Carla Marinucci of the SF Chronicle has been having quite the month of June.
She started with a little story two weeks ago on the hiring by the California Republican Party of one Chris Matthews (no, not Tweety, a different guy altogether) to be their new state deputy political director: State GOP goes outside US to hire top aide. Hmmm . . . that’s odd. What’s his deal, and where did they find him? He must have lots of credentials, lots of experience . . . or perhaps not:
Matthews was hired by Michael Kamburowski, an Australian citizen who was hired this year as the state GOP’s chief operations officer. But neither new official has experience in managing a political campaign in the nation’s most populous state — and as foreign citizens, neither is eligible to vote.
Kamburowski, a former real estate agent who sold property in the Dominican Republic, is a permanent U.S. resident in the process of obtaining American citizenship and does not require a specialized work visa, state GOP officials said.
As you can imagine, that went over well, especially with the “build a wall” crowd in Southern California that was already foaming at the mouth over the immigration fight in DC. It also ticked off the Silicon Valley folks, as the state GOP apparently wangled one of the limited (and thus coveted) H-1B visas reserved for specialized workers. Finally, it really ticked off CA GOP insiders, as it seemed to say “gosh, we just couldn’t find any qualified folks within the state.”
How could things get worse? Let’s just look at the SF Chronicle this week and find out. You see, Marinucci and her colleague, Lance Williams, have really been on a roll, with their own four day, page one series:
- Sunday: Aussie hired by state GOP embroiled in immigration lawsuit — “Michael Kamburowski, the Australian immigrant hired as a top official in the California Republican Party, was ordered deported in 2001, jailed three years later for visa violations — and has filed a $5 million wrongful arrest lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, according to U.S. District Court documents.”
- Monday: State GOP finance chief resigns/top Republicans shocked by Aussie’s immigration troubles
- Tuesday: State GOP chief flayed over scandal/Critics see cronyism in hiring of finance exec who quit suddenly
- Wednesday: Feds suggest state GOP broke law in hiring immigrant to key post
Add to that a Tuesday op-ed by Tim Morgan, the only member of the state GOP board that voted against hiring Kamburowski and who serves as the Treasurer of the RNC. He opened with “It’s a sad day for the California Republican Party.” Tim, try “terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad day” — it’d be closer to the truth. Conservative columnist Deborah Saunders writes today “THE GOP has a guy problem. Even after Veep Dick Cheney shot a friend in a hunting accident, he still hunts. In California, GOP biggies injure their comrades in a less ballistic manner. . . .”
So what do we have? Norquistian welfare recipients; the “Cronies, Not Credentials” GOP hiring model (see almost-DHS head Bernard Kerik, former FEMA head Michael Brown, and almost-Justice Harriet Miers, just to name three); not one but two marriages just as visa problems crop up (that never raises any red flags at ICE, does it?); a failed Carribean real estate dealer; a state party chief operating officer suing his own party’s administration for $5 million; and now ICE is asking questions about state GOP hiring practices.
But this isn’t just a little in-house California story. Even DC is worried:
Former White House adviser Steve Schmidt, who ran the re-election campaign for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, angrily described the appointment of Kamburowski as “almost a parody of incompetence and malfeasance.”
“Somebody who has been imprisoned, faced deportation, has never worked on a state political campaign … and who is suing the government for harm inflicted by his deportation order defies description,” Schmidt said. “The bylaws of the Republican Party invest enormous authority in the position of chief operating officer — and it’s clear that this person brings no experience and qualifications to run a state party of the size of California, not to mention the assorted legal issues involved.”
The harsh words from Schmidt — who ran the Bush 2004 presidential campaign war room, advised Vice President Dick Cheney and was a member of White House adviser Karl Rove’s inner circle — underscored the concern in the California GOP.
