Honestly, this is just an excuse to post this video of Sting’s Desert Rose…
From an op-ed in the Boston Globe:
…So, what happened? While British forces were struggling to suppress the violence, the parties and organizations operating on the public scene never felt the need to modify their behavio r. Militias were not defeated; they went underground or, more often, were absorbed into existing security forces. One resident after another told us they witnessed murders committed by individuals dressed in security force uniform. This, of course, with total impunity since the parties that infiltrate the security services also ensure that their own don’t get punished.
For militia members, it’s an easy call: By joining the security forces, they get a salary, government-paid weapons, and political cover to boot. Security services are divided along partisan lines. Fadhila — the governor’s party — controls the Oil Protection Force, responsible for safeguarding oil wells, refineries, and pipelines; the small Hizbollah party has a strong presence in the Customs Police Force; the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council dominates the intelligence service; and the Sadrists have penetrated the local police force.
Likewise, little was done to rebuild the city. Instead, the leading parties maintained their predatory practices, scrambling to take advantage of available public resources, contracts, or jobs. Oil contraband is an open secret, acknowledged even by a fighter in Moqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi army, who told us that “when Moqtada al-Sadr met with representatives . . . in Basra, he scratched his nose and said, ‘ I smell the smell of gasoline’ — his way of accusing his own representatives of smuggling oil.” Fadhila siphons diesel off at the source; others drill holes into pipelines. The public sector as a whole is rife with corruption — instance of mammoth-sized projects that have delivered virtually nothing are legion — malfeasance and partisan hiring….
For Baghdad, the implications are as clear as they are ominous. Basra is a microcosm of the country as a whole, in its multiple and multiplying forms of violence. In the southern city, strife generally has little to do with sectarianism or anti-occupation resistance, both of which are far more prominent in the capital or Iraq’s center. Instead, it involves the systematic misuse of official institutions, political assassinations, tribal vendettas, neighbo rhood vigilantism, together with the rise of criminal mafias that increasingly are indistinguishable from political actors. This means that even should the armed opposition weaken, even should sectarian tensions abate, and even should the surge momentarily succeed, Basra’s fate is likely to be replicated throughout the country on a larger, more chaotic, and more dangerous scale.
Welcome to George Bush’s illusion. Too bad Colin Powell didn’t step up and let the public know about the President’s delusional non-planning blinder vision before we sent American soldiers into a nation that we’ve now led down the path of chaos. History is littered with the failures of fools and egos — unfortunately the consequences of such failures fall on soldiers and innocents and children on all sides.
It is time we started supporting the troops and their families with more than just a damned magnet and some empty words. This proposal on the very real issues that soldiers face on their student loans while serving overseas is but one example of the myriad of issues they and their families are facing. It is past time that the people who keep this war going stepped up to the plate and took responsibility for all of the problems they are leaving in their wake. ALL of the problems.
(I’m looking at you, Joe Lieberman…)
NOTE: Yes, we are having a server issue that is causing problems with commenting. Many apologies for any inconvenience. We’ll let you know as soon as things get resolved. Also, H/T to reader WB for a couple of the links.
UPDATE: Looks like comments may be up and running again. Boo yah!



84 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Zed!
Are we back?
Hey!!! Looky what was just on Face the Nation!
Judiciary committee to call Patrick Fitzgerald to testify on Plame leak?
I don’t usually bug you guys, but I thought this was right up your alley. I told C&L already, so hopefully they’ll get the video.
Ding dong, the glitch is dead!
Good Morning Christy and fellow pups!
General Retired Powell, be a good old soldier and just fade away. You had your potential moment, and you blew it. You are, sir, irrelevant. More’s the pity. And the Middle East is blowing up. And we (generally speaking of course) elected George Bush twice.
Joe Lieberman wants to run down the US Air Force and Navy just like he and his warmongering coterie of neo-cons and neconfederates have down to the Army and the Nat’l Guard.
Way to weaken America from within Traitor Joe.
-GSD
Morning all — sorry about the comment issues. Looks like it is getting cleared up…
How is everyone this morning?
