As a reminder, here are our witnesses today:
- Joe Wilson: You guys know him, I think. I suspect he'll talk about how Bush and Cheney are thugs and so is Libby.
- Roger Adams, US DOJ Pardon Attorney. He'll end up talking about the normal process for commutation. Hopefully, some smart Congressperson will ask him about the measures Congress put into place to prevent bogus insta-commutations after the Clinton pardons--you know, the ones that Bush ignored?
- Douglas Berman, Fancy Law Professor, who also blogs at Sentencing Law and Policy. Presumably he'll explain about how Libby had a light sentence within the guidelines and probably about how Libby's sentence may be used by defense lawyers in the future to argue for leniency.
- Tom Cochran,
Victor Rita's lawyer. This is great theater. Rita, of course, just lost a SCOTUS challenge on the appropriateness of his 33 month sentence. SCOTUS said 33 months sounded about right for a guy convicted of perjury. I'm sure Cochran will have a lot to say about how his client's bid to have his sentence lowered because he's a long-term serviceman didn't work. I guess he doesn't have the goods on the Vice President, though. - David Rivkin. Rivkin is the designated Victoria Toensing of this hearing. He will tell you about how Fitzgerald was a runaway prosecutor. Uh huh.
Jane is being a pain in the ass right now, trying to turn me into a Mac person because her damn card wouldn't work on my damn PC. Mac people, you know what I mean?
We're getting started now. Not quite the billion cameras that were here when Valerie testified before Waxman's committee, but there's a good photo op going on between Conyers and Joe Wilson right now.
Conyers: On the use and misuse of Presidential pardon. Few principles more important than equal justice. Respect power to grant clemency. Coequal branch of government. Duty to conduct oversight. Part of oversight responsibility. Obtain answers to questions on Libby's get out of jail free card. Was this consistent with Bush's other pardons? Was DOJ consulted? Was the process fair and available to similarly situated individuals. Was it consistent with sentencing guidelines. President evidently believed the 30 month sentence was too harsh. Is Libby's ultimate sentence consistent with the guidelines? If not, do we need to reconsider the guidelines? What impact will this have on Congress' ability to learn how Ms. Plame was outed? Was her outing an inadvertent slip of the tongue, or was it part of a larger conspiracy to besmirch the Wilsons? Does the fact taht Libby as received a commuted sentence inhibit Congess' ability to learn the truth.
Some have muddied the facts of the Fitzgerald investigation. For example: that there was never an underlying crime, or that Libby should never have been charged. Several individuals, including Mr. Libby leaked classified information not just to Novak, but also to NYT. Some have tried to turn attention to Marc Rich.
Sid Blumenthal is sitting right next to me--looking forward to the mean Republicans.
Conyers: Fitzgerald declined our invitation to participate today, but we hope to still have him.
I've asked Bush not to invoke Executive Privilege, just as Clinton did not. I've not heard back yet.
Lamar Smith: We are a nation of laws. If any matter is abuundantly clear under our Constitution, it is that President has power to grant clemency. blah blah blah Fort Dix. Protecting our children from sexual predators (like Foley, Smith?) What is it about Democratic Presidents and pardons? By waiting until the end of his term to announce pardons, he escaped any political pressures. Marc Rich Marc Rich Marc Rich.
[Hey, what about Rich lawyer Libby? Isn't he a schmo? Why no mention of him, Smith?]
[Btw, we've now got a full Republican house here, not as many Dems. They're drooling a little bit, at having an opportunity to take on Joe Wilson. it's not pretty.]
Joe Wilson Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you, Libby convicted on four counts. I have followed the case closely. Involves a betrayal of Nat Security. Leaking of identity of a covert officer as a vicious means of political retribution. After it became clear one of the key justifications to go to war was not based on fact. In NYT article, I disclosed deliberate deceptions regarding invasion of Iraq. 8 days later Valerie's status made public in Novak column. End product of process initiated by Vice President Cheney. [reviewing bio, including staring down Saddam and his thugs] Proud to serve in both Republican and Democratic Administrations. Proud to be President Bush's team in Iraq. Members remain among my closest colleagues and friends. Launched by VP and carried out by Chief of Staff. Ruiuned my wife's career along the way. Always about the Administration's case for war, in order to protect original falsehoods. Libby sought to blame press. Willing to allow Judy to remain in jail, a cowardly act. Trial of Scooter Libby proves Rove involved--he still works at office. President Bush declassified national security material. Willingness to subvert rule of law. Make no mistake--his actions cast a pall of suspicion over his office and Vice President Cheney. PatFitz has said repeatedly that Libbys lying throwing sand in the eyes.