Calitics, a progressive CA blog, is having fun watching this all come down. On the other side of things . . . *crickets*. Nothing about Kamburowski’s departure at the California GOP website, nor the flap with Matthews’ hiring. They do have a press release, though, welcoming Kamburowski’s interim replacement. FlashReport, a state GOP blog and website, is similarly trying to ignore reality, though Jon Fleischmann, a member of the GOP board that hired Kamburowski in the first place, put up a short little post entitled “Get over it.”
That’s right, Jon. There’s nothing to see here, folks. Move along, move along . . . Oh, but you better tell Saunders to get with the program, because she thinks this has legs:
When I ran into [state party chair Ron] Nehring in Sacramento Tuesday [who brought Kamburowski on board], he couldn’t even argue that Kamburowski had the requisite experience. You can’t help but believe Nehring picked a guy who is good to pal around with. Some GOPers seem more interested in working within their comfort zone than in winning elections.
Now the party will pay a price. Money will dry up. Big donors don’t want to hand over money to losers. And they don’t want to bankroll bad headlines.
(I suppose we could ask Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins about the “donors not wanting to hand over money to losers” part.)
It’s just a parody of incompetence and malfeasance, the Grand Old Parody indeed.
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Zed!
Well, that was dumb luck…and thanks for this fun story, on the day after immigration reform keeled over for really reals.
Of course, we don’t mind those nice white immigrants, now do we?
zed!
Nuts. Stopped to read first.
Maybe the Left Coast will self-destruct and become an island in the Pacific.
Bob in HI
Mutant Poodle @ 2
That, and they have to speak English, I think. Of course, this is the state party that had to go to Austria to find a candidate for Governor, and he gets a barely passing mark for English.
Peterr @ 5
OK, on what planet do Republicans have to speak English? Not this one, I think:
Ahnold (as you point out)
Dan Quayle
The mangler in chief
Need I go on?
They have to know words in English – maybe that’s it.
Looks like it’s time for Dick Cheney to reach down and choke someone in the California GOP.
Anybody looking for the roll call vote to defund Cheney, it’s here.
Those elipses were in the original article, but I’d love to know all of what Schmidt said. I’m guessing, given his tone, that it was deleted in the same manner — &$%%^#*$%! — as the transcripts of the Watergate tapes.
WASHINGTON, June 28 — “Striking down an antitrust rule nearly a century old, the Supreme Court ruled today that it is no longer automatically unlawful for manufacturers and distributors to agree on setting minimum retail prices. The decision will give producers significantly more leeway, though not unlimited power, to dictate retail prices and to restrict the flexibility of discounters.”
A law nearly a 100 years old. That means Teddy Roosevelt probably passed the damn thing, he was known as the “trust buster” for taking on big business after all. This means, like gas companies do, retailers can now get together and all agree not to charge less than a certain $$ amount on different items. so even though the thing was made in china for 10 cents kmart and sam’s club will agree not to sell it for less than $100.
big business 1000000000000000000000, you 0
OT – but i gotta share a bit of outrage. please forgive.
I believe that Bush has increased spending 41% since taking office, but only increase revenue 21%. Except for Medicare, Part D any ideas what he is spending the money on? Almost everybody knows the $100 billion for the war is off budget as was the $50 billion for the Air Force request on Oct. 29, 2006 just 29 days(!!) into the fiscal year.
Matt @ 10
Kennedy voted with the majority because it will create competition..
Dover Bitch @ 7
Cool. Beating up on my Blue Dog rep (Mike Michaud) seems to be doing some good. He’s been voting the right way lately. Or maybe he’s just watching Tom Allen’s rising career :-).
Ah yes. Let the Bush/Coulter Republican Cannibalism continue apace.
-GSD
Matt @ 9
IANAL, but when I looked at it, it appeared to be saying that Manufacturer could set a minimum price on an item, and no retailer could go below that. I don’t think it allows manufacturers to say there will be no toasters below $500, but it does beat up on discounters.
Excellent recap, Peterr. Glad to see it making waves in DC.
