ 147&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agree with &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:Bluetoe@139.&quot;&gt;Bluetoe@139.&lt;/a&gt;  The thugs must be scared shitless to pull out this stuff.  I think they are afraid because Rove has stuff on them, and if they don’t bend over, he will drop it on them in the primaries.  We are dealing with criminals in the White House.  There are no holds barred with them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are plenty of Republican criminals and accomplices in Congress as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-847560"><em>Knut Wicksell @ 147</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Agree with <a href="mailto:Bluetoe@139.">Bluetoe@139.</a>  The thugs must be scared shitless to pull out this stuff.  I think they are afraid because Rove has stuff on them, and if they don’t bend over, he will drop it on them in the primaries.  We are dealing with criminals in the White House.  There are no holds barred with them.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There are plenty of Republican criminals and accomplices in Congress as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847578</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-i/#comment-847578</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-ii/&quot;&gt;Fresh thread&lt;/a&gt;, up and running…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please continue to keep comments and one-liners to a minimum.  It really helps.  Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/25/hjc-contempt-hearing-part-ii/">Fresh thread</a>, up and running…</p>
<p>Please continue to keep comments and one-liners to a minimum.  It really helps.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
