Comments on: The Grab Bag http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/ Firedoglake weblog Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:24:36 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: cinnamonape http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768951 cinnamonape Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:47:46 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768951 <p><a href="#comment-768316"><em>Mary McCurnin @ 72</em></a></p> <blockquote><p><a href="#comment-768308"><em>Frank33 @ 66</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Question: Why so many e-mails? If 88 people send 10 e-mails a day, that is, say 300,000 a year. Why are 5,000,000 missing?</p></blockquote> <p>Probably includes a ton of cc’s.</p></blockquote> <p>Which means a lot of hard drives would have to be erased!</p> Mary McCurnin @ 72

Frank33 @ 66

Question: Why so many e-mails? If 88 people send 10 e-mails a day, that is, say 300,000 a year. Why are 5,000,000 missing?

Probably includes a ton of cc’s.

Which means a lot of hard drives would have to be erased!

]]> By: CTuttle http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768336 CTuttle Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:02:56 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768336 <p>TRex has the Late Nite up!!!</p> TRex has the Late Nite up!!!

]]> By: technicolor http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768333 technicolor Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:01:35 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768333 <p>No problem, just trying to clear room in the lake. </p> <p>My main issue is that we spend so much time considering what is appropriate or not in communicating with our clients, and spend a great deal of time meeting the requirements that are required by regulatory agencies, that it is incredibly offensive that some people claim that Scooter Libby or any other official that is found guilty, “oh it’s politics”. Many of us are regulated and accept that it’s necessary. That’s fine. But to see the top of our government avoid that is insulting.</p> No problem, just trying to clear room in the lake.

My main issue is that we spend so much time considering what is appropriate or not in communicating with our clients, and spend a great deal of time meeting the requirements that are required by regulatory agencies, that it is incredibly offensive that some people claim that Scooter Libby or any other official that is found guilty, “oh it’s politics”. Many of us are regulated and accept that it’s necessary. That’s fine. But to see the top of our government avoid that is insulting.

]]> By: GordonM http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768330 GordonM Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:00:40 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768330 <p>Hey - since the RNC is very deeply complicit in this whole (illegal) email thing and coverup - could the RNC be found guilty and SHUT DOWN? Woo hoo - what would that do to Rove’s plans. BWAHAHAHAHAHA.</p> Hey – since the RNC is very deeply complicit in this whole (illegal) email thing and coverup – could the RNC be found guilty and SHUT DOWN? Woo hoo – what would that do to Rove’s plans. BWAHAHAHAHAHA.

]]> By: KayInMaine http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768329 KayInMaine Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:00:30 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768329 <p>Rula Law!!!! *screaming laughter* Oh you’re funny! Good one. Of course, as your snark pointed out, Phoenix Woman, the War Criminals in the White House have never heard of such a thing! </p> <p>*gagging myself with a spatula* at the sheer criminality of it all.</p> <p>Okay, going to bed. Nite peeps. ;-)</p> Rula Law!!!! *screaming laughter* Oh you’re funny! Good one. Of course, as your snark pointed out, Phoenix Woman, the War Criminals in the White House have never heard of such a thing!

*gagging myself with a spatula* at the sheer criminality of it all.

Okay, going to bed. Nite peeps. ;-)

]]> By: wangdangdoodle http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768328 wangdangdoodle Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:57:55 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768328 <p>“Until 9/11, counterterrorism was a very secondary issue at the Bush White House,” said a senior Clinton official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “Remember those first months? The White House was focused on tax cuts, not terrorism. We saw the budgets for counterterrorism programs being cut.”</p> <p><a href="http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/7/3950">Mary Matalin is full of it</a></p> “Until 9/11, counterterrorism was a very secondary issue at the Bush White House,” said a senior Clinton official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “Remember those first months? The White House was focused on tax cuts, not terrorism. We saw the budgets for counterterrorism programs being cut.”

Mary Matalin is full of it

]]> By: Suzanne http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768326 Suzanne Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:55:36 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768326 <p>sorry, LooHoo, I splashed almost everyone trying to avoid technicolor.</p> sorry, LooHoo, I splashed almost everyone trying to avoid technicolor.

]]> By: Loo Hoo. http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768323 Loo Hoo. Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:52:56 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768323 <p>Evening, Suzanne. You splashed me!</p> Evening, Suzanne. You splashed me!

]]> By: Suzanne http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768322 Suzanne Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:52:19 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768322 <p>hey PW - nice to see we got a twofer today from you. Excellent grab bag</p> <p>hey ll, sorry, technicolor, didn’t see ya until my second rotation</p> hey PW – nice to see we got a twofer today from you. Excellent grab bag

hey ll, sorry, technicolor, didn’t see ya until my second rotation

]]> By: Loo Hoo. http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768321 Loo Hoo. Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:52:06 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/18/the-grab-bag-2/#comment-768321 <p><a href="#comment-768316"><em>Mary McCurnin @ 72</em></a></p> <blockquote><p><a href="#comment-768308"><em>Frank33 @ 66</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Question: Why so many e-mails? If 88 people send 10 e-mails a day, that is, say 300,000 a year. Why are 5,000,000 missing?</p></blockquote> <p>Probably includes a ton of cc’s.</p></blockquote> <p>So how many of the cc’d people are going to come forth with their emails? I wonder if Waxman/Leahy could just put out a blanket “Turn in your RNC, GWB, GeorgeBush, Rove emails” to a designated third party now.</p> Mary McCurnin @ 72

Frank33 @ 66

Question: Why so many e-mails? If 88 people send 10 e-mails a day, that is, say 300,000 a year. Why are 5,000,000 missing?

Probably includes a ton of cc’s.

So how many of the cc’d people are going to come forth with their emails? I wonder if Waxman/Leahy could just put out a blanket “Turn in your RNC, GWB, GeorgeBush, Rove emails” to a designated third party now.

]]>