GordonM @ 16
yes…
it’s called price-fixing…
duh
Here we go. Keith is all over the Constitutional Crisis.
Schuster is all over the Clement issue too! Good. He’s been reading Marcy. “some analysts are saying it’s a conflict of interest.”
Some analyst indeed! GO MARCY!
selise @ 11
Grrrr . . .
Impeachment is not a bug in the system — it’s part of the way the system was designed. It’’s not pretty, it’s not easy, and it’s not often needed, but it’s there for when it is necessary. “In case of fire, break glass.”
And somehow, I’d like to believe that job #1 of “the people’s business” is protecting the constitution from those who have and continue to rape and pillage it. Warrantless wiretapping, lying to Congress, manipulating the justice department career employees, outing a NOC for political payback . . .
Where’d I put Hugh’s list?
GSD @ 14
Voinovich dresses down Hannity and what does he get:
And Coulter called Elizabeth Edwards a “harridan” for calling in on Tweety.
Because of the fund raising, Tweety accused Edwards of “exploiting” Coulter. Edwards gave an OK reply, but he should have jumped all over the use of the word “exploited”. As in “What did we do? Make her work overtime without pay? Make her work through her lunch break?”
Peterr @ 21
Yet another reason not to support Obama. That list is getting long.
soooooooo, peterr, are you there?
huh? are you in the post?
as a life-long methodist, i have to ask you, i’ve been wanting to ask you, as a man of faith, how do you keep your faith? i saw the state being entered into the church, firsthand, i stepped out………and other reasons…….so, tell us, how do you keep the faith with it being so misused?
inquiring minds want to know………
On KO John Dean asks Speaker Pelosi to relook at her pledge not to impeach and to aim for Darth first.
Sounds as if Biggus Dickus is running the california gooper party.
When are elected officials going to stop calling oversight “gotcha” and “tit for tat” politics? Get a clue.
all the FU letters from WH lawyers is just so much stalling and noise. Get on with the subpoenas and come on down to Congress already. This thing has been drug out…
Go Waxman.
Oh, and Hi Peter. Sounds like fun stuff in CA.
Here in MA, the Boston Glob is running a 7, count them 7 part series on Willard. Today there were 506 LTE’s that asked why the paper is wasting it’s ink and our time talking about a man who just used MA as a stepping stone to higher office and disses the state to boot. NONE complimented the series.
Love those LTE’s.
I agree with John Dean on Olbermann a few ago when he said that he would like to see the Speaker reconsider her view on impeachment and go after Cheney in this regard. Dean thinks there is a strong case to be made for impeachment of the vice-prez.
RevDeb @ 20
thank you, RevDev, for sharing keith we the cable-less!
Peterr!
High five man!
I gotta say, these Repubs are taking this incompetence thing to an extreme.
I’m lovin’ it.
wgg: rogue scholar @ 17
If the retailers did it, or separate manufacturers got together to set the price, yes. But I don’t think that’s what was rolled back. Maybe nudged a bit.
dmac @ 24
Lots of questions wrapped up in that little comment, dmac!
The best place for me to start on an answer to them is this: I try to be very clear about where I place my faith.
“The faith” can be misused, if by that you mean “the authority of the church” or some similar phrase. If you mean “my personal belief system,” well . . . there’s only one person that can misuse that, and that’s me.
One of the reasons I love the constitution — especially the first amendment — is for the checks and balances. A supreme court ruling that says “we trust the executive branch not to overstep the line of endorsing religion” is poorly placed trust indeed.
I can understand the “stepping out” part of your comment. But turn your comment into the political sphere for a moment. Lots of folks have stepped out of politics, because of what they see going on in: “they’re all alike . . . they’re all crooks and liars . . . it’s all rigged anyway.” Others have seen the same stuff, and decided to dig in to clean it up.
Count me in the second group, in both the church and the state.