Good morning, glad to see the server is back from the spa.
Hey, hey, server hiccup fixed! Thanks for all the hard work to get comments up & running.
Good morning from L.A. Beautiful post, CHS, & a great vid to boot. Sting & Kanye West made a good mix to close Live Earth yesterday IMO. The best part of this morning (other than watching Live Earth concert vids on youtube from all over the globe) is Frank Rich calling out GWB for what he is- a coward. I’m sure Marion in Savannah will have it available soon from behind the wall, if not already.
Poor Colin. Desperateely trying to prove himself as a good guy. Sorry General Powell, the time is long gone.
You were the man that ultimately pushed the fence sitters over to the pro-war side with your UN presentation.
History has judged you a loser already.
No mulligans on wars of aggression.
-GSD
that music is the sexiest
good morning Christy
Glad everyone is back…waiting to hear Leahy on CNN and just thumbed through our Facebook.
Quite a few stars and of course, ourselves.
I am not angry over Lieberman. I’m angry at my party over Lieberman.
Christy, do you want to update the comment issue in your post?
I think it’s a great day with the NYT editorial!
Finally.
Loo Hoo at 15 — Already did — refresh your screen to see…
Anybody seen “Blog Wars” on Sundance? I taped it this morning and haven’t watched it but I saw shots of Jane and FDL as I scanned it.
AND the lead editorial in today’s NYT calls for withdrawal from Iraq.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07…..ref=slogin
Paddy @ 3
That should be interesting! Is it Marcy and Jane who will be there? If so, I think Fitz will have two sets of eyeballs staring at the back of his head!
The Aspens are turning/singing
http://aspentimes.com/article/…..ILYCOMMENT
Powell will have a whole lot of things to atone for when he meets his maker…
mauimom @ 18
Seeing Al Qaeda Around Every Corner in The Public Editor is relevant.
Leahy certain he wants out of Iraq. Specter being Specter. Deep concern but no exit date, wants to hear the debate.
I want our men and woman, including some in my family, out of Iraq. I have a cousin who’s coming back from Germany next week to Fort Hood. And then he will go back to Iraq. For his third tour. He doesn’t want to, but he will. Why? Because he’s ‘being all that he can be’. He has three children ages 6 to 12. They want their Papa safe. And these kids know the score. I support the troops. I want them out of harm’s way. I want them home.
Christy, “some say” the mere existence of a Sting video is sufficent justification for including it in a post.
No excuses needed.
Off to work . . .
Good morning. So glad the comments are fixed. I was getting antsy. Patience is something I need more of sometimes.
I have been busy trying to get ahold of the agenda for Chicago. Was sure I had missed the email from them because I now have a different email addy, but found it on the web site. Now if they can just confirm that I am registered. I have no receipt for the payment by paypal (lost in move I think). The room is confirmed for GrandmaJo and I, but hopefully YearlyKos has our names.
And oh ya, the roundtable about the liveblogging the Libby trial — I will be there.
And since this is Sunday, can I ask how many dresses you ‘girls’ are taking? No offense meant by the girl comment, but as I age, I more and more like being called a girl. I know, I know, vanity — or would that be delusions of youth.
Paddy @ 3
LOL, exit Sting from Hoosierville’s fantasy stage and enter Patrick Fitzgerald! Morning all. Some encouraging things happening what with all the “mainstream” whispers of impeachment and all.
Mr. Powell. How many years can you get in purgatory for being a weenie? A weenie with much blood on his hands.
I was reading the NYT Editorial last night and the only thought I had was “Where were these people 5 years ago while they knew then what they claim to know now?!”
Subway at 29 — Sipping cosmos with Judy Miller?
Subway Serenade @ 29
Right. It was doomed from the start… yet
Think of the establishment media akin to an aircraft carrier. It has a really wide turning radius that takes a long, long time undertake a maneuver.
We are seeing the beginning of the turn.
-GSD
Ron Paul on ABC is great. I forgot that he read the entire Pentagon Papers as part of his filibuster! This dude is great.
For those who advocate staying in Iraq: Enlist. And request duty in the Middle East.
