<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Stop for Employee Free Choice: 2008 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:37:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: disgusted</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786817</link>
		<dc:creator>disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why shouldn’t the TALKING MONKEY look like he was gut punched, the RACIST NAZIS COMMITTEE (RNC) just shut him down, he now has been told we are out of IRAQ our RE-ELECTION depends on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Laughs up sleeve if you think this is about the will of the people this is about the will of RE-ELECTION.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why shouldn’t the TALKING MONKEY look like he was gut punched, the RACIST NAZIS COMMITTEE (RNC) just shut him down, he now has been told we are out of IRAQ our RE-ELECTION depends on it.</p>
<p>Laughs up sleeve if you think this is about the will of the people this is about the will of RE-ELECTION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tula Connell</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786679</link>
		<dc:creator>Tula Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786679</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-786298&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TeddySanFran @ 44&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-786279&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jane Hamsher @ 35&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much, Tula. As Tom Schaller has noted, reliable union votes were in large part responsible for Democrats taking control of Congress in 2006, and not the “angry white men” and “big tent stand-for-nothings” that Rahm et. al. are always trying to attract by selling out core progressive values.  We’re really happy you are blogging here and we’re committed to supporting workers and union voices.  What you’re doing is extremely important and we appreciate all you do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tula, thanks for keeping us up to date on these issues.  Building and maintaining the bridge between progressive bloggers and labor unions may be the most important work for the future of both movements.  It’s a privilege to have you here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jane, we are priviledged to be here and thank you and everyone at FDL for your commitment to helping connect the netroots and labor.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-786298"><em>TeddySanFran @ 44</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-786279"><em>Jane Hamsher @ 35</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Thanks so much, Tula. As Tom Schaller has noted, reliable union votes were in large part responsible for Democrats taking control of Congress in 2006, and not the “angry white men” and “big tent stand-for-nothings” that Rahm et. al. are always trying to attract by selling out core progressive values.  We’re really happy you are blogging here and we’re committed to supporting workers and union voices.  What you’re doing is extremely important and we appreciate all you do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Tula, thanks for keeping us up to date on these issues.  Building and maintaining the bridge between progressive bloggers and labor unions may be the most important work for the future of both movements.  It’s a privilege to have you here.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jane, we are priviledged to be here and thank you and everyone at FDL for your commitment to helping connect the netroots and labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tula Connell</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786677</link>
		<dc:creator>Tula Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786677</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-786298&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TeddySanFran @ 44&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-786279&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jane Hamsher @ 35&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much, Tula. As Tom Schaller has noted, reliable union votes were in large part responsible for Democrats taking control of Congress in 2006, and not the “angry white men” and “big tent stand-for-nothings” that Rahm et. al. are always trying to attract by selling out core progressive values.  We’re really happy you are blogging here and we’re committed to supporting workers and union voices.  What you’re doing is extremely important and we appreciate all you do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tula, thanks for keeping us up to date on these issues.  Building and maintaining the bridge between progressive bloggers and labor unions may be the most important work for the future of both movements.  It’s a privilege to have you here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-786298"><em>TeddySanFran @ 44</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-786279"><em>Jane Hamsher @ 35</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Thanks so much, Tula. As Tom Schaller has noted, reliable union votes were in large part responsible for Democrats taking control of Congress in 2006, and not the “angry white men” and “big tent stand-for-nothings” that Rahm et. al. are always trying to attract by selling out core progressive values.  We’re really happy you are blogging here and we’re committed to supporting workers and union voices.  What you’re doing is extremely important and we appreciate all you do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Tula, thanks for keeping us up to date on these issues.  Building and maintaining the bridge between progressive bloggers and labor unions may be the most important work for the future of both movements.  It’s a privilege to have you here.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786437</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-786412&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;dkmich @ 78&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;you weren’t asking me, but i’m going to answer anyway…. i think you are very likely correct. but i’m willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now… however, if fast track for trade negotiations is approved - i think we can conclude it was all kabuki. let’s hope for the best, but watch very, very carefully.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-786412"><em>dkmich @ 78</em></a> &#8211; </p>
<p>you weren’t asking me, but i’m going to answer anyway…. i think you are very likely correct. but i’m willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now… however, if fast track for trade negotiations is approved &#8211; i think we can conclude it was all kabuki. let’s hope for the best, but watch very, very carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dkmich</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786412</link>