Professor Berman
Commutation was fundamentally a sentencing decision
Prison sentence in Libby’s case not product of sentencing guidelines
Walton thought 30 months—bottom of prison term—no federal appellate court has decided a single sentence within guidelines as unreasonable. Even if one accepts, that it’s excessive. Hard to understand why to commute in entirety. Keeping in mind
Members have emphasized guidelines to be enforced in such a way so that all people are applied equally. Particularly concerned that Bush Administration argues in court that other persons should not be considered
Roger Adams
Usually consulted before clemency request. Pardon Attorney has always been a career employee. Lays out the normal times when someone can apply for clemency (ie, you gotta wait). Reviewing all the reviews that happen, basically the grounds on which it is done.
Victor Rita's Lawyer, Cochran Rita sought to have his sentence vacated. Rita asked me to thank you. Rita required to report to BOP to begin his service. This was the same day that Bush commuted Libby's prison term, concluding his sentence is excessive. Nearly identical in many aspects. Neither man truly target of investigation. Repeating the similarities between Libby and Rita. Like Libby, described as dedicated family man. Rita's personal background very different, grew up partly on his own. Exhausted all his funds in his defense. Libby had his own legal training, a large defense team, and a legal defense fund. In addition, Rita suffers from hypertension, type 2 diabetes, exposure of Agent Orange. Mr. Rita brought before GJ once, Libby, interviewed four times. Incredibly, President's justification contradicted Solicitor General's successful argument before SCOTUS. I spoke by telephone to Rita on Monday. How can Exec Branch argue that my reasons were wrong, and then use my same arguments to justify wiping out prison time for Libby.
Rivkin: Do appreciate chance to appear before you to address this Constitutional issue. Let me stipulate that perjury and obstruction are serious. Pardon power presupposes ability to pardon serious as well as minor crimes. Framers understood justice under the laws. Conyers mentioned in the opening statement, framers believed that branches should be driven by equity, not rules. President's pardon power is one notable example. Several reasons why this prosecution did not involve the way criminal justice is supposed to work. [Hey Rivkin--then why didn't Bush say that???] To me the whole process was iredemably problematic from the beginning. Appointment of Spec Pros--shouldn't have been done, FBI knew about Armitage. [Hey, Rivkin, if you had read the unsealed documents, you would know taht Fitz was still figuring out whether and how he could charge Armitage.] Spent years and millions of taxpayer dollars, all because he believed Libby may have lied. I do not see how aside from his memory, Fitzgerald could have known for sure taht Miller's and Cooper's conversation did not accord with theirs. Not going to raise discussion about Berger. [Um, didn't you just raise it?] Here we have two senior officials, accused of similar conduct. REceived dramatically different treatment from Criminal Justice system. Why wasn't Libby exonerated by jury--it has everything to do with how Fitzgerald presented case to jury. The key thing is the narrative presented to the jury. There was a nefarious effort to destroy Valerie's career. I believe this narrative to be fundamentally false. [How about Wells' argument, that there was a nefarious case, on the part of Rove--do you believe the Defense narrative, MR. Rivkin?]
Conyers: Any other example of pardon involving possible wrongdoing involving members of his administration?
[Um, how about Cap Weinberger???]
Adams: All familiar of cases of pardon of people who have formerly been in exec branch.
Conyers: Berman: under sentencing guidelines, would a privileged life, service, be a mitigating factor?
Berman: Guidelines say prior military service, good work, not ordinarily relevant. Guidelines provide a range, usually fairly narrow. The fact that Walton took the sentence at bottom, Walton attended at some level. [Yup--he said so clearly]
Conyers: Amb Wilson: Would you want to share anything with our committee In connection with what you've heard so far.