GordonM @ 22
Oh garsh, I did it again and embedded my reply in all the quotes. sorry
Tweety accuses Edwards of exploiting Coulter- Tweety was of course the one to first exploit the chicken head eating geek by having her on his show on the first place.
do-si-do @ 35
Preview is your friend.
Dover Bitch @ 8
Thanks!
Now I have to ask: What’s up with Obey and Sestak voting No on this? Anyone heard anything?
do-si-do @ 35
just make sure to scroll down (especially on a long quoted comment) and what you want to look for is the < thingie followed by a / and then the work blockquote and another carrot thingie.</p>
That means you are at the very end of the blockquote.
So the Republicans are going global. Today the United States, tomorrow the world. Fascist simps.
dakine01 @ 38
Republicans threatened to do the same thing to the next Demo VP.
Tweety would invite Coulter in ta eat a few elephant feces for the cameras and attach some leeches to her private parts. She’s always good fun.
Bustednuckles @ 31
I’d love to hear what the GOP presidential candidates think of this. It can’t help their CA fundraising swings, to have the party professionals caught up in this kind of nonsense.
And Murtha as well (voting No on the Cheney funding)…WTF?
Murtha’s a conservative on everything but the war- always has been.
Glenn Greenwald Interviews Helen Thomas
Oklahoma kiddo @ 41
If the Dem VP tried to claim s/he was a fourth branch not accountable in any way, I gots no problem with that.
Matt @ 10
Is it any surprise? This was inevitable, they already reversed the 100 year old breakup of Standard Oil.
See ya’s tomorrow, it’s past my beertime.
Clusterfuck with a 31% JAR- according to Fox News. A record low for them…Et Tu Foxie?
Bustednuckles @ 49
Get yourself a Fosters, or a good Canadian brew, in honor of our two beleaguered GOP immigrants!
rw, you hearing anything down south about Matthews, Kamburowski, and Nehring?
I am shocked, shocked that Republicans would outsource American jobs.
Peterr
No nothin yet- but I’ve been ignoring the local paper lately- except for material to peel vegetables on.
RevDeb @ 25
Wasn’t this the whole point of the “Angler” series, to start the Cheney I-ball rolling?
Wonder if Poppy and Babs had anything to do with the 4-part leak to save Sonny’s legacy (what remains of it). Plus, they need to sanitize the Bush name for Jeb to resume the Dynasty in 2012.
Oh, the intrigues that take place among the royalty! Nothing new here, move on folks.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 40
Let’s see. Nixon’s crimes == Clinton’s blowj*b.
Cheney’s numerous treasonous crimes == XXX’s jaywalking?
*MOD NOTE: Edited to allow through spam filter
Dover Bitch @ 8
Thanks, DB. I was wondering about that. I’d like to know which 2 republicans voted in favor and which 24 democrats voted against it too.
TWENTY-FOUR…..
The Cheney shitstorm may well draw attention from President Clusterfuck who spoke today at a naval war college- bet they could hardly wait. He told em that it’ll take time fer his “surge” ta work. They were amazed and delighted by his insights.
peterr at 33 says:
“Lots of questions wrapped up in that little comment, dmac!
The best place for me to start on an answer to them is this: I try to be very clear about where I place my faith.
“The faith” can be misused, if by that you mean “the authority of the church” or some similar phrase. If you mean “my personal belief system,” well . . . there’s only one person that can misuse that, and that’s me.
One of the reasons I love the constitution — especially the first amendment — is for the checks and balances. A supreme court ruling that says “we trust the executive branch not to overstep the line of endorsing religion” is poorly placed trust indeed.
I can understand the “stepping out” part of your comment. But turn your comment into the political sphere for a moment. Lots of folks have stepped out of politics, because of what they see going on in: “they’re all alike . . . they’re all crooks and liars . . . it’s all rigged anyway.” Others have seen the same stuff, and decided to dig in to clean it up.
