nolo @ 35

DING DING DING!

exactly.

I don’t agree. Harriet would have had to go before Conyers and you can see how well they have been kicking *ss. Not.

i guess my point was — and we shall see, for
she may yet be compelled to testify — that
sara taylor has largely shredded, with her
waivers, the specious executive privilege claims
of the president.

what’s more, ms. taylor indicated that bush was
uninvolved. one cannot claim privilege over the
LACK of any involvement or
deliberations or conversations. . .

all of these matters — and now judging from chair-
man conyers very well-crafted response of last night,
lead me to conclude that harriet miers would
have had a tough time befor the h.j.c.

but to each his, or her, own. i’ve enjoyed
reading your comments here at FDL, rev. deb. . .

p e a c e

IF the UAW can lead a group of service industry workers (English and non-English speaking I might add) to file with the NLRB against egregious abuses by a sovereign-though-interstate-commercing nation;

IF Michael Moore can champion a group of ‘designated lepers’ against abuses by an ill-appointed-middleman & profits-by-cancer-and-accidents industry;

Why are we wasting time when we already have the WITNESS of hundreds of thousands of disabled vets, military families, targets of domestic terrorism, Katrina survivors, relocation and other communities and individuals torn asunder by this regime’s MALADMINISTRATION?

The only EVIDENCE we’re lacking is that of the MASSES,
willing to drop everything to get our government back.

USE DEMOCRACY TO DEFEND DEMOCRACY!

Jeebus. All they needed was a dress and a
bunch of poseurs and pretenders.
WTF are we waiting for?????

IMPEACH!!!
See ya in Worcester!

Woodhall Hollow @ 75

Debbie Wasserman rocks!

She is hopefully an example of a new breed of politicians.

I have called her office after every hearing to thank her for her intelligent and insightful questioning, and I will be again, if her opening question is a signal to what is to come from her.

Woodhall – u got links?

Links to my phone calls? No, I didn’t record them. But if you have watched the house judiciary hearings, you would see what I am talking about.

And holy shit! Joe Wilson is giving them the Saddam with a noose around his neck treatment! And finally Conyers is standing up to the rethugs. Shut them up, Conyers!

selise @ 80

oops sorry, here’s the link to lieberman’s press release.

I

*ahem* Sorry about that. As I was about to say before I so rudely interrupted myself: in any attack on Iran, Lieberman should lead the charge. Literally.

could some explain why this urgency with the lieberman amendment?
i mean, what’s behind it? what’s the rationale?
if there isn’t anything compelling, why would anyone vote for it without reading it?

i. don’t. know.

They sign it, he breaks out a lighter and holds it to the paper and the words ‘I hereby authorize G.W. Dipshit to bomb Iran’.

Do not trust Lieberweasel.

-GSD