Wilson: I'm not a lawer, even though half the lawyers not employed by Libby employed by me. Struck by nature of underlying crime. Very clear from testimony that came out, a number of senior officials were involved. Mr. Fitz suggested that cloud over vice president. These people were in direct chain of command in VP. Keeping them employed, even after it became known that Rove was one of the leakers. Casts a cloud. I'd like to see them come clean to American people. They owe that to American people. I'd like to see cloud lifted.
Berman: President's statement: Encourage Federal judges to disregard guidelines. Libby motions. Suggesting taht guidelines not be followed whenever a person of high position of privilege, there may be circumstances that those things ought to come to bear. Guidelines do not enable judges to consider these factors.
Lamar Smith: Make part of record all pardons of Bush and Clinton.
[Why are Dems not using this to point out that Bush NEVER pardons?]
None of the majority witnesses mentioned any previous administration.
[Okay. Let's talk about Cap Weinberger. I'm curious about him.]
Did any of the other majority witnesses take alook at the pardons of other individuals from past administrations?
Berman: [Who for the record did mention Clinton] I'm particularly disappointed that Clinton didn't take a more proactive role in bringing justice to those people. Clemency power exists not just for wrongful prosecution. Rigid sentencing rules particularly can lead to extraordinarily long sentences. I
Smith: Rivkin: What do you say to Mr. Cochran's client?
Rivkin: there is something unique about the pardon power. My view would be that Pres did not dwell in it in his remarks. He's really trying to say, it's not that it's inherently excessive to sentence someone to 30 months. It was excessive in this circumstance. [You mean, because Bush had ordered Libby to leak this information? Is that what you're saying Rivkin?]
Smith [Hey Rivkin, you're not folowing the script]: What about special prosecutors?
Rivkin: whenever a prosecutor is appointed outside of normal guidelines, it's an endless prosecution, DOJ knew that individual involved was not a supporter of the war. It was ludicrous to appoint a SC. It's unfortunate it went on. [Hey Rivkin, if this is what Bush meant, why didn't he say it???]
Jerry Nadler: Hey, what about Cap Weinberger??? THe pardons arguable frustrate a legitimate investigation. Investigations in each case of wrongdoing by the Administration, and possibly by the President. This undermines trust in govt.
[Thanks Jerry]
My question will be structured by Rivkin's statement. [reads about Rivkin's claim that Fitz shouldn't have investigated] Investigation seeks to determine which administration official, motive, whether any violations of law committed. Investigation not limited to disclosures to Novak. Broader investigation, seems to negat ethat point.
Nadler: Mr. Wilson: was Ms Plame a covert agent.
Wilson: Ms. Plame's actual name is Mrs Wilson. The case was referred by CIA to DOJ bc CIA believed a crime had been committed, she was a classified officer should have been protectd under relevant law. My wife was covert, classified officer, member of CIA who served her country for 20 years, both in cover positions and NOC positions. In response to the question raised by Smith. When I took a look at pardons and other presidential actions, my concern was about ongoing obstruction of justice. I looked at Nixon, who did not pardon or commute Haldeman or Erlichman.
Nadler: Reads from Cheney's exoneration of Libby. It is clear from the record that Libby Rove Fleischer, get the word out. Mr. Wilson is that a correct reading of data.
Wilson: Fitz said that it was hard to conceive that there was not a conspiracy to discredit.
Sensenbrenner: This is a waste of time. Article II gives president authority, not reviewable [except in impeachment, per Madison, Mr. Sensenbrenner] Bush will continue to have power to grant clemency. This Congress is rapidly becoming a do even more nothing. About 80% that we passed had to do with renaming post offices. Seems to me that what's going on, more braying at the moon. We've got jurisdiction over private bills. Every private bill is a way of bending rules, to provide equity to people that majority of people of congress decide to provide equity to.
Mr. Adams: at end of Clinton Administration. A bunch of pardons. Consulted on Marc Rich? Roger Clinton. John Deutch. Dan Rostenkowski.
Adams: Rostenkowski not pardoned on last day, not consulted on that, not on Rich, not on Roger Clinton. My only involvement in Deutch, technical assistance in how to pardon for offenses he hadn't been acquitted.