		<dc:creator>dkmich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786412</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tula,  Do you find it curious that this bill wasn’t attached to anything that the Republicans might have wanted to horse trade for?   Do you think the Dems talk a good game but never quite deliver?  Why was Kennedy pushing a bill that included huge increases in guest workers and H-1B visas?  Why is Charlie Rangel negotiating any more trade deals, let alone in secret?  Do you really believe that W. caved to Charlie and gave him everything that was great for the environment and great for workers and great for unions?  You know, baby bush.  The guy who thinks he is a king, sold out his corporate interests cause Charlie is such a tough negotiator?  Also ask yourself about Obey pushing increases to abstinence only programs.  What’s up with that?  Me thinks something rotten this way comes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tula,  Do you find it curious that this bill wasn’t attached to anything that the Republicans might have wanted to horse trade for?   Do you think the Dems talk a good game but never quite deliver?  Why was Kennedy pushing a bill that included huge increases in guest workers and H-1B visas?  Why is Charlie Rangel negotiating any more trade deals, let alone in secret?  Do you really believe that W. caved to Charlie and gave him everything that was great for the environment and great for workers and great for unions?  You know, baby bush.  The guy who thinks he is a king, sold out his corporate interests cause Charlie is such a tough negotiator?  Also ask yourself about Obey pushing increases to abstinence only programs.  What’s up with that?  Me thinks something rotten this way comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786359</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-786341&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;jim oconnor @ 71&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Christine @ 60:&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you are referring to an agency fee. The theory being that even if an employee choses not to join the Union, she is benefiting from Union representation in the form of higher wages and benefits. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I add that this “libertarian” argument against Union membership is a common canard used by anti-worker rights groups. It’s in the same playbook as getting working class and middle class folks to vote Republican.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t understand your last paragraph??  Are you saying that I’m saying people shouldn’t join a Union??  If so, that’s not the case.  It’s up to each individual to decide if they want to join a Union or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Agency fee, then each and every employee in this country should be paying that fee then.  Because if it weren’t for Unions we’d all be working 6 days a week, 12 hour days with no sick or vacation time.  Not to mention safety regulations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-786341"><em>jim oconnor @ 71</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Christine @ 60:<br />
I believe you are referring to an agency fee. The theory being that even if an employee choses not to join the Union, she is benefiting from Union representation in the form of higher wages and benefits. </p>
<p>I add that this “libertarian” argument against Union membership is a common canard used by anti-worker rights groups. It’s in the same playbook as getting working class and middle class folks to vote Republican.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don’t understand your last paragraph??  Are you saying that I’m saying people shouldn’t join a Union??  If so, that’s not the case.  It’s up to each individual to decide if they want to join a Union or not.</p>
<p>Agency fee, then each and every employee in this country should be paying that fee then.  Because if it weren’t for Unions we’d all be working 6 days a week, 12 hour days with no sick or vacation time.  Not to mention safety regulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786357</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-786338&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oklahoma kiddo @ 70&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pelosi sought to reassure liberal voters by reiterating that the House passed hate crimes and minimum wage legislation and that she favored universal access to healthcare. Additionally, she reminded liberals that the House passed the Employee Free Choice Act, a top priority for union groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is working hard to make sure that the fiery liberal wing of the Democratic Party remembers that she is one of them. She is also going out of her way to reassure opponents of the war that she is on their side.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Her efforts are taking place in speeches and interviews off Capitol Hill and away from the constraints and compromises inherent in running the House. Liberal lawmakers and activists accuse Pelosi of being too cautious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I support the Speaker.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i do think speaker pelois is trying… but, she’s between a rock and hard place - and her secret trade deal with bush was not helpful.  i think she’ll be able to do better, if we keep our eyes open and hold our congress accountable to us and not to corporate america.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-786338"><em>Oklahoma kiddo @ 70</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Pelosi sought to reassure liberal voters by reiterating that the House passed hate crimes and minimum wage legislation and that she favored universal access to healthcare. Additionally, she reminded liberals that the House passed the Employee Free Choice Act, a top priority for union groups.</p>
<p>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is working hard to make sure that the fiery liberal wing of the Democratic Party remembers that she is one of them. She is also going out of her way to reassure opponents of the war that she is on their side.</p>
<p>Her efforts are taking place in speeches and interviews off Capitol Hill and away from the constraints and compromises inherent in running the House. Liberal lawmakers and activists accuse Pelosi of being too cautious.</p>
<p>I support the Speaker.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>i do think speaker pelois is trying… but, she’s between a rock and hard place &#8211; and her secret trade deal with bush was not helpful.  i think she’ll be able to do better, if we keep our eyes open and hold our congress accountable to us and not to corporate america.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwcole</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786349</link>
		<dc:creator>rwcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In the months to come, Clusterfuck may spend hundreds of fascinating hours staring at Nixon’s faded portrait and engaging in deep emotional conversations….”Yeah- they fucked YOU too- right?”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the months to come, Clusterfuck may spend hundreds of fascinating hours staring at Nixon’s faded portrait and engaging in deep emotional conversations….”Yeah- they fucked YOU too- right?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwcole</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786347</link>
		<dc:creator>rwcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786347</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;jim&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sure- the extreme case is the “right to work” legislation making a union shop contract illegal and cuttin the nuts off the unions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jim</p>
<p>Sure- the extreme case is the “right to work” legislation making a union shop contract illegal and cuttin the nuts off the unions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwcole</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786343</link>
		<dc:creator>rwcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/28/next-stop-for-employee-free-choice-2008-elections/#comment-786343</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;George Millhouse Bush today announced that he would disregard subpoenas for documents and testimony on his illegal wiretaps caper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Yer President is NOT a crook” echoed the channeled Millhouse.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Millhouse Bush today announced that he would disregard subpoenas for documents and testimony on his illegal wiretaps caper.</p>
<p>“Yer President is NOT a crook” echoed the channeled Millhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.266 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 13:38:16 -->