GSD(inNC) @ 32
Brilliant metaphor, GSD!
Oklahoma kiddo @ 35
Ya figure there are a lot of them reading the lake this morning?
Hey that’s my car in the video. Same color.
I’m glad to the editorials across the country an now getting it about the war.
DemfromCT has a diary here about it.
Paddy @ 3
Ha! Specter just called Valerie Wilson Valerie Flame.
Just another test post…
Joey the Vile Liarmann needs to be confronted in the street, on the floor of the Senate everywhere he goes until he realizes that he needs to resign. Senator Reid needs to get some love on this issue also. The cowardly pus-filled sack of lies and ego that is Joey needs to go!
raven @ 36
I do think the GOP monitors sites like this. And who knows perhaps “The Young Republicans” pick up a little chump change as monitors. ;0)
I am feeling hopeful that the tide is turning in re getting out of Iraq.
Here’s my question–how (practically) do fix what we’ve done? Can we get a coalition in there to rebuild without us? We’ve turned that country back in time 100s of years (particularly in the treatment of women) and the people who got us in there should pay.
This is not a “see, if we pull out we screw them over” question! This is a real question. I think we should be out of there yesterday and concentrating on how to fix the mess we were forced to make by incompetent leaders. I want to be optimistic that we are going to get out and concentrate on what happens next. How can we really help as opposed to just making things worse?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 30
…And watching the birds fly by.
;>)
British forces weren’t suppressing violence, they helped create it. Brit intelligence agents were caught driving in Iraq dressed as Arabs and with a trunk full of explosives.
We created the death squads. Do you remember Emmet Till and how he was murdered? Emmit was tortured with an electric drill before he was killed. Sound familiar? You didn’t think the Iraqis thought that up all on their own did you?
The end game has always been to break Iraq into pieces, the last thing we want is a united Iraq. Divide and conquer, and make damn sure that oil revenue sharing bill that lets Exxon and British Petrol in gets passed.
Another question, who can we lobby in the international community to charge our own leaders with war crimes? Let’s start a campaign!
I do think the GOP monitors sites like this. And who knows perhaps “The Young Republicans” pick up a little chump change as monitors. ;0)
Gotcha
Help bust the illusion: Rep. Conyers predicts Bush cooperation as impeachment support grows.
Attempted to edit my comment above to include the closing paragraph of the NYT editorial, but it was too late. Anyway:
WAY too late [like 3600 US lives & millions of Iraqi ones] but at least now, not years from now.
When did the phrase “narrative” sneak into political discussions on the toobz? It’s like the annoying constant “at the end of the day” and “look” that we are bombarded with.
mauimom @ 50
Amen!
Bay State Librul @ 20
pretty risky to publish that this weekend, considering “washington week” broadcast from there on friday – so there must be plenty of neo-cons visiting
Christy,
Living in Washington, and working in the Federal government, I’m stunned by how little has been done to help the soldiers, the veterans, and the families affected by the military misadventure of the Bush Administration. It doesn’t take a hell of a lot of effort to identify the sacrifices these men and women and their families have made, and to take steps to make sure they’re compensated properly and have the appropriate care.
But our defense establishment is not about supporting our troops; it’s meant to provide corporate welfare to failing industries, and has been for the last 50 years. It’s easy to lobby for weapons systems: slick ads on broadcast television, in the WaPo, and on the Metro. It’s hard to make the case for providing health insurance and other material support to the families of serving soldiers and veterans.
If Holy Joe — or any of the current Representatives and Senators — wanted to do one thing to atone for their support of the wars of the Bush Administration, it would be to work to ensure that the Defense and Veterans Administration appropriations included funds to really support our troops.
Specter willing to take Rove, Miers etc. on WH terms. Wants to settle AGAG issue.
Leahy disagrees. WH is offering a take it or leave it that would allow them to get up and leave after 2 minutes.
Specter wantss to call in Bush, Leahy says lets discuss it tomorrow on the floor!
