<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confusing Process With Intent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:56:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jayt</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-827145</link>
		<dc:creator>jayt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-827145</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;test for return of “f” thingie&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test for return of “f” thingie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrtle June</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826728</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrtle June</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826596&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cozumel @ 188&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sponsors start leaving O’Reilly Factor&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Thank you for taking the time to share with us your concerns regarding our recent advertising on the FOX network. We appreciate your feedback and want you to know that we take your comments quite seriously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Effective January 25, we have pulled Loweâ€™s advertising from the Oâ€™Reilly Factor program.&lt;br /&gt;
Please accept this letter as a sincere apology from Loweâ€™s and reassurance of Loweâ€™s commitment to you, our valued customer. If Loweâ€™s can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to write or call us. We encourage you to continue to share your comments and feedback, whenever you think it would be appropriate.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rg.bravenewfilms.org/blog/489-sponsors-start-leaving-o-reilly-factor&quot;&gt;http://rg.bravenewfilms.org/bl.....lly-factor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, that’s wonderful!!! Thanks for this info… I’ll pass it along!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-826596"><em>Cozumel @ 188</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><b>Sponsors start leaving O’Reilly Factor</b></p>
<p>“Thank you for taking the time to share with us your concerns regarding our recent advertising on the FOX network. We appreciate your feedback and want you to know that we take your comments quite seriously.</p>
<p>Effective January 25, we have pulled Loweâ€™s advertising from the Oâ€™Reilly Factor program.<br />
Please accept this letter as a sincere apology from Loweâ€™s and reassurance of Loweâ€™s commitment to you, our valued customer. If Loweâ€™s can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to write or call us. We encourage you to continue to share your comments and feedback, whenever you think it would be appropriate.”</p>
<p><a href="http://rg.bravenewfilms.org/blog/489-sponsors-start-leaving-o-reilly-factor">http://rg.bravenewfilms.org/bl&#8230;..lly-factor</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, that’s wonderful!!! Thanks for this info… I’ll pass it along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrtle June</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826711</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrtle June</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826711</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826659&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;johnSwifty @ 198&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826634&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Myrtle June @ 196&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I read somewhere that back in April, Ron Paul filed articles of impeachment for cheney in a house resolution. I’ve never seen anything else about it though. Might this already be in the works just waiting for Nancy to wake up and smell the coffee?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul scares the piss out of me. The only thing worse than neo-conservatism would be a backlash to hyper, self-righteous, libertarian conservatism with backing from moderates merely by standing in opposition to the insanity of the neo-conservative platform. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Conservatism has had its time since 1980 and the eight year Clinton hiatus was hardly much of a swing in the other direction. It is time for a some good old liberal, tree hugging, patchouli stinking policies of fellowship and general acceptance and feed the poor and cloth the babies and march in the streets…and, and just get people to start to give a damn about real things again. Now is NOT the time to fall back into that crappy, libertarian sense of self preservation over that of society. It’s time to pay a little attention to society and bring a little love back into the deal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OMG…. where did I say I was for Ron Paul?!?!?!? Please tell me, so I can never ever ever ever even come close to that again! :D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seriously, JohnSwifty…..I’m a Democrat, I’ve always been a Democrat. I’m a Liberal. I’m a progressive… apparently since they moved the just left of center way the hell over in the left field. Ron Paul serves a purpose for me though. If he’s already filed articles of impeachment, and he said he had, then how’s that backing him for some leader? Likewise, he served a huge purpose for standing up and telling the truth about the Bush/Cheney War in the pubbie “debates”. Someone has to say these things out loud on national teevee, too bad its Ron Paul and Mike Gravel. Neither are electable. I might vote for Gravel before Hillary though, but never Ron Paul… ever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Relax, JohnSwifty I’m in the blue boat demanding better from Blue “representatives”. Here’s what “scares the piss out of me”…. Neocons dressed up like Democrats. Yes, even more than Ron Paul :D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now let’s indict Cheney and impeach them both tomorrow! Its been waaaay toooo long. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-826659"><em>johnSwifty @ 198</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-826634"><em>Myrtle June @ 196</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
