<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Because Nobody Cares More About the Troops than Joe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:11:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DefendOurConstitution</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-829629</link>
		<dc:creator>DefendOurConstitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-829629</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lieberman has completely lost his marbles. He is saying that we have to give Bush carte blanch to do whatever he wants in Iraq because AQI is such a horrible threat! Why would we continue betting on the horse most responsible for creating AQI in the first place? Bush has completely fucked up everything in Iraq and now Lieberman says we should let him do more? NO thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberman has completely lost his marbles. He is saying that we have to give Bush carte blanch to do whatever he wants in Iraq because AQI is such a horrible threat! Why would we continue betting on the horse most responsible for creating AQI in the first place? Bush has completely fucked up everything in Iraq and now Lieberman says we should let him do more? NO thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluetoe</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828784</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluetoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828784</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone watching the Senate debate happen to notice if Republican David Vitter is wearing his diapers over his suit?  Heard that Republicans asked NASA to send them diapers for tonights slumper party.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone watching the Senate debate happen to notice if Republican David Vitter is wearing his diapers over his suit?  Heard that Republicans asked NASA to send them diapers for tonights slumper party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmosis</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828757</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828757</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As always with Zell Loserman, it is important to remember his party affliation:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Connecticut &lt;em&gt;for&lt;/em&gt; Lieberman. Not&lt;br /&gt;
Lieberman &lt;em&gt;for&lt;/em&gt; Connecticut.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s all about Joe and getting his droopy dog face in front of a live camera as much as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always with Zell Loserman, it is important to remember his party affliation:</p>
<p>Connecticut <em>for</em> Lieberman. Not<br />
Lieberman <em>for</em> Connecticut.  </p>
<p>It’s all about Joe and getting his droopy dog face in front of a live camera as much as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punaise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828508</link>
		<dc:creator>punaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-828130&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;nomolos @ 172&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-828118&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;punaise @ 159&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I dislike Joe Lieberman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;abhor, abominate, allergic to, antipathize, avoid, condemn, contemn, deplore, despise, detest, disapprove, disesteem, disfavor, disrelish, eschew, execrate, hate, loathe, mind, not appreciate, not endure, object to, regret, resent, scorn, shudder at, shun,  abominate, be sickened by, despise, detest,  execrate, feel disgust for, hate, loathe, scorn, view with horror&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;that pretty much covers it&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-828130"><em>nomolos @ 172</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-828118"><em>punaise @ 159</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I dislike Joe Lieberman</p>
</blockquote>
<p>abhor, abominate, allergic to, antipathize, avoid, condemn, contemn, deplore, despise, detest, disapprove, disesteem, disfavor, disrelish, eschew, execrate, hate, loathe, mind, not appreciate, not endure, object to, regret, resent, scorn, shudder at, shun,  abominate, be sickened by, despise, detest,  execrate, feel disgust for, hate, loathe, scorn, view with horror</p>
</blockquote>
<p>that pretty much covers it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftdcin72</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828480</link>
		<dc:creator>leftdcin72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828480</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-828254&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;brendan @ 287&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-828231&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;BigMitch @ 267&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brandon says: “Rich was pardoned on the request of the Israelis because he was an intelligence asset.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I never heard this accusation before. Rich was a very generous donor to Israeli charities. The israelis did lobby for a pardon of a different person — damn, I am forgetting his name but he was convicted of BIG spying — and Clinton rejected their pleas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, Pollard.  Here’s a reputable source on the Rich pardon:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.salon.com/news/col/cona/2001/02/13/rich/index.html&quot;&gt;http://archive.salon.com/news/.....index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once again, this is not some special fiendishness on the part of the Israelis, but, nevertheless, a case of demonstrably divergent interests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is Big Mitch promoting the Clintons’ cover story that Rich was pardoned by the Clintons because of Israeli intelligence issues. NONSENSE. Rich has beeen spending his days hanging out in Lake Lugano doing not much of anything. The idea that this scoundrel played any role in his life except ripping off and evading justice is absolute rubbish. Are we to believe that Rich needed a pardon or was granted a pardon in faux recognition of his dutiful service to Israel? Is there no end to the bull—- of the Clintons?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-828254"><em>brendan @ 287</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-828231"><em>BigMitch @ 267</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Brandon says: “Rich was pardoned on the request of the Israelis because he was an intelligence asset.” </p>
<p>I never heard this accusation before. Rich was a very generous donor to Israeli charities. The israelis did lobby for a pardon of a different person — damn, I am forgetting his name but he was convicted of BIG spying — and Clinton rejected their pleas.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, Pollard.  Here’s a reputable source on the Rich pardon:</p>
<p><a href="http://archive.salon.com/news/col/cona/2001/02/13/rich/index.html">http://archive.salon.com/news/&#8230;..index.html</a></p>
<p>Once again, this is not some special fiendishness on the part of the Israelis, but, nevertheless, a case of demonstrably divergent interests.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is Big Mitch promoting the Clintons’ cover story that Rich was pardoned by the Clintons because of Israeli intelligence issues. NONSENSE. Rich has beeen spending his days hanging out in Lake Lugano doing not much of anything. The idea that this scoundrel played any role in his life except ripping off and evading justice is absolute rubbish. Are we to believe that Rich needed a pardon or was granted a pardon in faux recognition of his dutiful service to Israel? Is there no end to the bull—- of the Clintons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eureka Springs</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828476</link>