I’ll start off with this tidbit since folks (e.g. TexR) were talking yesterday about whether there was any Constitutional basis for “suspending” the power of the President during impeachment…which was something that Madison suggested in response to George Mason’s concern for an “Imperial President” pardoning his conspiratorial underlings.
I’m unsure if such power existed in Madison’s time (I’ll have to look at the parts of the Constitution that were amended)…but it’s clear that the 25th Amendment gives Congress some power in this regard. In fact, it could give them quite a bit of power depending upon the reading.
It would get REALLY interesting if there was a vacancy in the VP position due to impeachment, death, or resignation.
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments OR of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.
Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble , determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall RESUME the powers and duties of his office
It seems to me that if there is no VP the proviso for him and the Cabinet to decide incapacity would be void…and an appointed Congressional body would make that determination.
In fact, the use of the term “OR” suggests that these are actually PARALLEL means to declare incapacity…and that Congress could do so even if there WAS a VP and Cabinet that made no such determination.
Now, the President could clearly fight such an involuntary suspension. But my reading (IANA Constitutional Lawyer, just a layperson) is that the suspension would remain in effect until Congress met and determined the incapacity…until 24 days after his letter of intent when the President would be able to return if there was no determination by a super-majority of both Houses. But he could NOT do so until there was a vote…or that 24 day duration.
I would imagine that a majority (or even a strong minority) of Congress could delay a vote until the 24 day cycle was over…thus suspending the ability of the President to act within that period. During that period the Acting-President would be whomever was eligible following the order of Succession. If no VP was seated then the Speaker of the House would act in that role.
Theoretically, if there were some action that was threatened by the President during the build-up to these actions the Acting President, with the cooperation of Congress, could undertake to pass legislation that would inhibit the acts of the returning President.
This act could also be used to block “last minute pardons” after the elections or prevent desperate manoeuvres by a cornered Executive to destroy materials or issue Executive orders blocking testimony of his staff.
raven @ 51
Good question!
My personal theory is that is partially an attempt to woo the ivory tower colleagues. The study of “narrative” is extremely vogue (with good reason and NOT as the media uses the term) among academic circles. It signals to me the involvement of a master spinner with academic cred stirring the bu!!$hit. When flung like a chimp it probably sounds educated (but not to me!).
Citizen Jane @ 47
I’d love to see a July 14 roll-out of . . . ??? Storm the Bastille, mes amis!
just a drive by posting…
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r…..807Y.shtml
Precis: Like Ralston, Miers has been informed to not obey the subpoena. Rep. Conyers, line one…
Thanks for the link to the NYT Public Editor above. He makes an important point [one we’ve been making here for quite a while, of course]:
Barbara @ 58.
Mais oui! Certainment! (my French is terrible)
I find the arguments for staying in Iraq tedious, at best.
Mauimom @60
Nice catch!
Citizen Jane @ 57
Having done (gasp) a qualitative dissertation I agree about the vouge. Maybe I’m blind to the way the left does the same thing but this clown on “This Week” is saying exactly the same thing about the “narrative” in almost exactly the same words that I heard another conservative spouting earlier in the week on MSNBC.
ya, powel should have been a patriot when it counted most, BEFORE the war
he needed to show the COURAGE embassador Joe Wilson showed, the COURAGE clark shoed, the COURAGE shinseky showed
he needed to go public and DISABUSE the American public from the notions this administration were manufacturing
he failed is sacred obligation to country
while he can never regain what he has lost and what we as a nation have lost he can STILL do WHAT HE IS OBLIGATED TO DO right NOW
he NEEDS to testify before congress…UNANOUNCED, he needs to “show up” so the administration CANNOT claim executive priviledge and prevent his testimony
he needs to come forward and be PRECISE how this administration manufactured information and invented war
collin powell, your country called you to action before we invaded this country that posed no threat
it calls you to action now, do not allow your past failure to script for you your ongoing failure
come forward and perform your obligation to this country
Okay. I’m still hung up on the visual of the table (off of which impeachment was taken by Speaker Pelosi).
New dream. Progressives show up all over the country, and have a ceremony wherein they unwrap and set up a table in their midst. Upon the table they place one thing only: An arrow that says: Impeachment goes here!