Sensenbrenner makes a snotty comment.
Conyers: I was just reviewing activities of 110 and 109th Congress, and the 110th Congress has passed to House 37 measures, and 109th sent 15 bills during the period from 1/1/05 to 1/1/2007 [Booyah]
Scott: Allegation we're considering is scheme to punish Wilson from telling the truth. We're in war today. no one spoke up. Someone should have known before Admin came before Budget committe, someone must have known that wasn't true. Seems to be pattern if you don't follow a political line. Surgeon General, Top officials repeatedly tried to suppress public health reports, Why is he just speaking out now? What would happen?
Is there any question revealing her name would endanger her life?
Wilson: Very clear--there have been threats, some credible, some not. Those have all been investigated. More to the point, the compromise of her identity--what other assets were compromised. Her job was to ensure that nukes wouldn't appear on our shores. I'll just refer you to the books. As soon as her identity is compromised, you assume that every asset have in one way or another been compromised.
Scott; this affected her career?
Wilson: yes, she could no longer do those things
Scott; Armitage--any question that others revealed her name to otherse.
Wilson: Libby, Rove, Armitage, all leaked of members of the Press. [And Ari, Joe]
Scott: Supervised release?
Adams: It is not uncommon for Pres to commute sentence to leave supervised release.
Scott: Is that now in question?
Adams; Judge has asked an opinion.
Scott: remorse is factor in downward departure?
Adams: Don't know anything about facts of case.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Frogmarch Karl!
Where can we watch this later?
hi you two!
mac people rule
Is there a link?
Wow, 2 hearings & 2 live blogs - only on FDL. Thanks Jane, Christy & Marcy.
Hearings in stereo! Go Marcy, Jane & Christy!
Where can we watch this?
Kathleen @ 2
i am attempting to record the audio. hopefully, i am not the only one.
Marcy,
from another Mac person, Jane has a point. Listen to her.
Thank you thank you FDL
eCAHNomics @ 5
http://judiciary.house.gov/
http://judiciary.house.gov/
follow link
Are any of the Republicans even there?
Lamar Smith (R) is there speaking now. Don’t know if any others bothered to show up yet as the camera angle hasn’t shown a wide shot.
What does this hearing expect to achieve? I’m asking, here. Will there be new presentations of evidence on Unca Dick?
EW - Re: MacPeople. Jane is extremely wise.
RevDeb @ 9
FDL runs on a PC?
Marcy, Come on over from the Dark Side and into the light of Mac world.
Hi there, I agree, two liveblogs in the same day is an FDL only possibility.
Heard on the radio this am that a lady here in MA has asserted that she should be granted clemency for obstruction because Libby got it. I’ll se if I can find a link.
ps I love Conyers.
pps. And Joe and Valerie too.
That was my fear at having Wilson appear: the GOPpers in the HJC are particularly noxious. That said, Joe Wilson stood up to Saddam Hussein, so I think he can cope with the festering horde on the minority side.
“Libbis Lewey”
Fantastic!
Steve-AR @ 17
Jane and Scarecrow and TRex use Macs. Christy and Pach use PC’s as does Marcy who is unofficially FDL as her blog is The Next Hurrah.
Chronology: Apple IIe, Apple IIc, Macintosh Classic through Quadra to G4, and now an iMac and a dual-Intel Mini at home and a G5 at the studio.
Just say yes to Macintosh.
Just to clarify — byline shows Jane, but content appears to be written by emptywheel. Not schizoid behavior, for the newbies among us.
;-)
Marcy,
You need a wireless card?
Just say no to more mac v pc conversation, puh-leeze!
I just gotta say Fitz.
On NPR this morning they quoted Conyers saying that the committee would also review the controversial pardons by Pres. Clinton. Might this be an end run move to get Scooter before the committee to discuss the depth of his knowledge with regard to pardon/commutation matters as reveiwed on behalf of Marc Rich? Rep. Conyers would certainly be able to put Scooter in the middle of some very awkward questions to answer without discussing directly his own frame of mind going into questioning for the Plame investigation. Allusion to conspiracy to obstruct, anyone?