I read somewhere that back in April, Ron Paul filed articles of impeachment for cheney in a house resolution. I’ve never seen anything else about it though. Might this already be in the works just waiting for Nancy to wake up and smell the coffee?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ron Paul scares the piss out of me. The only thing worse than neo-conservatism would be a backlash to hyper, self-righteous, libertarian conservatism with backing from moderates merely by standing in opposition to the insanity of the neo-conservative platform. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Conservatism has had its time since 1980 and the eight year Clinton hiatus was hardly much of a swing in the other direction. It is time for a some good old liberal, tree hugging, patchouli stinking policies of fellowship and general acceptance and feed the poor and cloth the babies and march in the streets…and, and just get people to start to give a damn about real things again. Now is NOT the time to fall back into that crappy, libertarian sense of self preservation over that of society. It’s time to pay a little attention to society and bring a little love back into the deal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>OMG…. where did I say I was for Ron Paul?!?!?!? Please tell me, so I can never ever ever ever even come close to that again! :D</p>
<p>Seriously, JohnSwifty…..I’m a Democrat, I’ve always been a Democrat. I’m a Liberal. I’m a progressive… apparently since they moved the just left of center way the hell over in the left field. Ron Paul serves a purpose for me though. If he’s already filed articles of impeachment, and he said he had, then how’s that backing him for some leader? Likewise, he served a huge purpose for standing up and telling the truth about the Bush/Cheney War in the pubbie “debates”. Someone has to say these things out loud on national teevee, too bad its Ron Paul and Mike Gravel. Neither are electable. I might vote for Gravel before Hillary though, but never Ron Paul… ever.</p>
<p>Relax, JohnSwifty I’m in the blue boat demanding better from Blue “representatives”. Here’s what “scares the piss out of me”…. Neocons dressed up like Democrats. Yes, even more than Ron Paul :D</p>
<p>Now let’s indict Cheney and impeach them both tomorrow! Its been waaaay toooo long. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e. julius drivingstorm</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826697</link>
		<dc:creator>e. julius drivingstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;PW @ 161 (aside)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Repubs v. Clinton in 1998 gave them a bad name for misuse of impeachment because of lame premise for indictment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They were stupid to impeach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dems would be stupid not to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;zsheesh.  look at the time.  Where’s Evil Parallel Universe when you need him/her/it - whatever?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ejd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(btw, love your work)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PW @ 161 (aside)</p>
<p>Repubs v. Clinton in 1998 gave them a bad name for misuse of impeachment because of lame premise for indictment.</p>
<p>They were stupid to impeach.</p>
<p>Dems would be stupid not to.</p>
<p>zsheesh.  look at the time.  Where’s Evil Parallel Universe when you need him/her/it &#8211; whatever?</p>
<p>ejd</p>
<p>(btw, love your work)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizen spot</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826693</link>
		<dc:creator>citizen spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826421&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RevDeb @ 35&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826413&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;citizen spot @ 28&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the impeachement of Cheney issue, Anna Eshoo Democrat of the 14th district of California is against any impeachment proceedings, claiming that it would bring a halt to all of the progress being made to undo the damage done by one party rule.  From the reply:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“On the subject of impeachment, I’ve lived through the&lt;br /&gt;
impeachment process and witnessed firsthand how it tears the&lt;br /&gt;
country apart.  I think it’s time to bring the country together.  We&lt;br /&gt;
have to move forward and impeachment, in my view, will heavily&lt;br /&gt;
distract from the critical work of reversing the disastrous policies&lt;br /&gt;
of this Administration and will bring to a halt progress being made&lt;br /&gt;
on important issues including ending the war, healthcare, global&lt;br /&gt;
warming, and our nation’s economic competitiveness. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the start of this new Congress, the House has held hundreds&lt;br /&gt;
of oversight hearings covering the war in Iraq, the response to&lt;br /&gt;
Hurricane Katrina, the firing of United States Attorneys, and the&lt;br /&gt;
treatment of our veterans at Walter Reed.  And there’s so much&lt;br /&gt;
more to do.  We either grind to a halt, or move forward.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no progress being made. Everything the dems try to do to correct the problems gets shot down either by the repigs or it is vetoed.  There will be no progress made by this administration. Their mission is to amass power and take it from the people. We need to take it back.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exactly!  I am composing my reply to her right now.  I am so disappointed in her position on this. But then again, she is tight with Nancy Pelosi, so it will be hard to persuade her to defend the constitution, rather than the party. But I just watched the Bill Moyer’s Impeachment episode, and I have some good points to make in my reply to her email.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-826421"><em>RevDeb @ 35</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-826413"><em>citizen spot @ 28</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>On the impeachement of Cheney issue, Anna Eshoo Democrat of the 14th district of California is against any impeachment proceedings, claiming that it would bring a halt to all of the progress being made to undo the damage done by one party rule.  From the reply:</p>