Media bite?
Good idea, bad idea, yawn? And then . . .
Rick Lowry is the one spouting the narrative crap.
Editotial from today’s Denver Post Go Blue, young Westerners
I have a fresh thread up, read for the reading for everyone.
Am I the only one here who thinks that Bush can’t end this war?
Alfred, so nice to see you! Hope your dad is well.
Ford Prefect @ 70
Can’t in what sense? He is going to but that’s not the same.
Raven @ 64
Once it works its way out there, an idea is poisonous. I recently saw a student saying in her prospectus that she was going to apply the ideas of a particular philosophical approach (I think it was structuralism) and another one (use of semiotics) yet she could not define either term–structuralism or semiotics–nor could she name more than one expert in each field.
Ai, yi, yi!!!
I felt like I was reading a neo-con handbook on feces flinging!
A lot of people are yelling that the reason we are in Iraq, etc. is for the oil. I happen to be one of the ‘yellers’. And if we followed the lead of AL Gore, we wouldn’t be dependant on the Middle East. Who knows where this could lead? Less pollution; better health, etc. President Gore would have a world-wide ‘ripple effect’. To the good.
raven @ 48
raven – see my “note of thanks” to ed gillespie in the morning heads thread. ;)
Citizen Jane @ 72
Ugh, I’m glad I’ve been out of that for 10 years.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 34
Great point. Rich Lowry (1968), Tucker Carlson (1969), five sons of Mitt Romney are eligible to enlist. It is easy to support the war when you are profiting from it. All these young neo-cons should be challenged. If you are no older than 42. and support Iraq genocide, then DO YOUR DUTY AND ENLIST!
Post a Sting song with any political communications, and it makes it all seems no so bad.
Make the girls happy!!!
The Police were “spot on” last night….and Melissa Ethridge made me laugh with her bold comments (no more “obstruction of justice”) and then it made me cry. While in the pool in the backyard yesterday, I had “Live Earth” on the outdoor speakers so all of my immediate neighborhood would have to listen.
I pledged myself to do it.
Frank33 @ 77
Check and see how Mitt avoided the Nam.
Citizen Jane @ 73
Umberto Eco on Semiotics
Slavoj Žižek has popularized the writings of Jacques Lacan, which are just Semiotics applied to Freudian analysis. I recommend the movie “Zizek”. It’s very good and not that difficult.
cinnamonape @ 8:38 am -
To the best of my knowledge, Congress has not passed legislation to establish the parallel means you mentioned in your interesting comment.
Please note that Section 4 does not contain a comparable means for declaring that the Vice President is unable to discharge his duties; Section 2 of the 25th Amendment discusses what happens in case of a vacancy in the office of the Vice President.
raven @ 67
he was fired up but unfortunately also tangled up in the web of mis-truths he wove on george stephanopoulos’ show. pathetic really, since he has such an important pulpit to preach from.
One big way to support the troops:
Let’s have a single payer national health insurance. So we can tap into the huge mental health resources available out here – for the mental anguish they’ve suffered. The VA will never, ever be able to service all of them! Enlarge the coverage for them and all.
And for their physical wounds of course. There is simply no reason they should have to fight for the best of care. Nor should anyone be denied that!
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ 81
Neither has Congress specifically established HOW the VP and the Cabinet are to ascertain the incapacity of the President to fulfill his duties. Is it the VP that determines it on his own, or do the Cabinet members vote? What’s a quorum? Is a law needed to determine this also?
Similarly, since Congress is allowed to compose Committees and Rules to fulfill it’s functions such a Committee would be legally able to be Constituted as the need arose, just as the VP/Cabinet would develop their own procedures.
And I never said that the VP could be removed from his duties using THIS criteria. The VP can be impeached, however. A resignation or death can also vacate the office. There is some debate as to whether a President can fire a truculent VP…although he can basically limit his powers to the point that his role is that of a “bucket of spit”. His role would be circumscribed to being the Parliamentary President of the Senate (and tie-vote breaker).