Thank you to Joe Wilson: Valerie Plame was not “outed”. She was “betrayed”.
Go Joe Wilson make our day! Thank you Thank you and Valerie for all you have done and continue to do to bring any shred of integrity that our country is hanging onto back to the American people.
Prairie Sunshine @ 26
Point taken.
Does Conyers have his teeth in today?
Please don’t let joe get into an argument about the african uranium docs & the merits of his oped…the repubs want to paint him as a ‘liar’ & self promoter…if bushco wanted to argue the merits of his oped, they should have done that 4 years ago instead of smearing him… they would have saved themselves a lot of trouble
If the Repubs on the committee try and smear Joe Wilson again he will expose them for the hypocrites that they are. Republicans support treason if it’s done by a member of their Party.
Where and who is Rove watching this hearing from and with?
@ 22..just a weak joke
msnbc busily humping Chertoff’s gut
Folks, if we could please stop the Mac versus PC debate — it’s clogging the thread and we are trying to stay on topic and keep the servers humming along. Thanks much — whatever we can do to make this easier on Marcy, let’s try and do it so we can get hearing coverage, since this one isn’t being broadcast live.
mucouswelby @ 33
Joe Wilson is a true patriot! Valerie put her own ass on the line for her country only to have this administration betray her. She is a patriot, hero and seems to have nerves of steel. Thank you Joe and Valerie Wilson/ Plame many Americans are marching right behind you in the search for truth and justice in regard to the intelligence used in the run up to this war of choice!
HOlding those responsible for lying our nation into an unnecessary war is the very least our Reps can do for those (both Iraqi and Americans who have lost their lives in this tragic war.
Evil simply evil!
Tuned in just in time to catch Rivkin.
Blurgh.
Here comes Rifkin. He’s gonna tell us all is well in commutationland.
It will be fun to hear how Rivkin can spin Libby’s sentence was excessive in light of the Rita decision which Mr Rita’s lawyer laid out so plainly.
Today’s doublebill of “The Bush Gang: Oversight Overload” brought to you by Firedoglake!
Ya rawk!
My feed is jumping during Rivkin, does that mean he speaks with a forked tongue?
I can’t believe it. Rivkin is wearing a pink shirt with a black bow tie. He looks like a clown–which of course what he really is!
Someone should point out to the execrable Lamar smith that Bush I pardoned Caspar Weinberger, Elliott Abrams and others at the end of his term. Weinberger was approx a month before he was to go to trial on Iran/Contra and effectively shut down that investigation. Before it reached into the office of the former VP/POTUS, George H. W. Bush his own self. Called Obstruction of Justice in some circles.
Rivkin: He’s doing the repub talking pts: Armitage leaked!! Fitz spent too much and screwed reporters.
Powerful stuff. Any chance that statement will have impact in, like you know, the news media? (I know, I know. Sigh. Feeling a touch of cynical despair this morning.)
Rivkin is saying that the reason that Libby was convicted because of how Fitz presented his case. And he’s saying it was unfair. BWA HA HA.
Fitz was too smart for them!!!
I have heard Rivkin talk about this before. Fitzgerald was out of control. Armitage was the leaker. etc.
He conveniently overlooks that Fitzgerald was a Bush appointee and a premier prosecutor not some bought and paid for hick lawyer from some bad Hollywood movie.
Did Rivkin just say that juries only understand motivations related to money?
Woodhall Hollow @ 45
He borrowed it from Code Pink earlier.
Is Rivkin defining Fitzgerald’s prosecution as a “narrative”, story-telling time?….
Did he indicate that it was unfair?….
Shorter Rivkin: Finding a high Republican official guilty is a miscarriage of justice.
QuakerGirl @ 52
Or maybe from Tucker Carlson.
I hope that the Dems force Rivkin to explain how a bunch of republican appointees including John Ashcroft, James Comey, Pat Fitzgerald, the FBI and Judge Walton led a partisan witch hunt against Scooter. And how this came to be during a time when the congress and the exectutive branches were controlled by republicans.
Please????
The two FDL liveblogs today have one very important common thread: Turdblossom. So, it’s really kinda like one big happy liveblog! Go get ‘em firepups!