Count me in the second group, in both the church and the state.”
==========================
yeah, i know a lot wrapped up in my question…..have been waiting to ask you….but there was a surge that happened with 9/11 that merged church and state, and made me leave the church……yeah, the liberal methodist church, i left…….it was happening there, too…….cuz bush says he’s a methodist……laughable…….martin luther is spewing right now…….. and since you are a minister, i really wanted to know your view…..i used to be privvy to those insights, but dropped out abrubtly, and don’t have them anymore…….people keep sending me things in the mail to come back, but don’t have it in me……….just don’t.
my whole life as a methodist, work projects in other states growing up, outreach in communities, but since bush, not gonna happen from me. sad, but true……..people talk about what all he has trounced on, but trouncing on the pro -labor, pro-human rights, pro-gay methodist religion is one of the least reported things that he has done. methodists used to be the last resort outreach to working people, now bush is a methdist and has redifined it, it makes me sick, and made me drop out.
and i think you sidestepped my question at 24 a little bit, but that’s ok, was a little loaded…….
Peterr @ 5
He might not be understandable, but, at times, he speaks more clearly than Dubya.
Now, ahem, if we could just get the money Enron & friends stole returned to the citizens of California.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 29
Please read Bruce Fein’s comments in Slate : Impeach Cheney
and i found firedoglake through achenblog, he’s eatin’ chaney alive-http://blog.washingtonpost.com…..rrer=email
RevDeb @ 23
The only reason I know for not kickin’ the bums out immediately is that Dems don’t have the votes. Does Obama not realize that is the ONLY reason? Sure sure, get more Dems elected, but if you’ve got them enforce the Law and impeach away.
Loo Hoo. @ 57
Rahm’s amendment to defund OVP was a clever joke, but as legislation it was a fool’s mission to proceed with it, without knowing he could win by a comfortable margin. This is one more proof of the fecklessness of the current Democratic congress. He would have been better off introducing a Sense of the Congress that the OVP was in fact part of the Executive Branch. A lot of Republicans would have voted for that. Now he has egg on his face.
You know, this blog has been a Rahm
enemycritic for a long time, but for a few days, he became a quasi-hero because he came up with this Quixotic idea.Rather than vote to defund OVP he should support a move to defund the war. What a waste.
Loo Hoo. @ 57
Ron Paul and Walter Jones(NC) were the Rs voting for.
dmac @ 61
707 Excellent.
cheney has no official function according to the constitution (except presiding over the senate. He has no right to a staff, an office, a portfolio, and has no more institutional power than I do. He only has the power the prez gives him- so if he’s fuckin up- who’s to blame?
dmac,
Your reaction is not uncommon. But I’d disagree that Bush has “redefined Methodist” or “redefined the church/faith”. He might want to, but I know too many Methodists (and other religious folk) that won’t let him get away with it. Keep looking around, if you’re interested, and you’ll find Methodists who haven’t bought into the merger of church and state.
(And I wasn’t trying to sidestep anything earlier — just trying to get a handle on what you were asking, and trying to keep my answer short. There’s YEARS of stuff packed into both your question and my response!)
GordonM @ 32
Apparently what they’re saying is that a manufacturer can demand that any retailer of their products must sell at the exact same price. So, how does one retailer compete against another? how does a retailer sell cheaper to gain market share?
It’s price fixing alright.
Think there’ll be any gasoline price wars?
Think WalMart should be screaming at the top of their lungs about THEIR freedom to charge whatever they want? Who’s protecting THEIR prerogatives?
Sounds like Commie protectionism if you ask me. Since when are the Repub SCOTUS justices Commies? I thought all the so-called Conservatives loved FREE Enterprise.
rwcole @ 67
The president.
dreamcatcher @ 69
Not THIS president. He’s not to blame for anything. Just ask him.
re SCt minimum price decision — hold on everybody. We don’t do ourselves or anyone else a service by lashing out at EVERYTHING that happens as part of the vast right wing conspiracy. Not saying there isn’t one — there is; not saying our rights and interests, and those of every American not in the top .OOOO1% income bracket aren’t being trashed — they are; not saying those in power are not threatening to undo every ideal on which our nation was founded — they are.