		<dc:creator>Eureka Springs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828476</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With balance like supporting Lieberman/Pryor we will have war, Supreme court problems, illegal abortion, no or disposable habeas corpus..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Al screwed up when he embraced Lieberman..Wes is doing the same with his embrace of Pryor..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of it (beyond lips service) suggests anything other than an illusion of moving to the left, imo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to see Gore run and see Wes change his support of Pryor… but cannot accept Wes’s support of Pryor, don’t understand it since he supported Ned last year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pryor is one of the worst DLC Dems in the Senate and Wes supporting him at home in AR is a huge problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With balance like supporting Lieberman/Pryor we will have war, Supreme court problems, illegal abortion, no or disposable habeas corpus..</p>
<p>Al screwed up when he embraced Lieberman..Wes is doing the same with his embrace of Pryor..</p>
<p>None of it (beyond lips service) suggests anything other than an illusion of moving to the left, imo.</p>
<p>I would like to see Gore run and see Wes change his support of Pryor… but cannot accept Wes’s support of Pryor, don’t understand it since he supported Ned last year.</p>
<p>Pryor is one of the worst DLC Dems in the Senate and Wes supporting him at home in AR is a huge problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Tough</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828436</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Tough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828436</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-828199&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;spurious @ 236&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-828159&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eureka Springs @ 195&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clark is raising money through his own mailing list for Gang of fourteen member Senator Mark “Lieberlovin’” Pryor D-AR, and will not respond to my letters asking him why?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s as bad as raising money for Joe himself, imo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ouch.  I liked Wes when he ran the last time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But you see, that balances the ticket very nicely with Gore.  Clark is a moderate and a general.  Of course he is going to have a pro-defense posture, and is going to support anti-terrorism measures.  Yes, the Bushies “leak” info for political purposes, and terrorists hate us more for the Bushies’ policies in Iraq, but terrorists are still organizing, and they are still intent on doing the US and our allies great harm.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clark is the perfect balance to Gore and his very left views–very left in this political atomsphere.  Gore/Edwards appeal to only the left-wingers, and that, I don’t think, wins the day.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-828199"><em>spurious @ 236</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-828159"><em>Eureka Springs @ 195</em></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Clark is raising money through his own mailing list for Gang of fourteen member Senator Mark “Lieberlovin’” Pryor D-AR, and will not respond to my letters asking him why?</p>
<p>It’s as bad as raising money for Joe himself, imo.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ouch.  I liked Wes when he ran the last time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But you see, that balances the ticket very nicely with Gore.  Clark is a moderate and a general.  Of course he is going to have a pro-defense posture, and is going to support anti-terrorism measures.  Yes, the Bushies “leak” info for political purposes, and terrorists hate us more for the Bushies’ policies in Iraq, but terrorists are still organizing, and they are still intent on doing the US and our allies great harm.  </p>
<p>Clark is the perfect balance to Gore and his very left views–very left in this political atomsphere.  Gore/Edwards appeal to only the left-wingers, and that, I don’t think, wins the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mabel&#8217;s Wig Shack</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828420</link>
		<dc:creator>Mabel&#8217;s Wig Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re: post @ 312:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their allegience is of course &lt;b&gt;‘dual’&lt;/b&gt; to this nation and their believe system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but their belief system is &lt;b&gt;primal&lt;/b&gt;…as in &lt;b&gt;primal&lt;/b&gt; therapy…that’s where the core of their being resides….&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: post @ 312:</p>
<p>Their allegience is of course <b>‘dual’</b> to this nation and their believe system.</p>
<p>but their belief system is <b>primal</b>…as in <b>primal</b> therapy…that’s where the core of their being resides….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828388</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828388</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-828366&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;dmac @ 312&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;selise says-”thanks, i just downloaded it. is it the most authoritative resource?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;don’t know, it’s one source of information, lugar is a rhodes scholar, i found it interesting, but haven’t read the whole thing yet…..but i would think the one christie linked to at 310 would be……&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;christy’s link included the same pdf. guess i better print it out, if that’s what i should read. am frustrated that i don’t know what senator reid et al are doing (and that they haven’t explained it)…. guess it’s up to me to try to figure it out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p.s. i think Stanley Bach and Richard S. Beth are the authors (not lugar)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-828366"><em>dmac @ 312</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>selise says-”thanks, i just downloaded it. is it the most authoritative resource?”</p>
<p>don’t know, it’s one source of information, lugar is a rhodes scholar, i found it interesting, but haven’t read the whole thing yet…..but i would think the one christie linked to at 310 would be……</p>
</blockquote>
<p>christy’s link included the same pdf. guess i better print it out, if that’s what i should read. am frustrated that i don’t know what senator reid et al are doing (and that they haven’t explained it)…. guess it’s up to me to try to figure it out.</p>
<p>p.s. i think Stanley Bach and Richard S. Beth are the authors (not lugar)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828366</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/17/because-nobody-cares-more-about-the-troops-than-joe/#comment-828366</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;selise says-”thanks, i just downloaded it. is it the most authoritative resource?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;don’t know, it’s one source of information, lugar is a rhodes scholar, i found it interesting, but haven’t read the whole thing yet…..but i would think the one christie linked to at 310 would be……&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>selise says-”thanks, i just downloaded it. is it the most authoritative resource?”</p>
<p>don’t know, it’s one source of information, lugar is a rhodes scholar, i found it interesting, but haven’t read the whole thing yet…..but i would think the one christie linked to at 310 would be……</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.226 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-15 23:11:39 -->