Rivkin, another Republican Party apparatchik! Party before country.
Definition of Rivkins “On the same token” If you are in the same club the wealthy and well connected you can operate outside of the law..”a different kind of justice” which is not justice not matter how you spin it Mr. Rivkin
Just how in the hell do we tell our children that different rules apply to those in the Bush administration…Libby.. who was proven to commit perjury and obstrutction of justice in the investigation of the outing of a CIA covert agent. to those who commit petty crimes who will do more time in jail than Libby will ever do?
No Matter how you spin it Rivkin..this is not JUSTICE THIS IS HORSESHIT!
Our justice system is not just and the Libby commutation proves it once again. Americans and the rest of the world are looking for justice in this critical case, and you twisted radicals continue to spin justice into utter hogwash!
My youngest daughter (20) and many of her friends have followed this trial to some degree. They walk away saying that our system is not just. What a great message for them!
Joe going right to underlying crime!!!
Bluetoe @ 59
There is no other kind of Republic any more.
Shorter Lamar Smith: I am a toad.
Rivkin is so dim: this is true of almost every trial I’ve ever heard of.
In the Senate, the cloture vote on the Webb amendment just failed. Seven Republicans voted with the Democrats.
dakine said:
Bush I pardoned Caspar Weinberger, Elliott Abrams and others at the end of his term. Weinberger was approx a month before he was to go to trial on Iran/Contra.
The only thing these Republicans can remember is Bill Clinton, his pen*s and Scooter’s $2 million client Marc Rich.
Reagan couldn’t remember anything except that ketchup was a suitable vegetable for school children’s lunches.
scarecrow @ 64
41 Republicans voted to NOT support the troops.
Disgraceful.
Mandatory minimums were the result of votes across party aisles, yet the only persons deserving not to face them are Republicans.
Did Clinton pardon persons before they served any time???
Why a difference for Libby?
I have a friend who did six years in a Federal prison for growing marijuana. Mandatory sentencing. He was seperated from his two children and wife for six years.
Libby was convicted of perjury and obstructions of Justice for “throwing sand in the eyes” of Fitz and interferring with the completion of the investigation. The “underlying crime” the outing of a CIA covert agent whose job it was to keep WMD’s from coming into the states. Libby undermined national security and will do no time.
“What do we say” to our children about this discrepency?
This is justice what a barrel full of hogwash!
What’sthe explanation for Rivkin’s strange speech? Was he born abroad or does he have a speech defect?
Rivkin is filled with lies and darkness. How in the hell do people like this live with themselves?
Clinton’s record on pardons and commutations: Is their a parity case to Scooter?
This line that Clinton was too free with the pardon power is two edged. It is precisely that Bush has been incredibly stingy with them yet in Libby’s case where Bush himself has a derived benefit from it he uses the commutation aspect of the pardon power.
Kathleen @ 68
“Don’t get caught…”
RevDeb @ 66
Is there some reason this wouldn’t be just wonderful PR for the Dems to exploit? I truly hope we’re not THAT wimpy.
Ludicrous to appoint a special counsel????
Someone please ask Rivkin who made the decision to appoint the special counsel? Since this issue seems to be at the heart of Rivkin’s argument!
Nadler: This is unusual comparable only to Iran Contra - GO Jerry!!
Are they going to spend the entire hearing arguing about whether Libby’s sentence was excessive and whether he should have been prosecuted?
If so, this hearing will be utterly useless.
The issue is whether the President can use his commutation and pardoning authority to protect himself and the VP from investigation into their own wrongdoing.
Nadler, Iran Contra pardons made sure that the investigation would not go forward. Just like Libby
sandflea @ 74
You’d think so, wouldn’t you? Time will tell.
DOJ loyalists staging shiny object presser soon on MSNBC
Nadler & Schumer are NY’ers. Know how to call bulllshit when they see it.
JGabriel @ 77
Nadler going there now.
When will the U.S. have a de-Republicanization similiar to what Germany had with de-Nazification?
Joe - she was covert. Which part of that is confusing?
Shorter Joe: Bush is worse than Nixon
Do any of these clowns realize that Libby was lying long before Fitz showed up?