But this decision is really not all that drastic. All it says is that minimum price agreements between mf’ers and distributors are not per se invalid. They can still be proved to be anti-competitive — and therefore illegal — under a “rule of reason” analysis, which is how most agreements in restraint of trade are judged.
rwcole @ 54
What? You mean you’re not reading the North County Times? Shocked…
http://www.nctimes.com/
AH! Yes the right to vote if you can’t stop it then control it prove your sincerity by hireing those from other Countries who are ignorant of the AMerican system and how it theme to point out is they can’t vote. Which is the RACIST NAZIS COMMITTEE (RNC)works but the most important theme is they can’t VOTE, this supports the RACISTS NAZIS COMMITTEE (RNC) theme lets start at home then work out, the GOOFY OPPOSITION PARTY (GOP) completely supports this as it is in line with voter fraud, that they go crazy about every 2 yrs.
So you see the party of HATE and INTOLERANCE is leading the way, on trying to find away to negate the vote. SCUMBAGS
LooHoo
Wow- haven’t even THOUGHT about the North County Times for years. OK I just thought about it- that was enough.
Loo Hoo. @ 57
It was never meant to pass – ceremonial only – to put pressure on Cheney. It was close enough that another time something similar actually could pass – if he doesn’t start to comply with what he is supposed to be doing.
The defund bill was a bit of a non-sequitor after Cheney’s office abandonded the legal position that caused it.
peterr at 68 says:
“dmac,
Your reaction is not uncommon. But I’d disagree that Bush has “redefined Methodist” or “redefined the church/faith”. He might want to, but I know too many Methodists (and other religious folk) that won’t let him get away with it. Keep looking around, if you’re interested, and you’ll find Methodists who haven’t bought into the merger of church and state.
(And I wasn’t trying to sidestep anything earlier — just trying to get a handle on what you were asking, and trying to keep my answer short. There’s YEARS of stuff packed into both your question and my response!)”
yeah, i know, we could talk at length, i was trying to summarize in this little space……..but it’s happening, and it’s true, and i know it, because that’s what i did……..i left the church because of gwb…people were proud that he was a methodist, and i choked on it…they didn’t realize what they were sayiing…i hate to say that, but i did……
and know of many others that did the same thing…..they were including military patriotic things in church services, totally unacceptable in my book…….and proud of it……..so i left…
i’m more buddhist anyway, so no harm done……..but we enlightened each other, in spite of our differences, and i have received letters wanting me to come back, because of my ‘different’ views…..and i can’t, not as long as they merge church and state……church is church…….and politics should be in the parking lot.
like i said, martin luther is turnin’ over in his grave……..
and rev deb, thanks, always have you in my thoughts in how you place yourself in such precarious situations…….ha………..i think of you.
MarkH @ 68
I don’t like it either. And now I’ve seen another article that interprets it differently than the first one I read.
But there is a big difference between Hamilton Beach saying “you can’t sell model 333 for less than $99″, and all blender manufacturers getting together to say no one can sell any blender for less than $99. For one thing, they’ve been getting away with that first one all along (wonder why there aren’t any discount Apple computers?). And the definition of price fixing is the latter.
Yes, I’m sure Walmart doesn’t like it.
And protectionism is completely orthogonal to political ideology.
New thread!
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…..antipodes/
precarious how?
dmac @ 78
You could also, of course, take some of these folks at their word about their interest in you, and tell them what you just shared here. In the six years since you left, lots has changed in the world, and perhaps in some of the folks at that church. If nothing else, you might have some very interesting conversations.
Just a thought. Peace, dmac.