<p>“On the subject of impeachment, I’ve lived through the<br />
impeachment process and witnessed firsthand how it tears the<br />
country apart.  I think it’s time to bring the country together.  We<br />
have to move forward and impeachment, in my view, will heavily<br />
distract from the critical work of reversing the disastrous policies<br />
of this Administration and will bring to a halt progress being made<br />
on important issues including ending the war, healthcare, global<br />
warming, and our nation’s economic competitiveness. </p>
<p>Since the start of this new Congress, the House has held hundreds<br />
of oversight hearings covering the war in Iraq, the response to<br />
Hurricane Katrina, the firing of United States Attorneys, and the<br />
treatment of our veterans at Walter Reed.  And there’s so much<br />
more to do.  We either grind to a halt, or move forward.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is no progress being made. Everything the dems try to do to correct the problems gets shot down either by the repigs or it is vetoed.  There will be no progress made by this administration. Their mission is to amass power and take it from the people. We need to take it back.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Exactly!  I am composing my reply to her right now.  I am so disappointed in her position on this. But then again, she is tight with Nancy Pelosi, so it will be hard to persuade her to defend the constitution, rather than the party. But I just watched the Bill Moyer’s Impeachment episode, and I have some good points to make in my reply to her email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnSwifty</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826659</link>
		<dc:creator>johnSwifty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826634&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Myrtle June @ 196&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I read somewhere that back in April, Ron Paul filed articles of impeachment for cheney in a house resolution. I’ve never seen anything else about it though. Might this already be in the works just waiting for Nancy to wake up and smell the coffee?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul scares the piss out of me.  The only thing worse than neo-conservatism would be a backlash to hyper, self-righteous, libertarian conservatism with backing from moderates merely by standing in opposition to the insanity of the neo-conservative platform.  The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.  Conservatism has had its time since 1980 and the eight year Clinton hiatus was hardly much of a swing in the other direction.  It is time for a some good old liberal, tree hugging, patchouli stinking policies of fellowship and general acceptance and feed the poor and cloth the babies and march in the streets…and, and just get people to start to give a damn about real things again.  Now is NOT the time to fall back into that crappy, libertarian sense of self preservation over that of society.  It’s time to pay a little attention to society and bring a little love back into the deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-826634"><em>Myrtle June @ 196</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
I read somewhere that back in April, Ron Paul filed articles of impeachment for cheney in a house resolution. I’ve never seen anything else about it though. Might this already be in the works just waiting for Nancy to wake up and smell the coffee?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ron Paul scares the piss out of me.  The only thing worse than neo-conservatism would be a backlash to hyper, self-righteous, libertarian conservatism with backing from moderates merely by standing in opposition to the insanity of the neo-conservative platform.  The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.  Conservatism has had its time since 1980 and the eight year Clinton hiatus was hardly much of a swing in the other direction.  It is time for a some good old liberal, tree hugging, patchouli stinking policies of fellowship and general acceptance and feed the poor and cloth the babies and march in the streets…and, and just get people to start to give a damn about real things again.  Now is NOT the time to fall back into that crappy, libertarian sense of self preservation over that of society.  It’s time to pay a little attention to society and bring a little love back into the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Tough</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826644</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Tough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826644</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In other words, the democrats have to get down and dirty in the trenches.  Play the R’s game.  I like what Webb did on Timmeh’s show.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keep on getting on.  And don’t listen to Clinton and Obama!  They don’t want impeachment because they don’t want to get impeached themselves in the future!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another Al Qaeda threat posted with the AP, with absolutely no news on the where and when, in case people want to protect themselves, you know.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bruce Fien more than two weeks ago called for Cheney’s impeachment.  Bruce Fien!  C’mon, let’s make it happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, the democrats have to get down and dirty in the trenches.  Play the R’s game.  I like what Webb did on Timmeh’s show.  </p>