As Joe says, Nixon didn’t pardon Haldeman and Erlichman.
George Bush — worse than Nixon.
A quick request: it would help if EW would put a time tag on her postings so I’ll know whether I should wait on F5 …
BC
Bluetoe @ 83
Hopefully we are starting now and it will take decades.
Nadler bringing up Cheney “meat grinder” quote.
Bush has set precedent:
MA woman requests commutation stating she is more deserving than Lewis Libby.
http://www.boston.com/news/loc.....mmutation/
Joe Wilson - Thank you for making a clear statement about Mrs. Wilson’s CIA covert status as COVERT. Can’t believe the Libby defenders are still putting this out there.
eCAHNomics @ 69
Too much strategizing and hanging out with demons. He’s started adopting their sppech patterns.
Commutation is not listed as an Executive right.
C’mon literalists!
Sensenbrenner the sleaze up. How can a progressive state like WI keep sending that gasbag back?
Shorter Kotex: oh for the days when I could bang the gavel, turn off the lights, and cut off the microphones.
(Nice of him to show up, at least. He’s been off sulking since he got moved to the minority.)
And the unchecked plenary power of the president to pardon is matched by the unchecked power of Congress to impeach a president.
Which raises the question: why is the power of impeachment a once-a-century deal.
Sensenbrenner is playing the line the Republicans want to spin, a waste of time, a do nothing Congress. When will Dems on the Committee slap these guys down?
cosmosis says:
July 11th, 2007 at 10:23 am
David Rivkin is one of the go-to whores for the Bush Syndicate on NPR. He knows they won’t challenge any of his bullshit.
I have a few Cheney words for nonSensenbuggar.
Shorter Sensenbrenner — how dare you question George Bush’s right to use his commutation powers to cover up his own criminal tracks.
Ed*ard Teller @ 73
Sad and telling. We wonder why there is no respect for the U.S. justice system.
Another false argument. The pardon is absolute. Not however when it is used to hide Presidential misconduct.
A do nothing Congress. That’s rich coming from the obstructionist Republicans.
Equating private bills with the pardon power. Someone needs a civics lesson.
Now on to Clinton.
Sensenbrenner. Will the voters not rid us of this feckless idiot?
Last day of office, not the first day of a Libby sentence…
why the disingenuous comparison?
Did he really just say that Dems are investigating “real or imagined” misconduct in the Bush administration??? REAL? (paraphrasing)
The issue of the Plame name is interesting. It is Valerie’s maiden name–I wonder if the Cheney chose to reveal her under that name was an attempt to “confuse” the issue, or to say that they “technically” did not reveal a the identity of a covert agent, since Plame is not her “real” name. Lame, I know, but these guys rely on “technicalities” to provide themselves with plausible deniability cover–at least before the “I do not recall” excuse was discovered.
OMG–Sennsebrenner just mentioned Marc Rich. I hope that someone makes the Rich-Libby connection loud and clear!
yellowdogD @ 94
The Nazi element. They love this guy. The rest of the state feels shame having him there. There are lots of good people in Wisconsin not to be obscured by Sensenbrenner.
scarecrow @ 64
“The republic party would rather support the pResident than the troops.”
Hugh @ 101
The Federalist Papers are pretty damn clear about Congressional power and responsibility to impeach for misuse of pardoning and appointments powers.
I wish someone would bring this up the next time one of the Republicans cites the ‘unreviewable’ argument. Obviously, it mandates investigation into abuse of the pardon power.
Soott is reeling off all of the BushCo lies.
Woodhall Hollow @ 105
What name did she use for NOC? Or for working for Brewster Jennings?
Under the Plame name would be the person Porter Goss knew. He worked with her at the CIA previously.
He was the GOP House Intel ranking member.
Rove phished on the Wilsons when the Ambassador was taking back channel steps to determine the diplomatic intelligence.
Google Chapter 28 of the Walsh Report. Walsh made it very clear that he believed that GHW Bush had been deeply involved in Iran Contra (not “out of the loop”), that he had impeded the investigation, that he had probably perjured himself, and that he hardon pardoned Weinberger in order to protect himself.
Link
Let’s get the Damage Assessment from the CIA!
Scot