Later, everyone!
oddmommy @ 72
Thanks, oddmommy. A while ago there was a story going around about a “no work list” being put into the immigration bill. It was obnoxious, but it wasn’t anywhere near as bad as it was portrayed. But, as usual, trying to inject reason got me accused of being one of them. Heck, I went door to door for Gene McCarthy, and have never ever voted for a Republican.
and as noted above, even the first is not LEGAL — or presumed legal — as a result of this decision…..it’s just NOT presumed to be illegal.
Dover Bitch @ 8
Fucking Murtha is a Vader lover
revdeb says:
precarious how?
========
weeeeeeeelllllllllll…………
you do things in the spirit of martin luther……..human and political……the death of most religious leaders…….yet, from what i’ve gathered from your comments, you delve into that area…..anethema to most religious leaders……therefore the precarious slant that i gave. brava to you.
my dad started out in college to be a methodist minister, he passed on those teachings to all of us kids…….i don’t take it lightly, so, don’t mean it lightly when i said that you have a precarious road to lead…….you must do it exceptionally well if you don’t think it’s precarious………hugs to you……
GordonM @ 83
yeah. I mean that is exactly what is wrong with “THEM” — the knee jerk name calling reaction without regard to context, fact, or nuance.
If we engage in that ourselves…..well, then, for lack of a better analogy…….the terrorists have won.
OT – Democrat debate at Howard University – anyone know if there is a live web cast of the event – thought it would be on PBS live but its the News Hour as usual.
dmac @ 86
First of all Martin Luther is on my sh*t list. His original “solution to the Jewish problem” is what Hitler based his “solution to the Jewish Problem” on.
Aside from that, I’m a UU which is to the left of just about all religious traditions. The only risk I take is alienating any of the 3 republicans left in our movement (yes, I exaggerate, there are probably many more but not in the congregations I serve).
My tradition is prophetic so I’m just doing what I’m called to do. I’m doing it here and with my flock and sometimes even in the greater UU movement, but I don’t consider it extraordinary. I’ve been blessed to be called by a congregation that is just fine with my activism (I hope so anyway, they don’t know me very well yet.)
Anyway, thanks for the hugs and all. I appreciate it, but I’m just doing my job (as I see it).
The DOJ scandal is really quite simple. The Republicans merely want to blur the line between Party and State. The NSDAP in Germany did the same thing up until 1945. Make the State and Party one and the same. All actions by DOJ are to serve the interest of the Party first, the nation’s interest takes a back seat This is the goal of the Republicans a one Party state ruling far into the future.
Suzanne @ 39
revdeb at 89says loudly:
“First of all Martin Luther is on my sh*t list. His original “solution to the Jewish problem” is what Hitler based his “solution to the Jewish Problem” on.
Aside from that, I’m a UU which is to the left of just about all religious traditions. The only risk I take is alienating any of the 3 republicans left in our movement (yes, I exaggerate, there are probably many more but not in the congregations I serve).
” My tradition is prophetic so I’m just doing what I’m called to do. I’m doing it here and with my flock and sometimes even in the greater UU movement, but I don’t consider it extraordinary. I’ve been blessed to be called by a congregation that is just fine with my activism (I hope so anyway, they don’t know me very well yet.)
Anyway, thanks for the hugs and all. I appreciate it, but I’m just doing my job (as I see it).”
======martin luther, we could go around and around all night….hitler misused him, we all know that……..his original teachings discount it……as far as your activism goes, learning from my father, that had to be done carefully, and i discount all of your laisse faire commets about how you went about it……..it takes deep down dedication and commitment to place yourself in such a position….so, call it what you want, i know what you had to do to get there, and i commend you for it……..
msmolly @ 91
msmolly, everyone is upstairs.
JPL @ 13
But it never does. It NEVER does.
The Eight Principles of Incompetence:
Get to know’em … and have fun spottin’em whenever neocons are in the news – day in and day out. ;-)