<p>Keep on getting on.  And don’t listen to Clinton and Obama!  They don’t want impeachment because they don’t want to get impeached themselves in the future!</p>
<p>Another Al Qaeda threat posted with the AP, with absolutely no news on the where and when, in case people want to protect themselves, you know.  </p>
<p>Bruce Fien more than two weeks ago called for Cheney’s impeachment.  Bruce Fien!  C’mon, let’s make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrtle June</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826634</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrtle June</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Currently, they are very angry that good legislation isn’t being passed, but when the Democrats cave at the prospect of a Republican filibuster, it is the Democrats — not the Republicans — that get blamed for not passing the legislation.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phoenix Woman, that is exactly the point. Excellent post!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t know what the Dems are afraid of. So many people made fun of Mike Gravel for saying “let them filibuster” months ago. The confusion people are seeing is exactly the point that they cave! They need to DO something. That something is to let them filibuster! They should have been letting pubs show themselves out for awhile now. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve called Pelosi and agree it is time for impeachment. Its to the point that to not do it, becomes the crime. I’ll be trying Reid tomorrow and until I see them DO something. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I read somewhere that back in April, Ron Paul filed articles of impeachment for cheney in a house resolution. I’ve never seen anything else about it though. Might this already be in the works just waiting for Nancy to wake up and smell the coffee?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Currently, they are very angry that good legislation isn’t being passed, but when the Democrats cave at the prospect of a Republican filibuster, it is the Democrats — not the Republicans — that get blamed for not passing the legislation.”</p>
<p>Phoenix Woman, that is exactly the point. Excellent post!</p>
<p>I don’t know what the Dems are afraid of. So many people made fun of Mike Gravel for saying “let them filibuster” months ago. The confusion people are seeing is exactly the point that they cave! They need to DO something. That something is to let them filibuster! They should have been letting pubs show themselves out for awhile now. </p>
<p>I’ve called Pelosi and agree it is time for impeachment. Its to the point that to not do it, becomes the crime. I’ll be trying Reid tomorrow and until I see them DO something. </p>
<p>I read somewhere that back in April, Ron Paul filed articles of impeachment for cheney in a house resolution. I’ve never seen anything else about it though. Might this already be in the works just waiting for Nancy to wake up and smell the coffee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnSwifty</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826633</link>
		<dc:creator>johnSwifty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826633</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826611&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Big Mitch @ 191&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Achhhh, the things I do for my fellow-pups. I have watched the first 14 minutes of the O’Reilly Factor just so that I can share with you that the first four sponsor on his show was … Olay Total Effects, Applebee’s, Ford, and Capitalone. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I need to take a bath.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, the good news is that those will all be easy to boycott!  Thanks man.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-826611"><em>Big Mitch @ 191</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Achhhh, the things I do for my fellow-pups. I have watched the first 14 minutes of the O’Reilly Factor just so that I can share with you that the first four sponsor on his show was … Olay Total Effects, Applebee’s, Ford, and Capitalone. </p>
<p>Now I need to take a bath.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, the good news is that those will all be easy to boycott!  Thanks man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cozumel</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826627</link>
		<dc:creator>Cozumel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/16/confusing-process-with-intent/#comment-826627</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-826611&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Big Mitch @ 191&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Achhhh, the things I do for my fellow-pups. I have watched the first 14 minutes of the O’Reilly Factor just so that I can share with you that the first four sponsor on his show was … Olay Total Effects, Applebee’s, Ford, and Capitalone. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I need to take a bath.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sad fact is advertisers don’t give a sh*t about the &lt;em&gt;venue&lt;/em&gt;. It’s all about getting &lt;b&gt;their&lt;/b&gt; message to you. The “show” is just a vehicle. For the most part they couldn’t care less. And that goes for Jet Blue also.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-826611"><em>Big Mitch @ 191</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Achhhh, the things I do for my fellow-pups. I have watched the first 14 minutes of the O’Reilly Factor just so that I can share with you that the first four sponsor on his show was … Olay Total Effects, Applebee’s, Ford, and Capitalone. </p>
<p>Now I need to take a bath.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The sad fact is advertisers don’t give a sh*t about the <em>venue</em>. It’s all about getting <b>their</b> message to you. The “show” is just a vehicle. For the most part they couldn’t care less. And that goes for Jet Blue also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
